spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 4


Fig. 4. CED-9-altered mitochondria can be partially suppressed by co-expression of DRP-1. (A) Co-expression of DRP-1 and CED-9 from the same transgene resulted in three classes of mitochondrial morphology: tubular, fragmented and interconnected (percentages represent the mean value of three independently generated transgenic lines; raw data is presented in C and Table S1 in supplementary material). These three phenotypes suggest that increased DRP-1 expression is able to partially suppress the effects of CED-9 on mitochondria, or vice-versa. n, nucleus. Bar, 10 µm. (B) Structure of CED-9 (yellow surface) bound to a portion of the BH3 containing protein EGL-1 (blue ribbon) (1TY4.pdb). In the gain-of-function ced-9(n1950sd) allele, glycine 169, which resides in the CED-9 BH3 binding pocket, is mutated to glutamate (G169E). This mutation has been reported to decrease EGL-1 binding to CED-9 (del Peso et al., 2000). (C) Co-expression of DRP-1 and CED-9(G169E) from the same transgene also resulted in three classes of mitochondrial morphology. (D) Each point represents the proportion of cells with interconnected mitochondria from an independently generated transgenic line; the mean value is indicated by a horizontal bar, and error bars represent the standard error. No mean was calculated for the CED-9(G169E) construct because of the apparent bimodal distribution. This variation among lines expressing CED-9(G169E) was examined by western blot analysis (Fig. S4 in supplementary material). The difference in proportions between co-expression of DRP-1 with CED-9 and co-expression of DRP-1 with CED-9(G169E) is significant, z=2.59, P<0.01. (E) The GTPase activity of 2.5 µM human DRP1 was assayed using a continuous assay coupled to a regenerative system. (F) The amount of GTP hydrolyzed by 2.5 µM human DRP1 with 12.5 µM CED-9 after 40 minutes (296±23 µM) was significantly higher than the amount of GTP hydrolyzed by 2.5 µM human DRP1 alone after 40 minutes (221±17 µM), t(4)=4.56, P<0.025.





Right arrow Return to article