spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif Propose a workshop for 2011 spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online November 19, 2008


Journal of Cell Science 121, 2304e (2008)
© The Company of Biologists Limited
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JCS
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

In this issue

ATR – putting Rad9 in its place


Figure 1

In response to DNA damage, the kinase ATR is recruited to single-stranded DNA, where it activates the cell-cycle-checkpoint kinase Chk1 – in turn, Chk1 regulates cell-cycle arrest and other aspects of the DNA damage response. Along with ATR, the protein complexes Rad17-RFC and 9-1-1 are both known to be important for Chk1 phosphorylation – Rad17-RFC recruits 9-1-1 to single-stranded DNA and is phosphorylated by ATR, whereas 9-1-1 recruits TopBP1, a protein that phosphorylates ATR. Less is known, however, about how the DNA damage response is propagated and maintained, and this issue is now addressed by Nick Lakin, Veronique Smits and colleagues (p. 3933). In cultured cells, the authors report, genotoxic stress results in the immobilisation of Rad9 (a 9-1-1 component) in nuclear foci; this localisation is Rad17-dependent. Cells expressing a mutated Rad17 (Rad17AA) that lacks both ATR phosphorylation sites form fewer Rad9 foci in response to stress, as do cells in which ATR is knocked down. By using FLIP and FRAP to test the retention time of Rad9 at nuclear foci, the authors show that Rad9 is more dynamic when ATR is depleted or Rad17AA is expressed. Thus, ATR and Rad17 might act together to stabilise the DNA damage response, modulating the retention – rather than the recruitment – of Rad9 at sites of DNA damage.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JCS:

ATR and Rad17 collaborate in modulating Rad9 localisation at sites of DNA damage
Annette L. Medhurst, Daniël O. Warmerdam, Ildem Akerman, Edward H. Verwayen, Roland Kanaar, Veronique A. J. Smits, and Nicholas D. Lakin
JCS 2008 121: 3933-3940. [Abstract] [Full Text]  




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JCS
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?