|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | |||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Files in this Data Supplement:
Fig. S1. Suppression of CD44-HA interaction by a neutralizing anti-CD44 antibody. (A) HEK293 cells were transfected with a control (mock) or a CD44 plasmid. Cell surface levels of CD44 were analyzed by flow cytometry. (B) The mock- and CD44-transfected cells were incubated with a control Ig or a neutralizing anti-CD44 Ab. Cells were then stained with FITC-conjugated HA and subjected to flow cytometry. The black lines show cells stained with FITC secondary Ig conjugate.
Fig. S2. Expression of TLR4 on BMMs. BMMs were incubated with TLR4 Ab followed by FITC-conjugated secondary Ab incubation. Cells were analyzed by a flow cytometer.
Fig. S3. Differential effects of HA from effects of LPS. BMMs were primed with M-CSF (30 ng/ml) and RANKL (100 ng/ml) for 3 days. The cells were then treated with LPS (0.001-1 ng/ml) or HA (1-5 μg/ml) in the presence of M-CSF (30 ng/ml) and RANKL (100 ng/ml) for 16 hours. Cells were stained for TRAP and multinuclear TRAP+ cells were counted. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 as compared with vehicle-treated control.
Fig. S4. No effects of HA on the surface level of M-CSF receptor. BMMs were cultured with M-CSF (30 ng/ml) and RANKL (100 ng/ml) for 2 days in the absence or presence of HA (2 μg/ml). Cell surface expression of c-Fms, the M-CSF receptor, was analyzed by flow cytometry. Blue line, −HA; red line, +HA; black area, secondary Ab control.
| ||||||||||||||||||||