spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 7 October 2008
doi: 10.1242/jcs.026351

Journal of Cell Science 121, 3541-3552 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jcs.026351v1
121/21/3541    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neilsen, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Callen, D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Neilsen, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Callen, D. F.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*Protein
*UniGene
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
*Genetics Home Reference
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Article

Identification of ANKRD11 as a p53 coactivator

Paul M. Neilsen1,*, Kelly M. Cheney1, Chia-Wei Li2, J. Don Chen2, Jacqueline E. Cawrse1, Renée B. Schulz1, Jason A. Powell3, Raman Kumar1 and David F. Callen1

1 Breast Cancer Genetics Group, Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories, Discipline of Medicine, University of Adelaide and Hanson Institute, IMVS, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
2 Department of Pharmacology, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ 08854-5635, USA
3 Cytokine Receptor Laboratory, Department of Human Immunology, Hanson Institute, IMVS, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: Paul.Neilsen{at}imvs.sa.gov.au)

Accepted 29 July 2008


   Summary
Top
 Summary
Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Materials and Methods
 References
 
The ability of p53 to act as a transcription factor is critical for its function as a tumor suppressor. Ankyrin repeat domain 11, ANKRD11 (also known as ANR11 or ANCO1), was found to be a novel p53-interacting protein that enhanced the transcriptional activity of p53. ANKRD11 expression was shown to be downregulated in breast cancer cell lines. Restoration of ANKRD11 expression in MCF-7 (wild-type p53) and MDA-MB-468 (p53R273H mutant) cells suppressed their proliferative and clonogenic properties through enhancement of CDKN1A (p21waf1/CIP1) expression. ShRNA-mediated silencing of ANKRD11 expression reduced the ability of p53 to activate CDKN1A expression. ANKRD11 was shown to associate with the p53 acetyltransferases and cofactors, P/CAF and hADA3. Exogenous ANKRD11 expression enhanced the levels of acetylated p53 in both MCF-7 and MDA-MB-468 cells. ANKRD11 enhanced the DNA-binding properties of mutant p53R273H to the CDKN1A promoter, suggesting that ANKRD11 can mediate the restoration of normal p53 function in some cancer-related p53 mutations. In addition, ANKRD11 itself was found to be a novel p53 target gene. These findings demonstrate a role for ANKRD11 as a p53 coactivator and suggest the involvement of ANKRD11 in a regulatory feedback loop with p53.

Key words: Acetylation, Ankyrin repeat domain protein, Breast cancer, p53, p53 mutant rescue


   Introduction
Top
 Summary
 Introduction
Results
 Discussion
 Materials and Methods
 References
 
The p53 protein is the most important tumor suppressor in the cell and is described as `the guardian of the genome' (Lane, 1992Go). The function of p53 is predominantly dependent on its activity as a sequence-specific transcription factor, controlling the expression of various target genes that mediate biological functions such as cell-cycle arrest, apoptosis, senescence, differentiation, DNA repair and inhibition of angiogenesis and metastasis (Liu and Chen, 2006Go). Approximately 50% of all cancers contain a mutation in the TP53 gene (Vogelstein et al., 2000Go). The six most frequently occurring tumorigenic mutations of p53 cluster within the DNA-binding surface, involving residues that either directly contact DNA (`DNA-contact' mutations – residues R248 and R273) or perturb the structural integrity of the DNA-binding surface of p53 (`structural' mutations – residues R175, G245, R249 and R282) (Bullock and Fersht, 2001Go). DNA-contact mutants generally retain a similar structural integrity and thermodynamic stability to that displayed by wild-type p53; however, the mutation might significantly impair or even completely abrogate its ability to interact with its cognate DNA-response element (Bullock et al., 2000Go). Rescue of DNA-contact mutants has been demonstrated through restoration of their DNA-binding affinities following treatment with a p53-derived C-terminal peptide (Selivanova et al., 1997Go), small p53-activating molecules (CP-257042, CP-31398 and PRIMA-1) (Bykov et al., 2002Go; Foster et al., 1999Go) or the introduction of second site suppressor mutations (Brachmann et al., 1998Go). Despite these recent advances, the development of successful pharmacological therapeutics designed to rescue p53 DNA-contact mutants has proven to be a challenging task because of the complex biomechanistics that occur during the restoration of mutant p53 function.

The p53 transcription factor is stabilized and activated in response to various forms of intracellular or extracellular stress. Stabilization and activation of p53 occurs through a complex pattern of post-translational modifications, including phosphorylation and acetylation. The acetylation of specific lysine residues of p53 is mediated by several acetyltransferases, including p300/CBP (Lys164, Lys370, Lys372, Lys373, Lys381, Lys382 and Lys386), Tip60/hMOF (Lys120) and P/CAF (Lys320) (Gu and Roeder, 1997Go; Sakaguchi et al., 1998Go; Sykes et al., 2006Go; Tang et al., 2008Go). Earlier studies have shown that acetylation of p53 promotes its ability to bind its cognate DNA-response element in vitro (Gu and Roeder, 1997Go; Sakaguchi et al., 1998Go); however, these findings are not consistent with recent in vivo data (Liu and Chen, 2006Go; Tang et al., 2008Go; Toledo and Wahl, 2006Go). It has since been shown that the critical function of acetylation in vivo is not to enhance the DNA-binding affinity of p53, but rather to enhance its interaction with coactivators or histone acetyltransferases (HATs) (Barlev et al., 2001Go), or perturb its interaction with Mdm2 (Tang et al., 2008Go) at the promoters of p53-responsive genes. Recent evidence also suggests that acetylation of specific lysine residues in p53 may influence the selection of specific p53 target genes, resulting in induction of either growth arrest or apoptotic pathways (Di Stefano et al., 2005Go). hADA3 (alteration/deficiency in activation) has been identified as a novel p53-interacting protein capable of recruiting p300/CBP and P/CAF to p53 (Wang et al., 2001Go). Ectopic expression of hADA3 increased the stability and transcriptional activity of p53, and was shown to have an essential role in p53 acetylation (Wang et al., 2001Go). Nevertheless, we currently do not have a comprehensive understanding of the complex molecular mechanisms involved in the regulation of p53 acetylation.

ANKRD11 was initially selected as a candidate breast cancer tumor suppressor gene because of its location within the 16q24.3 breast cancer LOH (loss of heterozygosity) region (Powell et al., 2002Go). LOH of human chromosome 16q occurs in at least half of all breast tumors (Miller et al., 2003Go) and cytogenetic studies have implicated this to be an early event in breast carcinogenesis (Gong et al., 2001Go). ANKRD11 (also termed ANCO1; official protein symbol ANR11) was also reported to interact with and suppress the function of the p160 coactivator family, including the oncogene AIB1 (amplified in breast cancer-1) (Zhang et al., 2004Go). AIB1 enhances ligand-dependent transactivation of steroid nuclear receptors, including estrogen receptor (ER), and is frequently amplified and overexpressed in breast and ovarian cancers (Anzick et al., 1997Go). ANKRD11 was reported to recruit histone deacetylases (HDACs) through its C-terminus to the AIB1/nuclear receptor complex, resulting in the inhibition of ligand-dependent transactivation (Zhang et al., 2004Go). Based on these findings, we investigated whether ANKRD11 has properties similar to that of a breast cancer tumor suppressor.

In this study we report the functional characterization of ANKRD11 as a novel p53-interacting protein. We find that ANKRD11 increases the acetylation of p53, potentiating the DNA-binding property and transcriptional activity of p53. Findings from this study suggest that ANKRD11 might have a crucial role in p53-mediated tumor suppression and might also be implicated in the restoration of mutant p53R273H function. We also show that ANKRD11 itself is a novel p53 target gene.


   Results
Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Results
Discussion
 Materials and Methods
 References
 
ANKRD11 associates with p53, p14ARF and PML in extranucleolar inclusions
To gain insight into the functional role of ANKRD11, we investigated its subcellular localization in breast epithelial cells. GFP-ANKRD11 was retrovirally expressed in MCF-10A, a nonmalignant human breast epithelial cell. Fluorescent and phase-contrast microscopy showed that the GFP-ANKRD11 protein forms distinct foci within the nuclei of MCF-10A cells (Fig. 1A). Subsequent counterstaining with the nucleolar marker nucleophosmin revealed that these domains were distinct from nucleoli (Fig. 1A).


Figure 1
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 1. ANKRD11 associates with p14ARF, p53 and PML in extranucleolar inclusions. (A) GFP-ANKRD11 localizes to subnuclear domains that are visible using phase-contrast microscopy (upper panels). MCF-10A cells were transduced with a recombinant retrovirus expressing GFP-ANKRD11, selected in geneticin and imaged using confocal microscopy. MCF-10A cells stably expressing GFP-ANKRD11 were immunostained with anti-nucleophosmin antibody (nucleolar marker; red) and DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; DNA; blue) (lower panels). (B) Endogenous ANKRD11 colocalizes with p53. MCF-10A cells were either untreated or treated with mitomycin C (20 µg/ml) for 6 hours and immunostained with anti-ANKRD11 and anti-p53 (Ab-5) antibodies. The relative p53 protein levels in these cells with up to 6 hours of mitomycin C treatment was determined by western blot analysis using an anti-p53 antibody. β-actin was used as a loading control. (C) ANKRD11-myc localized exclusively to p14ARF-positive extranucleolar inclusions. HEK293T cells were transiently transfected with constructs expressing GFP-p14ARF and ANKRD11-myc. GFP-p14ARF localized to both nucleoli (hollow arrowheads) and extranucleolar inclusions (filled arrowheads). Localization of ANKRD11-myc was determined through immunostaining with anti-myc antibody. (D) Endogenous PML colocalizes with p14ARF and ANKRD11-myc in extranucleolar inclusions. HEK293T cells from C, ectopically expressing GFP-p14ARF and ANKRD11-myc, were immunostained with anti-myc and anti-PML antibodies.

 
Recent studies refer to the above-mentioned domains as `extranucleolar inclusions' (Kashuba et al., 2003Go). These extranucleolar domains have been reported to house several crucial cell cycle proteins, including p53, p14ARF and the promyelocytic leukemia (PML) protein. To investigate if ANKRD11 associates with these proteins within extranucleolar inclusions, we determined the localization of endogenous ANKRD11 and p53 in MCF-10A cells in the presence or absence of mitomycin C, a DNA-damaging agent that induces elevated levels of p53 protein. Our findings show that endogenous ANKRD11 and p53 colocalize within nuclear foci, and this interaction is enhanced in the presence of elevated p53 protein levels in response to mitomycin C treatment (Fig. 1B). Similar findings were observed using an alternative anti-p53 antibody (supplementary material Fig. S1). It has also been previously reported that exogenous p14ARF localizes to both extranucleolar inclusions and the nucleolus (Kashuba et al., 2003Go). ANKRD11-myc and GFP-p14ARF were ectopically expressed in HEK293T cells and imaged using confocal microscopy (Fig. 1C). Coimmunolocalization results showed that ANKRD11-myc localized exclusively to extranucleolar p14ARF foci (filled arrowheads), but not to the larger nucleolar p14ARF foci (open arrowheads). Endogenous PML counterstaining showed that PML bodies were also recruited to ANKRD11/p14ARF-positive extranucleolar inclusions (Fig. 1D) as previously reported (Kashuba et al., 2003Go). In the absence of exogenous p14ARF, ANKRD11 nuclear foci were observed to exhibit only partial colocalization with PML bodies during late G2 phase of the cell cycle (data not shown). This observation suggests that the association of ANKRD11-PML complex is enhanced in the presence of p14ARF. The location of nucleoli in these cells was determined through detection of nucleophosmin, and nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. Further studies were undertaken using glycerol gradient centrifugation of lysates of MCF-7 cells stably expressing GFP-ANKRD11-myc. Both p53 and PML cofractionated with ANKRD11-myc (supplementary material Fig. S2), providing preliminary evidence that these proteins may coexist as a complex. Detection of p14ARF in these fractions was not possible because the MCF-7 cell line does not express endogenous p14ARF as a result of deletion of the CDKN2A locus (Stott et al., 1998Go).

ANKRD11 interacts with p53 in vivo and in vitro through the ankyrin repeat domain
Coimmunoprecipitation experiments were used to determine whether ANKRD11 interacts with p53 in vivo. Endogenous p53 was detected in protein complexes immunoprecipitated using an anti-ANKRD11 antibody from protein lysates of MCF-7 cells transduced with recombinant retroviruses expressing GFP-ANKRD11 and treated with mitomycin C for 6 hours (Fig. 2A, upper panel). Similar results were observed after immunoprecipitation of endogenous ANKRD11 from HEK293T cell lysates (Fig. 2A, lower panel). This interaction was specific, because p53 was not detected in complexes immunoprecipitated with preimmune serum. To further map the region of ANKRD11 that interacts with p53, HEK293T cells were transfected with constructs expressing Flag-tagged ANKRD11 regions. Anti-Flag immunoprecipitation of these fragments showed that endogenous p53 interacts with the 817 N-terminal residues of the ANKRD11 protein (Fig. 2B).


Figure 2
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 2. ANKRD11 interacts with p53 in vivo and in vitro via the ANK domain. (A) ANKRD11 coimmunoprecipitates with endogenous p53. Protein complexes from either MCF-7 (retroviral-mediated GFP-ANKRD11 expression; mitomycin C treated for 6 hours) or HEK293T cell lysates (endogenous ANKRD11) were immunoprecipitated using an anti-ANKRD11 antibody or pre-immune serum. Immunoprecipitated protein complexes were analyzed by western blot analysis using the indicated antibodies. WB, western blot; IP, immunoprecipitation. (B) p53 interacts with the N-terminal region of ANKRD11. HEK293T cells were transiently transfected with constructs expressing one of four different Flag-tagged regions of the ANKRD11 protein or empty pCMV-Tag2 vector as indicated. Protein complexes from total cell lysates were immunoprecipitated using anti-Flag antibody coated Sepharose beads. Inputs (lanes 1-5) or immunoprecipitates (lanes 6-10) were detected by western blot analysis. Low levels of non-specific p53 binding to the Sepharose beads were also detected (lanes 7-10). (C) ANKRD11 interacts with endogenous p53 through the ankyrin repeat domain. HCT116 cells treated with mitomycin C (6 hours) or HEK293T cells were transiently transfected with constructs encoding myc- or Flag-tagged ANKRD11144-313aa protein (ANK domain) or empty vector, respectively. Protein complexes were immunoprecipitated using the appropriate antibodies and western blotted. (D) ANKRD11 directly interacts with p53 through the ankyrin repeat domain. Purified recombinant GST (lanes 9 and 11) or GST-ANKRD11144-313aa (lanes 10 and 12) fusion proteins were incubated with either MBP (lanes 9 and 10) or MBP-p53 (lanes 11 and 12) amylose beads. GST (lane 7) and GST-ANKRD11144-313aa (lane 8) inputs and interacting protein complexes (lanes 9-12) were western blotted using an anti-GST antibody. To confirm their intactness, all proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and visualized by colloidal Coomassie Blue staining (lanes 1-6).

 
Intriguingly, this region of ANKRD11 contains an ankyrin-repeat domain. In silico analysis of the predicted ANKRD11 amino acid sequence revealed that the five ankyrin repeats (residues 133-296) constituting the ankyrin-repeat domain in ANKRD11 were highly homologous with the ankyrin-repeat domains of BARD1 (45% identical; 72% similar), I{kappa}B{alpha} (27% identical; 68% similar) and 53bp2 (24% identical; 57% similar). Since it has been previously reported that these proteins interact with p53 through their ankyrin domain (Dreyfus et al., 2005Go; Feki et al., 2005Go; Gorina and Pavletich, 1996Go), we investigated whether the homologous ankyrin-repeat domain of ANKRD11 was indeed the minimal region of interaction with p53. For this purpose, an N-terminal myc-tagged construct expressing a region of ANKRD11 encompassing the homologous ankyrin domain (residues 144-313) was used. HCT116 cells were transfected with either myc-ANKRD11144-313aa or empty vector and treated with mitomycin C for 6 hours. Anti-myc immunoprecipitation of HCT116 cell lysates showed that ANKRD11 interacts with p53 through this 144-313 residue region (Fig. 2C, upper panel). Similar results were obtained after anti-Flag immunoprecipitation of lysates from HEK293T cells expressing Flag-ANKRD11144-313aa (Fig. 2C, lower panel). Subsequently, an in vitro MBP pull-down experiment was used to determine whether ANKRD11 interacted directly with p53. GST-ANKRD11144-313aa protein was precipitated after incubation with MBP-p53 amylose beads (Fig. 2D). This interaction was shown to be specific, because GST-ANKRD11144-313aa protein did not bind MBP amylose beads alone, and GST alone did not interact with the MBP-p53 amylose beads. A schematic diagram depicts the ankyrin repeat (ANK), repressor (RD) and activator (AD) domains of ANKRD11 and summarizes the in vivo and in vitro ANKRD11-p53 interaction results (supplementary material Fig. S3), illustrating the minimal region of ANKRD11 required for p53 interaction (ANKRD11144-313aa).

ANKRD11 enhances p53-mediated transcription
Since ANKRD11 directly interacts with p53, we investigated whether ANKRD11 was able to modulate the transcriptional activity of p53. Results from dual luciferase assays show that expression of ANKRD11 in Saos-2 or HeLa cells led to a significant (2.0-fold and 1.8-fold, respectively; P<0.05) dose-dependent increase in p53-mediated transactivation of the pGL2-Promoter-p53-RE-Luc reporter construct containing 17 tandem p53-response elements (p53-REs) (Fig. 3). A similar effect was observed when endogenous p53-REs from CDKN1A (p21waf1/CIP1) and MDM2 promoter sequences were used in reporter assays, because expression of ANKRD11 caused a significant (maximum 3.3-fold and 4.1-fold; P<0.05) dose-dependent increase in p53-mediated transactivation of the pGL3-Basic-CDKN1A-pro-Luc and pGL2-Basic-MDM2-pro-Luc reporter constructs, respectively (Fig. 3).


Figure 3
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 3. ANKRD11 expression enhances p53 transcriptional activity. Saos-2 (left) or HeLa (right) cells were cotransfected with p53-responsive reporter constructs encoding 17 tandem p53-REs (left), the CDKN1A promoter region (middle) or the MDM2 promoter region (right), together with pRL-TK and constructs expressing myc-p53 and ANKRD11-myc as indicated. Empty pLNCX2 vector was added to equalize the total amounts of plasmid used in various treatments. In HeLa cells, ANKRD11 expression resulted in a minimal increase in reporter activity in the absence of exogenous myc-p53. This is presumably due to ANKRD11-mediated activation of endogenous p53 in HeLa cells, because this phenomenon was not observed in the p53-null Saos-2 cell line. Data are represented as mean ± s.e.m. of triplicates. The expression of protein levels from HeLa cells transiently transfected with the CDKN1A promoter region reporter, pRL-TK, myc-p53 and ANKRD11-myc constructs as indicated was determined by western blot analysis (inset).

 
ANKRD11 expression is downregulated in breast cancer cell lines
Since ANKRD11 is located within the 16q24.3 breast cancer LOH region and is able to enhance p53 activity, it was thought possible that ANKRD11 imparts a biological function as a tumor suppressor. To investigate this possibility further, the relative expression of ANKRD11 in a panel of breast cell lines was determined by real-time RT-PCR. Results showed that the average ANKRD11 expression in the six breast cancer cell lines was downregulated (89% average reduction; P<0.01) when compared with the average ANKRD11 expression in finite life-span HMECs and nonmalignant immortalized breast epithelial cells (Fig. 4A, dark shading).


Figure 4
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 4. ANKRD11 regulates p53-mediated expression of p21waf1 in breast cell lines. (A) ANKRD11 expression in the indicated breast cell lines was determined by real-time RT-PCR. Cultures of MCF-7, MB-468 or MB-231 stably expressing GFP-ANKRD11 (MCF-7-ANK-1 to ANK-3; MB-468-ANK-1; MB-231-ANK-1 to ANK-3) or negative control cell lines (MCF-7; MB-468; MB-231) were established from single colonies after retroviral transduction and selected in geneticin. Total ANKRD11 expression (endogenous plus exogenous; light shading) in these stably expressing cell lines were determined and compared with the levels of endogenous ANKRD11 expression (dark shading) in the indicated breast cell lines. The p53 status and 16q LOH status of each breast cell line is indicated. (B) Restoration of ANKRD11 expression increases p21waf1 expression only in MCF-7 and MB-468 cell lines. Both CDKN1A mRNA and p21waf1 protein levels (inset) were determined in cultures stably expressing GFP-ANKRD11 or the negative control cell cultures as described in A using real-time RT-PCR analysis and western blot analysis. (C) ANKRD11 upregulates p21waf1 expression in a p53-dependent manner. MCF-7 or MCF-7-ANK-1 cells as described in A were transfected with either p53-specific or scrambled siRNA for 72 hours. Both p53 and p21waf1 protein levels were determined using western blot analysis, and p21waf1 levels were quantified by densitometry (representative of two independent experiments). (D) Silencing of ANKRD11 by shRNA reduces p53-mediated transcription. MCF-10A cultures stably expressing ANKRD11 shRNA (MCF-10A-shANK) show a reduction in both mRNA and protein levels of ANKRD11 compared with MCF-10A cells stably expressing scrambled shRNA (MCF-10A-SCR). MCF-10A-shANK and MCF-10A-SCR cells were either untreated or treated with mitomycin C for 12 hours and the relative CDKN1A mRNA levels and p53 protein levels were determined using real-time RT-PCR analysis and western blot analysis, respectively.

 

Restoration of ANKRD11 expression enhances expression of p53 target genes
Our findings suggest that increased ANKRD11 expression enhances p53-mediated transcription of a reporter gene driven by the CDKN1A promoter region (Fig. 3) and ANKRD11 expression is down-regulated in breast cancer cell lines (Fig. 4A). Therefore, we hypothesized that restoring the expression of ANKRD11 in breast cancer cell lines that retain an intact p53 pathway may reduce their oncogenic phenotype by enhancing the transcriptional activity of p53. To test this hypothesis, exogenous ANKRD11 was re-introduced into the MCF-7 (wild-type p53), MB-468 (mutant p53R273H) and MB-231 (mutant p53R280K) cell lines. In contrast to the p53R273H mutant expressed in the MB-468 cell line that possesses the ability to bind its cognate DNA-response element and transactivate target genes, the MB-231 cell line expresses the p53R280K mutation, completely abrogating its DNA-binding affinity and transactivation potential (Park et al., 1994Go; Prasad and Church, 1997Go). Cultures stably expressing GFP-ANKRD11 (MCF-7-ANK-1 to MCF-7-ANK-3; MB-468-ANK-1; MB-231-ANK-1 to MB-231-ANK-3) or negative control cell lines (MCF-7; MB-468; MB-231) (see Materials and Methods) were established from single colonies after retroviral transduction and geneticin selection. The level of ANKRD11 re-expression in these stable cell isolates (Fig. 4A, light shading) was determined and was shown to be comparable to the level of endogenous ANKRD11 expressed by finite life span or nonmalignant immortalized breast epithelial cells (Fig. 4A, dark shading).

The relative CDKN1A expression levels in these MCF-7, MB-468 or MB-231 cultures stably expressing ANKRD11 were determined by real-time RT-PCR (Fig. 4B). MCF-7 and MB-468 cultures stably expressing ANKRD11 showed a 3.3-fold or 2.4-fold increase in CDKN1A expression levels, respectively. These observations were also consistent with p21waf1 protein levels (Fig. 4B, insets). Restoration of ANKRD11 expression was also associated with increased expression of p53-responsive apoptotic genes, including FAS and NOXA. MCF-7 cultures stably expressing ANKRD11 showed a 2.6-fold increase in FAS expression, whereas a 2.1-fold increase in NOXA expression was observed in MB-468 cultures stably expressing ANKRD11 (supplementary material Fig. S4). Restoration of ANKRD11 expression in the MB-231 cell line caused no significant change in the expression levels of p21waf1, FAS or NOXA, suggesting that the presence of an intact p53 pathway is required for ANKRD11 to enhance the transcription of downstream p53 target genes (Fig. 4B).

ANKRD11 enhances p21waf1 expression in a p53-dependent manner
The p21waf1 expression levels were subsequently determined in MCF-7 cultures stably expressing ANKRD11 (MCF-7-ANK-1) or negative control cells (MCF-7) in response to knockdown of p53 expression. Significant reduction of p21waf1 protein levels was observed in both the MCF-7-ANK-1 derivative and MCF-7 parental cell line following transfection with p53-specific siRNA (Fig. 4C). Furthermore, ectopic expression of ANKRD11 in a p53-null Saos-2 cell line (Saos-2-ANKRD11) was not associated with increased p21waf1 expression (supplementary material Fig. S5). Restoration of p53 expression in the Saos-2-ANKRD11 derivative led to a 3.6-fold increase in p21waf1 expression, while re-expression of similar levels of p53 in the parental Saos-2 cell line was only associated with 1.5-fold induction of p21waf1 expression (supplementary material Fig. S5). Taken together, these findings confirm that ANKRD11-mediated modulation of p21waf1 levels is indeed p53 dependent.

Restoration of ANKRD11 expression suppresses the growth characteristics of breast cancer cell lines
The clonogenic properties of the stably expressing MCF-7, MB-468 or MB-231 cultures were subsequently determined to investigate the effect of restoring physiologically relevant levels of ANKRD11 expression on the growth characteristics of breast cancer cells (supplementary material Fig. S6). The average number of colonies initiated on plastic by MCF-7 or MB-468 cultures stably expressing ANKRD11 was reduced by 76% or 92% respectively, when compared with the negative control cultures (MCF-7 or MB-468). Restoration of ANKRD11 expression in MB-231 cells resulted in a minimal inhibition (11% average reduction) of the clonogenic properties of this breast cancer cell line, supporting the notion that ANKRD11 suppresses the oncogenic phenotypes of these breast cancer cell lines by a p53-dependent mechanism. In addition, the effect of restoration of ANKRD11 expression in these breast cancer cell lines showed an average reduction in proliferation by 36%, 47% or 30% respectively (after 72 hours), when compared with the proliferation of negative control cultures (supplementary material Fig. S6). The findings that ANKRD11 expression is downregulated in breast cancer cell lines and that restoration of ANKRD11 expression suppresses the oncogenic characteristics of breast cancer cells suggest that ANKRD11 possesses characteristics consistent with those of a tumor suppressor.

Silencing of ANKRD11 reduces p53 transcriptional activity
To further investigate a role for ANKRD11 as a p53 coactivator, we silenced the expression of endogenous ANKRD11 using a previously validated short hairpin RNA (shRNA) (Zhang et al., 2007aGo). Stable expression of this shRNA in the MCF-10A breast epithelial cell line (MCF-10A-shANK) resulted in reduced levels of endogenous ANKRD11 mRNA and protein when compared with MCF-10A cells stably expressing scramble shRNA (MCF-10A-SCR) (Fig. 4D). Results show that shRNA-mediated silencing of ANKRD11 reduced the ability of p53 to activate p21waf1 expression in response to DNA damage. These findings provide additional evidence to support a functional role for ANKRD11 as a p53 coactivator.

ANKRD11 associates with hADA3 and P/CAF and increases p53 acetylation
To gain further mechanistic insight into the role of ANKRD11 as a p53 coactivator, we endeavored to identify other known p53-regulatory proteins that may be recruited by ANKRD11. hADA3 was identified from a yeast two-hybrid screen as an ANKRD11-interacting protein, as determined by the β-galactosidase reporter assay (Fig. 5A). To confirm this interaction, a GST pull-down assay was conducted using in vitro translated hADA3. Results show that hADA3 interacted specifically with GST-ANKRD112369-2663aa, but not with GST alone (Fig. 5A). Recent studies have shown that hADA3 plays a key role in the regulation of p53 acetylation, stability and activity through the recruitment of acetyltransferase complexes such as p300 and P/CAF to p53 (Nag et al., 2007Go; Wang et al., 2001Go). The localization of P/CAF was subsequently determined in relation to ANKRD11 nuclear foci. Coimmunolocalization studies demonstrated that Flag-P/CAF protein is recruited to HA-ANKRD11-positive nuclear foci (Fig. 5A).


Figure 5
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 5. ANKRD11 associates with hADA3 and P/CAF to enhance the acetylation and DNA-binding activity of both wild-type p53 and mutant p53R273H. (A) Yeast two-hybrid assay showing interaction between ANKRD112369-2663aa and hADA3 (left panel). Yeast cells coexpressing either pGBT-ANKRD112369-2663aa and empty pACT2 vector, pACT-hADA3 and empty pGBT9 vector, or pACT-hADA3 and pGBT-RAC3-N showed no activation of the β-galactosidase reporter. ANKRD11 interacts with hADA3 in vitro (centre panel). GST-pull down assay shows that GST-ANKRD112369-2663aa but not GST alone pulled down significant amounts of 35S-labeled hADA3. All proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and visualized by Coomassie Blue staining to confirm they were intact. ANKRD11 nuclear foci colocalize with P/CAF (right panel). ANKRD11 nuclear foci colocalize with P/CAF. COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with Flag-tagged P/CAF and full-length HA-tagged ANKRD11. Transfected cells were immunostained with anti-HA (ANKRD11; green) and anti-Flag (P/CAF; red) antibodies and DAPI (DNA; blue). (B) Restoration of expression of ANKRD11 increases p53 acetylation at Lys320. Total p53 and acetyl-lysine p53 (Lys320) protein levels were detected in MCF-7, MB-468 and MB-231 cultures stably expressing GFP-ANKRD11 or the negative control cell cultures previously described (Fig. 4A) through western blot analysis using the appropriate antibodies. MCF-7-ANK-1 was cultured in the presence or absence of mitomycin C for 6 hours and is presented as a representative MCF-7 derivative from (Fig. 4A). (C) The p53 coactivator function of ANKRD11 is dependent upon Lys320. H1299 cells were cotransfected with the p53-responsive reporter constructs encoding the CDKN1A promoter region, together with pRL-TK and constructs expressing either myc-p53, myc-p53-K320R or ANKRD11-myc as indicated. Empty pLNCX2 vector was added to equalize the total amounts of plasmid used in various treatments. Data are represented as mean ± s.e.m. of triplicates. The expression of protein levels from H1299 cells transiently transfected with either myc-p53 or myc-p53-K320R constructs was determined by western blot analysis (inset). (D) ANKRD11 enhances the DNA-binding activity of both wild-type p53 and mutant p53R273H. Lysates from either MCF-7-ANK-1 (upper panels) or MB-468-ANK-1 (lower panel) cells stably expressing GFP-ANKRD11 or the negative control MCF-7 or MB-468 cells (described in Fig. 4A) were promoter precipitated using either beads charged with the CDKN1A promoter region or uncharged beads. Inputs or promoter precipitates were analyzed by western blot using anti-p53 (detecting wild-type and p53R273H) and anti-acetyl-p53 (Lys320) antibodies, as indicated.

 
Expression of ANKRD11 was associated with increased acetylation of p53 at Lys320 in both MCF-7 and MB-468 stably expressing cell isolates (Fig. 5B). ANKRD11-mediated increase in Lys320-acetylated p53 levels was shown to occur solely through increased post-translation modification of p53, because exogenous ANKRD11 had no effect on total p53 protein levels in these cell lines (Fig. 5B). Exogenous expression of ANKRD11 in the MB-231 cell line had no effect on Lys320-acetylated p53 levels, which is consistent with our observation that ANKRD11 did not affect p21waf1 expression in this cell line (Fig. 4B). Results from dual luciferase assays in H1299 (p53-null) cells show that the ANKRD11-mediated increase in p53-mediated transactivation of the CDKN1A promoter was attenuated upon mutation of p53 at Lys320 (p53-K320R) (Fig. 5C). Furthermore, expression of ANKRD11 had no effect on acetylation of p53 at Lys373, a lysine residue that is modified by the p300/CBP acetyltransferase (supplementary material Fig. S7). Taken together, these findings suggest that ANKRD11 enhances p53 transcriptional activity through increased P/CAF-mediated acetylation of p53.

ANKRD11 enhances DNA-binding of both wild-type p53 and mutant p53R273H
The finding that restored ANKRD11 expression can enhance the transcriptional activity of the p53 through increased Lys320 acetylation prompted us to further investigate whether ANKRD11 influences the DNA-binding properties of p53. Results from promoter-binding assays show that both wild-type p53 (MCF-7 lysates) and mutant p53R273H (MB-468 lysates) bind the p53-responsive CDKN1A promoter region and that this binding is enhanced following restoration of ANKRD11 expression in these cell lines (MCF-7-ANK-1 and MB-468-ANK-1) (Fig. 5D). Furthermore, the enhanced DNA-binding activity of p53 in MCF-7-ANK-1 cells was also associated with increased levels of Lys320 acetylation. Therefore, these findings suggest that ANKRD11 enhances the DNA-binding activity of p53 and implicates a possible role for ANKRD11 in the functional rescue of the p53R273H mutant.

ANKRD11 is a p53 target gene
A putative p53-RE in the first intron of ANKRD11 was recently identified through two independent genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-based studies (Hearnes et al., 2005Go; Wei et al., 2006Go). This region of ANKRD11 intronic sequence was cloned upstream of a luciferase reporter (pGL3-Basic-ANKRD11-p53-RE-Luc), and the dual-luciferase reporter system was used to investigate the transcriptional activity of this putative p53-RE located within the ANKRD11 intronic region. Increasing expression of myc-p53 led to a dose-dependent increase in luciferase expression from this reporter construct (Fig. 6A). Furthermore, p53-mediated activation of this region of ANKRD11 intronic sequence was ablated when the putative p53-RE was mutated (pGL3-Basic-ANKRD11-p53-RE-mut-Luc) (Fig. 6A).


Figure 6
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 6. ANKRD11 is a p53 target gene. (A) p53 transcriptionally activates a reporter gene driven by an ANKRD11 intronic sequence carrying a p53-RE. HeLa cells were cotransfected with a construct expressing myc-p53 and the reporter constructs pGL3-Basic (left; empty vector), pGL3-Basic-ANKRD11-p53-RE-Luc (middle) or pGL3-Basic-ANKRD11-p53-RE-mut-Luc (right). The relative luciferase activity was determined in cell lysates as described in Fig. 3. Data are represented as mean ± s.e.m. of triplicates. The expression level of the myc-p53 construct compared with endogenous p53 levels in HeLa cells was determined by western blot analysis (inset). (B) ANKRD11 expression correlates with increasing p53 protein levels during the DNA damage response. ANKRD11 expression in either HCT116 or HCT116 (TP53–/–) cells was determined at time-points 0, 8, 24 and 48 hours post-treatment with mitomycin C. The expression of ANKRD11 in HCT116 (wild-type p53) cells was normalized to that observed in the isogenic HCT116 (TP53–/–) derivative to monitor only the p53-dependent modulation of ANKRD11 expression during the DNA damage response. Induction of p53 protein levels following treatment with mitomycin C were determined by western blot analysis (inset). (C) HCT116 (p53–/–) cells were transfected in a 24-well format with the indicated amounts of myc-p53 (A), and the relative ANKRD11 mRNA levels in these treatments were determined using real-time RT-PCR analysis.

 
To further investigate ANKRD11 as a p53 target gene, we monitored endogenous ANKRD11 expression levels during the p53 response evoked through treatment with a DNA-damaging agent. p53-dependent ANKRD11 transcription showed a concordant increase with p53 protein levels, increasing 8.2-fold 48 hours post treatment (Fig. 6B). In addition, endogenous ANKRD11 mRNA levels increased in a dose-dependent manner (P<0.005) in response to re-introduction of physiologically relevant levels of exogenous p53 in the HCT116 (TP53–/–) derivative (Fig. 6C). These data, together with the previous ChIP-verified studies, suggest that ANKRD11 is a novel p53 target gene.


   Discussion
Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
Materials and Methods
 References
 
In this study, we have characterized ANKRD11 as a novel p53 coactivator. We found that ANKRD11 can enhance the transactivation of p53 target genes such as CDKN1A (p21waf1) and that this transcriptional activation is dependent on p53 status. We have also shown that silencing of endogenous ANKRD11 expression reduces the transcriptional activity of p53. We show that ANKRD11-mediated enhancement of p53 activity occurs through increased p53 acetylation and DNA-binding activity.

Immunofluorescence studies have demonstrated that both endogenous and exogenous ANKRD11 localizes to nuclear foci, and both colocalization and cofractionation data indicate that ANKRD11 associates with p53, p14ARF and PML within these nuclear domains (Fig. 1). Previous studies have also shown that these latter three proteins associate within similar domains, which were referred to as `extranucleolar inclusions' (Kashuba et al., 2003Go). Interestingly, the association between endogenous ANKRD11 and p53 in MCF-10A cells was enhanced in the presence of a DNA-damaging agent, suggesting that ANKRD11 may be involved in post-translational regulation of p53 activity during the p53 response. Our data suggest that ANKRD11 might have a role in the acetylation of p53 acetylation within these extranucleolar inclusions upon cellular stress. This notion is supported by previous findings whereby PML, another component protein recruited to extranucleolar inclusions, was also implicated in the regulation of p53 transcriptional activity (Guo et al., 2000Go). PML has been shown to interact directly with the DNA-binding domain of p53 and enhance p300/CBP-mediated acetylation of p53 within PML nuclear bodies (Guo et al., 2000Go).

This study uses the MCF-7, MB-468 and MB-231 breast cancer cell lines as models to demonstrate the biological function of ANKRD11 as a p53 coactivator. Although both MB-468 and MB-231 cell lines express mutated p53, the DNA-binding properties and transactivation potential of these mutants differ substantially. The p53R280K `DNA-contact' mutant expressed in MB-231 cells is unable to bind DNA or transactivate p53 target genes (Park et al., 1994Go), making this an ideal negative control cell line for these studies. The observation that exogenous ANKRD11 had no significant effects on the expression of p21waf1, FAS or NOXA in the MB-231 cell line provides evidence to suggest that the coactivator function of ANKRD11 was indeed p53 dependent (Fig. 4; supplementary material Fig. S6). The ANKRD11-mediated modulation of p21waf1 was further confirmed to be p53 dependent through the use of studies involving p53 knockdown (Fig. 4C) and the expression of ANKRD11 in a p53-null cell line (supplementary material Fig. S5).

The p53R273H `DNA-contact' mutant expressed in MB-468 cells retains the ability to interact with its cognate p53-DNA-response element in vivo (Park et al., 1994Go; Prasad and Church, 1997Go). This was in contradiction to an in vitro study suggesting that p53R273H possessed no DNA binding affinity (Bullock et al., 2000Go). These discrepancies between in vivo and in vitro studies probably result from the use of recombinant, purified mutant p53 protein throughout the in vitro binding assays, suggesting that cellular post-translation modifications of p53 may influence its affinity for DNA. Our findings suggest that the restoration of mutant p53R273H function may be possible through ANKRD11-mediated enhancement of Lys320 acetylation and subsequent increased DNA binding activity (Fig. 5).

p53R273H is a potential target for restoration of mutant p53 function in cancer as it is the second most frequent cancer-associated mutation of p53, accounting for approximately 7.5% of entries in the IARC TP53 mutation database (www.iarc.fr/p53/index.html). Crystallographic studies have demonstrated that mutation of the R273 DNA contact residue significantly impairs the affinity of p53 for DNA, but has no effect on the thermodynamic stability or structural integrity of the DNA-binding surface of p53 (Ang et al., 2006Go). Therefore, it is suggested that only the enhancement of the DNA-binding properties of this mutant is required to restore the normal function of the p53R273H mutant (Bullock and Fersht, 2001Go). However, recent in vitro data suggests that the DNA-binding affinity of p53R273H is ~700 to 1000 times weaker than that of wild-type p53, making the therapeutic revival of this mutant a challenging task (Ang et al., 2006Go).

The transcriptional regulatory domains of ANKRD11, including two intrinsic repressor domains (RD1: residues 318-611 and RD2: residues 2369-2663) and an activator domain (AD1: 2076-2145), have recently been defined (Zhang et al., 2007aGo). It is likely that P/CAF or other HATs are recruited to transcription factors by ANKRD11 through this AD1 domain, although this is yet to be formally demonstrated. It has previously been reported that ANKRD11 can function as a co-repressor of steroid nuclear receptor transactivation through the recruitment of HDACs via the RD2 domain of ANKRD11 to the p160 and nuclear receptor complex (Zhang et al., 2007aGo; Zhang et al., 2004Go). Furthermore, ANKRD11 subnuclear localization is regulated by both nuclear import and export signals, and is essential for ANKRD11 to negatively regulate transcription of steroid nuclear receptors (Zhang et al., 2007bGo). It is apparent that ANKRD11 can function as either a coactivator or corepressor of transcription, although the underlying mechanisms that govern this dual functionality are yet to be elucidated.

ANKRD11 was initially identified as a putative breast cancer tumor suppressor gene because of its location within the 16q24.3 breast cancer LOH region (Powell et al., 2002Go). A number of other tumor suppressors have been identified within this region, including CBFA2T3 (Kochetkova et al., 2002Go) and FBXO31 (Kumar et al., 2005Go). It is hypothesized that LOH of chromosome 16q during the onset of breast cancer results in the simultaneous loss or reduction in activity of several tumor suppressor genes, and this contributes to the early stages of tumorigenesis. A role for ANKRD11 as a breast cancer tumor suppressor was supported by the findings that ANKRD11 expression is downregulated in breast cancer cell lines, and restoration of ANKRD11 expression in MCF-7 and MB-468 cells suppressed their oncogenic growth characteristics (supplementary material Fig. S6). A concordant increase in p21waf1 expression was also observed in response to restored ANKRD11 expression, suggesting that the anti-oncogenic effects of ANKRD11 occur through activation of downstream p53 pathways.

ANKRD11 itself is a novel p53 target gene (Fig. 6). A putative p53-RE was identified 50 kb from the 5' end of the first intron of ANKRD11 by two independent ChIP-based genome wide screens mapping functional p53-REs (Hearnes et al., 2005Go; Wei et al., 2006Go). Our results have validated this p53-RE and shown that p53 does indeed modulate endogenous ANKRD11 transcript levels. Furthermore, endogenous ANKRD11 expression directly correlates with p53 status in breast cell lines (P<0.05) (Fig. 4A). Taken together, these results further support a role for ANKRD11 as a p53 target gene. Interestingly, PCAF itself was also recently identified as a p53 target gene in breast epithelial cell lines (Watts et al., 2004Go). The findings of both ANKRD11 and PCAF as p53 target genes suggest the existence of a positive feedback loop in the p53 acetylation pathway, although this remains to be investigated. Detailed investigations into the regulation of p53 activity by ANKRD11 or its interacting partners will significantly improve our understanding of the molecular pathways surrounding the modulation of p53 and will provide deeper insight into the development of improved pharmacological approaches to restore the function of mutant p53 in tumors.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Materials and Methods
References
 
Cell lines and antibodies
HCT116 and its TP53–/– derivative were supplied by B. Vogelstein (Bunz et al., 1998Go). All other cell lines were as previously reported (Kumar et al., 2005Go). Antibodies used were mouse {alpha}-p53 (Ab-2 and Ab-5), mouse {alpha}-p21waf1 (Neomarkers, Fremont, CA); rabbit {alpha}-acetyl-p53 Lys320 (Upstate, Temecula, CA); rabbit {alpha}-acetyl-p53 Lys373 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK); mouse {alpha}-nucleophosmin, mouse {alpha}-Flag (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, Missouri); goat {alpha}-GST (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden); mouse {alpha}-GFP (Roche, Indianapolis, IN); rabbit {alpha}-PML and rabbit {alpha}-HA (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). A rabbit {alpha}-ANKRD11 polyclonal antibody was raised against a synthetic peptide representing residues 326-341 of the ANKRD11 sequence, conjugated to KLH and affinity-purified on Sepharose beads coupled with the same peptide. Other antibodies were as previously reported (Kumar et al., 2006Go; Kumar et al., 2005Go).

Plasmids
C-terminal myc-tagged ANKRD11 open reading frame (ORF) was cloned into pLNCX2 retroviral vector (Clontech Laboratories, Mountain View, CA) to generate pLNCX2-ANKRD11-myc using standard procedures. PCR amplified EGFP ORF from pEGFP-C1 (Clontech Laboratories) was inserted in-frame within pLNCX2-ANKRD11-myc to generate a construct expressing the GFP-ANKRD11-myc fusion protein. To generate epitope-tagged ANKRD11 truncated constructs, appropriate regions of ANKRD11 were PCR amplified from pLNCX2-ANKRD11-myc and cloned in-frame into the mammalian expression vector pCMV-Tag2 (FLAG-ANKRD111-817aa, ANKRD11144–313aa, ANKRD11816–1802aa, ANKRD111803–2203aa and ANKRD112352-2663aa), pCMV-myc (myc-ANKRD11144–313aa) or pGEX-5X-1 (GST-ANKRD11144–313aa). The pGBT-ANKRD112369-2663aa construct was constructed by subcloning the ANKRD11 C-terminal coding region from pACT2-ANKRD112369-2663aa plasmid (Zhang et al., 2004Go) into pGBT9 vector at BamHI and XhoI sites. Protein coding ORFs for p14ARF or p53 were PCR amplified from breast cDNA and cloned in-frame with the indicated tags into the mammalian expression vectors pEGFP-C1 (GFP-p14ARF), pLNCX2 (myc-p53) or pMAL-c2x (MBP-p53). The p53-K320R mutant was generated from the p53-K320/373/381/382R construct supplied by Shelly Berger (Barlev et al., 2001Go). The ANKRD11 shRNA expression vector (pMSCV-shANK) was generated through cloning of a previously reported ANKRD11-specific oligonucleotide sequence (Zhang et al., 2007aGo) or scrambled oligonucleotide into a modified pMSCV retroviral vector (also expressing EGFP and puromycin resistance) downstream of a H1 promoter. Reporter constructs pGL2-Promoter-p53-RE-Luc [17 tandem p53 response elements (REs)], pGL3-Basic-CDKN1A-pro-Luc and pGL2-Basic-MDM2-pro-Luc [CDKN1A and MDM2 promoter regions containing multiple endogenous p53-RE (el-Deiry et al., 1993Go; Juven et al., 1993Go)] were kind gifts from Moshe Oren (Weisman Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel). The CDKN1A promoter construct region was generated through PCR amplification of the CDKN1A promoter region from pGL3-Basic-CDKN1A-pro-Luc construct using biotinylated primers. To generate the pGL3-Basic-ANKRD11-p53-RE-Luc reporter construct, a region from the first intron of the ANKRD11 sequence (accession no. NM_013275) carrying the putative p53-binding site was PCR amplified from human genomic DNA using the forward: 5'-CAAAGCCACCAGACCTCCGTTC-3' and reverse: 5'-CAGCAGAACCTTGCTGTGCGTGTC-3' primers, and cloned into the pGL3-Basic-Luc reporter vector (Promega, Madison, WI). The putative p53-RE (GAACATGCCAGGTCATGTCT) within this ANKRD11 promoter region was mutated to GCTTGCAAAAGCTTGCAAAA using overlap PCR amplification to generate the pGL3-Basic-ANKRD11-p53-RE-mut-Luc reporter construct. pACT-hADA3 was isolated from a human placental cDNA library in the yeast two-hybrid screen, and it encodes full-length hADA3. pCMXHA-hADA3f was generated by subcloning full-length hADA3 coding region (residues 1-432) into pCMXHA vector at Asp718 and NheI sites. pGBT-RAC3-N (1-408) (Wu et al., 2001Go), GST-ANKRD112369-2663aa and HA-ANKRD11 have been described (Zhang et al., 2004Go). pAB-FLAG-hP/CAF was kindly provided by Bert O'Malley, Baylor College of Medicine. The sequences of all constructs were confirmed by DNA sequencing.

In silico analysis
In silico analysis of the predicted ANKRD11 amino acid sequence was performed using blastp (NCBI) and ClustalW (EBI) programs, with ANKRD11 (NM_013275), BARD1 (NM_000465), I{kappa}B{alpha} (NM_020529) and 53bp2 (NM_001031685) sequences derived from GenBank, NCBI.

Immunofluorescence
Cells were seeded in Lab-Tek II Chamber Slides (Nalge Nunc, Naperville, IL), transiently transfected with the indicated plasmids using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) or treated with mitomycin C (20 µg/ml). Twenty four hours post transfection, cells were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde for 15 minutes at room temperature (RT) and permeabilized in 0.4% Triton X-100 (15 minutes, RT). Cells were incubated with the indicated primary antibody in 5% donkey serum (overnight, 4°C), followed by incubation with the appropriate Alexa-Fluor-488-, Alexa-Fluor-594-, Rhodamine- or Fluorescein-conjugated antibodies (Molecular Probes, OR) in 5% donkey serum (1 hour, RT) and mounted in Vectashield mounting medium with DAPI (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Cells were imaged using either Bio-Rad Radiance 2100 confocal or Olympus IX70 inverted microscopes.

Glycerol gradient fractionation
MCF-7 cells (1x108) stably expressing the GFP-ANKRD11-myc protein were lysed in buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 250 mM NaCl, 0.1% Triton-X-100, 1 mM EDTA, 50 mM NaF, 1 mM Na3VO4 with 1x complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Indianapolis, IN), sonicated and centrifuged. The clarified protein lysate was loaded on a 10-40% continuous glycerol gradient prepared in 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 5 mM MgCl2, 100 mM KCl, 0.1% NP-40 and centrifuged overnight at 50,000 r.p.m. in an MLS-50 swing-out rotor (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA). Protein complexes from 24 gradient fractions were analyzed by western blot analysis using {alpha}-myc, {alpha}-p53 and {alpha}-PML antibodies.

Coimmunoprecipitation assays
Nuclei were harvested from 5x107 MCF-7 or HEK293T cells as described previously (Wysocka et al., 2001Go), resuspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton-X-100 and 1x complete protease inhibitor cocktail, sonicated and centrifuged. Clarified lysates were pre-cleared with pre-immune serum from the rabbit used to generate the {alpha}-ANKRD11 polyclonal antibody (1 hour, 4°C), incubated with Protein-A-conjugated Sepharose beads (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden) (1 hour, 4°C) and immunoprecipitated using the {alpha}-ANKRD11 antibody. Inputs and coimmunoprecipitated protein complexes were subjected to western blot analysis as previously described (Kumar et al., 2005Go). Coimmunoprecipitation of endogenous p53 with protein fragments of ANKRD11 was performed as previously described (Kumar et al., 2005Go).

In vitro binding assays
For in vitro binding assays, MBP (maltose-binding protein), MBP-p53, GST (glutathione S-transferase), GST-ANKRD11144-313aa or GST-ANKRD112369-2663aa proteins were induced in BL21pLysS bacteria. GST, GST-ANKRD11144-313aa or GST-ANKRD112369-2663aa fusion proteins were purified using glutathione Sepharose 4B beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) using a standard protocol. MBP or MBP-p53 fusion proteins were associated with the amylose resin for use as bait in the in vitro binding assay. 35S-labeled hADA3 was synthesized from pCMXHA-hADA3f by in vitro transcription/translation reactions using T7-Quick reticulocyte lysate (Promega). To confirm that proteins were intact, they were resolved by SDS-PAGE and visualized by colloidal Coomassie Blue staining. For MBP pull-down experiments, purified GST or GST-ANKRD11144-313aa fusion proteins were incubated with either MBP- or MBP-p53-amylose beads in TNME buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% NP-40, 20% glycerol at 4°C), washed in TNME buffer, eluted with 10 mM maltose in 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 5% glycerol and detected by western blot analysis. GST pull-down assays were performed as previously described (Zhang et al., 2004Go).

Promoter binding assays
For promoter binding assays, a biotinylated p53-responsive CDKN1A promoter region was immobilized to streptavidin-M280 magnetic beads (Invitrogen, Oslo, Norway) following the manufacturer's protocol. Promoter binding assays were performed as previously described (Goardon et al., 2006Go). MDA-MB-468 (5x106) cells were lysed in binding buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 6 mM MgCl2, 5 mM DTT, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.01% NP-40, 10% glycerol), sonicated and centrifuged. Clarified lysates were incubated (1 hour, RT) with either CDKN1A-charged or uncharged beads, washed in binding buffer containing 250 mM NaCl and eluted in 1x SDS loading buffer.

Reporter assays
HeLa or Saos-2 cells (2x105) were seeded in 24-well plates and transfected with 100 ng reporter plasmid with varying amounts of myc-p53 or ANKRD11-myc and 25 ng pRL-TK plasmid (Promega) as a transfection control. Empty vector was added to compensate for amounts of plasmid used in various treatments. Dual-reporter assays were performed as described previously (Kumar et al., 2006Go).

Reverse transcription real-time PCR (RT-PCR)
ANKRD11 (forward: 5'-AAGGAGCTGTTCAGGCAGCAGGAG-3' and reverse: 5'-AGTCGTCGTTGACGTCGACCATG-3' primers), CDKN1A (p21waf1) (forward: 5'-TGGACCTGGAGACTCTCAGGGTCG-3' and reverse: 5'-TTAGGGCTTCCTCTTGGAGAAGATC-3' primers), FAS (forward: 5'-ATGCTGGGCATCTGGACCCT-3' and reverse: 5'-GCCATGTCCTTCATCACACAA-3' primers) and NOXA (forward: 5'-AGAGCTGGAAGTCGAGTGT and reverse: 5'-GCACCTTCACATTCCTCTC-3' primers) expression were determined by real-time RT-PCR as previously described (Kumar et al., 2005Go). The significance of the downregulation of average ANKRD11 expression in breast cancer cell lines when compared with the average ANKRD11 expression in finite life-span HMECs and nonmalignant immortalized breast epithelial cells was determined using analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Cell-based assays
Generation of amphitrophic recombinant retroviruses was performed as previously described (Kumar et al., 2005Go). Stable cell isolates were established by transduction of MCF-7, MDA-MB-468 (MB-468), MDA-MB-231 (MB-231) or Saos-2 cell lines with retroviral particles derived from either pLNCX2-GFP-ANKRD11 or pLNCX2 vector (negative control). The clonogenicity of these stable cell isolates was determined through scoring the number of colonies initiated following the growth of low-density (1000 cells per well) cultures for a further 10-14 days in the presence of geneticin (600 µg/ml). Cell proliferation of these stable clones was performed by plating cells at 10-20% confluence in 96-well plates and was assayed using the CellTitre-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay (Promega). Knockdown of p53 expression in MCF-7 stable cell isolate was achieved through transfection with p53-specific siRNA (CGGCAUGAACCGGAGGCCCAU) or scrambled siRNA at 100 nM using lipitoid transfection reagent according to the manufacturer's protocol (Utku et al., 2006Go). The shRNA-mediated silencing of ANKRD11 was performed through generation of stable cell isolates established by transduction of MCF-10A cells with retroviral particles derived from either pMSCV-shANK of pMSCV-SCR (scrambled control).

Yeast two-hybrid screen
The pGBT-ANKRD112369-2663aa plasmid encoding a GAL4 DBD-ANKRD11 C-terminal domain (residues 2369-2663) fusion protein was used as bait to screen a human placental yeast two-hybrid cDNA library. Yeast Y190 strain was sequentially transformed with the bait and library plasmids following the manufacturer's protocols (Clontech Laboratories). Yeast colonies that survived on synthetic conditional plates supplemented with 50 mM 3-aminotriazole (Sigma-Aldrich) were then tested for β-galactosidase expression (Zhang et al., 2004Go). Library plasmids from double reporter positive colonies were rescued and reconfirmed by co-transformation with the bait plasmid.


   Acknowledgments
 
We wish to thank Moshe Oren, Shelley Berger and Bert O'Malley for providing constructs; Martha Stampfer and Bert Vogelstein for providing cell lines; and Ghafar Sarvestani for assistance with the confocal microscopy. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia grant 207703 (D.C.) and Faculty of Health Sciences and Department of Medicine, University of Adelaide and the Royal Adelaide Hospital. We also thank the Hanson Institute for generous financial support.


   Footnotes
 
Supplementary material available online at http://jcs.biologists.org/cgi/content/full/121/21/3541/DC1


   References
Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Materials and Methods
 References
 

Ang, H. C., Joerger, A. C., Mayer, S. and Fersht, A. R. (2006). Effects of common cancer mutations on stability and DNA binding of full-length p53 compared with isolated core domains. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 21934-21941.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Anzick, S. L., Kononen, J., Walker, R. L., Azorsa, D. O., Tanner, M. M., Guan, X. Y., Sauter, G., Kallioniemi, O. P., Trent, J. M. and Meltzer, P. S. (1997). AIB1, a steroid receptor coactivator amplified in breast and ovarian cancer. Science 277, 965-968.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Barlev, N. A., Liu, L., Chehab, N. H., Mansfield, K., Harris, K. G., Halazonetis, T. D. and Berger, S. L. (2001). Acetylation of p53 activates transcription through recruitment of coactivators/histone acetyltransferases. Mol. Cell 8, 1243-1254.[CrossRef][Medline]

Brachmann, R. K., Yu, K., Eby, Y., Pavletich, N. P. and Boeke, J. D. (1998). Genetic selection of intragenic suppressor mutations that reverse the effect of common p53 cancer mutations. EMBO J. 17, 1847-1859.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bullock, A. N. and Fersht, A. R. (2001). Rescuing the function of mutant p53. Nat. Rev. Cancer 1, 68-76.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bullock, A. N., Henckel, J. and Fersht, A. R. (2000). Quantitative analysis of residual folding and DNA binding in mutant p53 core domain: definition of mutant states for rescue in cancer therapy. Oncogene 19, 1245-1256.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bunz, F., Dutriaux, A., Lengauer, C., Waldman, T., Zhou, S., Brown, J. P., Sedivy, J. M., Kinzler, K. W. and Vogelstein, B. (1998). Requirement for p53 and p21 to sustain G2 arrest after DNA damage. Science 282, 1497-1501.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bykov, V. J., Issaeva, N., Shilov, A., Hultcrantz, M., Pugacheva, E., Chumakov, P., Bergman, J., Wiman, K. G. and Selivanova, G. (2002). Restoration of the tumor suppressor function to mutant p53 by a low-molecular-weight compound. Nat. Med. 8, 282-288.[CrossRef][Medline]

Di Stefano, V., Soddu, S., Sacchi, A. and D'Orazi, G. (2005). HIPK2 contributes to PCAF-mediated p53 acetylation and selective transactivation of p21Waf1 after nonapoptotic DNA damage. Oncogene 24, 5431-5442.[CrossRef][Medline]

Dreyfus, D. H., Nagasawa, M., Gelfand, E. W. and Ghoda, L. Y. (2005). Modulation of p53 activity by IkappaBalpha: evidence suggesting a common phylogeny between NF-kappaB and p53 transcription factors. BMC Immunol. 6, 12.[CrossRef][Medline]

el-Deiry, W. S., Tokino, T., Velculescu, V. E., Levy, D. B., Parsons, R., Trent, J. M., Lin, D., Mercer, W. E., Kinzler, K. W. and Vogelstein, B. (1993). WAF1, a potential mediator of p53 tumor suppression. Cell 75, 817-825.[CrossRef][Medline]

Feki, A., Jefford, C. E., Berardi, P., Wu, J. Y., Cartier, L., Krause, K. H. and Irminger-Finger, I. (2005). BARD1 induces apoptosis by catalysing phosphorylation of p53 by DNA-damage response kinase. Oncogene 24, 3726-3736.[CrossRef][Medline]

Foster, B. A., Coffey, H. A., Morin, M. J. and Rastinejad, F. (1999). Pharmacological rescue of mutant p53 conformation and function. Science 286, 2507-2510.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Goardon, N., Lambert, J. A., Rodriguez, P., Nissaire, P., Herblot, S., Thibault, P., Dumenil, D., Strouboulis, J., Romeo, P. H. and Hoang, T. (2006). ETO2 coordinates cellular proliferation and differentiation during erythropoiesis. EMBO J. 25, 357-366.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gong, G., DeVries, S., Chew, K. L., Cha, I., Ljung, B. M. and Waldman, F. M. (2001). Genetic changes in paired atypical and usual ductal hyperplasia of the breast by comparative genomic hybridization. Clin. Cancer Res. 7, 2410-2414.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gorina, S. and Pavletich, N. P. (1996). Structure of the p53 tumor suppressor bound to the ankyrin and SH3 domains of 53BP2. Science 274, 1001-1005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gu, W. and Roeder, R. G. (1997). Activation of p53 sequence-specific DNA binding by acetylation of the p53 C-terminal domain. Cell 90, 595-606.[CrossRef][Medline]

Guo, A., Salomoni, P., Luo, J., Shih, A., Zhong, S., Gu, W. and Pandolfi, P. P. (2000). The function of PML in p53-dependent apoptosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 730-736.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hearnes, J. M., Mays, D. J., Schavolt, K. L., Tang, L., Jiang, X. and Pietenpol, J. A. (2005). Chromatin immunoprecipitation-based screen to identify functional genomic binding sites for sequence-specific transactivators. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 10148-10158.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Juven, T., Barak, Y., Zauberman, A., George, D. L. and Oren, M. (1993). Wild type p53 can mediate sequence-specific transactivation of an internal promoter within the mdm2 gene. Oncogene 8, 3411-3416.[Medline]

Kashuba, E., Mattsson, K., Klein, G. and Szekely, L. (2003). p14ARF induces the relocation of HDM2 and p53 to extranucleolar sites that are targeted by PML bodies and proteasomes. Mol. Cancer 2, 18.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kochetkova, M., McKenzie, O. L., Bais, A. J., Martin, J. M., Secker, G. A., Seshadri, R., Powell, J. A., Hinze, S. J., Gardner, A. E., Spendlove, H. E. et al. (2002). CBFA2T3 (MTG16) is a putative breast tumor suppressor gene from the breast cancer loss of heterozygosity region at 16q24.3. Cancer Res. 62, 4599-4604.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kumar, R., Neilsen, P. M., Crawford, J., McKirdy, R., Lee, J., Powell, J. A., Saif, Z., Martin, J. M., Lombaerts, M., Cornelisse, C. J. et al. (2005). FBXO31 is the chromosome 16q24.3 senescence gene, a candidate breast tumor suppressor, and a component of an SCF complex. Cancer Res. 65, 11304-11313.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kumar, R., Manning, J., Spendlove, H. E., Kremmidiotis, G., McKirdy, R., Lee, J., Millband, D. N., Cheney, K. M., Stampfer, M. R., Dwivedi, P. P. et al. (2006). ZNF652, a novel zinc finger protein, interacts with the putative breast tumor suppressor CBFA2T3 to repress transcription. Mol. Cancer Res. 4, 655-665.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lane, D. P. (1992). Cancer. p53, guardian of the genome. Nature 358, 15-16.[CrossRef][Medline]

Liu, G. and Chen, X. (2006). Regulation of the p53 transcriptional activity. J. Cell Biochem. 97, 448-458.[CrossRef][Medline]

Miller, B. J., Wang, D., Krahe, R. and Wright, F. A. (2003). Pooled analysis of loss of heterozygosity in breast cancer: a genome scan provides comparative evidence for multiple tumor suppressors and identifies novel candidate regions. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 73, 748-767.[CrossRef][Medline]

Nag, A., Germaniuk-Kurowska, A., Dimri, M., Sassack, M. A., Gurumurthy, C. B., Gao, Q., Dimri, G., Band, H. and Band, V. (2007). An essential role of human Ada3 in p53 acetylation. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 8812-8820.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Park, D. J., Nakamura, H., Chumakov, A. M., Said, J. W., Miller, C. W., Chen, D. L. and Koeffler, H. P. (1994). Transactivational and DNA binding abilities of endogenous p53 in p53 mutant cell lines. Oncogene 9, 1899-1906.[Medline]

Powell, J. A., Gardner, A. E., Bais, A. J., Hinze, S. J., Baker, E., Whitmore, S., Crawford, J., Kochetkova, M., Spendlove, H. E., Doggett, N. A. et al. (2002). Sequencing, transcript identification, and quantitative gene expression profiling in the breast cancer loss of heterozygosity region 16q24.3 reveal three potential tumor-suppressor genes. Genomics 80, 303-310.[CrossRef][Medline]

Prasad, K. A. and Church, J. G. (1997). Characterisation of DNA binding and transcriptional regulatory function of an endogenous mutant p53 in MDA-468 human breast cancer cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 232, 14-19.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sakaguchi, K., Herrera, J. E., Saito, S., Miki, T., Bustin, M., Vassilev, A., Anderson, C. W. and Appella, E. (1998). DNA damage activates p53 through a phosphorylation-acetylation cascade. Genes Dev. 12, 2831-2841.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Selivanova, G., Iotsova, V., Okan, I., Fritsche, M., Strom, M., Groner, B., Grafstrom, R. C. and Wiman, K. G. (1997). Restoration of the growth suppression function of mutant p53 by a synthetic peptide derived from the p53 C-terminal domain. Nat. Med. 3, 632-638.[CrossRef][Medline]

Stott, F. J., Bates, S., James, M. C., McConnell, B. B., Starborg, M., Brookes, S., Palmero, I., Ryan, K., Hara, E., Vousden, K. H. et al. (1998). The alternative product from the human CDKN2A locus, p14(ARF), participates in a regulatory feedback loop with p53 and MDM2. EMBO J. 17, 5001-5014.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sykes, S. M., Mellert, H. S., Holbert, M. A., Li, K., Marmorstein, R., Lane, W. S. and McMahon, S. B. (2006). Acetylation of the p53 DNA-binding domain regulates apoptosis induction. Mol. Cell 24, 841-851.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tang, Y., Zhao, W., Chen, Y., Zhao, Y. and Gu, W. (2008). Acetylation is indispensable for p53 activation. Cell 133, 612-626.[CrossRef][Medline]

Toledo, F. and Wahl, G. M. (2006). Regulating the p53 pathway: in vitro hypotheses, in vivo veritas. Nat. Rev. Cancer 6, 909-923.[CrossRef][Medline]

Utku, Y., Dehan, E., Ouerfelli, O., Piano, F., Zuckermann, R. N., Pagano, M. and Kirshenbaum, K. (2006). A peptidomimetic siRNA transfection reagent for highly effective gene silencing. Mol. Biosyst. 2, 312-317.[CrossRef][Medline]

Vogelstein, B., Lane, D. and Levine, A. J. (2000). Surfing the p53 network. Nature 408, 307-310.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wang, T., Kobayashi, T., Takimoto, R., Denes, A. E., Snyder, E. L., el-Deiry, W. S. and Brachmann, R. K. (2001). hADA3 is required for p53 activity. EMBO J. 20, 6404-6413.[CrossRef][Medline]

Watts, G. S., Oshiro, M. M., Junk, D. J., Wozniak, R. J., Watterson, S., Domann, F. E. and Futscher, B. W. (2004). The acetyltransferase p300/CBP-associated factor is a p53 target gene in breast tumor cells. Neoplasia 6, 187-194.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wei, C. L., Wu, Q., Vega, V. B., Chiu, K. P., Ng, P., Zhang, T., Shahab, A., Yong, H. C., Fu, Y., Weng, Z. et al. (2006). A global map of p53 transcription-factor binding sites in the human genome. Cell 124, 207-219.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wu, X., Li, H. and Chen, J. D. (2001). The human homologue of the yeast DNA repair and TFIIH regulator MMS19 is an AF-1-specific coactivator of estrogen receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 23962-23968.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wysocka, J., Reilly, P. T. and Herr, W. (2001). Loss of HCF-1-chromatin association precedes temperature-induced growth arrest of tsBN67 cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 3820-3829.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yakovlev, A. G., Di Giovanni, S., Wang, G., Liu, W., Stoica, B. and Faden, A. I. (2004). BOK and NOXA are essential mediators of p53-dependent apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 28367-28374.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zhang, A., Yeung, P. L., Li, C. W., Tsai, S. C., Dinh, G. K., Wu, X., Li, H. and Chen, J. D. (2004). Identification of a novel family of ankyrin repeats containing cofactors for p160 nuclear receptor coactivators. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 33799-33805.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zhang, A., Li, C. W. and Chen, J. D. (2007a). Characterization of transcriptional regulatory domains of ankyrin repeat cofactor-1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 358, 1034-1040.[CrossRef][Medline]

Zhang, A., Li, C. W., Tsai, S. C. and Chen, J. D. (2007b). Subcellular localization of ankyrin repeats cofactor-1 regulates its corepressor activity. J. Cell. Biochem. 101, 1301-1315.[CrossRef][Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jcs.026351v1
121/21/3541    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neilsen, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Callen, D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Neilsen, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Callen, D. F.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*Protein
*UniGene
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
*Genetics Home Reference
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?