|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | |||||
First published online 18 April 2006
doi: 10.1242/jcs.02913
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Article |
1 RIKEN Bioresource Center, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0074, Japan
2 Department of Integrated Biosciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, University of Tokyo, Chiba 277-8562, Japan
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: ogura{at}rtc.riken.go.jp)
Accepted 1 February 2006
In general, cloning undifferentiated preimplantation embryos (blastomeres) or embryonic stem cells is more efficient than cloning differentiated somatic cells. Therefore, there has been an assumption that tissue-specific stem cells might serve as efficient donors for nuclear transfer because of the undifferentiated state of their genome. Here, we show that this is not the case with adult hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). Although we have demonstrated for the first time that mouse HSCs can be cloned to generate offspring, the birth rates (0-0.7%) were lowest among the clones tested (cumulus, immature Sertoli and fibroblast cells). Only 6% of reconstructed embryos reached the morula or blastocyst stage in vitro (versus 46% for cumulus clones; P<5x10-10). Transcription and gene expression analyses of HSC clone embryos revealed that they initiated zygotic gene activation (ZGA) at the appropriate timing, but failed to activate five out of six important embryonic genes examined, including Hdac1 (encoding histone deacetylase 1), a key regulator of subsequent ZGA. These results suggest that the HSC genome has less plasticity than we imagined, at least in terms of reprogrammability in the ooplasm after nuclear transfer.
Key words: Embryos, Hematopoietic stem cells, Mice, Nuclear transfer, Zygotic gene activation
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Wada, J. Kikuchi, N. Nishimura, R. Shimizu, T. Kitamura, and Y. Furukawa Expression Levels of Histone Deacetylases Determine the Cell Fate of Hematopoietic Progenitors J. Biol. Chem., October 30, 2009; 284(44): 30673 - 30683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Hochedlinger and K. Plath Epigenetic reprogramming and induced pluripotency Development, February 15, 2009; 136(4): 509 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Magnani and R. A Cabot Manipulation of SMARCA2 and SMARCA4 transcript levels in porcine embryos differentially alters development and expression of SMARCA1, SOX2, NANOG, and EIF1 Reproduction, January 1, 2009; 137(1): 23 - 33. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Nakamura, K. Inoue, S. Ogawa, H. Umehara, N. Ogonuki, H. Miki, T. Kimura, A. Ogura, and T. Nakano Effects of Akt signaling on nuclear reprogramming Genes Cells, December 1, 2008; 13(12): 1269 - 1277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.L Green, D.N Wells, and B Oback Cattle Cloned from Increasingly Differentiated Muscle Cells Biol Reprod, September 1, 2007; 77(3): 395 - 406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. K Berg, C. Li, G. Asher, D. N Wells, and B. Oback Red Deer Cloned from Antler Stem Cells and Their Differentiated Progeny Biol Reprod, September 1, 2007; 77(3): 384 - 394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Li, V. Greco, G. Guasch, E. Fuchs, and P. Mombaerts Mice cloned from skin cells PNAS, February 20, 2007; 104(8): 2738 - 2743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Mizutani, H. Ohta, S. Kishigami, N. Van Thuan, T. Hikichi, S. Wakayama, M. Kosaka, E. Sato, and T. Wakayama Developmental ability of cloned embryos from neural stem cells. Reproduction, December 1, 2006; 132(6): 849 - 857. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||