spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 2


Fig. 2. PAK1 regulates macrophage spreading but not migration speed. (A) WT and PAK1–/– BMMs were seeded onto tissue culture plastic in growth medium. Upper panels are representative micrographs of migrating BMMs 8 hours after seeding. Scale bars: 100 µm; arrows indicate round, flat cells; arrowheads indicate lamellipodia on migrating cells. Cell migration was observed by time-lapse microscopy for 8 hours. Mean migration speed at each time point was determined from cell tracks, n=70 and n=60 for WT and PAK1–/– BMMs, respectively. Results are representative of three separate experiments (lower panels). (B) WT and PAK1–/– BMMs were allowed to adhere to uncoated glass coverslips in macrophage starvation medium supplemented with 33 ng/ml CSF1 for the indicated times. Cells were stained for F-actin. Scale bars: 10 µm. (C) The images in B were analysed to quantify the spread area of WT and PAK1–/– BMMs. Data are the mean ± s.e.m. of three separate experiments; n=~50 cells per time point per experiment. (D) Quantification of WT and PAK1–/– BMM spread area as determined in C, using images of cells 24 hours after adhesion. Data are the mean ± s.e.m. of three separate experiments; n=~50 cells per experiment. (E) PAK1–/– BMMs nucleofected with GFP or GFP-PAK1 were allowed to adhere to uncoated glass coverslips in growth medium for the indicated times. Cells were stained for F-actin; Scale bar: 10 µm. The spread area of GFP- and GFP-PAK1-expressing cells was determined. Data are the mean ± s.d. of two separate experiments; n=~20 cells per experiment.





Right arrow Return to article