spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 3


Fig. 3. L6-Ag is ubiquitylated. Cellular distribution of ubiquitylation-deficient L6-Ag. (A,B) 293T cells were transiently transfected with the plasmids encoding wild-type L6-Ag (A) or L6K5,86 (B) and HA-tagged ubiquitin. 48 hours later, cells were lysed in 1% Triton X-100 and the immunoprecipitation (IP) was carried out using the anti-L6-Ag mAb (lanes 2) or a negative control mAb (lanes 3). The protein lysates were used as a positive control for transfection (lanes 1). Proteins were resolved in 11% SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were probed with either anti-HA polyclonal Ab or the anti-L6-Ag mAb (L6pke). (C) MCF-7 cells were co-transfected with the plasmid encoding GFP-L6-Ag [wild type (wt), or GFP-L6K5,86] and mRFP-CD63. Co-distribution of tagged proteins was analysed 48 hours after transfection. Shown are representative images acquired using a LSM510 microscope. (D) MCF-7 cells were transfected with the plasmid encoding L6-Ag mutants and 48 hours later the cells were processed for double-immunofluorescence staining using specific Abs as described in the legend to Fig. 2. Staining was visualised using Alexa-Fluor-488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG2a Ab (green, L6-Ag) and Alexa-Fluor-594-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG1 Ab (red). Shown is the co-distribution of L6-Ag mutants and Lamp2. Scale bars: 10 µm.





Right arrow Return to article