(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)
Click on image to view larger version.

Fig. 1. CD9 alters the localization and presentation of TGF
. MDCK cells stably expressing CD9 or TGF
, or coexpressing CD9 and TGF
were analyzed. (A) Cells were fixed, permeabilized, stained and analyzed by confocal immunofluorescence microscopy (green, CD9; red, TGF
). (B) Cell-surface immunostaining of TGF
of MDCK cells that express TGF
, or CD9 and TGF
together. Top panels show cell-surface staining of non-permeabilized cells on ice, whereas the lower panels shows total immunofluorescence for TGF
of permeabilized and fixed cells. The middle panels show phase-contrast microscopy of the stained cells in the top panels. (C) The cell-surface proteins labeled by biotinylation were subjected to immunoprecipitation for TGF
, thus showing the level of cell-surface TGF
in cells expressing CD9, TGF
, or CD9 and TGF
together (top panel). Middle and lower panels show immunoblotting for the expression levels of total TGF
and CD9, respectively. Arrows in the middle panel mark the three differentially processed TGF
forms (Bringman et al., 1987; Shi et al., 2000) (see also Fig. 2A). The arrow in the upper panel marks biotinylated cell-surface TGF
, corresponding to unglycosylated transmembrane TGF
without its pre-sequence (Bringman et al., 1987); this band corresponds to the lower one in the middle panel. (D) CD9 does not alter the distribution of TGF
that lacks the TGF
core sequence. MDCK cells stably expressing CD9, TGF
E or both were fixed, permeabilized, stained and analyzed by confocal immunofluorescence microscopy (green, CD9; red, TGF
E).