|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | |||||
First published online 18 April 2006
doi: 10.1242/jcs.02920
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Article |
Umeå Centre for Molecular Pathogenesis (UCMP), Umeå University, S-901 87, Umeå, Sweden
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: michael.williams{at}ucmp.umu.se)
Accepted 2 February 2006
| Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key words: Rho GFPases, Cellular immunity, Hemocytes, Parasitization, Actin cytoskeleton
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
When an invading organism is recognized as foreign, circulating hemocytes should rapidly remove it by phagocytosis and/or encapsulation. This reaction can be observed when the parasitoid wasp Leptopilina boulardi lays its eggs in the hemocoel of second-instar Drosophila larvae. Parasitization elicits a strong cellular response, inducing the release of hemocytes from the lymph gland (Lanot et al., 2001
) and also the sessile population (Zettervall et al., 2004
). Furthermore, it causes the differentiation of numerous lamellocytes (Carton and Nappi, 1997
; Meister, 2004
; Meister and Lagueux, 2003
). Once a wasp egg is recognized, capsule formation ensues. This requires circulating plasmatocytes to change from non-adhesive to adhesive, enabling them to adhere to the invader. After the plasmatocytes attach and spread around the chorion of the wasp egg they form septate junctions. This effectively separates the wasp egg from the larval hemocoel. The last phases of capsule formation include lamellocyte adherence, and melanization due to crystal cell degranulation (Russo et al., 1996
).
From these encapsulation events it is obvious that adhesion and cell shape change are an essential part of the cellular immune response against parasitoid wasp eggs. Rac GTPases are known to regulate the cytoskeletal rearrangements and adhesions necessary for cell-shape change and migration (reviewed in Burridge and Wennerberg, 2004
; Raftopoulou and Hall, 2004
). Cell migration can be subdivided into a series of sequential events, including lamellipodium extension, formation of new adhesions, cell-body contraction and tail detachment (reviewed in Ridley, 2001
; Small et al., 2002
). Lamellipodia formation requires the polymerization of actin branches, leading to the extension of a lamella in the direction of migration (reviewed in Ridley, 2001
). Branched actin polymerization during lamellipodium extension is under the control of Rac GTPases (Miki et al., 1998
), whereas the direction of migration is controlled by the Rho family member Cdc42 (Allen et al., 1998
). After the lamella is extended there is adhesion of the leading edge to the substrate. This requires the interaction of adhesion receptors with the extracellular matrix outside of the cell, and the actin cytoskeleton inside of the cell (Hotchin and Hall, 1995
). These initial adhesions formed at the leading edge are known as focal contacts. It is believed that Rac plays an active part in regulating focal contact formation (Nobes and Hall, 1995
). Once these interactions form, Rho activity leads to the maturation of focal contacts into focal adhesions (Chrzanowska-Wodnicka and Burridge, 1996
). Focal adhesions allow for the force that is created by cellular contraction of the actin cytoskeleton to be converted into cell movement. During the final stage, the trailing edge of the migrating cell is released from the extracellular matrix and retracts towards the front of the cell. For this retraction to occur the focal adhesions must be turned over and contraction of the cytoskeleton by actomyosin can then begin to pull the rear of the cell forward (reviewed in Ridley, 2001
).
The Drosophila genome encodes two Rac GTPases (Rac1 and Rac2). A third homolog Mig-2-like (Mtl) has similarity to both Rac and Cdc42 GTPases, but signals more like Rac GTPases (Hakeda-Suzuki et al., 2002
; Newsome et al., 2000
). In Drosophila, Rac GTPases are involved in the cell movements necessary for proper development, and during embryogenesis the three Racs are redundant (Hakeda-Suzuki et al., 2002
; Ng et al., 2002
). Paladi and Tepass reported that Rac1 and Rac2 are necessary in a redundant fashion for the migration of Drosophila embryonic hemocytes (Paladi and Tepass, 2004
), and Stramer et al. showed that Rac activity is necessary for hemocyte migration into embryonic wounds (Stramer et al., 2005
). All these observations suggest that Rac GTPases play a central role in cell migration in the Drosophila embryo. In Drosophila larvae, Rac1 and Rac2 are also involved in regulating hemocyte activation. The overexpression of wild-type Rac1 in larval hemocytes significantly increases the number of circulating plasmatocytes and lamellocytes (Zettervall et al., 2004
). Rac2 has a specific role in cellular spreading during the encapsulation process of invading parasitoid eggs from the wasp L. boulardi (Williams et al., 2005
).
We report here that Rac1 requires the Drosophila Jun kinase basket (Bsk) as well as stable actin formation to recruit the sessile hemocyte population and increase the number of circulating hemocytes. Furthermore, we show that Rac1 and Bsk are involved in the regulation of cellular adhesions in activated hemocytes. We also show that Rac1 and Bsk are both required for the proper encapsulation of eggs from the parasitoid wasp L. boulardi.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To study the effect of Rac1 signalling on the sessile hemocyte population various UAS-Rac1 transgenic flies were crossed to Hemese-GAL4, UAS-GFPnls driver flies (hereafter called He-Gal4). In third-instar control larvae, segmentally arranged hemocytes were observed just underneath the cuticle (Fig. 1A). Overexpression of wild-type Rac1 GTPase specifically in hemocytes disrupted this segmental banding pattern (Fig. 1B). The overexpression of the Rac1-effector-loop mutants Rac1F37A or Rac1Y40C in hemocytes had little effect on the sessile hemocyte population (Fig. 1C,D). Using the He-Gal4 driver we coexpressed Rac1F37A and Rac1Y40C in hemocytes and found that the phenotype was similar to that caused by Rac1 overexpression: the sessile hemocyte-banding pattern was disrupted (Fig. 1E). The expression of dominant-negative Rac1 (Rac1N17) in hemocytes did not disrupt the sessile hemocyte-banding pattern (Fig. 1F). Examination of protein expression levels in hemocytes showed all the transgenic constructs were overexpressed when crossed with He-Gal4 and produced stable proteins (supplementary material Fig. S1).
|
Rac1 requires two pathways to fully activate circulating hemocytes
To examine hemocyte morphology we bled early wandering third-instar larvae and stained the hemocytes with TRITC-phalloidin to visualize their actin cytoskeleton. Hemocytes from control larvae were round in appearance with little F-actin at the plasma membrane (Fig. 2A). Overexpression of Rac1 in hemocytes induced plasma membrane ruffling, with more F-actin visible at the cell periphery (Fig. 2B). When compared with control hemocytes, overexpression of wild-type Rac1 induced a 15-fold increase in the amount of cellular F-actin (Fig. 2G). Hemocytes expressing Rac1F37A had thick actin cables running from the center to the periphery of the cell (Fig. 2C). When these hemocytes were co-stained with anti-phosphorylated-tyrosine antibody, the staining was localized to the tips of the actin cables, indicating that the structures could be stress fibers (Zimerman et al., 2004
). Rac1F37A overexpression induced an approximately fivefold increase in cellular F-actin (Fig. 2G). Hemocytes expressing Rac1Y40C had ruffled membranes, although not to the same extent as Rac1 wild-type cells, and different amounts of actin accumulated at the periphery of the cell (Fig. 2D). Similar to Rac1F37A, Rac1Y40C induced an approximately fivefold increase in F-actin (Fig. 2G). Hemocytes bled from larvae coexpressing Rac1F37A and Rac1Y40C looked similar to larvae that overexpressed wild-type Rac1, having an increased F-actin accumulation at the cell periphery (Fig. 2E). Similar to wild-type Rac1 overexpression, hemocytes coexpressing Rac1F37A and Rac1Y40C had a 12-fold increase in F-actin (Fig. 2G). This shows that Rac1 must activate two pathways for stable formation of lamellipodia.
|
During these experiments it became obvious that the various Rac1 alleles had an effect on cell spreading. Fig. 2H shows that hemocytes that were bled from control larvae have a median diameter of 25 µm. Overexpression of Rac1 in hemocytes significantly increased their median diameter to 37 µm (Fig. 2H). When compared with Rac1-overexpressing cells, hemocytes expressing Rac1F37A were small, with a median diameter of just 26 µm (Fig. 2H), whereas Rac1Y40C hemocytes had a median diameter of 32 µm, just slightly smaller than that of cells expressing wild-type Rac1 (Fig. 2H).
Overexpression of dominant-negative Rac1 (Rac1N17) in hemocytes resulted in an interesting phenotype. When hemocytes expressing Rac1N17 were stained with TRITC-phalloidin, no F-actin was evident at the cell periphery and the cells had a greater diameter than control hemocytes (Fig. 2F). DAPI staining revealed that many of the cells were bi- or multinucleate (Fig. 2F). This might be because Rac1 has a role in hemocyte cytokinesis or because the overexpression of dominant-negative Rac1 interferes with the cytokinesis machinery.
|
During these experiments, we noticed that the Rac1Y40C/tsr; He-Gal4 larvae seemed to have an increased number of circulating hemocytes. As seen before, when Rac1Y40C was overexpressed in hemocytes, no increase in either circulating plasmatocytes or activated lamellocytes was observed (Fig. 3G). tsrk05633/Cyo, Kr-Gal4, UAS-GFP larvae also showed no increase in the numbers of plasmatocytes or lamellocytes. However, when Rac1Y40C was overexpressed and one copy of tsr was removed, there was a significant increase in the number of circulating plasmatocytes (Fig. 3G). The sessile hemocyte-banding pattern was also disrupted (data not shown). Thus, stable actin formation is sufficient to significantly increase the number of circulating plasmatocytes, but not sufficient for lamellocyte formation.
Effects of Rac1-effector-loop mutants on Bsk activation
To investigate further the activities of the Rac1-effector-loop mutants in hemocytes, we examined their ability to activate the Drosophila Jun N-terminal kinase homolog Bsk. During the final stages of larval development, just before pupation, Bsk becomes phosphorylated in circulating hemocytes, indicating a higher level of activiated Bsk (data not shown). To avoid this high level of endogenous activated Bsk, we bled hemocytes from early third-instar larvae. When hemocytes were bled from control larvae (He-Gal4 or CantonS) and stained with an antibody that recognizes activated Bsk, staining was observed at the periphery of the cell and in the nucleus (Fig. 4A). There was very little active Bsk evident in the cytoplasm of control hemocytes between the nucleus and cell periphery. Overexpression of wild-type Bsk in hemocytes produced high levels of activiated Bsk throughout the cell, but had no obvious effect on hemocyte morphology, the sessile hemocyte population, or the number of circulating hemocytes (Fig. 4B and data not shown). Overexpression of wild-type Rac1 in hemocytes induced a fourfold increase in the amount of active Bsk (Fig. 4C,F). This activity was observed in the nucleus, as well as in puncta distributed throughout the cell (Fig. 4C). Hemocytes expressing the Rac1-effector-loop mutant Rac1Y40C, which cannot activate Jun kinase, looked very similar to control hemocytes (compare Fig. 4D and 4A). When Rac1F37A was overexpressed the cytoplasmic Bsk activity was not localized, but diffuse throughout the cytoplasm (Fig. 4E), unlike in hemocytes expressing wild-type Rac1. Expression of Rac1F37A in hemocytes induced activated Bsk 2.5-fold (Fig. 4F). From these results, we conclude that Rac1F37A can activate Bsk signalling, but this activation is not sufficient to properly localize Bsk.
|
Bsk signals downstream of Rac1
We next wanted to determine whether Bsk is needed downstream of Rac1 to increase the number of circulating hemocytes. We therefore expressed UAS-BskIR, which expresses a Bsk RNAi construct (Ishimaru et al., 2004
), together with UAS-Rac1. When Bsk signalling was inhibited it completely blocked the release of the sessile hemocyte population, as well as the concurrent increase in circulating plasmatocytes and appearance of lamellocytes induced by Rac1 overexpression (Fig. 5E,G). This suggests that, downstream of Rac1, Bsk is necessary to recruit the sessile hemocyte population, increase the number of circulating plasmatocytes and induce lamellocyte formation.
|
Rac1 and Bsk regulate hemocyte cellular adhesions
Since lamellocyte formation induced by overexpression of wild-type Rac1 requires Bsk signalling, we decided to see whether Rac1 and Bsk are necessary for lamellocyte formation after parasitization. Control larvae (either Hml
-Gal4 or UAS-BskIR), larvae expressing UAS-BskIR under the control of Hml
-Gal4 and homozygous Rac1J11 loss-of-function larvae were parasitized by the avirulent L. boulardi wasp strain G486. We used the Hml
-Gal4 driver for this experiment, because unlike the He-Gal4 driver, Hml
-Gal4 is constitutively expressed in the lymph gland. The lymph gland is activated by wasp parasitization, thereafter producing and releasing many lamellocytes (Lanot et al., 2001
). Forty hours after parasitization, a significant increase in the number of circulating lamellocytes was seen in all cases (Fig. 6A). From this, we conclude that Rac1 and Bsk are not necessary for the formation of lamellocytes induced by wasp parasitization.
|
Usually, the darkened cellular capsule surrounding a parasitoid wasp egg is easily visible in the hemocoel of wild-type Drosophila larvae 30 to 40 hours after parasitization by the avirulent L. boulardi wasp strain G486. Yet, while doing these experiments, we noticed that homozygous Rac1J11 loss-of-function mutants and Hml
;BskIR larvae failed to properly melanize the wasp egg. We used this finding as the basis for a wasp encapsulation assay to test how Rac1 loss-of-function mutants as well as the lack of active Bsk effects the cellular immune reaction (Sorrentino et al., 2002
). In Rac1J11/TM6,Tb control larvae, 40 to 42 hours after parasitization, 68% of the wasp eggs were correctly encapsulated. In Rac1J11 homozygotes, however, the rate of proper encapsulation was 14% (Fig. 6C), and Hml
;BskIR larvae properly encapsulated only 16% of the wasp eggs. In Hml
-Gal4 or UAS-BskIR control larvae proper encapsulation was observed 69% or 67%, respectively (Fig. 6C). From this, we conclude that both Rac1 and Bsk are necessary for proper capsule formation in response to eggs from the parasitoid L. boulardi.
Bsk activation after parasitization is partially controlled by Rac1
Plasmatocytes bled from parasitized control larvae 40 hours post-parasitization had an approximately sevenfold increase of active Bsk compared with plasmatocytes of non-parasitized control larvae (Fig. 7A,B). Similar to wild-type Rac1-overexpressing hemocytes (see Fig. 4C), active Bsk was in the nucleus and in puncta throughout the cytoplasm (Fig. 7A). Plasmatocytes bled from parasitized homozygous Rac1J11 larvae 40 hours post-parasitization had partially reduced induction of Bsk activity (Fig. 7A,B). Interestingly, most of the active Bsk in hemocytes from Rac1J11 larvae was located in the nucleus (Fig. 7A). Unlike controls, there was very little active Bsk observed in the cytoplasm. From these results, we conclude that Rac1 is necessary for some, but not all, of the Bsk activation seen after parasitization.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Rac1 induced increase in circulating hemocyte numbers.
The expression of either Ras85D or Egfr in hemocytes leads to an approximately 60-fold increase in the number of circulating plasmatocytes compared with control larvae (Asha et al., 2003
; Zettervall et al., 2004
). The large increase induced by the EGF receptor pathway can only be explained by increased hemocyte proliferation. Overexpression of wild-type Rac1 increases the number of circulating plasmatocytes only 3-fold (Zettervall et al., 2004
) (this study). This increase might be explained by the release of the sessile hemocyte population, although we cannot rule out the possibility that proliferation is also involved.
At present, it is not known how sessile hemocytes are maintained in a segmental pattern underneath the larval epidermis, or what the mechanism is that induces their release into circulation. We used two Rac1-effector-loop mutants to elucidate what is required downstream of Rac1 to disrupt the sessile hemocyte segmental banding pattern. Although Rac1F37A activates Jun kinase and Rac1Y40C induces the formation of branched-actin leading to lamellipodia (Joneson et al., 1996
; Ng et al., 2002
), neither mutant on its own is sufficient to cause sessile hemocyte release or an increase in the number of circulating hemocytes. We speculate that Rac1Y40C can induce the formation of F-actin but not the inhibition of cofilin. Endogenous Rac1 acts upstream of Lim kinase to inhibit cofilin; this inhibition leads to formation of stable F-actin (Chen et al., 2005
; Raymond et al., 2004
). Although our study is not conclusive, it is possible that, as well as inducing actin formation, Rac1 overexpression in hemocytes inhibits cofilin. This inhibition leads to formation of stable F-actin and might be sufficient for sessile hemocyte release. This is evident when Rac1Y40C is overexpressed and one copy of the Drosophila cofilin tsr gene is removed. The sessile hemocytes are disrupted and a significant increase in circulating plasmatocytes is observed. Interestingly, this is not sufficient to increase the number of circulating lamellocytes; possibly because of a need for increased Bsk activity or some other, as yet unknown, mechanism downstream of Rac1 to form lamellocytes.
The Drosophila Jun kinase Bsk is necessary downstream of Rac1 for sessile hemocyte release, as well as for the formation of lamellocytes. When a Bsk RNAi construct is co-expressed with Rac1 in hemocytes, release of the sessile population is blocked. There is also no concurrent increase in circulating plasmatocytes or the formation of lamellocytes. This means that Bsk is required downstream of Rac1 to disrupt the sessile hemocyte banding pattern. It could also mean that Bsk is required for Rac1-induced formation of lamellocytes. Another intriguing possibility is that the formation of lamellocytes is a secondary event that initially requires sessile hemocytes to be released into circulation. However, as mentioned before, release is not sufficient to induce the formation of lamellocytes.
Rac1 and Bsk regulate actin- and FAK-rich placodes
In vertebrate cell lines it has been shown that Jun kinase phosphorylation of Paxillin is necessary for focal adhesion turnover (Huang et al., 2003
) and, in Drosophila, Paxillin inhibits Rho function and enhances Rac activation, leading to the inhibition of focal adhesions (Chen et al., 2005
). This is evidence of the involvement of Rac1 and Jun kinase in focal adhesion turnover. We found further evidence for Rac1 and Bsk involvement in the regulation of focal-adhesion-like actin- and FAK-rich placodes. We call them focal-adhesion-like placodes because they lack the stress fibers reminiscent of true focal adhesions (Chrzanowska-Wodnicka and Burridge, 1996
; Ridley and Hall, 1992
). When loss-of-function Rac1 larvae or larvae expressing Bsk RNAi in hemocytes were parasitized by L. boulardi, they formed large plaques of phosphorylated FAK and phosphorylated tyrosine that coincided with an increase of F-actin, which is in contrast to wild-type lamellocytes, This is evidence that in the Drosophila cellular immune response against parasitization, Rac1 and Bsk are necessary to regulate focal-adhesion-like placodes. It has not been reported whether lamellocytes can migrate, so at this time the purpose of these actin- and FAK-rich placodes is not known.
Concluding remark
Finally, we must caution that some, or possibly all, of the phenotypes seen when the various Rac1 alleles are overexpressed, might be due to an interference with Rac2. Whereas initial experiments expressing dominant-negative Rac1 gave strong embryonic phenotypes (Harden et al., 1995
; Glise and Noselli, 1997
), more recent studies using Rac1 and Rac2 loss-of-function alleles showed that these two genes are redundant during embryogenesis (Hakeda-Suzuki et al., 2002
; Ng et al., 2002
). This is evidence that overexpression of dominant-negative Rac1 can block not only Rac1 signalling, but Rac2 signalling as well. However, we showed that Rac2 has a specific role in cellular spreading during the encapsulation process of invading parasitoid eggs from the wasp L. boulardi (Williams et al., 2005
) and here we show that Rac1 mutants also fail to properly encapsulate wasp eggs. This is evidence that the Rac GTPases are not redundant during the larval immune response against the parasitoid L. boulardi.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-Gal4, 2X UAS-eGFP was provided by Sergey Sinenko (Sinenko et al., 2004
Immunofluorescence
For all antibody stainings hemocytes, were bled from larvae into 20 µl of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and allowed to attach to a glass slide (SM-011, Hendley-Essex, Essex, UK) for 1 hour. Staining and analysis were done according to Zettervall et al. (Zettervall et al., 2004
). The lamellocyte monoclonal antibody L1a was used undiluted (Kurucz et al., 2003
). The polyclonal anti-active-Jun-kinase antibody (Promega) and the monoclonal anti-phosphorylated-tyrosine antibody (Cell Signaling Technology) were diluted 1:500 in 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA)-PBS. The polyclonal anti-phosphorylated-FAKY397 (Biosource) and the monoclonal anti-Myc (Sigma) antibodies were diluted 1:1000 in 3% BSA-PBS. Double-staining was carried out as stated previously, except that after application of the secondary antibody, cells were washed three times in 1x PBS, before being fixed for 5 minutes in 3.7% paraformaldehyde-PBS. After this, cells were washed three more times with 1x PBS, then phalloidin-stained and washed, and analysed as in Zettervall et al. (Zettervall et al., 2004
). FITC-phalloidin (Sigma) was diluted to a final concentration of 0.10 µg/µl, Alexa-Fluor-350-phalloidin (Molecular Probes) was diluted to a final concentration of 0.20 µg/µl in 1x PBS.
For F-actin visualization alone, hemocytes were bled from larvae into 20 µl of PBS and allowed to attach to a glass slide for 1 hour at room temperature. The cells were then fixed for 5 minutes with 3.7% paraformaldehyde-PBS, before being washed once for 5 minutes with PBS, followed by a 5-minute wash with PBST (PBS containing 0.1% of Triton X-100) and a final 5-minute wash with PBS. The cells were then stained for 40 minutes at room temperature with TRITC-phalloidin (Sigma) and diluted to a final concentration of 0.10 µg/µl. After this, cells were washed twice for 5 minutes with PBS, once for 5 minutes with PBS containing DAPI (1:5000), and finally for 5 minutes with PBS. The cells were mounted with 50% glycerol in PBS. F-actin was visualized using epifluorescence and digital pictures were taken with a Hamamatsu C4742-95 video unit, controlled by the Openlab program (Improvision, Coventry, UK). Photoshop (Version 7.0, Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA) and Imagetrak (created by Peter K. Stys) were used for digital editing. Imagetrak was used to measure fluorescence intensity.
To visualize hemocyte patterns within larvae, wandering third-instar larvae were washed in PBS and then killed by freezing at -80°C for two minutes. The larvae were then transferred to a glass slide, covered in 50% glycerol and visualized as described previously.
Hemocyte counting and statistics
Hemocyte counting and statistics were done according to Zettervall et al. (Zettervall et al., 2004
). Briefly, UAS transgenic lines were crossed to Hemese-GAL4, UAS-GFPnls. The females were allowed to lay eggs at 21-23°C for 2 days before the vials were moved to 29°C. Larvae were staged according the procedures described in Andres and Thummel (Andres and Thummel, 1994
). Staged larvae were washed in PBS before being bled into 20 µl of PBS with a fine pair of forceps and a 27-gauge needle. The hemocyte-containing PBS was then loaded onto a improved Neubauer hemocytometer for counting. Hemocytes from at least 15 larvae of each strain were counted, and statistical analysis was carried out according the procedures outlined in Zettervall et al. (Zettervall et al., 2004
).
Measurement of cell size
Hemocytes were bled from larvae into 20 µl of PBS and allowed to attach to a glass slide (SM-011, Hendley-Essex, Essex, UK) for 1 hour. The cells were then stained with TRITC-phalloidin and DAPI as stated previously. F-actin was visualized using epifluorescence and digital pictures were taken with a Hamamatsu C4742-95 video unit, controlled by the Openlab program (Improvision, Coventry, UK). Cell-area measurements were made by measuring the cells on the x and y axes, using the Openlab program and taking the average of these two measurements in µm. For statistics, an initial ANOVA analysis (http://www.physics.csbsju.edu/stats/anova.html) indicated that the overexpression of the UAS constructs significantly affect hemocyte cell size. Multiple Student's t-tests (Microsoft Excel and http://www.graphpad.com/quickcalcs/ttest1.cfm) were performed to study specific interactions between certain genotypes and their corresponding crosses.
Wasp egg encapsulation assay
Encapsulation assays were done according to Sorrentino et al. (Sorrentino et al., 2002
). Briefly, 2 days before parasitization the appropriate fly strains were crossed and kept at 21-25°C. Four or five females of L. boulardi G486 were allowed to infest at room temperature for 2 hours, after which the Drosophila larvae were transferred to apple-juice plates and left at room temperature for 40-42 hours. After this time the larvae were collected, washed in PBS and analysed under a stereomicroscope for the presence of a dark capsule. Larvae in without dark capsules were dissected in 20 µl of PBS to determine whether they had been parasitized. Larvae containing eggs of the parasitoid that had not darkened by this time were scored as non-encapsulated. Non-parasitized larvae were excluded from the count.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Allen, W. E., Zicha, D., Ridley, A. J. and Jones, G. E. (1998). A role for Cdc42 in macrophage chemotaxis. J. Cell Biol. 141, 1147-1157.
Andres, A. and Thummel, C. (1994). Methods for quantitative analysis of transcription in larvae and prepupae. Methods Cell Biol. 44, 565-573.[Medline]
Asha, H., Nagy, I., Kovacs, G., Stetson, D., Ando, I. and Dearolf, C. R. (2003). Analysis of Ras-induced overproliferation in Drosophila hemocytes. Genetics 163, 203-215.
Burridge, K. and Wennerberg, K. (2004). Rho and rac take center stage. Cell 116, 167-179.[CrossRef][Medline]
Carton, Y. and Nappi, A. J. (1997). Drosophila cellular immunity against parasitoids. Parasitol. Today 13, 218-227.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chen, G.-C., Turano, B., Ruest, P. J., Hagel, M., Settleman, J. and Thomas, S. M. (2005). Regulation of Rho and Rac signaling to the actin cytoskeleton by paxillin during Drosophila development. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 979-987.
Chrzanowska-Wodnicka, M. and Burridge, K. (1996). Rho-stimulated contractility drives the formation of stress fibers and focal adhesions. J. Cell Biol. 133, 1403-1415.
Dupas, S., Frey, F. and Carton, Y. (1998). A single parasitoid segregating factor controls immune suppression in Drosophila. J. Hered. 89, 306-311.
Fisher, R. A. (1925). Intraclass correlations and the analysis of varience. In Statistical Methods for Research Workers, pp. 187-210. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.
Gallo, K. A. and Johnson, G. L. (2002). Mixed-lineage kinase control of JNK and p38 MAPK pathways. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 663-672.[CrossRef][Medline]
Glise, B. and Noselli, S. (1997). Coupling of Jun amino-terminal kinase and Decapentaplegic signaling pathways in Drosophila morphogenesis. Genes Dev. 11, 1738-1747.
Goto, A., Kadowaki, T. and Kitagawa, Y. (2003). Drosophila hemolectin gene is expressed in embryonic and larval hemocytes and its knock down causes bleeding defects. Dev. Biol. 264, 582-591.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hakeda-Suzuki, S., Ng, J., Tzu, J., Dietzl, G., Sun, Y., Harms, M., Nardine, T., Luo, L. and Dickson, B. J. (2002). Rac function and regulation during Drosophila development. Nature 416, 438-442.[CrossRef][Medline]
Harden, N., Loh, H., Chia, W. and Lim, L. (1995). A dominant inhibitory version of the small GTP-binding protein Rac disrupts cytoskeletal structures and inhibits developmental cell shape changes in Drosophila. Development 121, 903-914.[Abstract]
Hotchin, N. and Hall, A. (1995). The assembly of integrin adhesion complexes requires both extracellular matrix and intracellular rho/rac GTPases. J. Cell Biol. 131, 1857-1865.
Huang, C., Rajfur, Z., Borchers, C., Schaller, M. D. and Jacobson, K. (2003). JNK phosphorylates paxillin and regulates cell migration. Nature 424, 219-223.[CrossRef][Medline]
Huang, C., Jacobson, K. and Schaller, M. D. (2004). MAP kinases and cell migration. J. Cell Sci. 117, 4619-4628.
Ishimaru, S., Ueda, R., Hinohara, Y., Ohtani, M. and Hanafusa, H. (2004). PVR plays a critical role via JNK activation in thorax closure during Drosophila metamorphosis. EMBO J. 23, 3984-3994.[CrossRef][Medline]
Joneson, T., McDonough, M., Bar-Sagi, D. and Van Aelst, L. (1996). RAC regulation of actin polymerization and proliferation by a pathway distinct from Jun kinase. Science 274, 1374-1376.
Kunda, P., Craig, G., Dominguez, V. and Baum, B. (2003). Abi, Sra1, and Kette control the stability and localization of SCAR/WAVE to regulate the formation of actin-based protrusions. Curr. Biol. 13, 1867-1875.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kurucz, E., Zettervall, C.-J., Sinka, R., Vilmos, P., Pivarcsi, A., Ekengren, S., Hegedus, Z., Ando, I. and Hultmark, D. (2003). Hemese, a hemocyte-specific transmembrane protein, affects the cellular immune response in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 2622-2627.
Labrosse, C., Eslin, P., Doury, G., Drezen, J. M. and Poirie, M. (2005a). Haemocyte changes in D. Melanogaster in response to long gland components of the parasitoid wasp Leptopilina boulardi: a Rho-GAP protein as an important factor. J. Insect Physiol. 51, 161-170.[CrossRef][Medline]
Labrosse, C., Stasiak, K., Lesobre, J., Grangeia, A., Huguet, E., Drezen, J. M. and Poirie, M. (2005b). A RhoGAP protein as a main immune suppressive factor in the Leptopilina boulardi (Hymenoptera, Figitidae)-Drosophila melanogaster interaction. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 35, 93-103.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lanot, R., Zachary, D., Holder, F. and Meister, M. (2001). Postembryonic hematopoiesis in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 230, 243-257.[CrossRef][Medline]
Meister, M. (2004). Blood cells of Drosophila: cell lineages and role in host defence. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 16, 10-15.[CrossRef][Medline]
Meister, M. and Lagueux, M. (2003). Drosophila blood cells. Cell Microbiol. 5, 573-580.[CrossRef][Medline]
Miki, H., Suetsugu, S. and Takenawa, T. (1998). WAVE, a novel WASP-family protein involved in actin reorganization induced by Rac. EMBO J. 17, 6932-6941.[CrossRef][Medline]
Newsome, T., Schmidt, S., Dietzl, G., Keleman, K., Asling, B., Debant, A. and Dickson, B. (2000). Trio combines with dock to regulate Pak activity during photoreceptor axon pathfinding in Drosophila. Cell 101, 283-294.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ng, J., Nardine, T., Harms, M., Tzu, J., Goldstein, A., Sun, Y., Dietzl, G., Dickson, B. J. and Luo, L. (2002). Rac GTPases control axon growth, guidance and branching. Nature 416, 442-447.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nobes, C. and Hall, A. (1995). Rho, rac, and cdc42 GTPases regulate the assembly of multimolecular focalcomplexes associated with actin stress fibers, lamellipodia, and filopodia. Cell 81, 53-62.[CrossRef][Medline]
Paladi, M. and Tepass, U. (2004). Function of Rho GTPases in embryonic blood cell migration in Drosophila. J. Cell Sci. 117, 6313-6326.
Playford, M. and Schaller, M. (2004). The interplay between Src and integrins in normal and tumor biology. Oncogene 23, 7928-7946.[CrossRef][Medline]
Raftopoulou, M. and Hall, A. (2004). Cell migration: Rho GTPases lead the way. Dev. Biol. 265, 23-32.[CrossRef][Medline]
Raymond, K., Bergeret, E., Avet-Rochex, A., Griffin-Shea, R. and Fauvarque, M.-O. (2004). A screen for modifiers of RacGAP(84C) gain-of-function in the Drosophila eye revealed the LIM kinase Cdi/TESK1 as a downstream effector of Rac1 during spermatogenesis. J. Cell Sci. 117, 2777-2789.
Ridley, A. J. (2001). Rho GTPases and cell migration. J. Cell Sci. 114, 2713-2722.
Ridley, A. J. and Hall, A. (1992). The small GTP-binding protein rho regulates the assembly of focal adhesions and actin stress fibers in response to growth factors. Cell 70, 389-399.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rogers, S. L., Wiedemann, U., Stuurman, N. and Vale, R. D. (2003). Molecular requirements for actin-based lamella formation in Drosophila S2 cells. J. Cell Biol. 162, 1079-1088.
Russo, J., Dupas, S., Frey, F., Carton, Y. and Brehelin, M. (1996). Insect immunity: early events in the encapsulation process of parasitoid (Leptopilina boulardi) eggs in resistant and susceptible strains of Drosophila. Parasitology 112, 135-142.
Sinenko, S. A., Kim, E. K., Wynn, R., Manfruelli, P., Ando, I., Wharton, K. A., Perrimon, N. and Mathey-Prevot, B. (2004). Yantar, a conserved arginine-rich protein is involved in Drosophila hemocyte development. Dev. Biol. 273, 48-62.[CrossRef][Medline]
Small, J. V., Stradal, T., Vignal, E. and Rottner, K. (2002). The lamellipodium: where motility begins. Trends Cell Biol. 12, 112-120.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sorrentino, R. P., Carton, Y. and Govind, S. (2002). Cellular immune response to parasite infection in the Drosophila lymph gland is developmentally regulated. Dev. Biol. 243, 65-80.[CrossRef][Medline]
Stramer, B., Wood, W., Galko, M. J., Redd, M. J., Jacinto, A., Parkhurst, S. M. and Martin, P. (2005). Live imaging of wound inflammation in Drosophila embryos reveals key roles for small GTPases during in vivo cell migration. J. Cell Biol. 168, 567-573.
Student (1908). The probable error of a mean. Biometrika 6, 1-25.
Williams, M. J., Ando, I. and Hultmark, D. (2005). Drosophila melanogaster Rac2 is necessary for a proper cellular immune response. Genes Cells 10, 813-823.
Zettervall, C.-J., Anderl, I., Williams, M. J., Palmer, R., Kurucz, E., Ando, I. and Hultmark, D. (2004). A directed screen for genes involved in Drosophila blood cell activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 14192-14197.
Zimerman, B., Volberg, T. and Geiger, B. (2004). Early molecular events in the assembly of the focal adhesion-stress fiber complex during fibroblast spreading. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 58, 143-159.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Bergeret, J. Perrin, M. Williams, D. Grunwald, E. Engel, D. Thevenon, E. Taillebourg, F. Bruckert, P. Cosson, and M.-O. Fauvarque TM9SF4 is required for Drosophila cellular immunity via cell adhesion and phagocytosis J. Cell Sci., October 15, 2008; 121(20): 3325 - 3334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Stofanko, S. Y. Kwon, and P. Badenhorst A Misexpression Screen to Identify Regulators of Drosophila Larval Hemocyte Development Genetics, September 1, 2008; 180(1): 253 - 267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. I. Korolchuk, M. M. Schutz, C. Gomez-Llorente, J. Rocha, N. R. Lansu, S. M. Collins, Y. P. Wairkar, I. M. Robinson, and C. J. O'Kane Drosophila Vps35 function is necessary for normal endocytic trafficking and actin cytoskeleton organisation J. Cell Sci., December 15, 2007; 120(24): 4367 - 4376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Avet-Rochex, J. Perrin, E. Bergeret, and M.-O. Fauvarque Rac2 is a major actor of Drosophila resistance to Pseudomonas aeruginosa acting in phagocytic cells Genes Cells, October 1, 2007; 12(10): 1193 - 1204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Williams Drosophila Hemopoiesis and Cellular Immunity J. Immunol., April 15, 2007; 178(8): 4711 - 4716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|