|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | |||||
First published online November 27, 2006
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/jcs.03174
Cell Science at a Glance |
Department of Biology and Center for Research on Biological Clocks, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3258, USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: phardin{at}mail.bio.tamu.edu)
 |
Introduction |
|---|
 Top Introduction The fly per/tim feedback...The fly Clk loopThe circadian timekeeping...References |
|---|
). Although all clocks drive rhythms in gene expression, some control tissue-autonomous rhythms in physiology and metabolism, whereas others form networks of clock tissues that control rhythms in behavior (Bell-Pedersen et al., 2005; Chang, 2006).
Circadian clocks have three basic parts: an input pathway that receives environmental cues and transmits them to the circadian oscillator, a circadian oscillator that keeps circadian time and activates output pathways, and output pathways that control various metabolic, physiological and behavioral processes (Eskin, 1979). Considerable effort has been focused on determining how the circadian oscillator functions to keep circadian time. Genetic and molecular studies in the fruit fly have contributed significantly to our understanding of the circadian oscillator mechanism. Identification and isolation of the first clock gene from Drosophila, period (per), and subsequent analysis of its expression led to the first molecular model of the circadian oscillator - an autoregulatory feedback loop in gene expression (Hall, 2003). Discovery of additional clock genes in Drosophila not only support the feedback loop model but add substantially to its mechanistic detail and complexity. Current analysis indicates that the Drosophila circadian oscillator is composed of two interlocked feedback loops - the original per/timeless (tim) loop and a Clock (Clk) loop (Hardin, 2004; Hardin, 2005; Stanewsky, 2003) - and exhibits striking similarity to that in mammals (shown in the center of the poster).
|
|
The fly per/tim feedback loop |
|---|
|
TopIntroductionThe fly per/tim feedback...The fly Clk loopThe circadian timekeeping...References |
|---|
). PER phosphorylation is also dependent on casein kinase 2 (CK2), which is believed to be a primer kinase for DBT, and protein phosphatase 2a (PP2a), which dephosphorylates PER (Allada and Meissner, 2005; Harms et al., 2004). The coordinated effects of kinases and phosphatases during this time keep PER at low levels and in a hypophosphorylated state because hyperphosphorylated PER is degraded owing to low TIM levels.
After sundown (bottom right), per and tim continue to be transcribed and their mRNAs reach peak levels during the early evening. TIM begins to accumulate in the dark and forms a complex with PER and DBT, thereby stabilizing PER despite continued phosphorylation by DBT and CK2. As a result, PER and TIM accumulate to high levels during the middle of the night (bottom left). As DBT-PER-TIM accumulates, phosphorylation of TIM by SHAGGY (SGG) is believed to be a crucial step that triggers DBT, PER and TIM entry into the nucleus (Harms et al., 2004). Although these proteins enter the nucleus at about the same time, PER-DBT and TIM enter the nucleus separately (Hall, 2003). Once in the nucleus, PER-DBT or re-formed DBT-PER-TIM complexes bind to CLK-CYC, which represses transcription of per, tim and other genes by removing CLK-CYC from E-boxes and promotes DBT-dependent hyperphosphorylation of CLK (Hardin, 2005). The 
6-hour delay between per and tim transcription and accumulation of PER and TIM proteins in the nucleus is thought to be a critical determinant of circadian period. By the end of the night, TIM levels begin to decline through an as yet uncharacterized mechanism.
At dawn (top left), a light-induced conformational change in the blue-light photoreceptor cryptochrome (CRY) promotes the formation of CRY-TIM complexes, TIM degradation by the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway, and CRY destabilization (Ashmore and Sehgal, 2003). PER and CLK are also degraded during the early morning, but their degradation is promoted by DBT-dependent phosphorylation (Hardin, 2005). Although PER falls to its lowest levels by the middle of the day (top right), CLK levels remain relatively constant because hypophosphorylated CLK is generated by new CLK synthesis or PP2a-dependent dephosphorylation of hyperphosphorylated CLK (Kim and Edery, 2006; Yu et al., 2006). Hypophosphorylated CLK then forms a heterodimer with CYC and binds to E-boxes to initiate a new cycle of per and tim transcription (Hardin, 2005). The per/tim feedback loop is a necessary component of the circadian oscillator since per-null and tim-null mutants each abolish circadian oscillator function.
|
The fly Clk loop |
|---|
|
TopIntroductionThe fly per/tim feedback...The fly Clk loopThe circadian timekeeping...References |
|---|
(Pdp1), are activated by E-box binding at mid-day (top right). Although vri mRNA accumulates in phase with per and tim mRNAs, Pdp1 RNA accumulation is delayed by several hours (Hardin, 2004). In contrast to the delayed accumulation of PER and TIM, VRI levels rise in concert with vri mRNA. As VRI accumulates in the nucleus during the mid to late day, it binds VRI/PDP1 binding sites (V/P-boxes) [consensus A(/G)TTA(/T)T(/C):GTAAT(/C)], to repress Clk and cry transcription (Hardin, 2004). VRI protein reaches peak levels during the early evening (bottom right), which is coincident with low levels of Clk and cry mRNAs. Despite the low levels of cry mRNA, CRY begins to accumulate because it is relatively stable in the dark (Ashmore et al., 2003).
Whereas PDP1 accumulates to peak levels during the mid to late night (bottom-left), VRI levels decline during this time owing to DBT-PER-dependent repression of vri transcription. The rising ratio of PDP1/VRI favors binding of PDP1 to V/P-boxes, which activates Clk and cry transcription (Hardin, 2004). PDP1 levels start to decline during the late evening, and are low by the early morning (top left). However, small amounts of PDP1 may continue to activate Clk and cry transcription until the middle of the day, when VRI starts to accumulate after the next cycle of CLK-CYC transcription is initiated (top right).
The Clk feedback loop necessarily drives rhythmic transcription in the opposite phase as the per/tim loop because CLK-CYC activates E-box transcription and represses V/P-box transcription around dusk, and DBT-PER (or DBT-PER-TIM) represses E-box transcription and activates V/P-box transcription around dawn (Hardin, 2004). In addition to driving rhythms in per, tim, vri, Pdp1, Clk and cry expression, these feedback loops drive rhythms in the expression of 150 clock output genes (Wijnen et al., 2006). For example, the slowpoke (slo) Ca2+-dependent voltage-gated potassium channel and the SLO-binding protein (slob) genes are rhythmically expressed (Ceriani et al., 2002; Jaramillo et al., 2004), which suggests that aspects of neurotransmission are under clock control. Since Clk and cry mRNA cycling do not control CLK and CRY levels or activity, the Clk feedback loop may be more important for controlling rhythmic outputs than for sustaining circadian oscillator function.
|
The circadian timekeeping mechanism in Drosophila and mammals is conserved |
|---|
|
TopIntroductionThe fly per/tim feedback...The fly Clk loopThe circadian timekeeping...References |
|---|
replaces DBT, REV-ERB
replaces VRI, RORa replaces PDP1, RORE elements replace V/P-boxes, and PP2a, SGG, CK2 and CRY are removed. Several differences in the structure or function of these mammalian clock components are notable. mPER-mCRY functions to repress CLOCK-BMAL1 transcription, but mCRY is the major repressor as opposed to PER in flies (Reppert and Weaver, 2002). Although CRY functions as a circadian photoreceptor in flies, its role as a transcriptional repressor has been retained in at least some fly peripheral tissues (Collins et al., 2006). REV-ERB and RORa are nuclear receptors rather than bZIP transcription factors like VRI and PDP1, and they regulate transcription by binding RORE elements rather than V/P-boxes (Bell-Pedersen et al., 2005). Although the circadian oscillator mechanisms of Drosophila and mammals show striking similarities, their entrainment to light differs markedly. In flies, light entrains the circadian oscillator by inducing TIM degradation, whereas light entrains the mammalian oscillator by inducing Per1 transcription (Reppert and Weaver, 2002). Since light can directly entrain Drosophila oscillators (Ashmore and Sehgal, 2003), but indirectly entrains mammalian oscillators (Reppert and Weaver, 2002), it is not surprising that different mechanisms have evolved in these animals. |
References |
|---|
|
TopIntroductionThe fly per/tim feedback...The fly Clk loopThe circadian timekeeping...References |
|---|
Allada, R. and Meissner, R. A. (2005). Casein kinase 2, circadian clocks, and the flight from mutagenic light. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 274, 141-149.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ashmore, L. J. and Sehgal, A. (2003). A fly's eye view of circadian entrainment. J. Biol. Rhythms 18, 206-216.
Ashmore, L. J., Sathyanarayanan, S., Silvestre, D. W., Emerson, M. M., Schotland, P. and Sehgal, A. (2003). Novel insights into the regulation of the timeless protein. J. Neurosci. 23, 7810-7819.
Bell-Pedersen, D., Cassone, V. M., Earnest, D. J., Golden, S. S., Hardin, P. E., Thomas, T. L. and Zoran, M. J. (2005). Circadian rhythms from multiple oscillators: Lessons from diverse species. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 544-556.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ceriani, M. F., Hogenesch, J. B., Yanovsky, M., Panda, S., Straume, M. and Kay, S. A. (2002). Genome-wide expression analysis in Drosophila reveals genes controlling circadian behavior. J. Neurosci. 22, 9305-9319.
Chang, D. C. (2006). Neural circuits underlying circadian behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Behav. Processes 71, 211-225.[CrossRef][Medline]
Collins, B., Mazzoni, E. O., Stanewsky, R. and Blau, J. (2006). Drosophila CRYPTOCHROME is a circadian transcriptional repressor. Curr. Biol. 16, 441-449.[CrossRef][Medline]
Eskin, A. (1979). Identification and physiology of circadian pacemakers. Fed. Proc. 38, 2570-2572.[Medline]
Glossop, N. R. and Hardin, P. E. (2002). Central and peripheral circadian oscillator mechanisms in flies and mammals. J. Cell Sci. 115, 3369-3377.
Hall, J. C. (2003). Genetics and molecular biology of rhythms in Drosophila and other insects. Adv. Genet. 48, 1-280.[Medline]
Hardin, P. E. (2004). Transcription regulation within the circadian clock: the E-box and beyond. J. Biol. Rhythms 19, 348-360.
Hardin, P. E. (2005). The circadian timekeeping system of Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 15, 714-722.[CrossRef][Medline]
Harms, E., Kivimae, S., Young, M. W. and Saez, L. (2004). Posttranscriptional and posttranslational regulation of clock genes. J. Biol. Rhythms 19, 361-373.
Jaramillo, A. M., Zheng, X., Zhou, Y., Amado, D. A., Sheldon, A., Sehgal, A. and Levitan, I. B. (2004). Pattern of distribution and cycling of SLOB, Slowpoke channel binding protein, in Drosophila. BMC Neurosci. 5, 3.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kim, E. Y. and Edery, I. (2006). Balance between DBT/CKIepsilon kinase and protein phosphatase activities regulate phosphorylation and stability of Drosophila CLOCK protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 6178-6183.
Reppert, S. M. and Weaver, D. R. (2002). Coordination of circadian timing in mammals. Nature 418, 935-941.[CrossRef][Medline]
Stanewsky, R. (2003). Genetic analysis of the circadian system in Drosophila melanogaster and mammals. J. Neurobiol. 54, 111-147.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wijnen, H., Naef, F., Boothroyd, C., Claridge-Chang, A. and Young, M. W. (2006). Control of daily transcript oscillations in Drosophila by light and the circadian clock. PLoS Genet. 2, e39.[CrossRef][Medline]
Yu, W., Zheng, H., Houl, J. H., Dauwalder, B. and Hardin, P. E. (2006). PER-dependent rhythms in CLK phosphorylation and E-box binding regulate circadian transcription. Genes Dev. 20, 723-733.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  H.-C. Hung, C. Maurer, D. Zorn, W.-L. Chang, and F. Weber Sequential and Compartment-specific Phosphorylation Controls the Life Cycle of the Circadian CLOCK Protein J. Biol. Chem., August 28, 2009; 284(35): 23734 - 23742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C.-T. Tang, S. Li, C. Long, J. Cha, G. Huang, L. Li, S. Chen, and Y. Liu Setting the pace of the Neurospora circadian clock by multiple independent FRQ phosphorylation events PNAS, June 30, 2009; 106(26): 10722 - 10727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H.-C. Hung, S. A. Kay, and F. Weber HSP90, a Capacitor of Behavioral Variation J Biol Rhythms, June 1, 2009; 24(3): 183 - 192. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. Sheeba, V. K. Sharma, H. Gu, Y.-T. Chou, D. K. O'Dowd, and T. C. Holmes Pigment Dispersing Factor-Dependent and -Independent Circadian Locomotor Behavioral Rhythms J. Neurosci., January 2, 2008; 28(1): 217 - 227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Benito, H. Zheng, F. S. Ng, and P. E. Hardin Transcriptional Feedback Loop Regulation, Function, and Ontogeny in Drosophila Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, January 1, 2007; 72(0): 437 - 444. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
