Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Cell Science
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Cell Science

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS   Twitter  Facebook   YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
Journal Articles
Low concentrations of nocodazole interfere with fibroblast locomotion without significantly affecting microtubule level: implications for the role of dynamic microtubules in cell locomotion
G. Liao, T. Nagasaki, G.G. Gundersen
Journal of Cell Science 1995 108: 3473-3483;
G. Liao
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Nagasaki
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G.G. Gundersen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Summary

The role of microtubules (MTs) in cell locomotion is uncertain: while MTs are not essential for motility of certain cells, MTs are necessary for the directed translocation of large cells such as fibroblasts, endothelial cells and neuronal growth cones. Based on previous studies, we hypothesize that cell locomotion may involve MTs in two possible ways: (1) the rate of cell locomotion is proportional to MT level; or (2) cell locomotion is not proportional to MT level but requires a critical level of MTs to proceed. To test these hypotheses, we measured the rate of locomotion of NRK fibroblasts migrating into an in vitro wound, before and after treatment with different concentrations of nocodazole to generate cells with different levels of MTs. Locomotion of cells was monitored directly using timelapse recording and analyzed with an Image-1 image analysis program. Addition of nocodazole (> or = 50 nM) resulted in a rapid reduction in locomotion to a new rate that was maintained for > 2 hours. We found that addition of as little as 100 nM nocodazole decreased the rate of locomotion by more than 60%; and that 300 nM nocodazole completely stopped cell locomotion. Although 100 nM nocodazole decreased locomotion over 60%, we detected no qualitative change in MT distribution by immunofluorescence. Quantitative analysis of MT fluorescence in immunofluorescently stained preparations showed that 100 nM nocodazole had no detectable effect on MT levels and that 300 nM nocodazole only decreased MT levels to approximately 40% of controls. Quantitative analysis of tubulin polymer levels by cell extraction and western blotting yielded results similar to those obtained by quantification of MT fluorescence. A comparison of the locomotion rate measurements with the MT level measurements indicated that over half of the cell locomotion rate could be blocked by nocodazole without significantly affecting MT levels in the cell; the remaining locomotion rate was reduced proportionally to MT levels. These results do not support the notion that a critical level of MTs is required for cell locomotion and suggest that only a portion (< 50%) of the speed of the cells is proportional to MT levels. Rather, by analogy with studies of MT antagonists on the mitotic spindle, they suggest a third possibility: that low concentrations of nocodazole interfere with MT dynamics and thus, MT dynamics are critical for the maximal speed of cell locomotion. This notion was further supported by analogous effects of taxol and vinblastine on cell locomotion: at concentrations that reportedly cause little change in the level of MTs, taxol and vinblastine also dramatically decreased the rate of locomotion of NRK cells. In summary, our results establish the relationship between microtubule levels and locomotion rate and suggest that dynamic MTs are rate-limiting for fibroblast locomotion.

  • © 1995 by Company of Biologists

REFERENCES

    1. Achler C.,
    2. Filmer D.,
    3. Nerte C. and
    4. Drenckhahn D.
    (1989). Role of microtubules in polarized delivery of apical membrane proteins to the brush border of the intestinal epithelium. J. Cell Biol 109, 179–189
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Albrecht-Buehler G. and
    2. Bushnell A.
    (1979). The orientation of centrioles in migrating 3T3 cells. Exp. Cell Res 120, 111–118
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Bamburg J. R.,
    2. Bray D. and
    3. Chapman K.
    (1986). Assembly of microtubules at the tip of growing axons. Nature 321, 788–790
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Bergmann J. E.,
    2. Kupfer A. and
    3. Singer S. J.
    (1983). Membrane insertion at the leading edge of motile fibroblasts. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 83, 1367–1371
    OpenUrl
    1. Bershadsky A. D.,
    2. Vaisberg E. A. and
    3. Vasiliev J. M.
    (1991). Pseudopodia activity at the active edge of migrating fibroblasts is decreased after drug-induced microtubule depolymerization. Cell Motil. Cytoskel 19, 152–158
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Derry W. B.,
    2. Wilson L. and
    3. Jordan M. A.
    (1995). Substoichiometric binding of taxol suppresses microtubule dynamics. Biochemistry 34, 2203–2211
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Erickson C.A. and
    2. Trinkaus J.P.
    (1976). Microvilli and blebs as sources of reserve surface membrane during cell spreading. Exp. Cell Res 99, 375–384
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Euteneuer U. and
    2. Schliwa M.
    (1986). The function of microtubules in directional cell movement. Ann. NY Acad. Sci 466, 867–886
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Gail M. H. and
    2. Boone C. W.
    (1971). Effect of colcemid on fibroblast motility. Exp. Cell Res 65, 221–227
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Goldman R. D.
    (1971). The role of three cytoplasmic fibers in BHK-21 cell motility. I. Microtubules and the effects of colchicine. J. Cell Biol 51, 752–762
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Gotlieb A. I.,
    2. May L. M.,
    3. Subrahmanyan L. and
    4. Kalnins V. I.
    (1981). Distribution of microtubule organizing centers in migrating sheets of endothelial cells. J. Cell Biol 91, 589–94
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Gotlieb A. I.,
    2. Subrahmanyan L. and
    3. Kalnins V. I.
    (1983). Microtubule-organizing center and cell migration: effect of inhibition of migration and microtubule disruption in endothelial cells. J. Cell Biol 96, 1266–1272
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Gundersen G. G.,
    2. Kim I. and
    3. Chapin C. J.
    (1994). Induction of stable microtubules in 3T3 fibroblasts by TGF-and serum. J. Cell Sci 107, 645–659
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Gundersen G. G. and
    2. Bulinski J. C.
    (1988). Selective stabilization of microtubules oriented toward the direction of cell migration. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 5946–5950
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Hoebeke J.,
    2. Van Nijen G. and
    3. DeBrabender M.
    (1976). Interaction of oncodazole (R17934) a new antitumoral drug, with rat brain tubulin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 69, 319–324
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Holifield B. F.,
    2. Ishihara A. and
    3. Jacobson K.
    (1990). Comparative behavior of membrane protein-antibody complex on motile fibroblasts: Implications for a mechanism of capping. J. Cell Biol 111, 2499–2512
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Jordan M. A.,
    2. Thrower D. and
    3. Wilson L.
    (1992). Effects of vinblastine, podophyllotoxin and nocodazole on mitotic spindles. Implications for the role of microtubule dynamics in mitosis. J. Cell Sci 102, 401–416
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Jordan M. A.,
    2. Toso R. J.,
    3. Thrower D. and
    4. Wilson L.
    (1993). Mechanism of mitotic block and inhibition of cell proliferation by taxol at low concentrations. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 9552–9556
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Khawaja S.,
    2. Gundersen G.G. and
    3. Bulinski J. C.
    (1988). Enhanced stability of microtubules enriched in detyrosinated tubulin is not a direct function of detyrosination level. J. Cell Biol 106, 141–149
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Kreis T. E.
    (1990). Role of microtubules in the organization of the Golgi apparatus. Cell Motil. Cytoskel 15, 67–70
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Kupfer A.,
    2. Louvard D. and
    3. Singer S. J.
    (1982). Polarization of the Golgi apparatus and the microtubule-organizing center in cultured fibroblasts at the edge of an experimental wound. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 79, 2603–7
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Laemmli U. K.
    (1970). Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227, 680–685
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Nagasaki T.,
    2. Chapin C. J. and
    3. Gundersen G. G.
    (1992). Distribution of detyrosinated microtubules in motile NRK fibroblasts is rapidly altered upon cell-cell contact: implications for contact inhibition of locomotion. Cell Motil. Cytoskel 23, 45–60
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Nagasaki T.,
    2. Liao G. and
    3. Gundersen G. G.
    (1994). Isolated plasma membranes induce the loss of oriented detyrosinated microtubules and other contact inhibition-like responses in migrating NRK cells. J. Cell Sci 107, 3413–23
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Rogalski A. A. and
    2. Singer S. J.
    (1984). Associations of elements of the Golgi apparatus with microtubules. J. Cell Biol 99, 1101–09
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Sheetz M. P.,
    2. Turney S.,
    3. Qian H. and
    4. Elson E. L.
    (1989). Nanometre-level analysis demonstrates that lipid flow does not drive membrane glycoprotein movements. Nature 340, 284–288
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Schiff P. B.,
    2. Fant J. and
    3. Horwitz S. B.
    (1979). Promotion of microtubule assembly in vitro by taxol. Nature 277, 665–667
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Singer S. J. and
    2. Kupfer A.
    (1986). The directed migration of eukaryotic cells. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol 2, 337–365
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Tanaka E.,
    2. Ho T. and
    3. Kirschner M. W.
    (1995). The role of microtubule dynamics in growth cone motility and axonal growth. J. Cell Biol 128, 127–137
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Vasiliev J. M.,
    2. Gelfand I. M.,
    3. Domnina L.,
    4. Ivanova O. Y.,
    5. Komm S. G. and
    6. Olshevskaja L. V.
    (1970). Effect of colcemid on the locomotory behavior of fibroblasts. J. Embryo. Exp. Morph 24, 625–640
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Vasiliev J. M.
    (1991). Polarization of pseudopodial activities: cytoskeletal mechanisms. J. Cell Sci 98, 1–4
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Zakhireh B. and
    2. Malech H.
    (1980). The effect of colchicine and vinblastine on the chemotactic response of human monocytes. J. Immunol 125, 2143–2153
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Zigmond S. H.,
    2. Levitsky H. I. and
    3. Kreel B. J.
    (1981). Cell polarity: an examination of its behavioral expression and its consequences for polymorphonuclear leukocyte chemotaxis. J. Cell Biol 89, 585–92
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Cell Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Low concentrations of nocodazole interfere with fibroblast locomotion without significantly affecting microtubule level: implications for the role of dynamic microtubules in cell locomotion
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Cell Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Cell Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Journal Articles
Low concentrations of nocodazole interfere with fibroblast locomotion without significantly affecting microtubule level: implications for the role of dynamic microtubules in cell locomotion
G. Liao, T. Nagasaki, G.G. Gundersen
Journal of Cell Science 1995 108: 3473-3483;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Journal Articles
Low concentrations of nocodazole interfere with fibroblast locomotion without significantly affecting microtubule level: implications for the role of dynamic microtubules in cell locomotion
G. Liao, T. Nagasaki, G.G. Gundersen
Journal of Cell Science 1995 108: 3473-3483;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Involvement of actin filaments and integrins in the binding step in collagen phagocytosis by human fibroblasts
  • University administration
  • Integrin cytoplasmic domain-binding proteins
Show more Journal Articles

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

2020 at The Company of Biologists

Despite the challenges of 2020, we were able to bring a number of long-term projects and new ventures to fruition. While we look forward to a new year, join us as we reflect on the triumphs of the last 12 months.


Mole – The Corona Files

"This is not going to go away, 'like a miracle.' We have to do magic. And I know we can."

Mole continues to offer his wise words to researchers on how to manage during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Cell scientist to watch – Christine Faulkner

In an interview, Christine Faulkner talks about where her interest in plant science began, how she found the transition between Australia and the UK, and shares her thoughts on virtual conferences.


Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

“The clear advantages are rapid and efficient exposure and easy access to my article around the world. I believe it is great to have this publishing option in fast-growing fields in biomedical research.”

Dr Jaceques Behmoaras (Imperial College London) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 60 institutions in 12 countries taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


JCS and COVID-19

For more information on measures Journal of Cell Science is taking to support the community during the COVID-19 pandemic, please see here.

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hestiate to contact the Editorial Office.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Journal of Cell Science
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Fast-track manuscripts
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • JCS Prize
  • Manuscript transfer network
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contacts

  • Contact JCS
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992