|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | |||||
First published online 14 August 2007
doi: 10.1242/jcs.004770
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Article |
1 Developmental Biology Program, Sloan-Kettering Institute, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021, USA
2 Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: blankenj{at}mskcc.org)
Accepted 14 June 2007
| Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key words: Epithelial polarity, Adherens junctions, Exocyst complex, Membrane trafficking, Apical-basal polarity
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Misregulation of Crumbs activity can have severe effects on cell and tissue function and is associated with human retinal diseases (Wodarz et al., 1995
; den Hollander et al., 1999
; Lu and Bilder, 2005
; Laprise et al., 2006
). Multiple mechanisms contribute to Crumbs localization, stability and activity to precisely control its function. The basolateral proteins Dlg, Lgl and Scrib oppose Crumbs activity and restrict its localization in the Drosophila embryo (Bilder et al., 2003
; Tanentzapf and Tepass, 2003
), and the Yurt FERM-domain protein associates with the Crumbs cytoplasmic domain and negatively regulates Crumbs activity at the apicolateral cell surface (Laprise et al., 2006
). Endocytosis of Crumbs protein is also required for tissue morphology, as mutations in the Avalanche syntaxin or the Rab5 GTPase lead to Crumbs accumulation and wing imaginal disc overgrowth (Lu and Bilder, 2005
). In addition, a complex containing the Rich1 Cdc42 GAP protein and the angiomotin scaffolding protein associates with cytoplasmic binding partners of Crumbs and provides a potential link between the Crumbs complex and the endocytic machinery (Wells et al., 2006
). However, the mechanisms that govern the delivery of Crumbs protein to the cell surface are not known.
The targeting of transmembrane proteins to specific destinations at the cell surface is a widely used mechanism for establishing cell polarity (Hsu et al., 1999
; Mostov et al., 2003
; Schuck and Simons, 2004
; Rodriguez-Boulan et al., 2005
). The spatial specificity of vesicle trafficking is thought to occur at a late step in this process through the tethering of exocytic vesicles at defined membrane sites by the eight-subunit exocyst (or Sec6/8) complex (Lipschutz and Mostov, 2002
; Whyte and Munro, 2002
). Exocyst components were originally identified based on their role in polarized secretion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Novick et al., 1980
) and were subsequently shown to form a complex that is highly conserved from yeast to mammals (TerBush and Novick, 1995
; TerBush et al., 1996
; Kee et al., 1997
; Grindstaff et al., 1998
; Guo et al., 1999
; Hsu et al., 1999
). In multicellular organisms, exocyst components are required for multiple developmental processes including epithelial polarity (Grindstaff et al., 1998
; Yeaman et al., 2001
; Langevin et al., 2005
), membrane integrity (Murthy and Schwarz, 2004
; Beronja et al., 2005
; Murthy et al., 2005
), photoreceptor morphogenesis (Beronja et al., 2005
), cell fate determination (Jafar-Nejad et al., 2005
) and synapse formation (Mehta et al., 2005
). These diverse functions demonstrate that polarized exocytosis is a fundamental mechanism for regulating cell morphology.
Here we provide evidence that the Drosophila homolog of the Exo84 exocyst complex subunit is essential for epithelial polarity and apical protein localization in the Drosophila embryo. In Exo84 mutants, adherens junction proteins become mislocalized along the apical-basal axis in a manner reminiscent of cells lacking the Crumbs apical determinant. Loss of Crumbs from the apical surface is the earliest defect detected in Exo84 mutants. Exo84 mutants at advanced stages of epithelial degeneration display defects in trafficking apical and junctional proteins from the recycling endosome to the cell surface. These results demonstrate that the Drosophila homolog of the exocyst complex subunit Exo84 plays an essential role in epithelial polarity by regulating the localization of the Crumbs apical determinant.
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To determine whether a disruption of intercellular adherens junctions accompanies the epithelial defects in onr mutant embryos, we analyzed the distribution of the core adherens junction proteins DE-cadherin and Armadillo/
-catenin. In wild-type embryos, DE-cadherin and Armadillo localize to the apical margin of lateral cell interfaces, whereas Neurotactin and filamentous actin localize to basolateral surfaces (Fig. 1D,G). In stage 10 onr mutants, Armadillo and DE-cadherin failed to accumulate apically and were instead present in prominent aggregates at random locations along the apical-basal axis (Fig. 1E,H; 56% of onr embryos displayed aberrant Armadillo localization, n=50). In z-projections of optical sections encompassing a depth of one cell diameter (5 µm), each cell appeared to associate with approximately one large junctional aggregate (Fig. 1F). By contrast, Neurotactin and filamentous actin were correctly localized to basolateral surfaces (Fig. 1E,H). These results demonstrate that the apical localization of adherens junction proteins is disrupted in onr mutant embryos.
onr encodes the Drosophila homolog of the Exo84 exocyst complex subunit
The onr142-5 mutation was mapped to the 96F;97A interval on chromosome III in the region of the Exo84 gene (Giansanti et al., 2004
). Exo84 encodes a protein with 27% identity to human and mouse Exo84 proteins and 18% identity to the S. cerevisiae Exo84 protein (supplementary material Fig. S1). Two lines of evidence indicate that onr142-5 is an allele of Exo84. First, a 4.5 kb genomic transgene containing the predicted Exo84 coding region, 1.5 kb of upstream promoter sequence, and 1 kb of downstream sequence fully rescued epithelial morphology in onr mutant embryos (Fig. 1I; 100% of Stage 10 progeny from onr hemizygous females bearing one copy of the rescuing transgene crossed to onr/+ males displayed wild-type epithelial morphology and DE-cadherin localization, n=56; compared with 44% without the transgene, n=50). The Exo84 genomic transgene also conferred partial rescue when supplied zygotically (82% of progeny from onr hemizygous females crossed to onr/+ males bearing the genomic transgene displayed wild-type epithelial morphology and DE-cadherin localization, n=50). Zygotic expression of the Exo84 genomic transgene allowed onr mutants to survive to adulthood (43% of adult progeny from onr hemizygous females crossed to onr/+ males bearing the genomic transgene were onr mutant, n=104). Moreover, a C
T mutation in the onr142-5 allele introduces a stop codon in the Exo84 coding region that is predicted to generate a truncated protein containing 581 of 672 amino acids. Although null mutations in other exocyst complex subunits cause developmental arrest in oogenesis (Murthy and Schwarz, 2004
; Beronja et al., 2005
; Murthy et al., 2005
), the production of eggs in onr142-5 mutants may be due to hypomorphic onr function. Consistent with this possibility, the male sterile phenotypes of onr142-5 hemizygotes were more severe than onr142-5 homozygotes (data not shown). These results provide strong evidence that onr142-5 represents a mutation in the Exo84 gene, which we refer to as Exo84onr.
Distinct patterns of adherens junction localization in mutants defective for apical or basolateral proteins
To determine whether the mislocalization of adherens junction proteins in Exo84 mutant embryos results indirectly from a disruption of apical-basal polarity, we compared the distribution of junctional proteins in Exo84 embryos with mutants defective for apical (crumbs) or basolateral (dlg and lgl) components. The DE-cadherin and Armadillo adherens junction proteins localize to the apical margin of contacting cell surfaces in wild-type embryos (Fig. 2A,B). In Exo84 and crumbs mutants, these proteins accumulated in isolated puncta at various locations along the basolateral membrane (Fig. 2C-F). Adherens junction proteins were correctly delivered to the plasma membrane during early embryonic stages in Exo84 and crumbs mutants, but subsequently became mislocalized at the cell surface (Fig. 2C-F). By contrast, in embryos maternally and zygotically defective for the basolateral Dlg or Lgl proteins, DE-cadherin and Armadillo were diffusely localized throughout the basolateral surface (Fig. 2G-J). The similar DE-cadherin and Armadillo distributions in Exo84 and crumbs mutants are consistent with a functional relationship between Exo84 and the Crumbs apical determinant.
|
Apical proteins are mislocalized before the disruption of adherens junctions in Exo84 mutants
The epithelial defects in Exo84 and crumbs mutant embryos suggest that Exo84 may contribute to specification of the epithelial apical domain. Consistent with this possibility, we found that apical protein localization is selectively disrupted in Exo84 mutants. In wild-type embryos, Bazooka, Crumbs, atypical protein kinase C (aPKC) and dPATJ localize to the apical margins of lateral cell surfaces (Fig. 3A-D) (Tepass, 1996
; Bhat et al., 1999
; Wodarz et al., 1999
; Wodarz et al., 2000
), in the vicinity of adherens junctions by confocal microscopy (Fig. 3K). By contrast, in Exo84 mutants, Bazooka, Crumbs, aPKC and dPATJ accumulated in large aggregates at ectopic locations along the apical-basal axis (Fig. 3E-H). Apical protein aggregates in Exo84 and crumbs mutants also frequently contained the junctional protein Armadillo (Fig. 3L,O,P). By contrast, Discs large often localized correctly to lateral surfaces in Exo84 mutant embryos, despite Bazooka mislocalization and the moderate loss of columnar structure in these embryos (Fig. 3I,J).
|
We found that Crumbs mislocalization is an early step in the loss of epithelial polarity in Exo84 mutants, before the disruption of adherens junction localization. In stage 9 Exo84 mutant embryos at an early stage of epithelial breakdown, cells with intact apical domains containing Crumbs, Bazooka, and Armadillo were juxtaposed with areas of disrupted epithelial morphology (Fig. 4B). Loss of Crumbs from the apical surface was observed in cells that retained apical Bazooka and Armadillo localization (Fig. 4B). In other areas of the epithelial layer, cells were identified that were depleted for Crumbs and Bazooka but maintained apicolateral Armadillo localization. Cells with apical Crumbs protein in the absence of Bazooka or Armadillo were not observed. By contrast, disruption of adherens junctions in armadillo or shotgun/DE-cadherin mutant embryos produced a distinct phenotype in which cells were either wild type in appearance or simultaneously defective for the localization of all three proteins (Fig. 4C,D). dPATJ mislocalization did not obviously precede loss of Crumbs in our observations (data not shown). These results indicate that junctional defects in Exo84 mutants first become evident after the loss of Crumbs from the cell surface and may initially occur as a consequence of Crumbs mislocalization.
|
|
Accumulation of intermediate vesicular compartments in Exo84 mutants
The exocyst complex is implicated in the delivery of vesicles to the plasma membrane from the recycling endosome and Golgi compartments (Grindstaff et al., 1998
; Beronja et al., 2005
; Langevin et al., 2005
), and mutations in exocyst proteins have been shown to disrupt recycling endosome morphology (Jafar-Nejad et al., 2005
; Langevin et al., 2005
). To investigate whether the vesicular trafficking machinery is disrupted in Exo84 mutants, we examined the distribution of Golgi, early endosomal and late endosomal compartments. The Golgi protein Lava lamp was present in vesicles throughout the cytoplasm in wild-type (Fig. 6B) and Exo84 mutant embryos (Fig. 6C), suggesting that Golgi structure is unaffected. However, we found that the localization of the recycling endosome protein Rab11 was substantially disrupted in Exo84 mutants. In wild-type embryos, Rab11 was present in numerous small puncta, predominantly enriched in the apical cytoplasm (Fig. 6D). In Exo84 mutants, Rab11-positive vesicles were aberrantly distributed in large irregularly shaped aggregates that appeared to consist of multiple small vesicles (Fig. 6E). These aggregates are not likely to represent a fusion of multiple endosomal compartments, because early endosomes visualized with Rab5-GFP and late endosomes labeled with antibodies to Hrs were maintained as separate compartments with distinct morphologies (Fig. 6H,J). Both early and late endosomes showed a tendency to form small aggregates in Exo84 mutant embryos, with Rab5 maintaining a more diffuse distribution than Hrs (Fig. 6H,J).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In contrast to the relatively specific mislocalization of Crumbs in stage 9 Exo84 mutant embryos, by late stage 10 these embryos display defects in the delivery of multiple proteins to the cell surface. Epithelial polarity and the distribution of apical and junctional proteins are established correctly in Exo84 mutants (Fig. 8A), either because these processes occur independently of Exo84 or because of residual Exo84 activity in this mutant background. The earliest defect observed in Exo84 mutants is a loss of Crumbs from the apical surface during epithelial maturation (Fig. 8B). As a likely consequence of the loss of cell-surface Crumbs localization, adherens junction proteins become mislocalized to varying positions along the basolateral cell membrane (Fig. 8B). Mutant embryos at later stages display a cytoplasmic accumulation of apical and adherens junction proteins in an expanded Rab11 recycling endosome compartment (Fig. 8C), consistent with a defect in vesicular transport to the cell surface. The failure to deliver junctional proteins to the cell surface is unlikely to result from a defect in Crumbs localization, because the cytoplasmic accumulation of junctional proteins does not occur in crumbs mutants. These results indicate that disruption of exocyst-dependent membrane trafficking ultimately results in the failure to deliver both apical and junctional proteins from the recycling endosome to the cell surface. The mislocalization of apical and junctional proteins in Exo84 mutant embryos is associated with a loss of columnar morphology, demonstrating that Exo84 activity is essential for epithelial organization.
|
Apical and basolateral proteins direct adherens junction localization through different mechanisms
A precise balance between apical and basolateral determination is essential for epithelial integrity and the placement of the zonula adherens in the Drosophila embryo (Bilder et al., 2003
; Tanentzapf and Tepass, 2003
). Here we demonstrate that this balance is actively maintained by Exo84-dependent localization of the Crumbs transmembrane protein to the apical cell surface. Loss of apical or basolateral identity leads to distinct patterns of junctional protein distribution, suggesting that the apical and basal limits of the zonula adherens are defined by different mechanisms. In crumbs mutants, DE-cadherin and Armadillo are restricted to focused puncta at varying locations at the cell surface. By contrast, in embryos defective for the basolateral proteins Dlg and Lgl, junctional proteins are dispersed along the plasma membrane rather than aggregating at a single site (Bilder et al., 2000
) (this study). A basolateral expansion of the apical Crumbs domain has also been reported in dlg and lgl mutants (Bilder et al., 2000
; Tanentzapf and Tepass, 2003
). These results suggest that basolateral proteins create a nonpermissive barrier to adherens junction expansion, whereas apical proteins may play a positive role in recruiting or stabilizing junctions at the apical cell surface. Consistent with this possibility, the apical Crumbs domain is closely apposed to the zonula adherens (Tepass, 1996
), and we found that Bazooka and Armadillo colocalize at the cell surface and in the cytoplasm of Exo84 mutant embryos. Exocyst-dependent trafficking of Crumbs to the apical surface may reinforce the apical epithelial domain and stabilize the apicolateral localization of the zonula adherens.
Exo84 is required for membrane trafficking from the recycling endosome to the cell surface
We show here that the recycling endosome is the primary vesicular compartment affected in embryos mutant for the exocyst subunit homolog Exo84, while Golgi, early endosomal and late endosomal compartments remain largely intact. Exocyst proteins are required for recycling endosome morphology in several epithelial and sensory cell types (Jafar-Nejad et al., 2005
; Langevin et al., 2005
) and the Rab11 recycling endosome protein can associate directly with the exocyst subunits Sec5 and Sec15 (Zhang et al., 2004
; Beronja et al., 2005
; Jafar-Nejad et al., 2005
; Langevin et al., 2005
; Wu et al., 2005
). We found that Rab11 vesicles in maturing embryonic epithelia are enriched in the apical cytoplasm, where they preferentially accumulate in the plane of the adherens junctions. Conversely, a basal expansion of recycling endosomes during cellularization correlates with a basal bias in membrane addition (Lecuit and Wieschaus, 2000
; Pelissier et al., 2003
). These results suggest that there is a spatial correlation between the sites of recycling endosome accumulation and the surface destinations of proteins trafficked through recycling endosomes. The redistribution of the recycling endosome compartment to the apical cytoplasm accompanies the transition from basolateral to apical membrane insertion and may reflect the onset of a critical requirement for Crumbs activity during epithelial maturation.
The exocyst is required for distinct properties of epithelial organization
The requirement for Exo84 in apical protein localization in the Drosophila embryo is distinct from exocyst functions in other epithelia, in which exocyst components are required for the localization of basolateral or junctional proteins (Grindstaff et al., 1998
; Yeaman et al., 2001
; Langevin et al., 2005
). Our results indicate that Exo84 is also required for delivery of DE-cadherin to the cell surface in the embryo, consistent with the demonstrated roles for Sec5, Sec6 and Sec15 in DE-cadherin trafficking in the pupal epithelium (Langevin et al., 2005
). However, although the mislocalization of the apical Crumbs protein is a primary defect of Exo84 mutant embryos, exocyst mutations do not appreciably affect Crumbs localization in pupal epithelial and photoreceptor cells (Beronja et al., 2005
; Langevin et al., 2005
). These results are consistent with a model in which distinct cargo proteins are trafficked by the exocyst complex in different cellular contexts. Alternatively, DE-cadherin and Crumbs may be delivered to the cell surface in an exocyst-dependent fashion in multiple cell types, but undergo different rates of turnover. For example, Crumbs may be dynamically trafficked in the embryo but stably maintained at the surface of pupal epithelial cells. Differential effects on specific target proteins are not atypical of exocyst function, because loss of Sec6 activity in Drosophila photoreceptor cells disrupts the localization of the rhabdomere proteins Chaoptin and Rhodopsin1, whereas the apical localization of Crumbs and DE-cadherin occurs normally (Beronja et al., 2005
). The Drosophila embryonic epithelium undergoes pronounced changes in structure and organization during development that rely on a balance between apical and basolateral surface domains. A requirement for exocyst-dependent Crumbs trafficking during this process may facilitate the dynamic remodeling of epithelial polarity during morphogenesis.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Transgenic rescue experiments
A 4.5 kb EcoRI-NcoI genomic fragment was subcloned from BACR13F13 into pCasper4. Exo84 was the only complete predicted open reading frame in this genomic fragment. Transgenic stocks expressing this transgene were crossed to onr142-5 and assayed for rescue of embryonic lethality and epithelial disruption.
Immunohistochemistry
Unless otherwise specified, embryos were fixed by heat-methanol fixation (Muller and Wieschaus, 1996
). Embryos stained with antibodies to Dlg and
-galactosidase were fixed for 25 minutes in 3.7% formaldehyde/PBS:heptane and devitellinized in heptane:methanol. Embryos stained for F-actin and DE-cadherin were fixed for 1 hour in 3.7% formaldehyde/0.1M sodium phosphate buffer:heptane and manually devitellinized.
The following antibodies were used: rabbit anti-Arm [1:200 (Riggleman et al., 1990
)], rabbit anti-Baz [1:1000 (Wodarz et al., 1999
)], guinea pig anti-Baz [1:500, made by JAZ as described in Wodarz et al. (Wodarz et al., 1999
)], mouse anti-Crb (1:1, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, DSHB), mouse anti-Dlg (1:5, DSHB), mouse anti-
-Galactosidase (1:20, DSHB), mouse anti-Neurotactin (1:200, DSHB), rat anti-DEcadherin [1:100, DSHB (Oda et al., 1994
)], rabbit anti-Rab11 [1:500 (Satoh et al., 2005
)], rabbit anti-dPATJ [1:1000 (Bhat et al., 1999
)], guinea pig anti-Hrs [1:500 (Lloyd et al., 2002
)], rabbit anti-Lva [1:1000 (Sisson et al., 2000
)] and rabbit anti-
-Galactosidase (1:1000, Cappell). F-actin was visualized with Alexa Fluor 488-labelled phalloidin (1:1000). Secondary antibodies were conjugated to Alexa Fluor-488, -568 and -647 (Molecular Probes). Embryos were mounted in ProLong Gold with DAPI and imaged on a Zeiss LSM510 META confocal with a PlanNeo 40x/1.3NA objective. Images represent 1 µm optical sections and z-stacks were acquired at 0.5 µm steps. Figures were assembled in Adobe Photoshop and Illustrator.
Cuticle preparation
Aged embryos (
48 hours after egg laying) were dechorionated in 50% bleach, mounted in Hoyer's:Lactic acid and baked overnight at 60°C. Phase-contrast images were obtained on a Zeiss AxioImager microscope with a PlanApo 10x/0.3NA Ph1 objective and an AxioCam MRC camera using AxioVision software.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bachmann, A., Schneider, M., Theilenberg, E., Grawe, F. and Knust, E. (2001). Drosophila Stardust is a partner of Crumbs in the control of epithelial cell polarity. Nature 414, 638-643.[CrossRef][Medline]
Beronja, S., Laprise, P., Papoulas, O., Pellikka, M., Sisson, J. and Tepass, U. (2005). Essential function of Drosophila Sec6 in apical exocytosis of epithelial photoreceptor cells. J. Cell Biol. 169, 635-646.
Betschinger, J., Mechtler, K. and Knoblich, J. A. (2003). The Par complex directs asymmetric cell division by phosphorylating the cytoskeletal protein Lgl. Nature 422, 326-330.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bhat, M. A., Izaddoost, S., Lu, Y., Cho, K. O., Choi, K. W. and Bellen, H. J. (1999). Discs Lost, a novel multi-PDZ domain protein, establishes and maintains epithelial polarity. Cell 96, 833-845.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bilder, D. (2004). Epithelial polarity and proliferation control: links from the Drosophila neoplastic tumor suppressors. Genes Dev. 18, 1909-1925.
Bilder, D. and Perrimon, N. (2000). Localization of apical epithelial determinants by the basolateral PDZ protein Scribble. Nature 403, 676-678.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bilder, D., Li, M. and Perrimon, N. (2000). Cooperative regulation of cell polarity and growth by Drosophila tumor suppressors. Science 289, 113-116.
Bilder, D., Schober, M. and Perrimon, N. (2003). Integrated activity of PDZ protein complexes regulates epithelial polarity. Nat. Cell Biol. 5, 53-58.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chou, T. B. and Perrimon, N. (1996). The autosomal FLP-DFS technique for generating germline mosaics in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 144, 1673-1679.[Abstract]
den Hollander, A. I., ten Brink, J. B., de Kok, Y. J., van Soest, S., van den Born, L. I., van Driel, M. A., van de Pol, D. J., Payne, A. M., Bhattacharya, S. S., Kellner, U. et al. (1999). Mutations in a human homologue of Drosophila crumbs cause retinitis pigmentosa (RP12). Nat. Genet. 23, 217-221.[CrossRef][Medline]
Giansanti, M. G., Farkas, R. M., Bonaccorsi, S., Lindsley, D. L., Wakimoto, B. T., Fuller, M. T. and Gatti, M. (2004). Genetic dissection of meiotic cytokinesis in Drosophila males. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 2509-2522.
Grawe, F., Wodarz, A., Lee, B., Knust, E. and Skaer, H. (1996). The Drosophila genes crumbs and stardust are involved in the biogenesis of adherens junctions. Development 122, 951-959.[Abstract]
Grindstaff, K. K., Yeaman, C., Anandasabapathy, N., Hsu, S. C., Rodriguez-Boulan, E., Scheller, R. H. and Nelson, W. J. (1998). Sec6/8 complex is recruited to cell-cell contacts and specifies transport vesicle delivery to the basal-lateral membrane in epithelial cells. Cell 93, 731-740.[CrossRef][Medline]
Guo, W., Grant, A. and Novick, P. (1999). Exo84p is an exocyst protein essential for secretion. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 23558-23564.
Hsu, S. C., Hazuka, C. D., Foletti, D. L. and Scheller, R. H. (1999). Targeting vesicles to specific sites on the plasma membrane: the role of the sec6/8 complex. Trends Cell Biol. 9, 150-153.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jafar-Nejad, H., Andrews, H. K., Acar, M., Bayat, V., Wirtz-Peitz, F., Mehta, S. Q., Knoblich, J. A. and Bellen, H. J. (2005). Sec15, a component of the exocyst, promotes notch signaling during the asymmetric division of Drosophila sensory organ precursors. Dev. Cell 9, 351-363.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kee, Y., Yoo, J. S., Hazuka, C. D., Peterson, K. E., Hsu, S. C. and Scheller, R. H. (1997). Subunit structure of the mammalian exocyst complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 14438-14443.
Knust, E. and Bossinger, O. (2002). Composition and formation of intercellular junctions in epithelial cells. Science 298, 1955-1959.
Langevin, J., Morgan, M. J., Sibarita, J. B., Aresta, S., Murthy, M., Schwarz, T., Camonis, J. and Bellaiche, Y. (2005). Drosophila exocyst components Sec5, Sec6, and Sec15 regulate DE-cadherin trafficking from recycling endosomes to the plasma membrane. Dev. Cell 9, 355-376.[Medline]
Laprise, P., Beronja, S., Silva-Gagliardi, N. F., Pellikka, M., Jensen, A. M., McGlade, C. J. and Tepass, U. (2006). The FERM protein Yurt is a negative regulatory component of the Crumbs complex that controls epithelial polarity and apical membrane size. Dev. Cell 11, 363-374.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lecuit, T. and Wieschaus, E. (2000). Polarized insertion of new membrane from a cytoplasmic reservoir during cleavage of the Drosophila embryo. J. Cell Biol. 150, 849-860.
Lipschutz, J. H. and Mostov, K. E. (2002). Exocytosis: the many masters of the exocyst. Curr. Biol. 12, 212-214.[CrossRef]
Lloyd, T. E., Atkinson, R., Wu, M. N., Zhou, Y., Pennetta, G. and Bellen, H. J. (2002). Hrs regulates endosome membrane invagination and tyrosine kinase receptor signaling in Drosophila. Cell 108, 261-269.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lu, H. and Bilder, D. (2005). Endocytic control of epithelial polarity and proliferation in Drosophila. Nat. Cell Biol. 7, 1232-1239.[Medline]
Mehta, S. Q., Hiesinger, P. R., Beronja, S., Zhai, R. G., Schulze, K. L., Verstreken, P., Cao, Y., Zhou, Y., Tepass, U., Crair, M. C. et al. (2005). Mutations in Drosophila sec15 reveal a function in neuronal targeting for a subset of exocyst components. Neuron 46, 219-232.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mostov, K., Su, T. and ter Beest, M. (2003). Polarized epithelial membrane traffic: conservation and plasticity. Nat. Cell Biol. 5, 287-293.[CrossRef][Medline]
Muller, H. A. (2003). Epithelial polarity in flies: more than just crumbs. Dev. Cell 4, 1-3.[CrossRef][Medline]
Muller, H. A. and Wieschaus, E. (1996). armadillo, bazooka, and stardust are critical for early stages in formation of the zonula adherens and maintenance of the polarized blastoderm epithelium in Drosophila. J. Cell Biol. 134, 149-163.
Murthy, M. and Schwarz, T. L. (2004). The exocyst component Sec5 is required for membrane traffic and polarity in the Drosophila ovary. Development 131, 377-388.
Murthy, M., Ranjan, R., Denef, N., Higashi, M. E., Schupbach, T. and Schwarz, T. L. (2005). Sec6 mutations and the Drosophila exocyst complex. J. Cell Sci. 118, 1139-1150.
Nam, S. C. and Choi, K. W. (2006). Domain-specific early and late function of Dpatj in Drosophila photoreceptor cells. Dev. Dyn. 235, 1501-1507.[CrossRef][Medline]
Novick, P., Field, C. and Schekman, R. (1980). Identification of 23 complementation groups required for post-translational events in the yeast secretory pathway. Cell 21, 205-215.[CrossRef][Medline]
Oda, H., Uemura, T., Harada, Y., Iwai, Y. and Takeichi, M. (1994). A Drosophila homolog of cadherin associated with armadillo and essential for embryonic cell-cell adhesion. Dev. Biol. 165, 716-726.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pelissier, A., Chauvin, J. P. and Lecuit, T. (2003). Trafficking through Rab11 endosomes is required for cellularization during Drosophila embryogenesis. Curr. Biol. 13, 1848-1857.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pellikka, M., Tanentzapf, G., Pinto, M., Smith, C., McGlade, C. J., Ready, D. F. and Tepass, U. (2002). Crumbs, the Drosophila homologue of human CRB1/RP12, is essential for photoreceptor morphogenesis. Nature 416, 143-149.[CrossRef][Medline]
Riggleman, B., Schedl, P. and Wieschaus, E. (1990). Spatial expression of the Drosophila segment polarity gene armadillo is post-transcriptionally regulated by wingless. Cell 63, 549-560.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rodriguez-Boulan, E., Musch, A. and Le Bivic, A. (2004). Epithelial trafficking: new routes to familiar places. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 16, 436-442.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rodriguez-Boulan, E., Kreitzer, G. and Musch, A. (2005). Organization of vesicular trafficking in epithelia. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 233-247.[CrossRef][Medline]
Satoh, A. K., O'Tousa, J. E., Ozaki, K. and Ready, D. F. (2005). Rab11 mediates post-Golgi trafficking of rhodopsin to the photosensitive apical membrane of Drosophila photoreceptors. Development 132, 1487-1497.
Schuck, S. and Simons, K. (2004). Polarized sorting in epithelial cells: raft clustering and the biogenesis of the apical membrane. J. Cell Sci. 117, 5955-5964.
Sisson, J. C., Field, C., Ventura, R., Royou, A. and Sullivan, W. (2000). Lava lamp, a novel peripheral golgi protein, is required for Drosophila melanogaster cellularization. J. Cell Biol. 151, 905-918.
Tanentzapf, G. and Tepass, U. (2003). Interactions between the crumbs, lethal giant larvae and bazooka pathways in epithelial polarization. Nat. Cell Biol. 5, 46-52.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tepass, U. (1996). Crumbs, a component of the apical membrane, is required for zonula adherens formation in primary epithelia of Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 177, 217-225.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tepass, U. and Hartenstein, V. (1994). The development of cellular junctions in the Drosophila embryo. Dev. Biol. 161, 563-596.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tepass, U., Theres, C. and Knust, E. (1990). crumbs encodes an EGF-like protein expressed on apical membranes of Drosophila epithelial cells and required for organization of epithelia. Cell 61, 787-799.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tepass, U., Tanentzapf, G., Ward, R. and Fehon, R. (2001). Epithelial cell polarity and cell junctions in Drosophila. Annu. Rev. Genet. 35, 747-784.[CrossRef][Medline]
TerBush, D. R. and Novick, P. (1995). Sec6, Sec8, and Sec15 are components of a multisubunit complex which localizes to small bud tips in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 130, 299-312.
TerBush, D. R., Maurice, T., Roth, D. and Novick, P. (1996). The Exocyst is a multiprotein complex required for exocytosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 15, 6483-6494.[Medline]
Wells, C. D., Fawcett, J. P., Traweger, A., Yamanaka, Y., Goudreault, M., Elder, K., Kulkarni, S., Gish, G., Virag, C., Lim, C. et al. (2006). Rich1/Amot complex regulates the Cdc42 GTPase and apical-polarity proteins in epithelial cells. Cell 125, 535-548.[CrossRef][Medline]
Whyte, J. R. and Munro, S. (2002). Vesicle tethering complexes in membrane traffic. J. Cell Sci. 115, 2627-2637.
Wodarz, A., Hinz, U., Engelbert, M. and Knust, E. (1995). Expression of crumbs confers apical character on plasma membrane domains of ectodermal epithelia of Drosophila. Cell 82, 67-76.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wodarz, A., Ramrath, A., Kuchinke, U. and Knust, E. (1999). Bazooka provides an apical cue for Inscuteable localization in Drosophila neuroblasts. Nature 402, 544-547.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wodarz, A., Ramrath, A., Grimm, A. and Knust, E. (2000). Drosophila atypical protein kinase C associates with Bazooka and controls polarity of epithelia and neuroblasts. J. Cell Biol. 150, 1361-1374.
Woods, D. F., Wu, J. W. and Bryant, P. J. (1997). Localization of proteins to the apico-lateral junctions of Drosophila epithelia. Dev. Genet. 20, 111-118.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wu, S., Mehta, S. Q., Pichaud, F., Bellen, H. J. and Quiocho, F. A. (2005). Sec15 interacts with Rab11 via a novel domain and affects Rab11 localization in vivo. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 879-885.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wucherpfennig, T., Wilsch-Brauninger, M. and Gonzalez-Gaitan, M. (2003). Role of Drosophila Rab5 during endosomal trafficking at the synapse and evoked neurotransmitter release. J. Cell Biol. 161, 609-624.
Yeaman, C., Grindstaff, K. K., Wright, J. R. and Nelson, W. J. (2001). Sec6/8 complexes on trans-Golgi network and plasma membrane regulate late stages of exocytosis in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 155, 593-604.
Zhang, X. M., Ellis, S., Sriratana, A., Mitchell, C. A. and Rowe, T. (2004). Sec15 is an effector for the Rab11 GTPase in mammalian cells. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 43027-43034.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. A. Kaplan, X. Liu, and N. S. Tolwinski Epithelial Polarity: Interactions Between Junctions and Apical-Basal Machinery Genetics, November 1, 2009; 183(3): 897 - 904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Orlando and W. Guo Membrane Organization and Dynamics in Cell Polarity Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, November 1, 2009; 1(5): a001321 - a001321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Campbell, E. Knust, and H. Skaer Crumbs stabilises epithelial polarity during tissue remodelling J. Cell Sci., August 1, 2009; 122(15): 2604 - 2612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. Nelson Remodeling Epithelial Cell Organization: Transitions Between Front-Rear and Apical-Basal Polarity Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, July 1, 2009; 1(1): a000513 - a000513. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Lalli RalA and the exocyst complex influence neuronal polarity through PAR-3 and aPKC J. Cell Sci., May 15, 2009; 122(10): 1499 - 1506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Duncan and M. Peifer Regulating polarity by directing traffic: Cdc42 prevents adherens junctions from Crumblin' aPart J. Cell Biol., December 15, 2008; 183(6): 971 - 974. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. P. Harris and U. Tepass Cdc42 and Par proteins stabilize dynamic adherens junctions in the Drosophila neuroectoderm through regulation of apical endocytosis J. Cell Biol., December 15, 2008; 183(6): 1129 - 1143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. Blankenship, M. T. Fuller, and J. A. Zallen The Drosophila homolog of the Exo84 exocyst subunit promotes apical epithelial identity Development, September 15, 2007; 134(18): e1 - e1. [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||