This study investigated the molecular mechanism by which Bax inhibitor 1 (BI1) abrogates the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Electron uncoupling between NADPH-dependent cytochrome P450 reductase (NPR) and cytochrome P450 2E1 (P450 2E1) is a major source of ROS on the ER membrane. ER stress produced ROS accumulation and lipid peroxidation of the ER membrane, but BI1 reduced this accumulation. Under ER stress, expression of P450 2E1 in control cells was upregulated more than in BI1-overexpressing cells. In control cells, inhibiting P450 2E1 through chemical or siRNA approaches suppressed ROS accumulation, ER membrane lipid peroxidation and the resultant cell death after ER stress. However, it had little effect in BI1-overexpressing cells. In addition, BI1 knock down also increased ROS accumulation and expression of P450 2E1. In a reconstituted phospholipid membrane containing purified BI1, NPR and P450 2E1, BI1 dose-dependently decreased the production of ROS. BI1 bound to NPR with higher affinity than P450 2E1. Furthermore, BI1 overexpression reduced the interaction of NPR and P450 2E1, and decreased the catalytic activity of P450 2E1, suggesting that the flow of electrons from NPR to P450 2E1 can be modulated by BI1. In summary, BI1 reduces the accumulation of ROS and the resultant cell death through regulating P450 2E1.
- BAX inhibitor 1
- Reactive oxygen species
- Endoplasmic reticulum
- NADPH-P450 reductase
- Cytochrome P450
- Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate
- Microsomal monooxygenase
- Unfolded protein response
The anti-apoptotic protein, BI1 (Bax inhibitor 1) (Kadowaki et al., 2005), protects against apoptosis induced by ER stress (Xu and Reed, 1998). Cells isolated from BI1–/– mice exhibit hypersensitivity to apoptosis induced by ER stress (Chae et al., 2004). In BI1–/– mice, the ischemia/reperfusion-induced unfolded protein response is significantly increased, leading to increased cell death (Bailly-Maitre et al., 2006).
BI1 is protective, in part, via its pH-sensitive regulation of intra-ER Ca2+ levels (Kim et al., 2008). BI1 also regulates ROS production (Kawai-Yamada et al., 2004; Baek et al., 2004) in the ER by modifying heme oxygenase 1 (HO1) expression.
In the ER, the major source of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is the microsomal monooxygenase (MMO) system, which is composed of cytochrome P450 (P450), NADPH-P450 reductase (NPR) and phospholipids (Premereur et al., 1986; Davydov, 2001). Although the main function of MMO is mixed-function oxygenation of exogenous compounds (xenobiotics) and some endogenous substrates, the MMO system also leads to the release of large amounts of reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as superoxide anion radical and H2O2, from the P450 enzyme (especially cytochrome P450 2E1) without substrate oxidation (Nieto et al., 2002). The efficiency, or degree of coupling, of electron transfer from NADPH to P450 is usually less than 50-60%, often being as low as 0.5-3.0%. This `electron leakage' contributes significantly to ROS production during redox cycling between NPR and eukaryotic P450s.
In this study, we hypothesized that ER stress results in the accumulation of ROS generated from the MMO system and that BI1 can affect this system, leading to regulation of ROS on the ER membrane.
BI1 regulates ER stress-associated ROS accumulation and ER membrane lipid peroxidation
To examine the specific mechanism of ROS regulation by BI1, we first generated a stable monoclonal HepG2/BI1 clone (Fig. 1A, inset) and measured ROS levels in Neo (Neo-resistant vector-transfected: control) and BI1 (BI1-overexpressing) cells after treatment with the ER-stress inducers thapsigargin or tunicamycin. Treatment with thapsigargin significantly increased ROS levels in Neo cells, but not in BI1 cells (Fig. 1A). BI1 also inhibited tunicamycin-induced ROS accumulation. In addition, ER stress induced lipid peroxidation on the ER membrane in Neo cells, whereas BI1 cells showed smaller changes in the amount of reacted malondialdehyde (MDA) (Fig. 1B).
ER stress-induced ROS and cell death are associated with P450 2E1, which is regulated by BI1
P450 2E1 is associated with increased ROS (Nieto et al., 2002), and BI1 cells showed decreased basal expression of P450 2E1 (Fig. 2A). Western blot experiments showed that thapsigargin and tunicamycin increased the expression of P450 2E1 in Neo cells, whereas BI1 cells showed no induction of P450 2E1 (Fig. 2B).
To determine whether ER stress-induced accumulation of ROS occurs upstream or downstream of P450 2E1 induction, the expression of P450 2E1 was monitored by immunoblotting of cells treated with the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine (NAC) or with reduced glutathione (GSH). The expression of P450 2E1 was not affected by either NAC or GSH (supplementary material Fig. S1A,B). These results suggest that P450 2E1 induction is followed by ROS production in ER stress-exposed cells.
The effect of P450 2E1 was also confirmed in a BI1 knockdown system. BI1 siRNA-transfected cells reversed BI1-induced p450 2E1 inhibition, showing increased expression of P450 2E1 (supplementary material Fig. S2A). ROS accumulation was also modestly increased in the BI1 knockdown system (supplementary material Fig. S2B). Thus, BI1 regulates P450 2E1 induction and the resultant accumulation of ROS.
We next tested whether 4-methylpyrazole (4-MP), a specific P450 2E1 inhibitor (Gong et al., 2003; Halpert et al., 1994), could block lipid peroxidation on the ER membrane. 4-MP blocked thapsigargin- or tunicamycin-stimulated lipid peroxidation in Neo cells (Fig. 3A). Similarly, inhibition of P450 2E1 decreased the amount of H2O2 in ER-stressed Neo cells (Fig. 3B). In ER stress-exposed BI1 cells, 4-MP additionally inhibited the reduced level of ROS and lipid peroxidation (Fig. 3A,B). To modulate P450 2E1 levels directly, we used a siRNA directed against P450 2E1 and decreased the expression of P450 2E1 without affecting the expression of BI1 (Fig. 3C). The decreased P450 2E1 expression significantly inhibited ER stress-induced ROS accumulation (Fig. 3C), and tended to augment the decreased ROS levels in the ER stress-exposed BI1 cells. The effects on ROS by chemical and gene silencing approaches in BI1 cells (Fig. 3A-C) are consistent with the finding that P450 2E1 induction is not completely blocked by BI1 (Fig. 1A).
To extrapolate the role of P450 2E1 on ER stress-initiated ROS accumulation to cell death, we measured the viability of Neo and BI1 cells that were exposed to ER stress in the presence of 4-MP or under P450 2E1 knock-down. ER stress-induced cell death could be regulated by both of approaches-chemical and siRNA (Fig. 4A,B). In particular, 4-MP dose-dependently inhibited ER stress-induced cell death at concentrations (1 and 10 mM), consistent with an effect on P450 2E1 activity (Amato et al., 1998; Haorah et al., 2005). P450 2E1 siRNA also significantly inhibited cell death, but less than 4-MP treatment, probably owing to limitations of silencing efficiency. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) or reduced glutathione (GSH) treatment of cells exposed to thapsigargin or tunicamycin blocked cell death in Neo cells, but did not dramatically affect BI1 cells (Fig. 4C), as reported in another cell system, HT1080 cells (Lee et al., 2007).
BI1 decreases the production of ROS by P450 2E1 in a reconstitution system
To study the function of BI1, we purified and identified recombinant BI1 protein (supplementary material Fig. S3A,B), and measured the production of H2O2 by P450 2E1 using a reconstitution system in the absence of BI1. Reconstituted P450 2E1 released H2O2 and promoted NADPH oxidation in the presence or absence of substrate (supplementary material Table S1). In human microsomes enriched with P450 2E1, similar patterns of NADPH oxidation and H2O2 release were observed (see supplementary material Table S1).
By contrast, when recombinant BI1 was incorporated into the reconstitution system by simple mixing of the soluble protein with DLPC liposomes (containing P450 and NPR), the production of H2O2 by P450 2E1 decreased with increasing concentrations of BI1 in an exponential decay manner, and eventually reached a state of equilibrium, in which only ∼10% of H2O2 was produced at a protein ratio (BI1:NPR) of 1.5:2.0, when the amount of H2O2 in the sample without reconstituted BI1 was 100% (Fig. 5A).
To mimic conditions similar to those in vivo, the experiment was repeated with human microsomes enriched with P450 2E1. Adding increasing amounts of recombinant BI1 to the microsomes decreased the H2O2 levels (Fig. 5B). Although the presence of endogenous BI1 protein and the correct incorporation of recombinant BI1 into microsomes are unclear, this result indirectly implies that BI1 may act as an antioxidant in cells. To confirm the role of the C-terminal region of BI1 on the regulation of ROS production, we inhibited BI1 function using an antibody raised against the C terminus (AMNEKDKKKEKK). The amount of H2O2 produced increased with increasing ratios of antibody to BI1 protein (Fig. 5C), but was not altered in the presence of anti-mouse serum (results not shown). This result suggests that the C-terminal region of BI1 is important in decreasing H2O2 production.
We then measured the production of H2O2 using an assay kit containing Amplex Red reagent, a fluorescent probe that is specifically oxidized by H2O2 in the presence of peroxidase. BI1 dose-dependently and linearly decreased the emission fluorescence of the probe when the reaction sample included P450 2E1 (Fig. 6A). As mentioned previously, P450 2E1 generated the greatest amount of H2O2 among the P450s. Together with the spectrophotometric data, these results indicate that BI1 reduces the production of H2O2 with increasing ratios of BI1/NPR. However, paralleling the result from the C-terminal neutralizing antibody treatment (Fig. 5C), recombinant deletion mutants of BI1 (Δ8 and Δ16) (supplementary material Fig. S3C) showed decreased inhibition of H2O2 production. In particular, in the Δ16 mutant, there was almost no effect on inhibition, emphasizing the importance of the C-terminal region of BI1 in the regulation of ROS production (Fig. 6B).
The experiment above was also repeated with another fluorogenic probe, Ac-Tempo, which specifically reacts with hydroxyl radicals and superoxide to emit fluorescence (Jiang et al., 2004; Touyz et al., 2003). Fluorescence occurred in the reconstitution system containing P450 2E1 in the absence of BI1 protein (supplementary material Fig. S4A, line a), indicating the release of radicals and superoxide but not absolute levels of ROS. Increasing the ratio of BI1/NPR decreased the fluorescence intensity of Ac-Tempo, suggesting that BI1 reduced the release of ROS (supplementary material Fig. S4A). ROS inhibition was lower in recombinant deletion mutants of BI1 (supplementary material Fig. S4B); however, the BI1 mutants did not show dramatic differences in membrane binding, suggesting that the diminished effect of ROS inhibition in the BI1 mutants was not the cause. We next measured the effects of BI1 on the activities of catalase and horseradish peroxidase, without phospholipids or in a membrane-bound state. However, BI1 did not change catalytic activity in the presence of H2O2 (results not shown), suggesting that BI1 acts as a functional modulator of P450 2E1-induced oxidative stress.
BI1 interacts with NPR and P450 2E1
BI1 may directly interact with the NPR and/or P450 enzyme system. Therefore, we first tested the interaction of BI1 with NPR in a cell system. Co-transfection of BI1 (or CΔBI1: C-terminal deleted BI1) and NPR in 293T cells allowed co-immunoprecipitation of full-length BI1 and NPR, but not of CΔBI1 and NPR (Fig. 7A). This result suggests that BI1 and NPR bind each other in vivo, and that the C terminus of BI1 is required for binding. By contrast, direct binding between BI1 and P450 2E1 in the same system was relatively low (Fig. 7B). In addition, we examined the association of BI1 with NPR or P450 2E1 in a reconstitution system using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) analysis between Trp residues (NPR or P450 2E1) and IAEDANS (BI1). The fluorescence intensity at 490 nm increased with increasing NPR/BI1 ratios (Fig. 7C). Although the fluorescence intensity from increasing P450 2E1/BI1 ratios also increased (Fig. 7D), the intensity was much lower than that from NPR/BI1 (Fig. 7C). These results indicate that BI1 more efficiently interacts with NPR in a purified state. However, it is unclear how IAEDANS, a bulky fluorescent probe, influences the conformation of BI1 and thereby the physical contact between BI1 and NPR (or P450 2E1). As a control, the same FRET experiment was repeated in a soluble state without liposomes. However, we were not able to measure any detectable energy transfer between BI1 and NPR, which suggests that the physical association of both proteins occurs only in a membrane-bound state.
In a physiological system, all of the NPR, P450 and BI1 reside on the ER membrane. NPR and P450 2E1 binding in the presence of BI1 is required for the MMO system to initiate oxygenation. The presence of BI1 altered the binding affinity between NPR and P450 2E1 (Fig. 8), suggesting the strong affinity between BI1 and NPR may induce dissociation between NPR and P450 2E1 through binding to either component. However, we could not exclude an interaction between BI1 and P450 2E1, although it would be weaker than between BI1 and NPR.
BI1 decreases the activity of P450 2E1
BI1 induced a change in the activity of P450 2E1, perhaps by altering the flow of electrons from NPR to P450 2E1. To test this possibility, we measured the activity of P450 2E1 as a function of NPR concentration. p-Nitrophenol and chlorzoxazone hydroxylase activities decreased with decreasing amounts of NPR (fixed levels of P450 2E1) (Fig. 9A). With p-nitrophenol, BI1 reduced P450 2E1 activity by ∼60% at an NPR to P450 2E1 ratio of 0.5 (with catalytic activity in the absence of BI1 set at 100%).
In order to show more directly the effect of BI1 on P450 2E1 activity, we fixed the amounts of both NPR and P450 2E1, and only changed the amount of BI1. Consistently, P450 2E1 activity was reduced as a function of BI1 concentration (Fig. 9B).
The role of BI1 on P450 2E1 expression
BI1 inhibits ER stress-mediated ROS accumulation by regulating P450 2E1 activity. P450 2E1, a major source of ROS on the ER membrane, increased in response to the ER stresses, thapsigargin and tunicamycin (Fig. 2B). Our results are consistent with the theory that P450 2E1, which metabolizes and activates many toxicologically important substrates (including procarcinogens) into more toxic products, increases ROS and worsens pathology. To generalize the effect of BI1 on the modulation of ROS production, further work on other P450 subtypes, such as P450 1A2, another major source of ROS formation, or other oxidative stress-generating systems should be performed. Another ER enzyme, HO-1, is increased after ER stress (Lee et al., 2007), but the increase occurs later than P450 2E1 (results not shown). Increased HO-1 expression is dependent on P450 2E1 (Gong et al., 2003) and perhaps acts as a compensatory survival signal against P450 2E1 expression. The relationship between P450 2E1 and HO-1 requires further study.
The mechanisms of BI1-induced regulatory effects on ROS generation and cell death
BI1 may protect cells from the pathological effect of P450 2E1 by decreasing oxidative stress via two potential mechanisms. First, BI1 may enzymatically destroy ROS, as do catalase and horseradish peroxidase, although BI1 did not show this in our study. BI1 protein does not change molecular weight after ROS production, indirectly indicating that BI1 itself does not capture ROS and is not consequently oxidized.
The second possibility is that BI1 scavenges ROS produced by the P450 2E1 enzyme. The inhibition of P450 2E1 through chemical and siRNA approaches (Fig. 3) supports this possibility. Furthermore, the basal level of ROS seems to be lower in BI1 cells than in Neo cells, although the basal level was similar in Neo and BI1 cells (Fig. 3B,C; supplementary material Fig. S2B). The basal reductions in ROS in BI1 cells were consistent with lower expression of P450 2E1 in the BI1 cells (Fig. 1A), suggesting BI1 scavenges ROS produced by P450 2E1 even without stresses.
ROS production induced by the ectopic expression of Bax is insensitive to the co-expression of AtBI1 (Kawai-Yamada et al., 2004). However, BAX also increases mitochondria-initiated ROS accumulation and cell death. As BI1 is expressed on the ER membrane (Xu and Reed, 1998), BI1 may only directly regulate ER-originated ROS production. We believe that ER stress-associated ROS production is initiated from the ER and extends into the mitochondria, leading to cell death. Thus, the ectopic expression of BAX can be different from our ER stress-initiated ROS system.
As it was first documented that ER-resident caspase 12 mediates ER-specific apoptosis (Nakagawa et al., 2000), ER-specific or mitochondria-interconnected pathways have been actively studied (Zhang et al., 2008). ER stress-induced ROS production may be initiated from the ER, pushing mitochondrial ROS production above the threshold, leading to cell death. The mitochondria also play an important role in amplifying apoptotic signaling from the ER, where cytochrome c release plays an essential role (Zhang et al., 2008).
BI1 was originally characterized as a protective protein that inhibited ER stress-mediated cytochrome c release but was less protective effect against cell death (Chae et al., 2004). Although it is premature to determine the specific step of BI1-induced protection with these data alone, BI1 may regulate ER stress-initiated ROS generation by interacting with the ER ROS production system, NPR and P450 2E1, and blocking the ER/mitochondria ROS amplification and apoptosis signaling.
The functional role of the physical association between BI1 and NPR
BI1 exists in close proximity and shows a higher affinity for NPR in vivo (co-immunoprecipitation between BI1 and NPR in cells) and in a reconstitution system (FRET), than P450 2E1 (Fig. 6). BI1 may induce dissociation of NPR and P450 2E1 and disrupt electron transfer between the two proteins, as a physical association between NPR and CYP family proteins is required for CYP activity and ROS production on the ER membrane.
Decreased levels of NPR decreased P450 2E1 catalytic activity more in the presence of BI1, suggesting that BI1 inhibits electron flow better when levels of NPR are limiting. In fact, P450s are present in the membrane in large excess compared with reductase, a limiting component in microsomes, with molar ratios ranging from 10:1 to 25:1 depending on treatment with inducers (Strobel et al., 1970). Therefore, the interaction of BI1 with NPR may correlate with a decrease in P450 2E1-induced ROS by regulating electron flow.
The role of the BI1 C-terminus on P450 2E1-induced ROS generation and NPR association
C-terminal deleted BI1 showed less inhibition of P450 2E1-induced ROS generation (Fig. 5B; supplementary material Fig. S4B) and no NPR binding (Fig. 6A), but was still bound to the membrane in our model membrane system. Therefore, the C-terminal region is required for BI1 activity, especially regulation of ROS and cell death.
In conclusion, BI1 decreases electron uncoupling between NPR and P450 family proteins (especially P450 2E1), reducing ROS production and cell death.
Materials and Methods
Thapsigargin and tunicamycin were bought from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA). DCF-DA (2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate) was obtained from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). The antibodies against P450 2E1, β-actin and the His6 tag, as well as the siRNAs of NADPH-dependent p450 reductase and P450 2E1, were acquired from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). The sense and antisense strands of BI1 and non-specific siRNA duplex are as follows: for BI1, 5′-GUGGAAGGCCUUCUUUCUA-3′ (sense) and 5′-UAGAAAGAAGGCCUUCCAC-3′ (antisense); for non-specific control, CUGAACAACCAAUGCAAAU-3′ (sense) and 5′-AUUUGCAUUGGUUGUUCAG-3′ (antisense). The siRNAs were synthesized in duplex and purified forms using Bioneer technology (Daejon, Korea). The Amplex Red assay kit was obtained from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). Chlorzoxazone and p-nitrophenol were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St Louis, MO). All phospholipids were obtained from Avanti Polar Lipids (Birmingham, AL). Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) and other tissue culture reagents were supplied by Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY).
Generation of Neo and BI1 stable cell lines
HA-pcDNA3-BI1 and Neo-pcDNA3 plasmids (Neo: containing neomycin-selection marker) were transfected into 80% confluent HepG2 cells with lipofectamine (Invitrogen, CA). G418 (1 mg/ml; Wako) was used for selection. Neo and BI1 stably transfected HEPG2 cell lines were generated and used during this study.
Expression and purification of recombinant proteins (P450 2E1, NPR and BI1) and catalytic activity of P450 2E1
Recombinant human P450 2E1 was prepared as described previously (Winters and Cederbaum, 1992). Recombinant rat NPR was expressed in E. coli and purified as described previously (Shen et al., 1989; Hanna et al., 1998). Recombinant human BI1 protein and its C-terminal deletion mutants (Δ8 and Δ16) containing an N-terminal (His)6 tag were subcloned into the pRSETc expression vector (Invitrogen, CA). The BI1 proteins were expressed and purified as described previously (Kim et al., 2008).
The activity of P450 2E1 was assayed by p-nitrophenol hydroxylation as described previously (Ahn et al., 2006) with slight modification. The standard incubation mixture (final volume of 0.5 ml) contained P450 2E1 (0.2 μM), NPR (0.4 μM), p-nitrophenol (100 μM) and lipid vesicles (80 μM) in 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.5). The catalytic activity of P450 2E1 was also determined by monitoring the hydroxylation of chlorzoxazone (Gillam et al., 1994).
Intracellular ROS levels were measured as previously described (Kim et al., 2005). After treatment with ER stress agents, the cells were incubated with 100 μM 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCF-DA) at 37°C for 30 minutes. The fluorescence intensity of 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein formed by a reaction between DCF-DA and intracellular ROS was analyzed by PAS flow cytometry (Partec, Münster, Germany) at excitation and emission wavelengths of 488 and 525 nm, respectively. Data are expressed as representative histograms from three independent experiments.
The microsomal fraction was obtained as previously described (Yang et al., 2004). Briefly, the cells were re-suspended in buffer A [250 mM sucrose, 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 10 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA and 1× protease inhibitor complex (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany)] on ice for 30 minutes. The cells were homogenized and the lysates centrifuged at 750 g for 10 minutes at 4°C to remove the non-lysed cells and nuclei. The supernatant was then centrifuged at 100,000 g for 1 hour at 4°C. The resulting supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was saved as the light membrane (LM:ER/microsome) fraction.
Western blotting and immunoprecipitation
Labeling of proteins
Labeling of BI1 or NPR with 1,5-IAEDANS was performed as previously described (Jeganathan et al., 2006). The amount of bound 1,5-IAEDANS was determined by absorption at 336 nm (ϵ336=6100 M–1 cm–1) (Hudson and Weber, 1973).
Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)
All fluorescence measurements were performed at 30°C using a Shimadzu RF-5301 PC spectrofluorometer with a temperature-controlled cuvette. The energy transfer between Trp residues in NPR (or P450 2E1) and IAEDANS, a cysteine-specific fluorogenic probe, was measured in the emission range of 300-600 nm, with an excitation wavelength of 290 nm. Next, 0.4 μM NPR (or P450 2E1) was reconstituted into 100 μM of dilauroylphosphatidylcholine (DLPC) liposomes, including the IAEDANS-labeled BI1 protein, whereas the ratio of NPR to BI1 (or P450 2E1/BI1, as a molar ratio) or BI1 to NPR (or BI1/P450 2E1) was increased.
Measurement of radicals and H2O2 formation
Reaction mixtures consisted of 0.4 μM P450 2E1, 0.8 μM NPR and 200 μM DLPC in the presence or absence of each substrate (100 μM) in 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.5). Reactions were initiated at 37°C by the addition of an NADPH-generating system (0.5 mM NADP+, 10 mM glucose 6-phosphate, and 1.0 IU glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase ml–1) as described previously (Guengerich, 1994). The production of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was determined spectrophotometrically by reaction with ferroammonium sulfate and KSCN as described (Atkins and Sligar, 1988). The level of H2O2 was also measured fluorometrically using Amplex Red reagent (Hopper et al., 2006). The Amplex Red assay kit was used according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Polyclonal antibody preparation against BI1 and immuno-inhibition
The epitope corresponding to the C terminus of BI1 containing an additional Cys residue (CAMNEKDKKKEKK) was used as an antigen, and antibodies against BI1 were generated (Kim et al., 2008). Functional inhibition of BI1 by these polyclonal antibodies was performed by preincubating BI1 and the antibody with an increasing ratio of antibody to BI1 without NPR in the reconstitution sample. After the addition of NPR, the amount of H2O2 produced was measured.
NADPH oxidation was measured by reconstitution of P450 2E1 and NPR into DLPC, as described previously (Yun and Miller, 2000), in the presence or absence of BI1.
Data from the dose-response experiments were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA), as well as by two-tailed Student's t-tests. P<0.05 was considered significant. In each case, the statistical test used is indicated, and the number of experiments is stated individually in the legend of each figure.
Supplementary material available online at http://jcs.biologists.org/cgi/content/full/122/8/1126/DC1
↵* These authors contributed equally to this work
We thank Dr John C. Reed (The Burnham Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA) for critical discussion about this manuscript. This study is supported by KOSEF (R01-2006-000-10422-0 and R01-2007-000-20275-0) and by a Korea Research Foundation Grant (KRF-2005-070-C00081 and KRF-2007-314-C00234).
- Accepted December 1, 2008.
- © The Company of Biologists Limited 2009