The fully linked HTML version of this article has now been published.
JCS ePress
online publication date 23 Jan 2003
doi: 10.1242/jcs.00332
Research Article
Deletion of proteasomal subunit S5a/Rpn10/p54 causes lethality, multiple mitotic defects and overexpression of proteasomal genes in Drosophila melanogaster
Tamás Szlanka,
Lajos Haracska,
István Kiss,
Péter Deák,
Éva Kurucz,
István Andó,
Erika Virágh,
and
Andor Udvardy*
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: udvardy{at}nucleus.szbk.u-szeged.hu)
The regulatory complex of the 26S proteasome is responsible for the selective recognition and binding of multiubiquitinated proteins. It was earlier shown that the subunit S5a/Rpn10/p54 of the regulatory complex is the only cellular protein capable of binding multiubiquitin chains in an in vitro overlay assay. The role of this subunit in substrate selection, however, is a subject of debate, following the observation that its deletion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is not lethal and instead causes only a mild phenotype. To study the function of this subunit in higher eukaryotes, a mutant Drosophila strain was constructed by deleting the single copy gene encoding subunit S5a/Rpn10/p54. This deletion caused larval-pupal polyphasic lethality, multiple mitotic defects, the accumulation of higher multimers of ubiquitinated proteins and a huge accumulation of defective 26S proteasome particles. Deletion of the subunit S5a/Rpn10/p54 does not destabilise the regulatory complex and does not disturb the assembly of the regulatory complex and the catalytic core. The pupal lethality is a consequence of the depletion of the maternally provided 26S proteasome during the larval stages and a sudden increase in the proteasomal activity demands during the first few hours of pupal development. The huge accumulation of the fully assembled 26S proteasome in the deletion mutant and the lack of free subunits or partially assembled particles indicate that there is a highly coordinated accumulation of all the subunits of the 26S proteasome. This suggests that in higher eukaryotes, as with yeast, a feedback circuit coordinately regulates the expression of the proteasomal genes, and this adjusts the actual proteasome concentration in the cells according to the temporal and/or spatial proteolytic demands.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Kurepa, S. Wang, Y. Li, D. Zaitlin, A. J. Pierce, and J. A. Smalle
Loss of 26S Proteasome Function Leads to Increased Cell Size and Decreased Cell Number in Arabidopsis Shoot Organs
Plant Physiology,
May 1, 2009;
150(1):
178 - 189.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Hamazaki, K. Sasaki, H. Kawahara, S.-i. Hisanaga, K. Tanaka, and S. Murata
Rpn10-Mediated Degradation of Ubiquitinated Proteins Is Essential for Mouse Development
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
October 1, 2007;
27(19):
6629 - 6638.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J. Neuburger, K. J. Saville, J. Zeng, K.-A. Smyth, and J. M. Belote
A Genetic Suppressor of Two Dominant Temperature-Sensitive Lethal Proteasome Mutants of Drosophila melanogaster Is Itself a Mutated Proteasome Subunit Gene
Genetics,
July 1, 2006;
173(3):
1377 - 1387.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Lundgren, P. Masson, Z. Mirzaei, and P. Young
Identification and Characterization of a Drosophila Proteasome Regulatory Network
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
June 1, 2005;
25(11):
4662 - 4675.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Lundgren, P. Masson, C. A. Realini, and P. Young
Use of RNA Interference and Complementation To Study the Function of the Drosophila and Human 26S Proteasome Subunit S13
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
August 1, 2003;
23(15):
5320 - 5330.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003