spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif Propose a workshop for 2011 spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search    

The fully linked HTML version of this article has now been published.
JCS ePress online publication date 25 Aug 2004
doi: 10.1242/jcs.01335


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jcs.01335v1
117/20/4665    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fiorini, C.
Right arrow Articles by Pointis, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fiorini, C.
Right arrow Articles by Pointis, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Article

Dominant negative effect of connexin33 on gap junctional communication is mediated by connexin43 sequestration


Céline Fiorini, Baharia Mograbi, Laurent Cronier, Isabelle Bourget, Xavier Decrouy, Marielle Nebout, Bernard Ferrua, André Malassine, Michel Samson, Patrick Fénichel, Dominique Segretain, and Georges Pointis*
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: pointis{at}unice.fr)

Gap junctional intercellular communication is involved in the control of cell proliferation and differentiation. Connexin33, a member of the multi-gene family of gap junction proteins, exerts an inhibitory effect on intercellular communication when injected into Xenopus oocytes. However, the molecular mechanisms involved remain to be elucidated. Our results show that connexin33 was only expressed within the seminiferous tubules in the testis. In contrast to the majority of connexins, connexin33 was unphosphorylated. Immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that connexin33 physically interacted with connexin43, mainly with the phosphorylated P1 isoform of connexin43 but not with connexin26 and connexin32, two other connexins expressed in the tubular compartment. In Sertoli cells and COS-7 cells, connexin43 was located at the plasma membrane, whereas in connexin33 transfected cells, the specific association of connexin33/43 was sequestered in the intracellular compartment. High-resolution fluorescent deconvolution microscopy indicated that the connexin33/43 complex was mainly found within early endosomes. Sequestration of connexin33/43 complex was associated with a complete inhibition of the gap junctional coupling between adjacent cells. These findings provide the first evidence of a new mechanistic model by which a native connexin, exerting a dominant negative effect, can inhibit gap junctional intercellular communication. In the testis, connexin33 could exert a specific role on germ cell proliferation by suppressing the regulatory effect of connexin43.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
J. Gilleron, C. Fiorini, D. Carette, C. Avondet, M. M. Falk, D. Segretain, and G. Pointis
Molecular reorganization of Cx43, Zo-1 and Src complexes during the endocytosis of gap junction plaques in response to a non-genomic carcinogen
J. Cell Sci., December 15, 2008; 121(24): 4069 - 4078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
X.-Q. Gong, Q. Shao, S. Langlois, D. Bai, and D. W. Laird
Differential Potency of Dominant Negative Connexin43 Mutants in Oculodentodigital Dysplasia
J. Biol. Chem., June 29, 2007; 282(26): 19190 - 19202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
C. Fiorini, X. Decrouy, N. Defamie, D. Segretain, and G. Pointis
Opposite regulation of connexin33 and connexin43 by LPS and IL-1{alpha} in spermatogenesis
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, March 1, 2006; 290(3): C733 - C740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004