spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online April 28, 2005


Journal of Cell Science 118, 902e (2005)
© The Company of Biologists Limited
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JCS
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

In this issue

RasGEFs show Dicty the way


Chemotactic stimuli, such as cyclic AMP in Dictyostelium, cause cells to polarize and migrate towards them. Distinguishing proteins that function at various stages in polarization and migration is essential if we are to understand chemotaxis. On p. 1899, Peter van Haastert and co-workers do just this, implicating two related nucleotide-binding proteins at different points in the process. GbpC and GbpD are recently identified proteins that each possess a cyclic-nucleotide-binding domain and a RasGEF (Ras-regulating guanine-nucleotide-exchange factor) domain. van Haastert and co-workers have generated gbpC-null and gbpD-null cells and show the mutations have opposing effects: the gbpC-null mutation inhibits chemotaxis, whereas the gbpD-null mutation promotes it. The gbpC-null mutation blocks the ability of cells to polarize effectively and mobilize myosin II motors; gbpD-null cells are by contrast hyperpolar. Indeed overexpression of GbpD inhibits chemotaxis; in this case cells form numerous pseudopodia, fail to develop a leading edge and are highly adhesive. The authors conclude that GbpC regulates polarization in response to chemoattractants by controlling myosin motors that drive the necessary cytoskeletal rearrangements. They propose that GbpD is involved in generation of substrate-attached pseudopodia, which antagonises this and allows cells to change direction.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JCS:

RasGEF-containing proteins GbpC and GbpD have differential effects on cell polarity and chemotaxis in Dictyostelium
Leonard Bosgraaf, Arjen Waijer, Ruchira Engel, Antonie J. W. G. Visser, Deborah Wessels, David Soll, and Peter J. M. van Haastert
JCS 2005 118: 1899-1910. [Abstract] [Full Text]  




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JCS
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?