Cells inversely adjust the plasma membrane levels of integrins and cadherins during cell migration and cell–cell adhesion but the regulatory mechanisms that coordinate these trafficking events remain unknown. Here, we demonstrate that the small GTPase Rab35 maintains cadherins at the cell surface to promote cell–cell adhesion. Simultaneously, Rab35 supresses the activity of the GTPase Arf6 to downregulate an Arf6-dependent recycling pathway for β1-integrin and EGF receptors, resulting in inhibition of cell migration and attenuation of signaling downstream of these receptors. Importantly, the phenotypes of decreased cell adhesion and increased cell migration observed following Rab35 knock down are consistent with the epithelial–mesenchymal transition, a feature of invasive cancer cells, and we show that Rab35 expression is suppressed in a subset of cancers characterized by Arf6 hyperactivity. Our data thus identify a key molecular mechanism that efficiently coordinates the inverse intracellular sorting and cell surface levels of cadherin and integrin receptors for cell migration and differentiation.
The migratory potential of cells is determined by the composition of the receptor proteome present at the cell surface. Integrins engage components of the extracellular matrix and enhanced internalization and recycling of integrins is essential for cell migration (reviewed in Margadant et al., 2011). On the other hand, surface-expressed cadherins form homophilic interactions that promote cell–cell contact and therefore inhibit cell migration (Huttenlocher et al., 1998; Delva and Kowalczyk, 2009). It is thus imperative for cells to balance the surface levels of these receptors in order to go through complex cellular programs such as cell migration during development and cell–cell adhesion during tissue differentiation.
The cell surface proteome is in constant flux, new molecules are added from the secretory pathway and through translocation from endosomal compartments, while endocytosis removes receptors and other proteins from the surface and delivers them to endosomes. At the level of endosomes, receptors are sorted for retention, recycling or lysosomal degradation and thus, factors controlling endosomal sorting decisions strongly influence the protein composition of the plasma membrane and resulting cell functions (Maxfield and McGraw, 2004; Hsu and Prekeris, 2010). The Arf and Rab families of small GTPases, which switch between inactive GDP-bound conformations and active GTP-bound conformations, are critical regulators of membrane trafficking (reviewed in Kawasaki et al., 2005). Once activated by guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs), GTP-bound Arfs and Rabs recruit a plethora of effectors that have many functions including the formation of cargo carriers on multiple organelles including endosomes, the recruitment of appropriate cargo into those carriers, and the routing of the carriers to the appropriate site of fusion. With the help of GTPase activating proteins (GAPs), the GTPases hydrolyse the GTP to GDP, thus terminating the process.
Arf6 is a well-studied member of the Arf family and functions in the endocytosis of a wide variety of receptor molecules including integrins and cadherins (Schweitzer et al., 2011). In addition, Arf6 activity is required for endosomal sorting of cargo, with different cargo having different fates. For example, active Arf6 prevents the recycling of E-cadherin, leading to intracellular retention or degradation with disruption of cell–cell contacts (Palacios et al., 2001; Palacios et al., 2002; Frasa et al., 2010). Consistently, downregulation of Arf6 activity by EphA2 and Robo4 signaling enhances E- and VE-cadherin-mediated cell–cell contacts (Miura et al., 2009; Jones et al., 2009). On the other hand, Arf6 activity increases the recycling of integrins, causing upregulation of integrin levels and signaling, leading to the formation of actin-based membrane protrusions associated with migration and invasion including lamellipodia (Santy and Cassanova, 2001), membrane ruffles (Zhang et al., 1999; Radhakrishna, 1999), podosomes (Svensson et al., 2008), and invadopodia (Hashimoto et al., 2004; Tague et al., 2004). The Arf6-driven loss of cell–cell adhesion, increased motility and changes in cell morphology are all facets of a process referred to as the epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) (Thiery, 2003). EMT is a feature of embryogenesis that is vital for morphogenesis during development (Kong et al., 2010) and it shares many phenotypic similarities with invasive cancer cells (Polyak and Weinberg, 2009; Micalizzi et al., 2010). Consistently, Arf6 activity is upregulated in several epithelial and non-epithelial cancers such as breast, lung and brain cancer (Li et al., 2006; Morishige et al., 2008; Sabe et al., 2009; Li et al., 2009; Hu et al., 2009; Menju et al., 2011).
A second small GTPase necessary for efficient recycling of cargo from endosomes is Rab35. Once activated by its specific GEFs, the connecdenn/DENND1 family of proteins (Allaire et al., 2010; Marat and McPherson, 2010), Rab35 drives the recycling of a wide variety of cargo including MHC class I (Allaire et al., 2010) and MHC class II (Walseng et al., 2008), T-cell receptor (Patino-Lopez et al., 2008), the calcium activated potassium channel KCa2+2.3 (Gao et al., 2010), exosomes (Hsu et al., 2010) and synaptic vesicles (Uytterhoeven et al., 2011). Rab35 also functions during cell division to recycle lipid and protein components necessary for furrow ingression (Kouranti et al., 2006; Dambournet et al., 2011). Interestingly, recent studies have demonstrated an intimate relationship between Rab35 and Arf6. Specifically, Arf6 binds the Rab35 GAPs TBC1D10A (Hanono et al., 2006), TBC1D10B (Chesneau et al., 2012) and TBC1D24/Skywalker (Uytterhoeven et al., 2011), and expression of constitutively active Arf6 leads to defects in cytokineses and the accumulation of binucleated cells due to Arf6-mediated inhibition of Rab35 (Chesneau et al., 2012). Based on these observations, Arf6 has been placed upstream of Rab35. By contrast, Rab35 binds to the Arf6 GAP ACAP2/centaurinβ recruiting ACAP2 to Arf6-positive endosomes (Kanno et al., 2010; Rahajeng et al., 2012; Kobayashi and Fukuda, 2012), which places Rab35 upstream of Arf6.
We now demonstrate that Rab35 and Arf6, through mutual antagonism, are geared to reciprocally balance the recycling of integrins and cadherins in order to tune cell adhesive behavior towards cell migration or intercellular contact. In particular, we find that Rab35 activity is essential to maintain cadherins at the cell surface to promote cell–cell adhesion, suggesting that the well-established antagonistic effect of active Arf6 on cadherin recycling is mediated through inhibition of Rab35. We also find that Rab35 negatively regulates integrin recycling and cell migration through its inhibition of Arf6, driven by ACAP2 recruitment to active Rab35. Consistently, Rab35 knock down leads to enhanced Arf6 activity, recycling of integrins as well as EGF receptor, which is known to co-traffic with integrins, and increased cell migration. Importantly, given that Arf6 activity levels are upregulated in numerous tumors (Li et al., 2006; Morishige et al., 2008; Sabe et al., 2009; Li et al., 2009; Hu et al., 2009; Menju et al., 2011), we find that Rab35 levels are downregulated in surgically resected human tumors known for Arf6 hyperactivity including gliomas. Together, our data reveal that the functional interplay between Rab35 and Arf6 provides the molecular underpinnings for efficient coordination of cell migration and cell–cell adhesion.
Rab35 is required to maintain cadherin surface levels and cell–cell adhesion
We previously demonstrated that Rab35 and its GEF, connecdenn 1/DENND1A are required for the endosomal recycling of MHC class I since knock down of either protein causes retention of internalized MHC class I in an endosomal-recycling compartment (Allaire et al., 2010). We sought to identify additional cell surface receptors that require Rab35 for recycling. We used previously established shRNAmiR sequences to knock down Rab35 (Allaire et al., 2010) (Fig. 1A). Upon Rab35 knock down in COS-7 cells, endogenous N-cadherins lose their cell surface localization and accumulate in an intracellular compartment together with MHC class I (Fig. 1B). Similar results are seen with E-cadherin transfected into COS-7 cells (supplementary material Fig. S1). Moreover, surface biotinylation assays reveal significantly reduced levels of endogenous cadherin at the surface of Rab35 knock down cells (Fig. 1C,D). To determine if Rab35 is required for cell–cell adhesion, we performed cell aggregation assays. Suppression of Rab35 expression efficiently prevents dissociated cells from aggregating after 20 minutes (Fig. 1E,F) and even after 60 minutes, a significant number of cells deprived of Rab35 remain single (Fig. 1F). Similar results are observed in U251 cells, a line derived from a human glioblastoma (supplementary material Fig. S2A). Thus, Rab35 is necessary to maintain cadherins at the cell surface, perhaps by allowing for efficient recycling, and Rab35 is also required for the ability of cells to form cell–cell contacts.
Rab35 suppresses β1-integrin recycling and cell motility
Downregulation of adhesive cell surface cadherin is a hallmark of cancer progression and is associated with changes in cell morphology and enhanced cellular motility (Huttenlocher et al., 1998; Jakob et al., 1998; Blindt et al., 2004; Shoval et al., 2007; Maret et al., 2010). To determine if Rab35 knock down leads to an increase in cell motility we used a scratch assay, demonstrating that Rab35 loss of function significantly stimulates cell migration in both COS-7 (Fig. 2A,B) and U251 cells (supplementary material Fig. S2B). Re-expression of an shRNAmiR-resistant (mouse) Rab35 construct rescues the cell migration phenoype (Fig. 2C) demonstrating that the phenotype is due to loss of Rab35 function. Since cell migration depends on β1-integrin recycling (Gu et al., 2011), we labeled the internal pool of β1-integrin by incubating cells with an antibody recognizing the extracellular domain followed by stripping of residual surface antibody, and determined the amount of resurfacing antibody over time. Rab35 knock down significantly increases β1-integrin recycling (Fig. 2D) and consistently, FACS analysis shows an increase in the surface pool of β1-integrin in Rab35 knock down cells (Fig. 2E). In fact, western blot analysis of crude cell lysates reveals an overall increase in β1-integrin levels (Fig. 2F,G), suggesting that in the absence of Rab35, enhanced recycling reroutes β1-integrin away from lysosomal degradation towards the cell surface.
In addition to enhanced β1-integrin recycling, cell migration also depends on β1-integrin activation and signaling to focal adhesion kinase (FAK) (Lipfert et al., 1992). In Rab35 knock down cells the levels of FAK tyrosine phosphorylation, used as a measure of activity are significantly upregulated while total levels of FAK remain unchanged (Fig. 2F,G). Together, these data reveal that Rab35 knock down cells adapt to the requirements for enhanced motility by shifting cadherins away from the cell surface to decrease cell–cell adhesion, while upregulating β1-integrin recycling and signaling.
Rab35 controls cell migration through negative regulation of Arf6
It is established that activation of Arf6 enhances β1-integrin recycling and signaling and β1-integrin-mediated cell migration (Arjonen et al., 2012). Given that the Arf6 GAP ACAP2 is a Rab35 effector that is recruited to Arf6-positive endosomes by Rab35 (Kanno et al., 2010; Kobayashi and Fukuda, 2012), it is probable that Rab35 knock down stimulates β1-integrin activity by relieving a physiological suppression of Arf6. To address this, we analyzed the levels of active Arf6 in control and Rab35 knock down cells in effector binding assays using the Arf6 effector GGA3. ACAP2 binds exclusively to the constitutively active Rab35 variant Q67L (Fig. 3A), consistent with previous studies (Kanno et al., 2010; Rahajeng et al., 2012; Kobayashi and Fukuda, 2012), and we demonstrate here that Rab35 knock down significantly enhances endogenous Arf6 activity (Fig. 3B,C), showing directly that Rab35 is a negative regulator of Arf6.
Since Arf6 activation is required for β1-integrin recycling, we tested whether the increase in cell migration observed with Rab35 depletion results from stimulation of the Arf6 recycling pathway. Interestingly, the enhanced cell migration resulting from Rab35 knock down is reversed by simultaneous knock down of Arf6 (Fig. 3D,E), supporting the concept that Rab35 supresses Arf6 to limit cell migration. To address whether the intracellular accumulation of cadherin and decrease in cell–cell adhesion seen following Rab35 knock down (Fig. 1) is also a reflection of enhanced activity of Arf6, we tested double knock down cells in aggregation assays. Importantly, Arf6 knock down does not reverse the decrease in cell–cell adhesion resulting from Rab35 knock down (Fig. 3F). Thus, Rab35 directly promotes activities that maintain cadherin on the cell surface while simultaneously inhibiting Arf6 to suppress β1-integrin recycling (Fig. 3G), identifying Rab35 as a crucial regulator of intracellular receptor sorting that inversely coordinates cell–cell adhesion and cell migration.
Rab35 suppresses EGF receptor signaling and cell proliferation
EGF receptor co-traffics with β1-integrin (Muller et al., 2009) and we thus sought to evaluate EGF receptor recycling following Rab35 knock down. We labeled the internal pool of the receptor by incubating cells with an antibody against the extracellular domain followed by stripping of residual cell surface antibody, and measured the amount of resurfacing antibody over time. As for β1-integrin (Fig. 2D), the recycling of EGF receptor is significantly increased in Rab35 knock down cells (Fig. 4A). In addition, FACS analysis confirms that the surface pool of EGF receptor is increased (Fig. 4B) while western blot analysis of cell lysates reveals an increase in the overall levels of the receptor (Fig. 4C,D). Together, these data suggest that enhanced recycling reroutes EGF receptor away from lysosomal degradation, allowing for receptor accumulation at the cell surface.
EGF receptor signals from both the cell surface and endosomes and receptor signaling required for cell migration and proliferation is thought to occur primarily in recycling/signaling endosomes (Lenferink et al., 1998; Worthylake et al., 1999; Caswell et al., 2008; Muller et al., 2009). Under normal conditions, EGF receptors are sorted to lysosomes terminating signaling while in Rab35 knock down cells, the receptors appear to be rerouted to the recycling pathway. β1-integrin receptors also appear to be re-routed to the recycling pathway and consistently, internalized EGF and β1-integrin receptors co-distribute in enlarged intracellular vesicles in Rab35 knock down cells (supplementary material Fig. S3). EGF receptor partitioning into the recycling pathway following Rab35 knock down should increase EGF-stimulated signaling cascades. We thus examined EGF receptor activity by blotting cell lysates for receptor phosphorylation at Y1068 and Y1148, docking sites for Grb2 and Shc that when occupied lead to activation of Erk1/2 and Akt (Rojas et al., 1996; Zwick et al., 1999; Rodrigues et al., 2000; Mattoon et al., 2004). Phosphorylation at both sites is increased proportionally to the increase in total EGF receptor following Rab35 knock down (Fig. 4C,D), indicating that while there is a constant fraction of the receptor pool being phosphorylated, Rab35 knock down yields a net increase in the total amount of activated receptor. In addition, we detected enhanced activation of both Erk1/2 and Akt (Fig. 4D,E). Given the enhanced activity of the pro-mitotic EGF receptor/Erk/Akt pathway, we tested for changes in cell proliferation. Knock down of Rab35 significantly increases proliferation rates, with doubling times reduced by close to 3 hours from 26.2 to 23.6 hours (Fig. 4E). Similarly, knock down of Rab35 in U251 cells decreases the doubling time by ∼4.5 hours (supplementary material Fig. S2C). Thus, Rab35 controls cell growth, likely by regulating EGF receptor expression and activity.
Rab35 expression is decreased in malignant tumors
In all, Rab35 knock down causes reduced cell–cell adhesion, enhanced recycling and signaling of β1-integrin and EGF receptors, increased cell migration and pro-mitotic signaling. This is reminiscent of an EMT, which is accompanied by a characteristic change in cell morphology that includes an extensive formation of lammelipodia, indicative of enhanced migration and invasion capabilities (Radisky et al., 2005; Yilmaz and Christofori, 2009). Indeed, we observe that Rab35 knock down also alters cell morphology: cells show a loss of actin stress fibres and have membrane ruffling with formation of multiple actin and β1-integrin-rich lamellipodia-like structures (supplementary material Fig. S4A,B). In addition, enhanced activity of Arf6 is linked to the oncogenic effect of EGF receptor in breast and lung cancers (Sabe et al., 2009; Morishige et al., 2008) and EGF receptor is overexpressed or mutated to become constitutively active in many forms of cancer (CGARN, 2008). Finally, enhanced proliferation and migration, coupled with decreased intercellular adhesion are hallmarks of malignant tumor cells. We thus speculated that Rab35 expression levels would be reduced in tumors. Using qRT-PCR, we find that Rab35 mRNA expression is suppressed in high-grade gliomas, and in breast and squamous cancers (Fig. 5A–C). In contrast, the levels of Arf6 mRNA are not significantly modified (Fig. 5A–C); however, our data on the suppression of Arf6 activity by Rab35 is consistent with the notion that the downregulation of Rab35 levels in tumors directly contributes to the cancer aspects driven by Arf6 hyperactivity.
Early/sorting endosomes are highly dynamic compartments that constantly receive material internalized by various endocytic pathways while simultaneously sorting cargo for retention, recycling or degradation. The mechanisms governing cargo selection towards degradation in lysosomes are the best understood of the endosomal sorting decisions, involving a sequential transition from Rab5 to Rab7 on endosomal membranes (Rink et al., 2005; Poteryaev et al., 2010). Lately, such Rab cascades have become an attractive model to explain how trafficking pathways assure linearity of cargo transport (Hutagalung and Novick, 2011). However, a linear Rab cascade cannot insure coordination of trafficking pathways leading to antagonistic functions. Here, we discover that the mutually exclusive trafficking routes mediating recycling and function of cadherins and integrins are coordinated by a molecular module involving the small GTPases Rab35 and Arf6, which inhibit each other's activities.
In this antagonistic module, active Rab35 promotes cell–cell adhesion by maintaining cadherins at the cell surface, likely by directly guiding their recycling. Knock down of Rab35 leads to cadherin accumulation in endosomes, decreased cadherin surface levels and reduced cell–cell adhesion. Simultaneously, active Rab35 recruits its effector, the Arf6 GAP ACAP2 to inhibit the function of Arf6. Knock down of Rab35 alleviates ACAP2-mediated downregulation of Arf6 activity, leading to enhanced activation of Arf6. This in turn increases Arf6-dependent recycling of β1-integrin, causing increased receptor levels with consequent enhancement of β1-integrin signaling and cell migration. Importantly, depletion of Arf6 expression in Rab35 knock down cells blocks the enhanced cell migration seen with Rab35 knock down alone, demonstrating that Rab35 controls the activity level of Arf6 to indirectly modulate β1-integrin recycling and cell migration. In vivo, the Rab35/Arf6 module would provide a mechanism for cells to switch from a motile state to one allowing for cell–cell interaction and differentiation. It is worth noting that in our previous study Rab35 knock down did not influence β1-integrin recycling (Allaire et al., 2010). However, there were several important differences in experimental approach. First, unlike the previous study, here we did not serum-starve the cells prior to labeling surface β1-integrin and thus did not sensitize cells to growth factors from the media that are known to stimulate integrin recycling via Arf6, and which could reduce the inhibitory effect of Rab35 on Arf6 in wild-type cells preventing detection of the influence of Rab35 knock down. Second, in the current study we designed our recycling assay to enhance the sensitivity to resurfacing receptor instead of detecting receptor retained in the cell. In addition, we followed resurfacing receptor over time, which gave a more precise measure of the recycling kinetics, whereas we previously determined the amount of β1-integrin retained at 2 hours only, a point at which the system could have already achieved equilibrium.
Given that active Arf6 binds the Rab35 GAPs TBC1D10A (Hanono et al., 2006), TBC1D10B (Chesneau et al., 2012), and TBC1D24/Skywalker (Uytterhoeven et al., 2011), it seems highly likely that the ability of receptor tyrosine kinases such as EGF, human growth hormone and VEGF receptors to activate Arf6 leading to removal of cell surface cadherins (Palacios et al., 2001; Lu et al., 2003; Morishige et al., 2008; Sabe et al., 2009; Ji et al., 2009; Hashimoto et al., 2011) is mediated through inhibition of Rab35 activity. Moreover, active Arf6 inhibits MHC class I recycling (Caplan et al., 2002; Naslavsky et al., 2004) and we previously demonstrated that knock down of Rab35 inhibits efficient MHC class I recycling (Allaire et al., 2010). Thus, active Arf6 reduces the activity level of Rab35, which interferes with the efficient recycling of various Rab35-dependent receptor cargos. As such, Rab35 and Arf6 form a mutually antagonistic module. Interestingly, the mutual antagonism likely extends beyond the recruitment of respective GAPs. The acidic C-terminal tail of Rab35 directs the GTPase to PtdIns(4,5)P2-rich membranes such as the plasma membrane and Arf6-positive endosomes (Heo et al., 2006; Kouranti et al., 2006; Chesneau et al., 2012). Arf6 activity catalyzes the production of PtdIns(4,5)P2 by recruiting the effector PtdIns-kinases PIP5a, b and c (Funakoshi et al., 2011) and this may support co-localization of Rab35 to Arf6 compartments. Intriguingly, Rab35 itself recruits the PtdIns5P phosphatase OCRL (Dambournet et al., 2011) converting PtdIns(4,5)P2 to PtdIns4P, countering Arf6-mediated PtdIns(4,5)P2 formation. Thus, lipid-modifying effectors of Rab35 and Arf6 also assure the generation of specific recycling pathways by enhancing the production of either PtdIns4P by Rab35 or PtdIns(4,5)P2 by Arf6. This would increase the likelihood that only one set of lipid-interacting proteins is recruited in sufficient amounts at any given time. Moreover, the Arf6 effector EPI64 also functions as a GAP for Rab8 and regulates Arf6-dependent membrane trafficking (Hokanson and Bretscher, 2012) indicating that this type of interplay extends to other Arf6/Rab pairs.
Uncontrolled Arf6 activity resulting from overexpression or kinase-activating mutations in EGF receptor drive proliferation and invasion in malignant brain tumors (Li et al., 2006; Li et al., 2009; Hu et al., 2009), squamous cell carcinomas (Menju et al., 2011), and breast cancer (Hashimoto et al., 2006; Morishige et al., 2008). A role for Arf6 in driving tumor formation has also been shown in vivo using xenografts in nude mice (Muralidharan-Chari et al., 2009). Here, we demonstrate that release of Rab35/ACAP2-mediated inhibition of Arf6 increases the activity of Arf6 and in turn leads to increased recycling of both β1-integrin and EGF receptor. To our surprise, we also noticed a strong increase in β1-integrin and EGF receptor expression levels, which has not been reported as a consequence of increased Arf6 activity. This is likely because previous studies used expression of mutant forms of Arf6 that disrupt the GTPase cycle, which impedes both endocytosis and recycling by sequestering GEFs, GAPs and effectors. Thus, our results reveal a novel Arf6 function in which activation of endogenous Arf6 increases β1-integrin and EGF receptor expression levels by rerouting them from the degradation pathway to a recycling pathway. This triggers enhanced signaling from Erk1/2, Akt and FAK, core signaling pathways that promote proliferation and accordingly, we observe enhanced proliferation rates, an additional hallmark of cancer. Interestingly, Erk1/2 and FAK also directly disrupt cadherin-based junctions by phosphorylating α-catenin (Ji et al., 2009) and β-catenin (Chen et al., 2012), respectively. These phosphorylation events disrupt interactions of cadherin with cortical actin, which are required for stable cell–cell junctions (reviewed in Stepniak et al., 2009). As a result, Rab35 and Arf6 likely control cell adhesive properties not only via trafficking but also through modulation of signaling kinases.
To further validate the pathophysiological implications of the Rab35/Arf6 module, we determined Rab35 levels in brain, breast and squamous tumors, which are all associated with EGF receptor overexpression and enhanced Arf6 activity. Importantly, we found a strong reduction in Rab35 expression levels in the high-grade tumors. This reduction was most notable in high-grade malignant gliomas, which are highly invasive leading to extremely poor prognosis. As a result, our in vitro phenotypes observed upon Rab35 knock down are entirely consistent with the overwhelming bulk of information correlating tumor aggressiveness with EGF receptor expression, kinase signaling, proliferation and invasion, providing a first comprehensive explanation of all phenotypes.
To conclude, our study has determined how two seemingly separate recycling pathways that traffic distinct cargos are coordinated to appropriately regulate antagonistic cell functions. In this scheme, we find that the combination of specific cargo recycling and mutual antagonistic activity between Arf6 and Rab35 allows for control of each other's feed-forward loops to coordinate integrin and cadherin function required for migration and differentiation. Given the importance of Arf6 hyperactivity in tumor invasive properties and the downregulation of Rab35 in tumors, it is likely that manipulation of the Rab35/Arf6 module, for example through upregulation of Rab35 activity, would have efficacy in the treatment of highly aggressive tumors such as gliomas, which currently have an extremely poor prognosis.
Materials and Methods
Antibodies and fluorophores
Mouse monoclonal antibodies recognizing EGF receptor (SC-120), MHC class I (W6/32) and β1-integrin (TS2/16) were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA), FLAG (M2) was from Sigma (St Louis, MO), Erk1/2 (3A7) and pErk1/2 (E10) from Cell Signaling (Danvers, MA), and FAK from Millipore (Temecula, CA). Rabbit polyclonal antibodies recognizing GFP (A6455) and pY397-FAK (44624G) were from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA), c-myc (C-3959) and pan-cadherin (C3678) were from Sigma, Arf6 (Ab77581) and β1-integrin (Ab52971) were from Abcam (Cambridge, MA), EGF receptor (1005) from Santa Cruz, and Akt (9272), pT308-Akt (9275), pY1068-EGF receptor (D7A5), and pY1148-EGF were from Cell Signaling. Polyclonal antibodies against CLCs, connecdenn 1 (3776), and Rab35 have been described previously (Allaire et al., 2006; Poupon et al., 2008; Allaire et al., 2010). Alexa-Fluor-647-EGF and phalloidin-TRITC were from Invitrogen.
Human ACAP2 (NM_006861) was obtained from Open Biosystems. The coding sequences was amplified by PCR and cloned into pcDNA3-FLAG. Rab35 wild type, S22N and Q67L in pGEX-6P1-GST and Rab35 wild-type in pEGFP-C1 and pcDNA3-FLAG were previously described (Allaire et al., 2010). GST-GGA3 (aa 1–316) was generously provided by J. Bonifacino (NIH). Arf6-HA was generated by L. Santy (Pennsylvania State University) and was obtained from Addgene and non-tagged E-cadherin was provided by D. Colman (Montreal Neurological Institute). All plasmids were verified by sequencing.
COS-7 cells were plated on poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips and transfected 24 hours later using JetPrime (Polyplus Transfection; Illkirch, France) following the manufacturer's recommendations. Following overnight incubation, cells were fixed in 4% PFA and processed for immunofluorescence following standard protocols.
Knock down of Rab35 and Arf6
Knock down of Rab35 was performed as previously described (Allaire et al., 2010). Target sequences for Arf6 were designed using the Block-iT RNAi Designer (Invitrogen) and the human Arf6 mRNA sequence NM_001663.3 (Arf6 nt428, TCAAGTTGTGCGGTCGGTGAT; Arf6 nt693, CGGCAAGACAACAATCCTGTA) and oligonucleotides were subcloned into pcDNA6.2/GW-EmGFP-miR (Invitrogen) to yield shRNAmiR knock down constructs. Viral particles were prepared in HEK-293T cells, concentrated by centrifugation and titered using HEK-293T cells as previously described (Thomas et al., 2009; Allaire et al., 2010). The control shRNAmiR virus was described previously (Thomas et al., 2009). For knock down studies in COS-7 cells, cells were plated on the day of transduction and viruses were added at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 7.5. The next day media was replaced with fresh culture medium. For subsequent Arf6 knock down, Rab35 knock down cells were plated on the day of transduction (1 week after transduction by Rab35 viruses or control viruses) and viruses targeting Arf6 were added at a MOI of 7.5. The next day, media was replaced with fresh culture media. In all experiments, data was obtained from at least two different viral preparations and three transductions. All experiments were performed 7–21 days post transduction.
For the rescue of Rab35 expression, mouse Rab35 was cloned in frame in a pRRLsinPPT plasmid in which the sequence that is used to accept the microRNA sequence downstream of the emGFP expression cassette was replaced with a polylinker. This construct was then used to transduce (MOI of 4) Rab35 knock down cells (human Rab35 targeting sequence) generating emGFP-Rab35 expressing cells.
GST-Rab35 affinity-selection assays
FLAG-tagged ACAP2 was expressed in HEK-293T cells that were lysed in 10 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl supplemented with protease inhibitors (0.83 mM benzamidine, 0.23 mM phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride, 0.5 µg/ml aprotinin and 0.5 µg/ml leupeptin). Triton X-100 was added to a final concentration of 1% and lysates were rocked for 5 minutes at 4°C before centrifugation at 205,000 g to remove insoluble material. Aliquots of the supernatant were incubated for 1 hour at 4°C with 10 µg of GST-Rab35 (wild type, Q67L or S22N) fusion proteins and then washed with lysis buffer containing 1% Triton X-100. Proteins specifically bound to the beads were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and western blot.
Quantification of Arf6-GTP in cells
Transduced COS-7 cells were grown to 70% confluency in 15 cm dishes and lysed in 50 mM Tris pH 7.4, 200 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1% Triton, 0.5% deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, and 5% glycerol supplemented with protease inhibitors. Lysates were centrifuged for 5 minutes at 4°C at 205,000 g. A 4 mg aliquot of the supernatant was incubated with 40 µg of GST-GGA3 (aa 1–316) for 1 hour and washed three times with lysis buffer. Proteins specifically bound to the beads were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and western blot.
Surface biotinylation assays
Cells at 100% confluency in 6 well dishes were washed three times with ice cold PBS containing 1 mM MgCl2 and 0.1 mM CaCl2. Cells were then incubated for 30 minutes on ice with 0.5 mg/ml EZ-link sulfo-NHS-LC-biotin (Pierce, Thermo Scientific). Cells were subsequently washed 2 times in PBS containing 1 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM CaCl2 and were then incubated in PBS containing 1 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM CaCl2 and 10 mM glycine. Cells were lysed on ice with 1.5 ml of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris pH 7.4, 200 mM NaCl, 1% Triton, 0.5% deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 5% glycerol, supplemented with protease inhibitors). Cell lysates were harvested with a rubber policeman, passed through a 26 gauge needle three times and centrifuged at 205,000 g at 4°C for 5 minutes to remove insoluble material. Aliquots of protein lysates (200 µg) were incubated with streptavidin-coupled agarose beads (Pierce, Thermo Scientific) for 1 hour and washed four times with lysis buffer. Samples were separated by SDS-PAGE and levels of cadherin were detected by western blot.
β1-integrin and EGF receptor surface expression analysis
Transduced cells were incubated with 1 µg of anti-β1-integrin or anti-EGF receptor antibodies per 106 cells for 1 hour at 4°C in DMEM, washed three times with ice cold PBS, and were then incubated with Alexa-Fluor-647-conjugated secondary antibody (1∶500) in PBS at 4°C for 30 minutes. The cells were washed with PBS, removed from the plate in 1 ml of PBS using a rubber policeman, filtered through a cell strainer, and analyzed immediately by flow cytometry on a FACSCalibur (Becton Dickinson). In each assay, 10,000 cells were analyzed for each time point (in duplicate).
β1-integrin and EGFR recycling assays
Transduced cells were incubated with 1 µg of anti-β1-integrin or anti-EGF receptor antibodies per 106 cells for 2 hours at 37°C in DMEM. Cells were then chilled on ice and surface-bound antibody was removed by acid wash (0.5 M NaCl, 0.2 M acetic acid, pH 2.5) followed by a PBS wash. Cells were then incubated in pre-warmed DMEM plus 10% serum containing Alexa-Fluor-647-conjugated secondary antibody (1∶500) at 37°C. At the indicated time points, cells were chilled to 4°C, washed with PBS, scraped off the plates, and processed by flow cytometry. In each assay, 10,000 cells were analyzed for each time point (in duplicate). Each time point represents the fold recycling over the 5-minute time point.
Cell proliferation assays
Cell proliferation assays (MTT assays) were performed as described (Maret et al., 2010). Briefly, cells were seeded in 96-well plates at 1000 cells/well and MTT (Sigma-Aldrich) was added at a final concentration of 0.5 mg/ml at different time points. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 4 hours, the medium was then removed, 100 µl of DMSO was added per well, plates were incubated at 37°C for 1 hour, and the absorption was measured at 595 nm using a spectrophotometer. The optical density of the sample was subtracted from that of the blank. An exponential growth trend line was applied to the data points yielding the following equation: Y(t) = Y0ekt where Y(t) is the optical density at 595 nm at time point t, Y0 is the optical density at t = 0, k is the growth constant, and t is time. The doubling time (td) was calculated using the equation td = ln2/k.
Cell aggregation assay
Aggregation assays were performed as described (Maret et al., 2010). Briefly, monolayer cultures were treated with 2 mM EDTA in PBS for 5 minutes at 37°C to invoke cadherin internalization and cell dissociation. Cells were then pelleted to removed EDTA and resuspended in DMEM with 10% bovine calf serum until cells were visibly completely dissociated and 5×105 cells were seeded at a final volume of 0.5 ml per well, and transferred onto 24-well low-adherent plates (VWR, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada). The plates were set on an orbital shaker at 80 rpm at 37°C to allow aggregation. Samples were taken from individual wells at different time points and immediately examined by light microscopy. The assay was quantified as follows: The number of single cells was measured at different time points and the rate of aggregation at time t was calculated as the ratio of single cells/total cells.
Wound healing migration assays
The two-dimensional migration of cell lines was assayed by wound healing migration as previously described (Maret et al., 2010). Briefly 2.2×105 cells were seeded in 12-well cell culture plates and grown to confluency. The wells were marked on the underside (serving as fiducial marks for analysis of wound areas). The culture media was removed and replaced by PBS and monolayers were disrupted with a parallel scratch wound made with a fine pipette tip. Migration into the wound was observed using phase-contrast microscopy on an inverted microscope with the 5× objective. Images of the wound were taken at regular time intervals. The number of cells that migrated into the wound was counted using Northern Eclipse software 6.0 (EMPIX Imaging, Inc., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada).
Human brain tumor samples were obtained from the Montreal Neurological Institute Brain Tumor Tissue Bank. The experimental procedures were approved by the ethics committee of the Montreal Neurological Institute. The breast and squamous cell carcinomas and normal tissues were obtained from FolioBio (Columbus, OH).
RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis and real-time quantitative PCR
RNA was extracted from frozen human tissue using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Missisauga, Ontario, Canada) following manufacturer's recommendations. The RNeasy FFPE kit was used for the RNA extraction of paraffin-embedded tissue samples (Qiagen, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) following the manufacturer's recommendations. Typically, 0.5–1 µg of total RNA was used for the first-strand cDNA synthesis using the Superscript cDNA kit (Life Technologies) following the manufacturer's recommendations. qRT-PCR was performed using a Light Cycler (Roche). Reactions (20 µl) contained 2 µl of FastStart DNA Master Mix SYBR Green I, 0.5 µM of the primers and 1 µl of first-strand synthesized template DNA. Primer sequences used in this study are as follows: Rab35, Fw 5′-TCAAGCTGCTCATCATCGGCGA-3′, Re 5′-CCCCGTTGATCTCCACGGTCC-3′; Arf6, Fw 5′-ATGGGGAAGGTGCTATCCAAAATC-3′, Re 5′-GCAGTCCACTACGAAGATGAGACC-3′; hs14 control; Fw 5′-CAGGTCCAGGGGTCTTGGTCC-3′, Re 5′-GGCAGACCGAGATGAATCCTCA-3′.
Descriptive statistics were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 4. Mean, s.e.m. and Student's t-test were used to determine significant differences between pairs. Comparisons of three or more groups were performed using a parametric analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni or Dunnett multiple comparison tests. P<0.05 was considered significant.
We thank R. Biervig (University of Bergen, Norway) for providing the U251 malignant glioma cell line, J. Bonifacino (NIH, USA) for the GST-GGA3 construct, and D. Colman (Montreal Neurological Institute, Canada) for the E-cadherin construct. We also thank the Franco Di Giovanni and Tony Colannino Foundations for support.
P.D.A. helped conceive the study, designed, conducted and interpreted experiments, and helped write the manuscript. M.S.S. helped conceive the study, designed, conducted and interpreted experiments, and helped write the manuscript. M.C. conceived, designed, conducted and interpreted experiments, and helped write the manuscript. E.S.S. conducted and interpreted experiments. S.K. conducted and interpreted experiments. M.F. conducted experiments. D.M. supplied and validated important samples. B.R. helped conceive the study and write the manuscript. R.F.D.M. helped conceive the study and provided and validated important samples. P.S.M. helped conceive the study, conceived, designed and interpreted experiments, and helped write the manuscript.
This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research [grant number MOP15396 to P.S.M.]. M.S.S. holds a C. Geada Brain Tumor Research Fellowship. R.F.D.M. is the W. Feindel Chair in Neuro-Oncology and P.S.M. is a James McGill Professor.
Supplementary material available online at http://jcs.biologists.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1242/jcs.112375/-/DC1
- Accepted November 19, 2012.
- © 2013. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd