spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)
Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 3


Fig. 3. Cell migration towards ECM substrates. (A) Haptotactic migration of HTR-8/SVneo towards various purified ECM substrates. The filters were coated on the lower surface with 20 µg/ml of the substrates. Data are expressed as mean ± s.d. under baseline conditions (BSA). Post-hoc comparison of BSA versus test substrates after significant ANOVA for repeated-measures main effect, Dunnet's test (n=4). *P<0.05. (B) Migration versus haptotaxis of HTR-8/SVneo cells. Filters were coated with purified FN or EMILIN-1 on their upper (migration) or lower (haptotaxis) surfaces and the cells were allowed to migrate for 5 hours. The values shown represent the mean ± s.d. of five experiments. P was calculated for values obtained in haptotactic versus migration conditions. (C) Haptotactic migration of HTR-8/SVneo and fresh EVT cells in response to FN or EMILIN1 was determined by FATIMA assay at one time point (5 hours). The mean ± s.d. of three experiments is reported. (D) The effect of the {alpha}4 function-blocking mAb P1H4 is shown. For EMILIN1 and gC1q1 P values are reported. The values shown represent the mean ± s.d. of three experiments.





Right arrow Return to article