spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 4


Fig. 4. Identifying sites by correlative microscopy and in unpermeabilised cells. (A-E) Permeabilised HeLa cells were allowed to extend nascent transcripts in BrUTP, and the resulting BrRNA indirectly immunolabelled with Cy3; cells were then embedded, sectioned (70 nm), and images of the same sections collected by fluorescence and electron microscopy. (A) Merge of fluorescence and –155 eV EM images; sites containing nascent BrRNA (yellow) are scattered throughout the nucleoplasm (grey). Insets, selected areas shown in B-E. (B) Collage of ESI merges (P, red; N, green) of the same region. (C-E) Typical ESI merges (P, red; N, green) of regions shown in insets in A and B. (F-H) Cells were directly fixed, sectioned (without immunolabelling), P and N maps collected and merged, perimeters around N-rich regions mapped (as in Fig. 3C), and nucleoplasmic structures with diameters and P:N ratios typical of active transcription sites (i.e. >40 nm and 0.38±0.1) selected; three examples are shown. These sites by definition have similar diameters and P:N ratios to their labelled counterparts in permeabilised cells; they also have similar textures. Scale bars: 1 µm (A,B); 100 nm (C-H).





Right arrow Return to article