spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 7


Fig. 7. (A) Diagram of the KIFC5A-s cDNA used as bait in the yeast two-hybrid system. (B) Protein sequence alignment between Nubp1 and Nubp2. Identical residues are boxed and conservative substitutions are highlighted in grey. The conserved ATP/GTP-binding motif (P loop) is marked in blue, the successive MRP motifs {alpha} and ß are marked in green, and the sequence to which an anti-peptide serum to Nubp2 was produced is marked in orange. (C) In vitro co-selection experiments confirming interactions between KIFC5A&Nubp2, KIFC5A&Nubp1 and Nubp1&Nubp2. In the top panels, bacterially expressed tagged His6-KIFC5A-s, immobilised on Ni2+-NTA agarose beads, was incubated with a lysate from NIH 3T3 fibroblasts expressing GFP-Nubp2 or GFP-Nubp1 (lanes 1), or GFP only (negative control, lanes 2), or GFP-Nubp2 in the absence of pre-bound His6-KIFC5A-s (additional negative control, lanes 3). Bound proteins were probed by immunoblotting with anti-KIFC5A (left panel) or anti-GFP (right panel). A positive signal (detection of GFP-Nubp2 or GFP-Nubp1) is obtained only in the presence of pre-bound His6-KIFC5A-s (no signal in the absence of bound KIFC5A indicates that Nubp2 or Nubp1 does not bind the beads non-specifically). The co-selection of GFP-Nubp2 on the beads is not caused by interaction of KIFC5A with the FP domain (absence of signal in lane 2, right panel). In the bottom panels, the set-up of the experiment and negative controls is similar. GST-Nubp2 was immobilised on glutathione-Sepharose beads and was tested against GFP-Nubp1 (lanes 1), GFP only (negative control, lanes 2) or GFP-Nubp1 in the absence of GST-Nubp2 (additional negative control, lanes 3). Again, the positive signal (detection of Nubp1) was specific only in the presence of GST-Nubp2 (lanes 1). (D) Detection of native Nubp2 in NIH 3T3 cells. Western blot analysis of a total protein extract from NIH 3T3 fibroblasts, using the affinity-purified anti-peptide antibody to Nubp2, revealed a unique band consistent with the predicted Mr of Nubp2. (E) Localisation of Nubp2 in NIH 3T3 cells. Immunofluorescence for Nubp2 (green), centrin (red) and {alpha}-tubulin (red). DNA was visualised with Hoechst (blue). (E1) Cells in interphase; (E2) cell in prophase; (E3) an aberrant spindle with four asters in prometaphase; (E4) double labelling with anti-centrin and anti-Nubp2 in a cell in prometaphase; (E5) Nubp2 enrichment in centrosomes (arrows) of the fully formed metaphase spindle, shown by double labelling with {alpha}-tubulin. Bars, 10 µm (E2-E4) and 5 µm (E1). (F) Silencing phenotype after double Nubp1&Nubp2 RNAi, as revealed by triple fluorescence. Cells were immunolabelled for {alpha}-tubulin, centrin and counterstained for DNA (red, green and blue in the overlay, respectively). Bar, 10 µm.





Right arrow Return to article