|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | |||||
First published online 14 November 2007
doi: 10.1242/jcs.018366
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Article |


Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Maulbeerstrasse 66, CH-4058 Basel, Switzerland
¶ Author for correspondence (e-mail: susan.gasser{at}fmi.ch)
Accepted 20 September 2007
Double-strand breaks (DSB) in yeast lead to the formation of repair foci and induce a checkpoint response that requires both the ATR-related kinase Mec1 and its target, Rad53. By combining high-resolution confocal microscopy and chromatin-immunoprecipitation assays, we analysed the genetic requirements for and the kinetics of Mec1 recruitment to an irreparable HO-endonuclease-induced DSB. Coincident with the formation of a 3' overhang, the Mec1-Ddc2 (Lcd1) complex is recruited into a single focus that colocalises with the DSB site and precipitates with single-strand DNA (ssDNA). The absence of Rad24 impaired cut-site resection, Mec1 recruitment and focus formation, whereas, in the absence of yKu70, both ssDNA accumulation and Mec1 recruitment was accelerated. By contrast, mutation of the N-terminus of the large RPA subunit blocked Mec1 focus formation without affecting DSB processing, arguing for a direct involvement of RPA in Mec1-Ddc2 recruitment. Conversely, loss of Rad51 enhanced Mec1 focus formation independently of ssDNA formation, suggesting that Rad51 might compete for the interaction of RPA with Mec1-Ddc2. In all cases, Mec1 focus formation correlated with checkpoint activation. These observations led to a model that links end-processing and competition between different ssDNA-binding factors with Mec1-Ddc2 focus formation and checkpoint activation.
Key words: Double-strand break, ATR-related kinase, Checkpoint, Single-stranded DNA, Rad24, RPA, Rad51
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Agmon, S. Pur, B. Liefshitz, and M. Kupiec Analysis of repair mechanism choice during homologous recombination Nucleic Acids Res., August 1, 2009; 37(15): 5081 - 5092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Bystricky, H. Van Attikum, M.-D. Montiel, V. Dion, L. Gehlen, and S. M. Gasser Regulation of Nuclear Positioning and Dynamics of the Silent Mating Type Loci by the Yeast Ku70/Ku80 Complex Mol. Cell. Biol., February 1, 2009; 29(3): 835 - 848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Nagai, K. Dubrana, M. Tsai-Pflugfelder, M. B. Davidson, T. M. Roberts, G. W. Brown, E. Varela, F. Hediger, S. M. Gasser, and N. J. Krogan Functional Targeting of DNA Damage to a Nuclear Pore-Associated SUMO-Dependent Ubiquitin Ligase Science, October 24, 2008; 322(5901): 597 - 602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||