spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 5


Fig. 5. FGF2 and Ang-1 have additive effects on the maintenance of CLS in the absence of VEGF. (A) Phase-contrast micrographs of BREC after treatment for 2 days with VEGF plus FGF2 and an additional 2 days of VEGF neutralization, in the absence or presence of Ang1. (B) Neutralization of VEGF significantly decreased the length of CLS (*P<0.0001 compared to 2 days treatment with VEGF plus FGF2), whereas Ang1 provided partial protection from the regression, an effect not antagonized by Ang2 (**P<0.04). The angiopoietins did not significantly alter proliferation from that with VEGF-Trap plus FGF2 alone. (C) Phase-contrast micrographs of BREC after treatment for 2 days in the presence of VEGF followed by VEGF neutralization for an additional 2 days, in the absence or presence of Ang1. (D) All treatments with VEGF-Trap led to a significant reduction of CLS compared with baseline (VEGF after 2 days, P<0.0001). In combination with VEGF neutralization, Ang1 treatment led to significantly more CLS (*P<0.03 vs no angiopoietins), an effect that was not influenced by Ang2. Addition of FGF2 or angiopoietins did not significantly alter proliferation from that with VEGF-Trap alone. Concentrations of factors used: 25 ng/ml VEGF, 2.5 ng/ml FGF2, 1 ng/ml TGFβ1, 500 ng/ml Ang1, 500 ng/ml Ang2, and 1 µg/ml VEGF-Trap. Bar, 100 µm.





Right arrow Return to article