spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 2


Fig. 2. Cell adhesion to ECM substrates. (A) Levels of HTR-8/SVneo cell adhesion to a selected panel of purified ECM proteins. Substrate proteins were coated at 10 µg/ml and cell adhesion was performed in the presence of 1.0 mM Mg2+ and 1.0 mM Ca2+. Statistical tests were not performed for this descriptive adhesive analysis. (B) Adhesion of HTR-8/SVneo and freshly isolated EVT cells to EMILIN1 and FN. Four experiments were performed and mean ± s.d. reported. No significative difference was seen between EVT and HTR-8/SVneo adhesion capability on EMILIN1 and FN substrates. (C) Perturbation of HTR-8/SVneo cell attachment to gC1q1. Wells were coated with gC1q1 (10 µg/ml). The anti-EMILIN1 mAb 1H2G8 was added to the coated wells just before addition of the cells. In other instances the cells were preincubated with the anti-{alpha}4 integrin subunit mAb P1H4 for 15 minutes at 37°C and were then allowed to adhere at 37°C for 20 minutes. Data are expressed as mean ± s.d. Post-hoc comparison of control mAb versus test samples after significant ANOVA for repeated-measures main effect, Dunnet's test (n=3). *P<0.01.





Right arrow Return to article