spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 22 January 2008
doi: 10.1242/jcs.020107


Journal of Cell Science 121, 421-427 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jcs.020107v1
121/4/421    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JCS
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laude, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Prior, I. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Laude, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Prior, I. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Article

Palmitoylation and localisation of RAS isoforms are modulated by the hypervariable linker domain

Alex J. Laude and Ian A. Prior*

Physiological Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: iprior{at}liverpool.ac.uk)

Accepted 13 November 2007

RAS isoforms have been proposed to exhibit differing biological outputs due to differences in their relative occupancy of cellular organelles and signalling microdomains. The membrane binding and targeting motifs of RAS are encoded by the C-terminal hypervariable region (HVR), and the precise localisation depends upon interactions between the HVR and the host membrane. Classic studies revealed that all RAS proteins rely on farnesylation and either palmitoylation or a polybasic stretch for stable binding to membranes. We now show that, for N-RAS and Ki-RAS4A, mono-palmitoylation and farnesylation are not sufficient for specifying stable cell-surface localisation. A third motif that is present within the linker domain of all palmitoylated RAS HVRs is necessary for stabilising localisation to the plasma membrane. This motif comprises acidic residues that stabilise palmitoylation and basic amino acids that are likely to interact electrostatically with acidic phospholipids enriched at the cell surface. Importantly, altered localisation is achieved without changes in palmitoylation status. Our data provide a mechanism for distinct HVR membrane interactions controlling subcellular distribution. In the context of the full-length RAS proteins, this is likely to be of crucial importance for controlling signalling output and engagement with different pools of effectors.

Key words: RAS, Isoforms, Palmitoylation, Trafficking, Compartmentalisation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JCS:

Ras isoforms: the missing linker

JCS 2008 121: 401. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
K. Inder, A. Harding, S. J. Plowman, M. R. Philips, R. G. Parton, and J. F. Hancock
Activation of the MAPK Module from Different Spatial Locations Generates Distinct System Outputs
Mol. Biol. Cell, November 1, 2008; 19(11): 4776 - 4784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Eisenberg, K. Giehl, Y. I. Henis, and M. Ehrlich
Differential Interference of Chlorpromazine with the Membrane Interactions of Oncogenic K-Ras and Its Effects on Cell Growth
J. Biol. Chem., October 3, 2008; 283(40): 27279 - 27288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008