|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | |||||
First published online December 1, 2003
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/jcs.00836
Research Article |
1 Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Universitaetstrasse 10, 78457 Konstanz, Germany
2 Department of Pathology, Centre Medical Universitaire, Geneva, Switzerland
3 Laboratory for Micro- and Nanotechnology, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen-PSI, Switzerland
* Author for correspondence at present address: Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Institut für Allgemeine Zoologie, Erbertstrasse 1, 07743 Jena, Germany (e-mail: bastmeyer{at}pan.zoo.uni-jena.de)
Accepted 18 August 2003
Cell adhesion, spreading and migration require the dynamic formation and dispersal of contacts with the extracellular matrix (ECM). In vivo, the number, availability and distribution of ECM binding sites dictate the shape of a cell and determine its mobility. To analyse the geometrical limits of ECM binding sites required for cell attachment and spreading, we used microcontact printing to produce regular patterns of ECM protein dots of defined size separated by nonadhesive regions. Cells cultured on these substrata adhere to and spread on ECM regions as small as 0.1 µm2, when spacing between dots is less than 5 µm. Spacing of 5-25 µm induces a cell to adapt its shape to the ECM pattern. The ability to spread and migrate on dots
1 µm2 ceases when the dot separation is
30 µm. The extent of cell spreading is directly correlated to the total substratum coverage with ECM-proteins, but irrespective of the geometrical pattern. An optimal spreading extent is reached at a surface coating above 15%. Knowledge of these geometrical limits is essential for an understanding of cell adhesion and migration, and for the design of artificial surfaces that optimally interact with cells in a living tissue.
Key words: Microcontact printing, Patterned substratum, Focal adhesion, Integrin, Cytoskeleton
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. A. C. Harley, H.-D. Kim, M. H. Zaman, I. V. Yannas, D. A. Lauffenburger, and L. J. Gibson Microarchitecture of Three-Dimensional Scaffolds Influences Cell Migration Behavior via Junction Interactions Biophys. J., October 15, 2008; 95(8): 4013 - 4024. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Pouthas, P. Girard, V. Lecaudey, T. B. N. Ly, D. Gilmour, C. Boulin, R. Pepperkok, and E. G. Reynaud In migrating cells, the Golgi complex and the position of the centrosome depend on geometrical constraints of the substratum J. Cell Sci., July 15, 2008; 121(14): 2406 - 2414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Northey, J. Chmielecki, E. Ngan, C. Russo, M. G. Annis, W. J. Muller, and P. M. Siegel Signaling through ShcA Is Required for Transforming Growth Factor {beta}- and Neu/ErbB-2-Induced Breast Cancer Cell Motility and Invasion Mol. Cell. Biol., May 15, 2008; 28(10): 3162 - 3176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. von Philipsborn, S. Lang, Z. Jiang, F. Bonhoeffer, and M. Bastmeyer Substrate-Bound Protein Gradients for Cell Culture Fabricated by Microfluidic Networks and Microcontact Printing Sci. Signal., November 27, 2007; 2007(414): pl6 - pl6. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Cavalcanti-Adam, T. Volberg, A. Micoulet, H. Kessler, B. Geiger, and J. P. Spatz Cell Spreading and Focal Adhesion Dynamics Are Regulated by Spacing of Integrin Ligands Biophys. J., April 15, 2007; 92(8): 2964 - 2974. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. P. Helmke and A. R. Minerick Designing a nano-interface in a microfluidic chip to probe living cells: Challenges and perspectives PNAS, April 25, 2006; 103(17): 6419 - 6424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Goffin, P. Pittet, G. Csucs, J. W. Lussi, J.-J. Meister, and B. Hinz Focal adhesion size controls tension-dependent recruitment of {alpha}-smooth muscle actin to stress fibers J. Cell Biol., January 16, 2006; 172(2): 259 - 268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. D. Gallant, K. E. Michael, and A. J. Garcia Cell Adhesion Strengthening: Contributions of Adhesive Area, Integrin Binding, and Focal Adhesion Assembly Mol. Biol. Cell, September 1, 2005; 16(9): 4329 - 4340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||