Advertisement
Journal Articles
Heterochromatin protein 1 is required for correct chromosome segregation in Drosophila embryos
R. Kellum, B.M. Alberts
Journal of Cell Science 1995 108: 1419-1431;

Summary

Heterochromatin protein 1 is associated with centromeric heterochromatin in Drosophila, mice, and humans. Loss of function mutations in the gene encoding heterochromatin protein 1 in Drosophila, Suppressor of variegation2-5, decrease the mosaic repression observed for euchromatic genes that have been juxtaposed to centromeric heterochromatin. These heterochromatin protein 1 mutations not only suppress this position-effect variegation, but also cause recessive embryonic lethality. In this study, we analyze the latter phenotype in the hope of gaining insight into heterochromatin function. In our analyses of four alleles of Suppressor of variegation2-5, the lethality was found to be associated with defects in chromosome morphology and segregation. While some of these defects are seen throughout embryonic development, both the frequency and severity of the defects are greatest between cycles 10 and 14 when zygotic transcription of the Suppressor of variegation2-5 gene apparently begins. By this time in development, heterochromatin protein 1 levels are diminished by four-fold in a quarter of the embryos produced by parents that are both heterozygous for a null allele (Suppressor of variegation2-5(05)). In a live analysis of the phenotype, we find prophase to be lengthened by more than two-fold in Suppressor of variegation2-5(05) mutant embryos with subsequent defects in chromosome segregation. The elongated prophase suggests that the segregation phenotype is a consequence of defects in events that occur during prophase, either in chromosome condensation or kinetochore assembly or function. Immunostaining with an antibody against a centromerespecific antigen indicates that the kinetochores of most chromosomes are functional. The immunostaining results are more consistent with defects in chromosome condensation being responsible for the segregation phenotype.

REFERENCES

    1. Bernat R. L.,
    2. Delannoy M. R.,
    3. Rothfield N. and
    4. Earnshaw W. C.
    (1991). Disruption of centromere assembly during interphase inhibits kinetochore morphogenesis and function in mitosis. Cell 66, 1229–1238
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Bouteille M.,
    2. Bouvier D. and
    3. Seve A. P.
    (1983). Heterogeneity and territorial organization of the nuclear matrix and related structures. Int. Rev. Cytol 83, 135–182
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Brown S. W.
    (1966). Heterochromatin. Science 151, 417–425
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Brunner D.,
    2. Oellers N.,
    3. Szabad J.,
    4. Biggs W. H. III.,
    5. Zipursky and
    6. Hafen S. L. S.
    (1994). A gain-of-function mutation in Drosophila MAP kinase activates multiple receptor tyrosine kinase signaling pathways. Cell 76, 875–888
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Buchenau P.,
    2. Saumweber H. and
    3. Arndt-Jovin D. J.
    (1993). Consequences of topoisomerase II inhibition in early embryogenesis of Drosophila revealed by in vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy. J. Cell Sci 104, 1175–1186
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Chevillard C.,
    2. Reik W.,
    3. McDermott M.,
    4. Fontes M.,
    5. Mattei M. and
    6. Singh G. P. B.
    (1993). Chromosomal localization of human homologs of the Drosophila heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) gene. Mammalian Genome 4, 124–126
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Cooke C. A.,
    2. Bernat R. L. and
    3. Earnshaw W. C.
    (1990). CENP-B: A major human centromere protein located beneath the kinetochore. J. Cell Biol 110, 1475–1488
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Dorer D. R. and
    2. Henikoff S.
    (1994). Expansions of transgene repeats cause heterochromatin formation and gene silencing in Drosophila. Cell 77, 993–1002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Eberl D. F.,
    2. Duyf B. J. and
    3. Hilliker A. J.
    (1993). The role of heterochromatin in the expression of a heterochromatic gene, the rolled locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 134, 277–292
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Edgar B. A. and
    2. Schubiger G.
    (1986). Parameters controlling transcriptional activation during early Drosophila development. Cell 44, 871–877
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Eissenberg J. C.,
    2. Morris G. D.,
    3. Reuter G. and
    4. Hartnett T.
    (1992). The heterochromatin-associated protein HP1 is an essential protein in Drosophila with dosage-dependent effects on position-effect variegation. Genetics 131, 345–352
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Eissenberg J. C. and
    2. Hartnett T.
    (1993). A heat shock-activated cDNA rescues the recessive lethality of mutations in the heterochromatin-associated protein HP1 of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Gen. Genet 240, 333–338
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Foe V. E. and
    2. Alberts B. M.
    (1983). Studies of nuclear and cytoplasmic behaviour during the five mitotic cycles that precede gastrulation in Drosophila embryogenesis. J. Cell Sci 61, 31–70
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Franke W. W.,
    2. Scheer U.,
    3. Krohne G. and
    4. Jarash E.
    (1981). The nuclear envelope and the architecture of the nuclear periphery. J. Cell Biol 91, 39–50
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Girdham C. H. and
    2. Glover D. M.
    (1991). Chromosome tangling and breakage at anaphase result from mutations in lodestar, a Drosophila gene encoding a putative nucleoside triphosphate binding protein. Genes Dev 5, 1786–1799
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Hamvar R. M.,
    2. Reik W.,
    3. Gaunt S. J.,
    4. Brown S. D. and
    5. Singh P.B.
    (1992). Mapping of a mouse homolog of a heterochromatin protein gene on the X chromosome. Mammalian Genome 2, 72–75
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Hancock R. and
    2. Boulikas T.
    (1982). Functional organization in the nucleus. Int. Rev. Cytol 79, 165–214
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Hawley R. S.,
    2. Irick H.,
    3. Zitron A. E.,
    4. Haddox D. A.,
    5. Lohe A.,
    6. New C.,
    7. Whitley M. D.,
    8. Arbel T.,
    9. Jang J.,
    10. McKim K. and
    11. et al.
    (1993). There are two mechanisms of achiasmate segregation in Drosophila, one of which requires heterochromatic homology. Dev. Genet 13, 440–467
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
    1. Hearn M. G.,
    2. Hedrick A.,
    3. Grigliatti T. A. and
    4. Wakimoto B. T.
    (1991). The effect of modifiers of position-effect variegation on the variegation of heterochromatic genes of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 128, 785–797
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Hilliker A. J.
    (1976). Genetic analysis of the centromeric heterochromatin of chromosome 2 of Drosophila melanogaster: Deficiency mapping of EMS-induced lethal complementation groups. Genetics 83, 765–782
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Hiroaka Y.,
    2. Minden J. S.,
    3. Swedlow J. R.,
    4. Sedat J. W. and
    5. Agard D. A.
    (1989). Focal points for chromosome condensation and decondensation revealed by three-dimensional in vivo time-lapse microscopy. Nature 342, 293–296
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hochstrasser M.,
    2. Mathog D.,
    3. Gruenbaum Y.,
    4. Saumweber H. and
    5. Sedat J. W.
    (1986). Spatial organization of chromosomes in the salivary gland nuclei of Drosophilamelanogaster. J. Cell Biol 102, 112–123
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. James T. C. and
    2. Elgin S. C. R.
    (1986). Identification of a nonhistone chromosomal protein associated with heterochromatin in Drosophila melanogaster and its gene. Mol. Cell. Biol 6, 3862–3872
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Kellogg D. R.,
    2. Mitchison T. J. and
    3. Alberts B.
    (1988). Behaviour of microtubules and actin filaments in living Drosophila embryos. Development 103, 675–686
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Kellum R.,
    2. Raff J. W. and
    3. Alberts B. M.
    (1995). Heterochromatin protein 1 distribution during development and during the cell cycle in Drosophila embryos. J. Cell Sci 108, 1407–1418
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Lindsley D. and
    2. Novitski E.
    (1958). Localization of the genetic factors responsible for the kinetic activity of the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 43, 790–798
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Locke J.,
    2. Kotarski M. A. and
    3. Tartof K. D.
    (1988). Dosage-dependent modifiers of position effect variegation in Drosophila and a mass action model that explains their effect. Genetics 120, 181–198
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Masumoto H.,
    2. Masukata H.,
    3. Muro Y.,
    4. Nozaki N. and
    5. Okazaki T.
    (1989). A human centromere antigen CENP-B interacts with a short specific sequence in alphoid DNA, a human centromeric satellite. J. Cell Biol 109, 1963–1973
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Merrill P. T.,
    2. Sweeton D. and
    3. Wieschaus E.
    (1988). Requirements for autosomal gene activity during precellular stages of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 10, 345–350
    OpenUrl
    1. Minden J. S.,
    2. Agard D. A.,
    3. Sedat J. W. and
    4. Alberts B. M.
    (1989). Directcell lineage analysis in Drosophila melanogaster by time lapse, three-dimensional optical microscopy of living embryos. J. Cell Biol 109, 505–516
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Mitchison T. J. and
    2. Sedat J.
    (1983). Localization of antigenic determinants in whole Drosophila embryos. Dev. Biol 99, 261–264
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Pardue M. L. and
    2. Gall J. G.
    (1970). Chromosomal localization of mouse satellite DNA. Science 168, 1356–1358
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Powers J. A. and
    2. Eissenberg J. C.
    (1993). Overlapping domains of the heterochromatin-associated protein HP1 mediate nuclear localization and heterochromatin binding. J. Cell Biol 120, 291–299
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Raff J. W.,
    2. Kellum R. and
    3. Alberts B.
    (1994). The Drosophila GAGA transcription factor is associated with specific regions of heterochromatin throughout the cell cycle. EMBO J 13, 5977–5983
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Samejima I.,
    2. Matsumoto T.,
    3. Nakaseko Y.,
    4. Beach D. and
    5. Yanagida M.
    (1993). Identification of seven new cut genes involved in Schizosaccharomyces pombe mitosis. J. Cell Sci 105, 135–143
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Shaffer C. D.,
    2. Wallrath L. L. and
    3. Elgin S. C. R.
    (1993). Regulating genes by packaging domains: Bits of heterochromatin in euchromatin?. Trends Genet 9, 35–37
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Sinclair D. A. R.,
    2. Mottus R. C. and
    3. Grigliatti T. A.
    (1983). Genes which suppress position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster are clustered. Mol. Gen. Genet 191, 326–333
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Sullivan W.,
    2. Minden J. S. and
    3. Alberts B. M.
    (1990). daughterless-abo-like, a Drosophila maternal-effect mutation that exhibits abnormal centrosome separation during the late blastoderm divisions. Development 110, 311–32
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Sullivan W.,
    2. Daily D. R.,
    3. Fogarty P.,
    4. Yook K. J. and
    5. Pimpinelli S.
    (1993). Delays in anaphase initiation occur in individual nuclei of the syncytial Drosophila embryo. Mol. Biol. Cell 4, 885–896
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Talbert P. B.,
    2. LeCiel D. S. and
    3. Henikoff S.
    (1994). Modification of the Drosophila heterochromatic mutation brownDominant by linkage alterations. Genetics 136, 559–571
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Wines D. R. and
    2. Henikoff S.
    (1992). Somatic instability of a Drosophila chromosome. Genetics 131, 683–691
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Wreggett K. A.,
    2. Hill F.,
    3. James P. S.,
    4. Hutchings A.,
    5. Butcher G. W. and
    6. Singh P. B.
    (1994). A mammalian homologue of Drosophila heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) is a component of constitutive heterochromatin. Cytogenet. Cell Genet 66, 99–103
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Wustmann G.,
    2. Szidonya J.,
    3. Taubert H. and
    4. Reuter G.
    (1989). The genetics of position-effect variegation modifying loci in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Gen. Genet 217, 520–527
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
Back to top

 Download PDF

Email
Journal Articles
Heterochromatin protein 1 is required for correct chromosome segregation in Drosophila embryos
R. Kellum, B.M. Alberts
Journal of Cell Science 1995 108: 1419-1431;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Alerts

Article navigation

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Advertisement

2020 at The Company of Biologists

Despite the challenges of 2020, we were able to bring a number of long-term projects and new ventures to fruition. While we look forward to a new year, join us as we reflect on the triumphs of the last 12 months.

Mole – The Corona Files

"This is not going to go away, 'like a miracle.' We have to do magic. And I know we can."

Mole continues to offer his wise words to researchers on how to manage during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Cell scientist to watch – Christine Faulkner

In an interview, Christine Faulkner talks about where her interest in plant science began, how she found the transition between Australia and the UK, and shares her thoughts on virtual conferences.

Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

“The clear advantages are rapid and efficient exposure and easy access to my article around the world. I believe it is great to have this publishing option in fast-growing fields in biomedical research.”

Dr Jaceques Behmoaras (Imperial College London) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 60 institutions in 12 countries taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.

JCS and COVID-19

For more information on measures Journal of Cell Science is taking to support the community during the COVID-19 pandemic, please see here.

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hestiate to contact the Editorial Office.