|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | |||||
First published online 7 April 2009
doi: 10.1242/jcs.044321
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Article |
1 Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
2 Department of Chemical Physiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
3 Genentech, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: fang.guowei{at}gene.com)
Accepted 16 December 2008
| Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key words: Kif2a, Plk1, Aurora A, Microtubule depolymerase, Mitotic spindle, Mitosis
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Polo-like kinase, Plk1, is an essential mitotic kinase (Sunkel and Glover, 1988
) that controls mitotic entry, centrosome maturation, bipolar spindle formation, cohesin dissociation, chromosome congression and segregation, as well as cytokinesis (Barr et al., 2004
; van de Weerdt and Medema, 2006
). We report here that Plk1 interacts with and directly phosphorylates Kif2a. Although Plk1 is well characterized for its ability to promote MT nucleation through recruitment of
-tubulin to centrosomes (Barr et al., 2004
), we show here that Plk1 also promotes MT depolymerization through targeting Kif2a to the spindle and poles and through enhancing its depolymerase activity. Thus, Plk1 promotes spindle dynamics by simultaneously upregulating the activities responsible for MT polymerization as well as depolymerization. In addition, we show that Aurora A is a kinase for negative regulation of Kif2a. We propose that the antagonistic regulation of Kif2a by Plk1 and Aurora A provides spatial cues for the efficient assembly and proper function of the mitotic spindle.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The endogenous Plk1 and Kif2a also interact. HeLa S3 cells were synchronized at the G1-S boundary by a double-thymidine (TT) treatment and then released to progress from G1 to S, G2 and then to mitosis. The Plk1-Kif2a complex was first detected in early G2, accumulated from G2 to M and peaked in M (Fig. 1D). The kinetics of the formation of the Plk1-Kif2a complex followed the kinetics of the activation of Plk1 in the cell cycle, suggesting that Plk1 may control the function of Kif2a. To analyze this complex during mitotic exit, HeLa S3 cells were synchronized at prometaphase by a thymidine-nocodazole (TN) treatment and then released from prometaphase into G1. This complex persisted throughout the mitotic exit (Fig. 1E). Given that Plk1 and Kif2a only partially colocalize in early mitosis, but do not colocalize during mitotic exit, we conclude that at least a subpopulation of the Plk1-Kif2a complex is likely to act as a soluble complex in the cytosol.
The interaction between Plk1 and Kif2a is phospho-dependent, as incubation of the Plk1 immuno-complex purified from G2 (TT9) or M (TN0) cells with
-phosphatase removed the associated Kif2a (Fig. 1F). To determine which kinase is responsible for this phospho-dependence, prometaphase cells arrested by the TN treatment was incubated with MG132, an inhibitor of proteasomes, together with BI 2536 (a Plk1 inhibitor) (Lenart et al., 2007
), Purvalanol A (a Cdk1 inhibitor) (Skoufias et al., 2007
) or VX680 (an Aurora A inhibitor) (Harrington et al., 2004
) (Fig. 1G). The presence of MG132 prevents mitotic exit upon inhibition of various mitotic kinases (Seki et al., 2008b
; Skoufias et al., 2007
). Although the abundance of the Plk1-Kif2a complex was slightly increased in cells treated with either Aurora A or Cdk1 inhibitor (Fig. 1G, lanes 2-4), this complex dissociated in the presence of the Plk1 inhibitor, even though the levels of the Plk1 and Kif2a proteins in cell lysates were not altered by inhibition of Plk1 (Fig. 1G, lanes 5 and 6). We conclude that the kinase activity of Plk1 is required for the complex formation.
|
Next, we examined whether the depolymerase activity of Kif2a is regulated by Plx1. Recombinant Kif2a and Plx1or Plx1-KD were first incubated with ATP and then with pre-polymerized MTs. The MTs remaining at the end of the incubation were pelleted through a glycerol cushion and assayed by silver-staining and western blotting (Fig. 2B) or by immunofluorescence (Fig. 2C). Incubation of MTs with Kif2a reduced the amounts of MTs in the pellet, indicating the presence of depolymerase activity (Fig. 2B, lanes 3 and 4 vs 1 and 2), whereas neither Plx1 nor Plx1-KD altered the amounts of MTs in the pellets (Fig. 2B, lanes 7, 8, 11 and 12 vs 1 and 2; Fig. 2C). Interestingly, incubation of Kif2a with Plx1 greatly enhanced the depolymerase activity of Kif2a (Fig. 2B, lanes 5 and 6 vs 3, 4, 7 and 8; Fig. 2C). This enhancement specifically resulted from the phosphorylation of Kif2a by Plx1, as Plx1-KD failed to stimulate Kif2a (Fig. 2B, lanes 9 and 10 vs 3, 4, 11 and 12). We conclude that Plk1 directly phosphorylates Kif2a and enhances its ability to depolymerize MTs.
Plk1 enhances the localization of Kif2a to spindle MTs and spindle poles
It has been reported that Plk1 controls spindle assembly and function in mitosis (Lenart et al., 2007
; Sumara et al., 2004
). We demonstrate here that Kif2a is a spindle-associated target for Plk1 regulation. Inhibition of Plk1 by a specific inhibitor, BI 2536, leads to a monopolar spindle (Lenart et al., 2007
). However, a sub-population of cells incubated with BI 2536 reached metaphase with unaligned chromosomes (Fig. 3A), presumably because of a partial inhibition of Plk1. We quantified the effect of Plk1 inhibition on the localization of Kif2a and other spindle-pole-associated proteins, such as
-tubulin and NuMA (nuclear mitotic apparatus protein), to the bipolar spindle in metaphase cells. Inhibition of Plk1 reduced the amounts of Plk1 associated with centrosomes (Fig. 3C), consistent with a previous report (Lenart et al., 2007
). Interestingly, inhibition of Plk1 also reduced Kif2a signals on spindle MTs and poles, even though the amounts of total cellular Kif2a did not alter (Fig. 3B,C). Consistent with this, the amounts of spindle MTs were increased by 30% upon inhibition of Plk1 (Fig. 3C), despite the fact that the spindle-pole-associated polymerization activity, as indicated by
-tubulin signals, was also substantially reduced (Fig. 3D). This reduction in Kif2a signals was even more significant when normalized to the spindle MT intensity (Fig. 3C). As a control, spindle pole signals for an unrelated protein, NuMA, were not altered by BI 2536 when normalized to the MT intensity (Fig. 3E). We conclude that efficient targeting of Kif2a to spindle MTs and poles requires the kinase activity of Plk1.
|
-tubulin and NuMA signal intensities around spindle poles were not substantially affected by Kif2a (Fig. 4D,E). As expected from its depolymerase activity, depletion of Kif2a increased the spindle MT intensity (Fig. 4C), consistent with our previous report (Jang et al., 2008
|
Aurora A interacts with Kif2a and inhibits its depolymerase activity
Spindle- and spindle pole-associated Kif2a only partially overlaps with the localization of Plk1, but colocalizes with the kinase Aurora A in mitosis (Fig. 5A) (Barr and Gergely, 2007
), suggesting that Aurora A may be another regulator of Kif2a. Indeed, in a transient transfection experiment, Myc-Aurora A co-precipitated with GFP-Kif2a, but not with GFP (Fig. 5B), indicating a direct interaction.
|
Biochemically, recombinant Aurora A directly phosphorylated recombinant Kif2a and this phosphorylation was inhibited by VX680 (Fig. 5F). Furthermore, phosphorylation of Kif2a by Aurora A decreased its depolymerase activity in a manner dependent on the kinase activity of Aurora A (Fig. 5G,H). We conclude that Aurora A negatively regulates Kif2a by promoting the dissociation of Kif2a from the spindle MTs and poles and through inhibiting its depolymerase activity.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mechanistically, Plk1 and Aurora A directly interact with and phosphorylate Kif2a. The interaction between endogenous Plk1 and Kif2a is phospho-dependent and mitosis-specific. Substrates of Plk1 tend to interact with the Polo-box domain in Plk1 after being prime-phosphorylated by another kinase. Although Cdk1 has been shown to be a common priming kinase for Plk1 substrates (Barr et al., 2004
), inhibition of Cdk1 enhances the Kif2a-Plk1 interaction, indicating that Cdk1 is not the priming kinase. Similarly, Aurora A is not the priming kinase. Instead, Plk1 itself appears to be the priming kinase that is required for the Kif2a-Plk1 interaction, as inhibition of the kinase activity of Plk1 abolished this interaction.
Even though the interaction between endogenous Kif2a and Aurora A has escaped our detection so far (data not shown), presumably because of the transient nature of a weak interaction, Kif2a and Aurora A colocalize, and ectopically expressed proteins form a complex. It is interesting to note that MCAK, a member of the kinesin-13 family of MT depolymerases, is also phosphorylated by Aurora A and Aurora B, and phosphorylation controls the localization of MCAK and inhibits its depolymerase activity (Andrews et al., 2004
; De Luca et al., 2008
; Knowlton et al., 2006
; Lan et al., 2004
; Ohi et al., 2004
; Sampath et al., 2004
; Zhang et al., 2008
; Zhang et al., 2007
).
In theory, phosphorylation of Kif2a by either Plk1 or Aurora A may change its affinity to MTs, the rate of MT depolymerization or the processitivity of the depolymerase. In addition, phosphorylation may also alter the mode of interaction between Kif2a and MTs (binding to the MT lattice versus binding to MT ends). We have tried extensively, but failed because of technical difficulties, to map the sites of phosphorylation in endogenous Kif2a purified from mitotic cells as well as in recombinant Kif2a phosphorylated in vitro by either Aurora A or Plk1. Although the sites of phosphorylation of MCAK by Aurora A and Aurora B have been analyzed previously (Andrews et al., 2004
; Lan et al., 2004
; Zhang et al., 2008
; Zhang et al., 2007
), these sites are not highly conserved in Kif2a. Thus, the exact biochemical mechanisms by which phospho-Kif2a alters its depolymerase activity remain a subject for future investigation.
Physiological function of antagonistic regulation on Kif2a
We propose that the antagonistic nature of Kif2a regulation by Plk1 and Aurora A provides a mechanism for spatial control of the spindle assembly and MT dynamics. During mitosis, MTs polymerized from chromatin are sorted into a spindle structure by molecular motors and by MT-associated proteins (Gadde and Heald, 2004
). Aurora A phosphorylates and inhibits Kif2a on spindle MTs, thereby stabilizing the minus-ends of MTs before they are anchored onto centrosomes. Through its regulation of Kif2a, Aurora A promotes MT growth and spindle assembly. However, once the minus-ends of MTs are incorporated into spindle poles, centrosomal Plk1 then binds to Kif2a and activates its depolymerase activity, which promotes MT dynamics and generates the pulling force to establish tension across sister kinetochores, consistent with the fact that Plk1 is required for the inter-kinetochore tension (Sumara et al., 2004
). Thus, the antagonistic regulation of Kif2a by Plk1 and Aurora A may result in differential dynamics of MTs on the spindle and at the poles, and this differential dynamics may be essential for efficient assembly and proper function of the mitotic spindle.
Regulation of Kif2a by Plk1 is probably not restricted to spindle poles alone, as the Plk1-Kif2a complex is abundant in nocodazole-arrested prometaphase cells, in which Kif2a does not colocalize with Plk1 on centrosomes (data not shown). We propose that the Plk1-Kif2a complex has a general role in cytosol to depolymerize MTs generated outside the mitotic spindle. In this model, cytosolic Kif2a is predominantly associated with Plk1, not with Aurora A, consistent with the differential stability between Plk1-Kif2a and Aurora A-Kif2a complexes. Plk1 stimulates the depolymerase activity of the cytosolic Kif2a and reduces the amounts of MTs polymerized in cytosol in general. However, chromatin, through the Ran-GTP pathway, recruits Aurora A (Ducat and Zheng, 2004
; Goodman and Zheng, 2006
), which inhibits Kif2a and promotes MT polymerization. Thus, Aurora A and Plk1 confer a differential stability to MTs existing inside compared with those outside of the mitotic spindle, thereby ensuring that MTs are predominantly polymerized and assembled around the chromatin into the mitotic spindle. We speculate that the antagonistic regulation of Kif2a by Plk1 and Aurora A provides spatial cues for spindle assembly.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The anti-GFP sera were raised against the full-length recombinant GFP and affinity purified. The anti-Kif2a antibody was a generous gift from Claire Walczak (Indiana University, Bloomington, IN). The anti-NuMA antibody was kindly provided by Duane Compton (Dartmounth Medical School, Hanover, NH). Anti-β-tubulin E7 monoclonal antibody was obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank. The following antibodies were from commercial sources: anti-
-tubulin (Sigma); anti-Kif2a (Novus); anti-Plk1, anti-Aurora A, anti-Myc, and anti-p38MAPK antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology).
Cell Culture, siRNAs and transfection
HeLa S3, HeLa and 293T cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen) and antibiotics. Cells were synchronized at the G1-S boundary by a double-thymidine treatment or at prometaphase by a thymidine-nocodazole treatment, as previously described (Fang et al., 1998a
; Fang et al., 1998b
).
siRNAs were synthesized by Dharmacon, Inc. The sequence targeting Plk1 was 5'-AGATTGTGCCTAAGTCTCT-3' and Kif2a was 5'-GGAATGGCATCCTGTGAAA-3'. The control siRNA (siGL2) was 5'-CGTACGCGGAATACTTCGATT-3'. siRNAs were transfected into HeLa cells using DharmaFect 1 (Dharmacon, Inc.).
DNA transfection was performed using Effectene (Qiagen) or Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) as instructed by the manufacturers. Cells co-transfected with GFP-Kif2a and Myc-Plk1 or Myc-Aurora A were analyzed at 36 hours post-transfection.
Immunoprecipitation
Antibodies against Plk1, Aurora A or GFP were coupled to Affi-Prep Protein A beads (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA) at a concentration of 0.3 mg/ml. HeLa or HeLa S3 cells were lyzed in NP-40 lysis buffer (50 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 200 mM KCl, 0.3% NP-40, 10% glycerol, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.5 µM microcystin, 10 µg/ml each of leupeptin, pepstatin and chymostatin). Lysates were centrifuged, incubated at 4°C for 1 hour with Protein A beads coupled to pre-immune rabbit IgG, and then incubated at 4°C overnight with Protein A beads coupled to specific antibodies. Antibody beads were recovered by centrifugation, washed five times with the lysis buffer and then twice with the lysis buffer in the presence of 500 mM KCl, analyzed by SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted with appropriate antibodies.
Immunofluorescence
HeLa cells on coverslips were fixed with -20°C methanol for 30 minutes. Alternatively, cells were extracted briefly with the BRB80-T buffer (80 mM Pipes, pH 6.8, 1 mM MgCl2, 5 mM EGTA and 0.5% Triton X-100; Fig. 1B) and then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 minutes at room temperature. Subsequently, cells were permeabilized and blocked with PBS-BT (1 x PBS, 3% BSA, and 0.1% Triton X-100) for 30 minutes at room temperature. Coverslips were then incubated in primary and secondary antibodies diluted in PBS-BT. Images were acquired with Openlab 5.2 (Improvision) under a Zeiss Axiovert 200M microscope using a 1.4 NA 100 x oil immersion lens. Deconvolved images were obtained using AutoDeblur v9.1 and AutoVisualizer v9.1 (AutoQuant Imaging).
For quantification of immunofluorescence intensity, cells were stained for various spindle and spindle pole antigens and immunofluorescence images of metaphase cells were acquired as z-stacks from the top to the bottom of each cell. For each antigen quantified in different samples, all the samples were stained in parallel and images were acquired under a constant exposure for each antigen. Z-stacks of fluorescence images were deconvolved using AutoDeblur v9.1 and AutoVisualizer v9.1 (AutoQuant Imaging) and the 2-dimentional maximal projections of deconvolved z-stacks were used for quantification of the fluorescence intensity of spindle proteins after subtracting the background from areas outside the cells.
Phosphorylation of Kif2a by Plk1 and Aurora A
Recombinant His-Kif2a was incubated with recombinant His-Plx1 or His-Aurora A in the kinase buffer (20 mM Hepes, pH 7.8, 10 mM MgCl2, 15 mM KCl, 1 mM EGTA) containing 100 µM ATP, 10 mM DTT and 80 mM NaF in the presence of radioactive ATP for 30 minutes at room temperature. Alternatively, His-Kif2a was phosphorylated with 1 mM ATP in the absence of radioactive ATP.
MT depolymerization assay
Assembly-competent
- and/or β-tubulin was isolated as described previously (Hyman et al., 1991
). Recombinant His-Kif2a (10 nM for the experiment shown in Fig. 2B and 25 nM for that in Fig. 5G), with or without prior phosphorylation by Plx1 or Aurora A, was incubated with 3.6 µM Taxol-stabilized MTs in 1 x BRB80 buffer (80 mM Pipes, pH 6.8, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA) containing 1 mM DTT, 1 mM ATP and 15 µM Taxol at room temperature for 3 minutes (Fig. 2B) or 10 minutes (Fig. 5G) and pelleted through a 150 µl 40% glycerol cushion containing 20 µM Taxol and protease inhibitors in the 1 x BRB80 buffer at 100,000 g for 20 minutes at 25°C. Pellets were washed three times with the 1 x BRB80 buffer and analyzed by SDS-PAGE, followed by silver staining and western blotting.
The microtubule-visual assay was performed according to a published protocol (Mishima et al., 2002
) with the following modifications. Recombinant Kif2a (10 nM for the experiment shown in Fig. 2C and 25 nM for that in Fig. 5H) was phosphorylated by either Plx1 or Aurora A in the absence of radioactive ATP and the reaction mix was incubated at room temperature with Taxol-stabilized microtubules (final concentration 2 µM) in 1 x BRB80 containing 1 mM DTT, 1 mM ATP and 15 µM Taxol in 40 µl reactions. Aliquots (6 µl) of each sample were then fixed with 60 µl of 1 x BRB80 containing 1% glutaraldehyde at room temperature for 5 minutes before being overlaid onto a 5-ml cushion (25% glycerol in 1 x BRB80) and spun onto coverslips at 31,611 x g for 70 minutes in a Beckman SW41Ti rotor at 22°C. After the spin, the coverslips were fixed with -20°C methanol for 10 minutes, rehydrated, and stained with the antibodies indicated.
Plk1 proteomics was performed as described previously (Seki et al., 2008a
; Seki et al., 2008b
; Zhao et al., 2008
; Zhu et al., 2008
).
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Andrews, P. D., Ovechkina, Y., Morrice, N., Wagenbach, M., Duncan, K., Wordeman, L. and Swedlow, J. R. (2004). Aurora B regulates MCAK at the mitotic centromere. Dev. Cell 6, 253-268.[CrossRef][Medline]
Barr, A. R. and Gergely, F. (2007). Aurora-A: the maker and breaker of spindle poles. J. Cell Sci. 120, 2987-2996.
Barr, F. A., Sillje, H. H. and Nigg, E. A. (2004). Polo-like kinases and the orchestration of cell division. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 5, 429-440.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cameron, L. A., Yang, G., Cimini, D., Canman, J. C., Kisurina-Evgenieva, O., Khodjakov, A., Danuser, G. and Salmon, E. D. (2006). Kinesin 5-independent poleward flux of kinetochore microtubules in PtK1 cells. J. Cell Biol. 173, 173-179.
De Luca, M., Brunetto, L., Asteriti, I. A., Giubettini, M., Lavia, P. and Guarguaglini, G. (2008). Aurora-A and ch-TOG act in a common pathway in control of spindle pole integrity. Oncogene 27, 6539-6549.[CrossRef][Medline]
Desai, A., Verma, S., Mitchison, T. J. and Walczak, C. E. (1999). Kin I kinesins are microtubule-destabilizing enzymes. Cell 96, 69-78.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ducat, D. and Zheng, Y. (2004). Aurora kinases in spindle assembly and chromosome segregation. Exp. Cell Res. 301, 60-67.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fang, G., Yu, H. and Kirschner, M. W. (1998a). Direct binding of CDC20 protein family members activates the anaphase-promoting complex in mitosis and G1. Mol. Cell 2, 163-171.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fang, G., Yu, H. and Kirschner, M. W. (1998b). The checkpoint protein MAD2 and the mitotic regulator CDC20 form a ternary complex with the anaphase-promoting complex to control anaphase initiation. Genes Dev. 12, 1871-1883.
Ferenz, N. P. and Wadsworth, P. (2007). Prophase microtubule arrays undergo flux-like behavior in mammalian cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 3993-4002.
Gadde, S. and Heald, R. (2004). Mechanisms and molecules of the mitotic spindle. Curr. Biol. 14, R797-R805.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ganem, N. J. and Compton, D. A. (2004). The KinI kinesin Kif2a is required for bipolar spindle assembly through a functional relationship with MCAK. J. Cell Biol. 166, 473-478.
Ganem, N. J., Upton, K. and Compton, D. A. (2005). Efficient mitosis in human cells lacking poleward microtubule flux. Curr. Biol. 15, 1827-1832.[CrossRef][Medline]
Goodman, B. and Zheng, Y. (2006). Mitotic spindle morphogenesis: Ran on the microtubule cytoskeleton and beyond. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 34, 716-721.[CrossRef][Medline]
Harrington, E. A., Bebbington, D., Moore, J., Rasmussen, R. K., Ajose-Adeogun, A. O., Nakayama, T., Graham, J. A., Demur, C., Hercend, T., Diu-Hercend, A. et al. (2004). VX-680, a potent and selective small-molecule inhibitor of the Aurora kinases, suppresses tumor growth in vivo. Nat. Med. 10, 262-267.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hyman, A., Drechsel, D., Kellogg, D., Salser, S., Sawin, K., Steffen, P., Wordeman, L. and Mitchison, T. (1991). Preparation of modified tubulins. Methods Enzymol. 196, 478-485.[Medline]
Jang, C. Y., Wong, J., Coppinger, J. A., Seki, A., Yates, J. R., 3rd and Fang, G. (2008). DDA3 recruits microtubule depolymerase Kif2a to spindle poles and controls spindle dynamics and mitotic chromosome movement. J. Cell Biol. 181, 255-267.
Kline-Smith, S. L. and Walczak, C. E. (2004). Mitotic spindle assembly and chromosome segregation: refocusing on microtubule dynamics. Mol. Cell 15, 317-327.[CrossRef][Medline]
Knowlton, A. L., Lan, W. and Stukenberg, P. T. (2006). Aurora B is enriched at merotelic attachment sites, where it regulates MCAK. Curr. Biol. 16, 1705-1710.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kumagai, A. and Dunphy, W. G. (1996). Purification and molecular cloning of Plx1, a Cdc25-regulatory kinase from Xenopus egg extracts. Science 273, 1377-1380.[Abstract]
Lan, W., Zhang, X., Kline-Smith, S. L., Rosasco, S. E., Barrett-Wilt, G. A., Shabanowitz, J., Hunt, D. F., Walczak, C. E. and Stukenberg, P. T. (2004). Aurora B phosphorylates centromeric MCAK and regulates its localization and microtubule depolymerization activity. Curr. Biol. 14, 273-286.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lenart, P., Petronczki, M., Steegmaier, M., Di Fiore, B., Lipp, J. J., Hoffmann, M., Rettig, W. J., Kraut, N. and Peters, J. M. (2007). The small-molecule inhibitor BI 2536 reveals novel insights into mitotic roles of polo-like kinase 1. Curr. Biol. 17, 304-315.[CrossRef][Medline]
Manning, A. L., Ganem, N. J., Bakhoum, S. F., Wagenbach, M., Wordeman, L. and Compton, D. A. (2007). The kinesin-13 proteins Kif2a, Kif2b, and Kif2c/MCAK have distinct roles during mitosis in human cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 2970-2979.
Mishima, M., Kaitna, S. and Glotzer, M. (2002). Central spindle assembly and cytokinesis require a kinesin-like protein/RhoGAP complex with microtubule bundling activity. Dev. Cell 2, 41-54.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ohi, R., Sapra, T., Howard, J. and Mitchison, T. J. (2004). Differentiation of cytoplasmic and meiotic spindle assembly MCAK functions by Aurora B-dependent phosphorylation. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 2895-2906.
Ohi, R., Burbank, K., Liu, Q. and Mitchison, T. J. (2007). Nonredundant functions of Kinesin-13s during meiotic spindle assembly. Curr. Biol. 17, 953-959.[CrossRef][Medline]
Qian, Y. W., Erikson, E., Li, C. and Maller, J. L. (1998). Activated polo-like kinase Plx1 is required at multiple points during mitosis in Xenopus laevis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 4262-4271.
Sampath, S. C., Ohi, R., Leismann, O., Salic, A., Pozniakovski, A. and Funabiki, H. (2004). The chromosomal passenger complex is required for chromatin-induced microtubule stabilization and spindle assembly. Cell 118, 187-202.[CrossRef][Medline]
Seki, A., Coppinger, J. A., Du, H., Jang, C. Y., Yates, J. R., 3rd and Fang, G. (2008a). Plk1- and beta-TrCP-dependent degradation of Bora controls mitotic progression. J. Cell Biol. 181, 65-78.
Seki, A., Coppinger, J. A., Jang, C. Y., Yates, J. R. and Fang, G. (2008b). Bora and the kinase Aurora a cooperatively activate the kinase Plk1 and control mitotic entry. Science 320, 1655-1658.
Skoufias, D. A., Indorato, R. L., Lacroix, F., Panopoulos, A. and Margolis, R. L. (2007). Mitosis persists in the absence of Cdk1 activity when proteolysis or protein phosphatase activity is suppressed. J. Cell Biol. 179, 671-685.
Sumara, I., Gimenez-Abian, J. F., Gerlich, D., Hirota, T., Kraft, C., de la Torre, C., Ellenberg, J. and Peters, J. M. (2004). Roles of polo-like kinase 1 in the assembly of functional mitotic spindles. Curr. Biol. 14, 1712-1722.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sunkel, C. E. and Glover, D. M. (1988). Polo, a mitotic mutant of Drosophila displaying abnormal spindle poles. J. Cell Sci. 89, 25-38.
van de Weerdt, B. C. and Medema, R. H. (2006). Polo-like kinases: a team in control of the division. Cell Cycle 5, 853-864.[Medline]
Wordeman, L. (2005). Microtubule-depolymerizing kinesins. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 17, 82-88.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zhang, X., Lan, W., Ems-McClung, S. C., Stukenberg, P. T. and Walczak, C. E. (2007). Aurora B phosphorylates multiple sites on mitotic centromere-associated kinesin to spatially and temporally regulate its function. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 3264-3276.
Zhang, X., Ems-McClung, S. C. and Walczak, C. E. (2008). Aurora A phosphorylates MCAK to control ran-dependent spindle bipolarity. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 2752-2765.
Zhao, W. M., Coppinger, J. A., Seki, A., Cheng, X. L., Yates, J. R., 3rd and Fang, G. (2008). RCS1, a substrate of APC/C, controls the metaphase to anaphase transition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 13415-13420.
Zhu, H., Coppinger, J. A., Jang, C. Y., Yates, J. R., 3rd. and Fang, G. (2008). FAM29A promotes microtubule amplification via recruitment of the NEDD1-{gamma}-tubulin complex to the mitotic spindle. J. Cell Biol. 183, 835-848.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||