spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search    

The fully linked HTML version of this article has now been published.
JCS ePress online publication date 15 Jan 2008
doi: 10.1242/jcs.021485


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jcs.021485v1
121/3/298    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Itallie, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Itallie, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, J. M.

Research Article

The density of small tight junction pores varies among cell types and is increased by expression of claudin-2


Christina M. Van Itallie*, Jennifer Holmes, Arlene Bridges, Jody L. Gookin, Maria R. Coccaro, William Proctor, Oscar R. Colegio, and James M. Anderson
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: vitallie{at}med.unc.edu)

Epithelial tight junctions contain size- and charge-selective pores that control the paracellular movement of charged and noncharged solutes. Claudins influence the charge selectivity and electrical resistance of junctions, but there is no direct evidence describing pore composition or whether pore size or density differs among cell types. To characterize paracellular pores independent of influences from charge selectivity, we profiled the 'apparent permeabilities' (Papp) of a continuous series of noncharged polyethylene glycols (PEGs) across monolayers of five different epithelial cell lines and porcine ileum. We also characterized Papp of high and low electrical resistance MDCK cell monolayers expressing heterologous claudins. Papp profiling confirms that the paracellular barrier to noncharged solutes can be modeled as two distinct pathways: high-capacity small pores and a size-independent pathway allowing flux of larger solutes. All cell lines and ileum share a pore aperture of radius 4 Å. Using Papp of a PEG of radius 3.5 Å to report the relative pore number provides the novel insight that pore density along the junction varies among cell types and is not necessarily related to electrical resistance. Expression of claudin-2 results in a selective increase in pore number but not size and has no effect on the permeability of PEGs that are larger than the pores; however, neither knockdown of claudin-2 nor overexpression of several other claudins altered either the number of small pores or their size. We speculate that permeability of all small solutes is proportional to pore number but that small electrolytes are subject to further selectivity by the profile of claudins expressed, explaining the dissociation between the Papp for noncharged solutes and electrical resistance. Although claudins are likely to be components of the small pores, other factors might regulate pore number.







© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008