spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 8


Fig. 8. An active form of ILK (S343D) blocks the inhibitory effect of EphA1. (A) HEK293 (293) WT-EphA1–GFP and {Delta}SAM-EphA1–GFP cells were transfected with wild-type ILK-myc (myc), starved of serum for 12 hours and then stimulated with ephrin-A1–Fc or control Fc (1 µg/ml) for 15 minutes. Cells were fixed and immunostained by anti-myc antibody (red). DAPI is blue; GFP is green. Note the colocalization of EphA1-GFP and ILK-myc in the merged images even before ephrin-A1–Fc stimulation in WT-EphA1–GFP cells (see the area with an arrowhead in the inset). Scale bar: 20 µm. (B) The same set of cells as is shown in A, with additional transfection with ILK-S343D, was subjected to spreading assays. The number of spreading cells over that of myc-positive cells was calculated. Data show means ± s.d. of three independent experiments. (C) ILK and RhoA activities in HEK293 WT-EphA1–FLAG cells transfected with wild-type ILK-myc (WT) or ILK-S343D–myc (S343D) were measured by immunoblot analysis as described in the Materials and Methods. (D) HEK293 WT-EphA1–GFP cells transfected with vector alone (lanes 1, 2) or ILK-S343D–myc (lane 3) were subjected to cell migration assays as described in Fig. 6E in the absence (lane 1) or presence (lanes 2, 3) of ephrin-A1–Fc.





Right arrow Return to article