spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 4


Fig. 4. Rottlerin inhibits cell spreading of REFs on FN but does not interfere with focal adhesions of REFs pre-spread on FN. (A) REF cells were serum starved overnight, trypsinized and either treated with rottlerin at 1 µM (a,b) or 3 µM (c,d) or DMSO (e) in suspension for 20 minutes, then plated on FN-coated coverslips for 2.5 hours. For some cultures, rottlerin-containing medium was replaced with fresh serum-free medium 30 minutes after seeding on the FN substrate to ascertain whether the rottlerin effects were reversible (b,d). Cells were subsequently fixed and stained for F-actin. Bar, 50 µm. The graph (f) shows the cell area (mean ± s.d.) obtained from 40 cells selected at random from a representative experiment. (B) Serum-starved REF cells were spread on FN for 2 hours, then treated with rottlerin at 1 µM (a) or 3 µM (d) for 30 minutes. Cells were fixed, permeabilized and double stained for F-actin (red) and paxillin (green). Arrows indicate cells with a protrusive phenotype, arrowhead indicates a cell with no obvious filamentous actin organization. Bar, 50 µm. The graph (c) depicts the percentage of cells (± s.d.) with stress fibres, protrusive and no F-actin structures under the various rottlerin treatments. Black bars, DMSO; white bars, 1 µM rottlerin; hatched bars, 3 µM rottlerin. At least 30 cells were scored from each of two independent experiments.





Right arrow Return to article