|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | |||||
First published online 19 March 2009
doi: 10.1242/jcs.045740
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Article |
1 Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3RE, UK
2 Laboratory for 3-D Electron Microscopy of Cells, Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: keith.gull{at}path.ox.ac.uk)
Accepted 8 December 2008
| Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key words: Trypanosome, Flagellum, Flagellar pocket, Basal body, Electron tomography, Golgi, Microtubule, Cytoskeleton, Secretion
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The importance of the flagellar pocket is perhaps best exemplified in the African trypanosome, Trypanosoma brucei. This pathogen, spread by the tsetse fly, causes both a devastating human disease, African Sleeping Sickness and a similar disease, Nagana, of cattle. The flagellum of the trypomastigote form of T. brucei emerges from the flagellar pocket at the posterior end of the cell and is attached to the exterior of the cell along the length of the cell body. The T. brucei pocket provides the physical platform for plasma membrane domain differentiation. It is the normal cell surface site for localisation of receptors such as transferrin or CRAM (Field et al., 2007
; Hung et al., 2004
; Steverding, 2000
). It is the site of trafficking and recycling of glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored surface proteins, such as procyclin (the major surface protein of the tsetse midgut form) and the variable surface glycoprotein (VSG) antigen (the major surface component in the mammalian bloodstream form). Finally, the flagellar pocket is also a key player in the trypanosome's defence against attack by the innate and acquired immune systems (Allen et al., 2003
; Chanez et al., 2006
; Engstler et al., 2007
; Field and Carrington, 2004
; Hung et al., 2004
; Landfear and Ignatushchenko, 2001
; Overath and Engstler, 2004
; Pays et al., 2006
; Schwartz et al., 2005
; Shiflett et al., 2007
; Vanhollebeke et al., 2008
). Flagellar pocket membrane dynamics are at their highest in the bloodstream form, but the general appearance and function of bloodstream and `procyclic' cell (tsetse midgut form) pockets are similar.
Although the trypanosome flagellum is primarily a motility organelle, it and its associated parts perform many additional functions. The basal bodies help to position and segregate the kinetoplast (the mitochondrial genome) (Ogbadoyi et al., 2003
; Robinson and Gull, 1991
) and the flagellum itself is a sensory and signalling organelle (Oberholzer et al., 2007a
; Oberholzer et al., 2007b
). It also operates as an attachment organelle (Beattie and Gull, 1997
; Vickerman, 1973
). Finally, the trypanosome flagellum plays a key role in cell morphogenesis and cell division by defining the polarity of the cell and developmental axes (Broadhead et al., 2006
; Ploubidou et al., 1999
; Robinson et al., 1995
). The single flagellum present at the start of the cell cycle is subtended from a basal body, which has an associated probasal body that was formed in the previous cell cycle. This probasal body matures at the G1/S transition and forms a new flagellum (Sherwin and Gull, 1989a
). The new flagellum tip attaches to the lateral aspect of the old flagellum through a mobile transmembrane junction – the flagella connector – that acts as a cytotactic element influencing the morphogenesis and construction of the cytoskeleton and structure of the nascent daughter cells (Briggs et al., 2004
; Moreira-Leite et al., 2001
). During this process, the internal cytoskeleton of the trypanosome is restructured, and a new flagellum attachment zone (FAZ) filament structure and associated microtubule quartet develop to accommodate the new flagellum. In effect the FAZ forms a seam in the subpellicular corset of microtubules that provides shape, polarity and form for the trypanosome cell body (Vaughan et al., 2008
).
Recent work has led to an increased understanding of the importance of the flagellar pocket, its biochemistry and cell biology, yet we lack a clear understanding of its detailed architecture; in particular, how the membrane systems relate to the underlying cytoskeletal architecture. This is particularly unfortunate as RNAi analyses in T. brucei are providing mutant phenotypes with dramatic changes in flagellar pocket structure and operation (Allen et al., 2003
; Bonhivers et al., 2008
; Broadhead et al., 2006
; Chanez et al., 2006
; Garcia-Salcedo et al., 2004
). Precise understanding of these phenotypes is hampered by the lack of detailed understanding of the normal flagellar pocket. We have now addressed this lack of knowledge and other issues using more reliable and better resolution structural studies. In a more general cell biology context, the highly structured trypanosome flagellar pocket provides us with an opportunity to study fundamental issues of how orchestration of membrane and cytoskeletal interactions produces defined areas of differentiated eukaryotic cell surface.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Here, we present conclusions integrated from all these preparations to describe the basic architecture of a flagellar pocket. We have used data from a number of tomograms, but individual pocket organisation is most obviously revealed by examination of a particular tomogram that includes
80% of the volume from the anterior flagellar pocket associated with the new flagellum of a very late stage dividing cell, immediately prior to cytokinesis. This model therefore represents flagellar pocket architecture at its initial state in the cell cycle, illustrating standard pocket features. Fig. 1 shows a model generated from a tomographic reconstruction of this cell (referred to hereafter as tomo 1). Tomo 1 is derived from three adjacent serial 250 nm sections that yielded 435 tomographic slices of
1.6 nm (as illustrated in Fig. 1B-D); these encompass
2 µm3 of the cell. Fig. 1A represents this serial tomogram diagrammatically. Fig. 1B displays a slice at the level where the flagellum is emerging from the pocket area, Fig. 1C is a slice at the level of the basal body and probasal body, and Fig. 1D is a slice from a lower region of the pocket; it also reveals the kinetoplast within the mitochondrion. Movie 1 displays this reconstructed volume and shows the invagination of the plasma membrane that forms the flagellar pocket, with the single flagellum emerging from the flagellar pocket and onto the cell surface.
|
|
The basal body defines the proximal end of the flagellum, and the axoneme that extends from it invades the flagellar pocket asymmetrically (Fig. 2B,D). The basal body is represented by an extreme proximal end set of microtubule triplets followed by the more distal doublet microtubule transition zone and then a basal plate (from which the central pair of singlet microtubules extends). After this, the 9+2 canonical microtubule axoneme extends up to the site where the flagellum exits the flagellar pocket. At this point, the axoneme is joined by the paraflagellar rod (PFR), a unique lattice-like structure situated alongside the axoneme (Fig. 2B). A newly formed probasal body, containing triplet microtubules, lies close to and parallel with the basal body (Fig. 2B,D). In addition, a set of four specialised microtubules, termed the microtubule quartet (Taylor and Godfrey, 1969
), is nucleated between the basal body and probasal body and runs along, up and around the flagellar pocket membrane in a left-handed helical pattern, finally inserting into the subpellicular array of microtubules (Fig. 2B,D). The microtubule quartet traverses the flagellar pocket collar, an electron-dense structure that defines an annulus at the neck of the flagellar pocket (Fig. 2B).
There is an extensive network of endoplasmic reticulum and a single Golgi apparatus located within the vicinity of the flagellar pocket (Fig. 2B). Comparisons between tomo 1 and other tomograms and thin sections from cells in corresponding stages of the cell cycle reveal that these architectural features and positions are consistent, reflecting the high fidelity of cellular organisation.
Flagellar pocket boundaries
Tomo 1 and many images of conventional thin sections show that the flagellum invades the flagellar pocket asymmetrically. This arrangement results in a bulge on one side of the flagellar pocket in quadrants 1 and 2 (Fig. 2D). Both the probasal body and Golgi are invariably located to the bulge side of the flagellar pocket (Fig. 2B,D; Fig. 3A).
|
|
|
We now turn to the basal flagellar entry boundary zone, where we can define at least three structural features that appear to have important roles in separating the flagellar pocket membrane from the flagellar membrane. These structures are the internal transitional fibres, the radial fibres and the external collarette (Fig. 3B,E; Fig. 4A-C). The transitional fibre array radiates from the distal end of the basal body microtubule triplets and connects with the flagellar membrane at the base of flagellar pocket (Fig. 4A). The second element is located on the outside of the flagellar membrane in the lumen of the flagellar pocket; it is termed the collarette (Fig. 3E; Fig. 4B). This decorates the external surface of the flagellar membrane surrounding a region of the transition zone of the basal body. This was originally described in longitudinal section (Vickerman, 1973
; Vickerman and Tetley, 1990
), but we now show that the collarette has an elaborate structure in transverse sections, including nine regularly spaced double-tube-like units (Fig. 4B, black arrows). These are connected to each other by plate-like fibrillar structures on the flagellar membrane (Fig. 4B, white arrows). In addition to these two features, EM tomography has highlighted a previously unrecognised set of structures, which we term `radial fibres' lying inside the flagellar membrane (Fig. 3B; Fig. 4C,D) and alongside the basal body proximal region. These fibres are 6±1.6 nm in diameter and 280±20 nm in length, and make a discrete inflection at the point where they enter the flagellum (Fig. 4C,D). The ninefold radial symmetry of the transitional fibres, collarette and radial fibres mirrors the radial symmetry of the doublet microtubules of the basal body transition zone, emphasising a discrete transmembrane influence from the internal cytoskeleton to external membrane adornments.
Setting the FAZ architecture
The positions of the axoneme and PFR relative to the FAZ filament structure and microtubule quartet are precisely defined (Fig. 5B). The FAZ comprises a set of structures on either side of the flagellar/plasma membrane that forms a discrete seam in the subpellicular corset of microtubules linking the cell body to the flagellum. Importantly, our previous work has shown that the quartet microtubules are anti-parallel to the rest of the microtubules of the subpellicular array in having their plus ends at the anterior of the cell (Robinson et al., 1995
). The PFR has been well described and is known to be connected to the axoneme via doublets 4-7 (Fig. 5B).
Electron tomography revealed the 3D positioning between the axoneme, FAZ and PFR within the flagellar pocket area. Using the previously defined axes, the microtubule quartet is nucleated in positive quadrant 1 and follows a left-handed helical path through to quadrant 4 and back around to quadrant 1 (Fig. 2D; Fig. 5A). During this transit, the microtubule quartet is firmly attached to the flagellar pocket membrane (Fig. 3B,G). Three other specific points about the microtubule quartet can be noted: they are associated with electron-dense material, until they reach the neck region there is no accompanying FAZ filament structure. Finally, they are tightly adjacent with essentially no inter-microtubule gaps, whereas when they are incorporated into the subpellicular array the intermicrotubule distance is a noticeable 31±5 nm. The FAZ filament structure is not present on the flagellar pocket membrane and appears only distal to the collar on the neck region. In this region the FAZ filament structure follows the final part of the same helical path as the microtubule quartet (Fig. 5A,C)
Tomo 1 illustrates that the spatial positioning of the axonemal doublets is invariant from their proximal ends to the main axoneme with the colocated PFR, such that there is no twisting of the axoneme between the basal body and the start of the PFR. Thus, the FAZ has to follow their precise left-handed helical path to be inserted into the subpellicular microtubule array at a specific position, which is essential for them to connect with this invariant internal axonemal organisation. Fig. 5C illustrates this insertion of the microtubule quartet and FAZ filament structure between two subpellicular microtubules, thus setting up this invariant positioning and discrete seam in the subpellicular corset of microtubules (Fig. 5B).
Subpellicular microtubule corset
The microtubules of the subpellicular corset are highly ordered in a linear, planar, array, showing a regular intermicrotubule spacing of 24±5 nm and 23±5 nm microtubule to plasma membrane. Each microtubule is crosslinked to its neighbours and to the plasma membrane by specific linkers. The inter-microtubule spacing is invariant along the cell, even though the cell diameter varies. Thus, microtubules must be of different lengths with stops and starts along the cell body. When one subpellicular microtubule ends (either the plus or minus end), those on either side continue and then become crosslinked to each other. More than 50 subpellicular microtubules are present in the cell volume encompassed in tomo 1. Fig. 5D models a region of the subpellicular corset: one end of five microtubules and both ends of two lie within the tomogram (all ends are annotated with either a hash symbol or an arrow). The subpellicular microtubules appeared to end preferentially at points of decreasing cell diameter or when the plasma membrane bends/folds. All subpellicular microtubules (except the microtubule quartet) are oriented so their plus ends face the posterior end of the cell (Robinson et al., 1995
). Fig. 5E illustrates the ending of two microtubules, showing the subsequent approach of the neighbouring lateral microtubules. A triangle of clear space to the point where both lateral microtubules have come together and possess the normal inter-microtubule distance is apparent on these tomographic slices.
We then addressed how this interlinked microtubule corset is modified to allow the exit of the flagellum from the cell body. A number of general points can be illustrated by the specific arrangement of subpellicular microtubules in Tomo 1. First, a specific set of microtubules end at the posterior side of the flagellum exit point and neck region. In fact, three microtubules end close together at this point, and significantly this is the only position where we have observed two adjacent microtubules ending together. Moreover, the ending of three microtubules in this position opens up a space for the exit of the flagellum through the microtubule corset (Fig. 5D, arrowheads). Importantly, we note that two of these microtubules are short and their plus and minus ends are both included in the volume of the tomogram (highlighted in Fig. 5D). Other microtubules then border the space left by these microtubule ends and form a lateral boundary at the corset as they move around the flagellar pocket exit point. We note that, because of the insertion of the FAZ filament structure and microtubule quartet into the array at the anterior cell side of the flagellum exit point, very few subpellicular microtubules are required to end on this side of the flagellum exit point (Fig. 5C,D).
Basal body – probasal body organisation
The proximal end of the basal body is positioned in the cytoplasm as a 9+0 triplet arrangement of microtubules, but a 9+0 arrangement of doublet microtubules is found in the transition zone that intrudes into the flagellar pocket (Fig. 4E; Fig. 5A). Subsequently, the central pair is nucleated, forming the canonical 9+2 axoneme. A probasal body is positioned in the cytoplasm on the bulge side of the flagellar pocket within quadrant 2 (Fig. 2D; Fig. 3A; Fig. 4E); it is composed of 9 + 0 triplet microtubules.
The basal body and probasal body are physically connected, and both are connected to the kinetoplast. The latter connection is mediated by the Tripartite Attachment Complex (Ogbadoyi et al., 2003
), which is not dealt with here. The connections between basal body and probasal body are so strong that they allow co-isolation of the two structures in flagellum preparations (Fig. 4H). In thin sections, we observed fibres leading from the basal body and additional connections between the probasal body and the microtubule quartet (Fig. 4E,F,G). Our view of these structures is a composite achieved by integrating information from all three of our imaging techniques. Different levels of substructure resolution are achievable with each technique. Integrating information from all methods reveals that the connections include two sets of striated fibres on the basal body. The first set consists of two striated fibres that lead from the C-tubule of triplet microtubule number 5 and connect with the microtubule quartet. The second set includes three striated fibres leading from the C-tubule of triplet microtubule 6. The most distal one connects with the microtubule quartet, and filaments lead from this connection to the probasal body. The other striated fibres on microtubule 6 do not connect to the microtubule quartet, but they connect to the probasal body via a set of filaments. Fig. 4F,G illustrates some of these connections.
Secretory system organelles
The crucial feature of cytoskeletal organisation and flagellar exit from the trypanosome cell is that it provides the framework for the discrete membrane environment of the flagellar pocket. This pocket is not only an area of differentiated surface membrane (albeit internal to the cell), it also provides a focus for a highly organised secretory and endocytic system. Our tomography revealed that a prominent feature of this secretory system is a system of branching tubules and flattened sacs that comprises a section of endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The ER in the vicinity of the flagellar pocket has both fenestrated and sheet-like sections. A specific sheet of ER is located over the bulge side of the flagellar pocket in quadrant 1 (Fig. 2B; Fig. 6A). Noticeably, this flat sheet does not extend onto the flagellar pocket area in quadrant 4 of tomo 1 (Fig. 6B). A region of the ER is organised into fenestrated mesh-like membranes that eventually run parallel to the cis side of the Golgi apparatus (Fig. 6A,C). The Golgi itself is invariably positioned close to the bulge side of the flagellar pocket (Fig. 2B; Fig. 3A; Fig. 6C), with a discrete cis/trans orientation. Different orientations of the tomo 1 model illustrate different views of the ER and Golgi network and their relationship to cytoskeletal structures (Fig. 6A-D), and the asymmetry of the flagellar pocket. Examination of Fig. 6 and Movie 1 reveals that the Golgi is positioned adjacent to the neck region of the flagellar pocket and is associated with the discrete area of the FAZ filament and microtubule quartet on this neck membrane.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The use of tomography revealed the important feature of flagellar pocket asymmetry, showing very clearly the bulge on the probasal body side. This is the side adjacent to the main volume of cytoplasm and the area where the Golgi apparatus is located. There are obvious structural advantages to this asymmetry for membrane traffic but it is unclear whether it occurs as a consequence of increased membrane activity at that the bulge face or is imposed by the adjacent cytoskeletal structures. There are clear candidates for the latter phenomenon in the positioning of the probasal body and the microtubule quartet. Both of these could either influence or impose the asymmetry. In procyclic forms we have consistently seen that this bulge pocket membrane in quadrants 1 and 2 is covered on its cytoplasmic side by a plate-like sheet of endoplasmic reticulum. The ER of the trypanosome is known from light microscope imaging of components such as BiP to form a highly branched tubular network throughout the cell (Bangs et al., 1993
). However, the tomograms reveal both plate-like and fenestrated areas. A particular fenestrated sheet is associated with the cis-Golgi.
T. brucei possesses a single Golgi apparatus that has a very particular location influenced by a specific centrin-containing structure described at the light microscope level. Warren and co-workers have shown that the new Golgi appears de novo adjacent to the old and develops over around 2 hours. The location of the new Golgi is determined by the position of the new basal body complex (He et al., 2004
). Particular centrins locate to both the basal body and an additional bilobed structure near to the Golgi apparatus. One lobe is associated with the old Golgi, and the other is associated with the forming Golgi. In RNAi knock-down experiments, depletion of TbCentrin1 inhibited duplication of the basal body, whereas depletion of TbCentrin2 also inhibited duplication of the Golgi (He et al., 2005
). Moreover, duplication of the bilobed structure is dependent on the single polo-like kinase (PLK) of T. brucei (TbPLK). Depletion of TbPLK leads to abnormal bilobed structures and concomitant inhibition of normal Golgi structures. These and other data suggest that the bilobed structure may be a primary scaffold for assembly of the new Golgi (de Graffenried et al., 2008
). We were unable to discern a specific separate cytoskeletal structure in this area. However, our 3D description suggests that the neck region is a good candidate for a cytoskeletal structure that defines the position of the single Golgi.
The definition of this discrete neck region of the pocket comes from specific observations using tomography. We, and others, have long believed that the flagellum in trypanosomes facilitates the differentiation of three different areas of surface membrane – the cell surface plasma membrane, the flagellum membrane and the flagellar pocket membrane. Not only can these be defined structurally, but they have distinct biochemical properties and functions. The neck region now has to be added as a fourth surface membrane domain. It is on this domain that the FAZ filament is initiated and the quartet of microtubules associates with the filament after its traverse around the flagellar pocket. In essence, the neck region represents a post collar/pre-flagellar exit point domain.
The electron dense collar forms an annulus around the top of the flagellar pocket. Clues to the identity of collar components have recently come from the identification of the protein Bilbo1 (Bonhivers et al., 2008
) and from our laboratory in the identification of proteins with specific membrane interacting domains (Neil Portman and K.G., unpublished). The collar provides a clear separation between the flagellar pocket and the neck region membrane and, although present on the cytoplasmic face of the membrane, may well participate in the selective retention of surface receptors in the flagellar pocket. Obviously, the cytoskeletal architecture of the collar provides a fundamental mechanism for defining a fenestration in the subpellicular array of microtubules and an annulus whereby the surface plasma membrane can fold over and into the pocket. Moreover, the collar may operate as a cytoplasmic valve that regulates the entry and exit of material into the pocket lumen, which is known to be a privileged site for glycoconjugates (Atrih et al., 2005
).
The base of the pocket is defined by another complex that interlinks the membrane with the underlying cytoskeleton, but this time it is the cytoskeletal structures of the flagellum that interact with the pocket base. One of these is the direct linkage of the transitional fibres from the basal body to the membrane. These nine transitional fibres are an integral part of many flagella and ciliary systems (Geimer and Melkonian, 2004
; O'Toole et al., 2003
). In addition, the trypanosome flagellum membrane base exhibits the collarette, originally described in longitudinal section by Vickerman (Vickerman, 1973
) and now revealed as a particularly structured adornment on the external flagellar membrane base. Although we have no information on components or precise function for the collarette, it appears well designed to act as an external sleeve, allowing membrane to be constrained and formed into the tube required to encase the flagellar axoneme. The membrane does not have any significant curvature until it reaches the very base of the collarette, at which point it immediately flares out to form the base of the pocket. Our tomography and thin section analysis has revealed a novel internal structure – the radial fibres – which again reflects the ninefold symmetry of the basal body.
The radial fibres appear to provide another basal buttress and are characterised by a short segment that then kinks into a longer distal segment lying alongside the microtubules of the basal body under the initial region of the flagellum membrane. These distal regions of the radial fibres invade the flagellum for about half the length of the transition zone and are an internal reflection of the external collarette. The radial fibres are associated only with the basal body and not the probasal body, and hence appear to be associated with maturation and docking with the membrane. One might confuse these structures with intraflagellar transport (IFT) particles (Bastin et al., 2000
) but comparisons reveal that these latter structures are of variable length and are generally seen further up in the flagellum. Moreover, the radial fibres are present in fully elongated flagella and have a consistent ninefold symmetry that IFT particles do not. However, it is possible that the role of these radial fibres also encompasses roles in providing the physical base for docking and assembly sites for flagellar components (Rosenbaum and Witman, 2002
; Stephan et al., 2007
).
Trypanosome basal bodies perfectly exhibit the binary inheritance pattern that has been maintained throughout much of evolution for both centrioles and basal body complexes. The probasal body is always positioned at a specific location in the cell close to the basal body; specific sets of striated fibres link the two and make connections to the microtubule quartet that can be viewed as a specific example of a microtubule rootlet that is so characteristic of highly organised protistan cells (Moestrup, 2000
). This microtubule quartet is a key feature of the trypanosome cell. The tomographic reconstructions now reveal its nucleation between the basal body and probasal body, its extended traverse around the pocket crossing the collar, and, finally, the associated initiation of the FAZ filament on the cytoplasmic surface of the neck region. A specific microtubule organisation centre must therefore be situated between the basal body and probasal body, and this architecture then defines the microtubules of the quartet as having their plus ends at the anterior of the cell (in contrast to the subpellicular array – the minus ends of which are facing the anterior) (Robinson et al., 1995
; Sherwin and Gull, 1989b
). Thus, when this quartet subsequently joins the subpellicular array of microtubules, it forms an antiparallel seam along the site of flagellum attachment. Given the number of unusual kinesins in the trypanosome genome (Wickstead and Gull, 2006
), it remains an intriguing possibility that this antiparallel seam might act as a specific track for motor proteins directing cellular membrane traffic into or out of the flagellar pocket/basal body area.
Attachment of the microtubule quartet to the cytoplasmic surface of the pocket and neck region membrane presumably provides support to the pocket balloon and rigidity to the extended neck. However, as the quartet is tightly associated to the cytoplasmic surface of these membranes it could also endow particular properties into that membrane region in comparison with those alongside it. Although we know of a number of microtubule associated proteins (MAPs) in the subpellicular microtubule array (Baines and Gull, 2008
; Hertz-Fowler et al., 2001
; Vedrenne et al., 2002
), there is no evidence for MAPs that locate specifically to the microtubule quartet. Further insight to components may shed light on attachment to the inner surface of the pocket membrane and how variation in the intermicrotubule packing in the pocket and the cell body areas are orchestrated.
The tomographic analysis displayed here allows a much clearer demonstration of the structural organisation of a crucial area of the trypanosome. It demonstrates the structural intricacies of the capacity of the basal body complex to act as a master regulator of morphogenesis in the trypanosome and will aid future molecular, functional and mutant studies.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Sample preparation for electron microscopy
Cells inside the culture flask were chemically fixed for 10 minutes by the addition of enough 25% (w/v) glutaraldehyde to the growing medium to reach a final aldehyde concentration of 2.5%. Cells were collected by centrifugation, re-fixed in 4% (w/v) formaldehyde, 2% (w/v) glutaraldehyde and 0.1% (w/v) picric acid in 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) for 1 hour at room temperature, then post-fixed with 1% (w/v) osmium tetroxide in 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer. Fixed cells were washed several times in double-distilled water, en bloc stained with 1% (w/v) aqueous uranyl acetate for 16 hours at 4°C, dehydrated through an acetone series and embedded in epoxy resin.
Transmission electron microscopy
Plastic embedded cells were thin-sectioned, post-stained with aqueous uranyl acetate and Renyold's lead citrate, and viewed in an FEI Tecnai-F12 electron microscope operating at 80 KeV. Specimens for negatively stained isolated flagella and scanning electron microscopy were prepared as previously described (Sherwin and Gull, 1989a
). Whole-mount cytoskeletons were prepared by settling cells onto formvar, carbon-coated, glow discharged grids; extracting with 1% v/v nonidet P-40 in PEME buffer [0.1 M PIPES, 2 mM EGTA, 1 mM MgSO4, 0.1 mM EDTA (pH 6.9)]; fixing in 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde in PEME buffer; and negatively staining with 0.7% (w/v) gold-thioglucose in water.
Cellular tomography
Ribbons of serial sections, 250 nm thick, were collected on formvar coated, copper-rhodium slot grids, then post-stained with aqueous uranyl acetate and Renyold's lead citrate. Colloidal gold particles (15 nm) were deposited on both surfaces of the sections for use as fiducial markers during subsequent image alignment. Sections were viewed in an FEI Tecnai-F30 electron microscope operating at 300 KeV, and images recorded digitally with a 2048x2048 pixel CCD camera (Gatan, Pleasonton, CA) using a pixel size of 1.2 nm. Tilt series were recorded with automated methods for image montaging, data acquisition and image alignment as the sample was serially tilted by 1° angular increments over a range of 120° (±60°) about two orthogonal axes with the microscope control program SerialEM (Mastronarde, 2005
). 3D distributions of stain density (tomograms) were calculated from each tilt series, aligned with each other and combined to produce a single dual-axis 3D reconstruction (Mastronarde, 1997
) measuring 2.4x2.4x0.73 µm3 (for tomo 1). Tomograms from adjacent sections were aligned to each other, then subcellular structures and membranes within the 3D volumes were analysed and modelled using the IMOD software package (Kremer et al., 1996
).
These 3D reconstructions were segmented by modelling features of interest. Experienced investigators used the IMOD package to represent the 3D position, orientation and trajectory of structural components of the flagellar pocket and its surrounding cytoplasmic features: the plasma membrane, the kinetoplast, the flagellum and its associated cytoskeletal components. Each such 3D model was checked and re-evaluated by other investigators until the model represented the complex cytoarchitecture visible in the tomograms to the satisfaction of all concerned. Movie 1 (supplementary material) first shows the 3D tomographic reconstruction, then the tomogram merged with the corresponding model and eventually the 3D model.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Work in K.G.'s laboratory was supported by the Wellcome Trust, Human Frontiers Science Program and the EP Abraham Trust. K.G. is a Wellcome Trust Principal Research Fellow. S.L. is supported by a Henry Goodger Scholarship. This work benefited from use of electron micrographs collected over many years by previous members of K.G.'s laboratory to whom thanks are due. Electron tomography was carried out in the Boulder Laboratory for 3D Electron Microscopy of Cells, supported by RR000592 from the NIH to J.R.M. Special thanks are due to Boulder colleagues for their expert advice and training. Deposited in PMC for release after 12 months.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Allen, C. L., Goulding, D. and Field, M. C. (2003). Clathrin-mediated endocytosis is essential in Trypanosoma brucei. EMBO J. 22, 4991-5002.[CrossRef][Medline]
Atrih, A., Richardson, J. M., Prescott, A. R. and Ferguson, M. A. J. (2005). Trypanosoma brucei glycoproteins contain novel giant poly-N-acetyllactosamine carbohydrate chains. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 865-871.
Baines, A. and Gull, K. (2008). WCB is a C2 domain protein defining the plasma membrane-sub-pellicular microtubule corset of kinetoplastid parasites. Protist 159, 115-125.[Medline]
Bangs, J. D., Uyetake, L., Brickman, M. J., Balber, A. E. and Boothroyd, J. C. (1993). Molecular cloning and cellular localisation of a BiP homolog in Trypanosoma brucei-divergent ER retention signals in a lower eukaryote. J. Cell Sci. 105, 1101-1113.[Abstract]
Bastin, P., Pullen, T., Moreira-Leite, F. and Gull, K. (2000). Inside and outside of the trypanosome flagellum: a multifunctional organelle. Microbes Infect. 2, 1865-1874.[CrossRef][Medline]
Beattie, P. and Gull, K. (1997). Cytoskeletal architecture and components involved in the attachment of Trypanosoma congolense epimastigotes. Parasitology 115, 47-55.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bonhivers, M., Nowacki, S., Landrein, N. and Robinson, D. R. (2008). Biogenesis of the trypanosome endo-exocytotic organelle is cytoskeleton mediated. PLoS Biol. 6, e105.[CrossRef][Medline]
Briggs, L. J., McKean, P. G., Baines, A., Moreira-Leite, F., Davidge, J., Vaughan, S. and Gull, K. (2004). The flagella connector of Trypanosoma brucei: an unusual mobile transmembrane junction. J. Cell. Sci. 117, 1641-1651.
Broadhead, R., Dawe, H. R., Farr, H., Griffiths, S., Hart, S. R., Portman, N., Shaw, M. K., Ginger, M. L., Gaskell, S. J., McKean, P. G. et al. (2006). Flagellar motility is required for the viability of the bloodstream trypanosome. Nature 440, 224-227.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chanez, A. L., Hehl, A. B., Engstler, M. and Schneider, A. (2006). Ablation of the single dynamin of T. brucei blocks mitochondrial fission and endocytosis and leads to a precise cytokinesis arrest. J. Cell Sci. 119, 2968-2974.
de Graffenried, C. L., Ho, H. H. and Warren, G. (2008). Polo-like kinase is required for Golgi and bilobe biogenesis in Trypanosoma brucei. J. Cell Biol. 181, 431-438.
Engstler, M., Pfohl, T., Herminghaus, S., Boshart, M., Wiegertjes, G., Heddergott, N. and Overath, P. (2007). Hydrodynamic flow-mediated protein sorting on the cell surface of trypanosomes. Cell 131, 505-515.[CrossRef][Medline]
Field, M. C. and Carrington, M. (2004). Intracellular membrane transport systems in Trypanosoma brucei. Traffic 5, 905-913.[CrossRef][Medline]
Field, M. C., Natesan, S. K. A., Gabernet-Castello, C. and Koumandou, V. L. (2007). Intracellular trafficking in the trypanosomatids. Traffic 8, 629-639.[CrossRef][Medline]
Garcia-Salcedo, J. A., Perez-Morga, D., Gijon, P., Dilbeck, V., Pays, E. and Nolan, D. P. (2004). A differential role for actin during the life cycle of Trypanosoma brucei. EMBO J. 23, 780-789.[CrossRef][Medline]
Geimer, S. and Melkonian, M. (2004). The ultrastructure of the Chlamydomonas reinhardtii basal apparatus: identification of an early marker of radial asymmetry inherent in the basal body. J. Cell Sci. 117, 2663-2674.
Gull, K. (1999). The cytoskeleton of trypanosomatid parasites. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 53, 629-655.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gull, K. (2003). Host-parasite interactions and trypanosome morphogenesis: a flagellar pocketful of goodies. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 6, 365-370.[CrossRef][Medline]
He, C. Y., Ho, H. H., Malsam, H., Chalouni, C., West, C. M., Ullu, E., Toomre, D. and Warren, G. (2004). Golgi duplication in Trypanosoma brucei. J. Cell Biol. 165, 313-321.
He, C. Y., Pypaert, M. and Warren, G. (2005). Golgi duplication in Trypanosoma brucei requires Centrin2. Science 310, 1196-1198.
Henley, G. L., Lee, C. M. and Takeuchi, A. (1978). Electron-microscopic observations on Trypanosoma brucei freeze cleaving and thin sectioning study of apical part of flagellar pocket. Z. Parasitenkd. 55, 181-187.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hertz-Fowler, C., Ersfeld, K. and Gull, K. (2001). CAP5.5, a life-cycle-regulated, cytoskeleton-associated protein is a member of a novel family of calpain-related proteins in Trypanosoma brucei. Mol. Biol. Parasitol. 116, 25-34.[CrossRef]
Hung, C. H., Qiao, X. G., Lee, P. T. and Lee, M. G. S. (2004). Clathrin-dependent targeting of receptors to the flagellar pocket of procyclic-form Trypanosoma brucei. Eukaryotic Cell 3, 1004-1014.
Kremer, J. R., Mastronarde, D. N. and McIntosh, J. R. (1996). Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. J. Struct. Biol. 116, 71-76.[CrossRef][Medline]
Landfear, S. M. and Ignatushchenko, M. (2001). The flagellum and flagellar pocket of trypanosomatids. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 115, 1-17.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mastronarde, D. N. (1997). Dual-axis tomography: an approach with alignment methods that preserve resolution. J. Struct. Biol. 120, 343-352.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mastronarde, D. N. (2005). Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. J. Struct. Biol. 152, 36-51.[CrossRef][Medline]
Moestrup, O. (2000). The flagellate cytoskeleton: introduction of a general terminology for microtubular flagellar roots in protists. In The Flagellates: Unity, Diversity and Evolution (ed. B. S. C. Leadbetter and J. C. Green). New York: Taylor and Francis.
Moreira-Leite, F. F., Sherwin, T., Kohl, L. and Gull, K. (2001). A trypanosome structure involved in transmitting cytoplasmic information during cell division. Science 294, 610-612.
O'Toole, E. T., Giddings, T. H., McIntosh, J. R. and Dutcher, S. K. (2003). Three-dimensional organization of basal bodies from wild-type and delta-tubulin deletion strains of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 2999-3012.
Oberholzer, M., Bregy, P., Marti, G., Minca, M., Peier, M. and Seebeck, T. (2007a). Trypanosomes and mammalian sperm: one of a kind? Trends Parasitol. 23, 71-77.[CrossRef][Medline]
Oberholzer, M., Marti, G., Baresic, M., Kunz, S., Hemphill, A. and Seebeck, T. (2007b). The Trypanosoma brucei cAMP phosphodiesterases TbrPDEB1 and TbrPDEB2: flagellar enzymes that are essential for parasite virulence. FASEB J. 21, 720-731.
Ogbadoyi, E. O., Robinson, D. R. and Gull, K. (2003). A high-order trans-membrane structural linkage is responsible for mitochondrial genome positioning and segregation by flagellar basal bodies in trypanosomes. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 1769-1779.
Overath, P. and Engstler, M. (2004). Endocytosis, membrane recycling and sorting of GPI-anchored proteins: Trypanosoma brucei as a model system. Mol. Microbiol. 53, 735-744.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pays, E., Vanhollebeke, B., Vanhamme, L., Paturiaux-Hanocq, F., Nolan, D. P. and Perez-Morga, D. (2006). The trypanolytic factor of human serum. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4, 477-486.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ploubidou, A., Robinson, D. R., Docherty, R. C., Ogbadoyi, E. O. and Gull, K. (1999). Evidence for novel cell cycle checkpoints in trypanosomes: kinetoplast segregation and cytokinesis in the absence of mitosis. J. Cell Sci. 112, 4641-4650.[Abstract]
Robinson, D. R. and Gull, K. (1991). Basal body movements as a mechanism for mitochondrial genome segregation in the trypanosome cell cycle. Nature 352, 731-733.[CrossRef][Medline]
Robinson, D. R., Sherwin, T., Ploubidou, A., Byard, E. H. and Gull, K. (1995). Microtubule polarity and dynamics in the control of organelle positioning, segregation, and cytokinesis in the trypanosome cell cycle. J. Cell Biol. 128, 1163-1172.
Rosenbaum, J. L. and Witman, G. B. (2002). Intraflagellar transport. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 3, 813-825.[CrossRef][Medline]
Schwartz, K. J., Peck, R. F., Tazeh, N. N. and Bangs, J. D. (2005). GPI valence and the fate of secretory membrane proteins in African trypanosomes. J. Cell Sci. 118, 5499-5511.
Sherwin, T. and Gull, K. (1989a). The cell division cycle of Trypanosoma brucei brucei-timing of event markers and cytoskeletal modulations. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 323, 573-588.
Sherwin, T. and Gull, K. (1989b). Visualization of detyrosination along single microtubules reveals novel mechanisms of assembly during cytoskeletal duplication in trypanosomes. Cell 57, 211-221.[CrossRef][Medline]
Shiflett, A. M., Faulkner, S. D., Cotlin, L. F., Widener, J., Stephens, N. and Hajduk, S. L. (2007). African trypanosomes: intracellular trafficking of host defense molecules. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 54, 18-21.[CrossRef][Medline]
Stephan, A., Vaughan, S., Shaw, M. K., Gull, K. and McKean, P. G. (2007). An essential quality control mechanism at the eukaryotic basal body prior to intraflagellar transport. Traffic 8, 1323-1330.[CrossRef][Medline]
Steverding, D. (2000). The transferrin receptor of Trypanosoma brucei. Parasitol. Int. 48, 191-198.[CrossRef][Medline]
Taylor, A. E. R. and Godfrey, D. G. (1969). A new organelle of bloodstream salivarian trypanosomes. J. Protozool. 16, 466-470.[Medline]
Vanhollebeke, B., De Muylder, G., Nielsen, M. J., Pays, A., Tebabi, P., Dieu, M., Raes, M., Moestrup, S. K. and Pays, E. (2008). A haptoglobin-hemoglobin receptor conveys innate immunity to Trypanosoma brucei in humans. Science 320, 677-681.
Vaughan, S., Kohl, L., Ngai, I., Wheeler, R. J. and Gull, K. (2008). A repetitive protein essential for the flagellum attachment zone filament structure and function in Trypanosoma brucei. Protist 159, 127-136.[Medline]
Vedrenne, C., Giroud, C., Robinson, D. R., Besteiro, S. B., Bosc, C., Bringaud, F. and Baltz, T. (2002). Two related subpellicular cytoskeleton-associated proteins in Trypanosoma brucei stabilize microtubules. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 1058-1070.
Vickerman, K. (1973). Mode of attachment of Trypanosoma vivax in proboscis of tsetse fly Glossina fuscipes-ultrastructural study of epimastigote stage of trypanosome. J. Protozool. 20, 394-404.[Medline]
Vickerman, K. and Tetley, L. (1990). Flagellar surfaces of parasitic protozoa and their role in attachment. In Ciliary and Flagellar Membranes (ed. R. A. Bloodgood), pp. 267-303. New York: Plenum Press.
Wickstead, B. and Gull, K. (2006). A "holistic" kinesin phylogeny reveals new kinesin families and predicts protein functions. Mol. Biol. Cell 17, 1734-1743.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
Related articles in JCS:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Gadelha, S. Rothery, M. Morphew, J. R. McIntosh, N. J. Severs, and K. Gull Membrane domains and flagellar pocket boundaries are influenced by the cytoskeleton in African trypanosomes PNAS, October 13, 2009; 106(41): 17425 - 17430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||