spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online November 5, 2008


Journal of Cell Science 121, 2202e (2008)
© The Company of Biologists Limited
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JCS
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

In this issue

ECM – at the heart of cell function


Figure 1

The stiffness of the extracellular matrix (ECM) – which varies considerably between tissues – influences cell shape, protein expression and differentiation, and is important for tissue function. In the heart, for instance, the ECM to which cardiomyocytes attach must be sufficiently compliant for the heart to beat in response to actomyosin contraction. Fibrotic scars – which are considerably stiffer than normal myocardium – are present in the heart after myocardial infarction, but how do they affect cardiomyocyte function? On page 3794, Dennis Discher and colleagues address this question by culturing embryonic cardiomyocytes on a series of substrates of differing elasticity. The authors show that the transmission of contractile work (cardiomyocyte beating) to the matrix is optimal on matrices that mimic the elasticity of the developing myocardial microenvironment. By contrast, cells growing on stiffer substrates (which mimic a fibrotic scar) transmit little work to the matrix; moreover, they are deficient in myofibril assembly and their beating frequency slows over time. The authors use an in-situ cysteine-shotgun approach to identify several key differences in protein conformation or assembly between cells grown on myocardium- and fibrosis-like substrates. Their data highlight the likely importance of mechanical microenvironments in pathogenesis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JCS:

Embryonic cardiomyocytes beat best on a matrix with heart-like elasticity: scar-like rigidity inhibits beating
Adam J. Engler, Christine Carag-Krieger, Colin P. Johnson, Matthew Raab, Hsin-Yao Tang, David W. Speicher, Joseph W. Sanger, Jean M. Sanger, and Dennis E. Discher
JCS 2008 121: 3794-3802. [Abstract] [Full Text]  




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JCS
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?