Article Figures & Tables
Figures
- Fig. 1.
MMH-D3 cells display a polarized phenotype and respond to the growth inhibitory function of TGF-β1. (A) Phase contrast and confocal immunofluorescence microscopy of parental MMH-D3 cells stained with the adherens junction markers E-cadherin and β-catenin and the tight junction marker ZO-1. (B) Proliferation kinetics of MMH-D3 cells (circles) versus MMH-D3 supplemented with 5 ng/ml TGF-β1 (squares). (C) Flow cytometry determining the cell cycle distribution of MMH-D3 cells versus MMH-D3 at day 5 of TGF-β1 (5 ng/ml) treatment.
- Fig. 3.
Cell cycle progression of MMH cell types and expression of marker proteins. (A) Proliferation kinetics of epithelial (MMH-D3, circles; MMH-R, squares) versus fibroblastoid MMH-RT cells (triangles). (B) Protein abundance of representative components participating in intercellular communication in epithelial and fibroblastoid cells. Besides the exogenous expression of Ha-Ras in epithelial MMH-R and fibroblastoid MMH-RT cells, the downregulation and loss of respective markers is indicated in fibroblastoid cells by immunoblotting.
- Fig. 2.
TGF-β1 triggers an epithelial to fibroblastoid conversion of MMH-R cells expressing constitutive active Ha-Ras. Left panel (—TGF-β1): MMH-R cells show a polarized epithelial phenotype as analyzed by phase contrast and confocal immunofluorescence microscopy. Right panel (+TGF-β1): Epithelial MMH-R cells treated with 5 ng/ml TGF-β1 undergo a conversion to a spindle-shaped fibroblastoid phenotype. The resulting depolarized MMH-RT cell type was processed for microscopical inspection. Exceptionally, cells were stained for Smad2 30 minutes after TGF-β1 induction. Insets in panels of undetectable E-cadherin and desmoplakin staining indicate the presence of GFP-positive cells.
- Fig. 4.
Malignant transformation of epithelial MMH-R and fibroblastoid MMH-RT cells analyzed in vitro and in vivo. (A) Phase contrast images depicting the typical colonies formed in vitro by anchorage-independent growth of MMH-R and MMH-RT cells in soft agar. (B) Kinetics of tumor formation in vivo after subcutaneous injection of MMH-R (circles) and MMH-RT cells (squares) into immunocompromized SCID/BALB/c recipient mice. (C) Visualization of endothelial cells in histological sections of tumors by immunological staining with anti-von Willebrand Factor. Insets represent lower magnifications (10×) of histological sections. (D) Dedifferentiation of epithelial MMH-R and fibroblastoid MMH-RT cells after tumor formation in vivo. Histological sections of tumors give rise to poorly differentiated cell carcinomas as shown by immunological staining with ZO-1. The cytoplasmic distribution of ZO-1 appears to be very weak in vascularized MMH-RT-derived tumors, and cell boundary staining is exclusively displayed by endothelial cells (white arrow). (E) Assessment of invasive properties in vitro. The ability of epithelial MMH-R and fibroblastoid MMH-RT cells to migrate through Matrigel matrices as reconstituted basement membranes is shown. Invaded cells on lower surfaces of membranes were visualized by immunofluorescence microscopy of GFP-positive MMH-R and MMH-RT cells.
- Fig. 5.
Typical hepatocellular-derived cell structures in collagen gels. (A) A phase contrast image of epithelial MMH-R cells generating lumen-forming structures. (B) Treatment of epithelial MMH-R cells with exogenous TGF-β1 (5 ng/ml) resulted in the formation of disordered branching cord-like structures.
- Fig. 6.
Molecular characteristics of epithelial MMH-R versus established fibroblastoid MMH-RT cells. (A) TGF-β1 production of epithelial and fibroblastoid cell types. The amount of latent TGF-β1 secretion into the medium was determined by ELISA. (B) Semi-quantitative RT-PCR determining the selective decrease (left panel) and increase (right panel) of mRNA abundance in epithelial versus fibroblastoid cells. All samples contained equal amounts of cDNA. As a control, rhoA mRNA expression remained unaffected (right panel). Lane 1, epithelial MMH-R cells; lane 2, fibroblastoid MMH-RT cells.
- Fig. 7.
Reversion of fibroblastoid MMH-RT cells to an epithelium-like phenotype. (A) Phase contrast microscopy of MMH-RT cells (control) grown on tissue culture plates and either treated with 30 μM UO126 or 5 μM LY294.002 for 24 hours. (B) Confocal immunofluorescence microscopy of MMH-RT cells treated with 5 μM LY294.002 for 24 hours. (C) Expression of E-cadherin and MMP-9 as determined by immunoblotting. Staining of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) is shown as a loading control. Lane 1, fibroblastoid MMH-RT cells; lanes 2 and 3, MMH-RT cells treated with 5 μM LY294.002 for 24 and 72 hours, respectively; lane 4, epithelial MMH-R cells.
Tables
- Table 1.
Tumorigenic features of epithelial and fibroblastoid cell types
MMH-D3 MMH-R MMH-RT Phenotype in culture Epithelial Epithelial Fibroblastoid Transepithelial resistance a +++ ++ - Efficiency of colony formation <1×10-3 0.2 0.22 Spreading of colonies b - - +++ Tumor induction in vivo c - 11-12 days 6-7 days Vascularization of tumors d - +/- +++ Phenotype ex-tumor - Fibroblastoid Fibroblastoid Invasive growth e - +/- +++ -
↵ a (+++) >200 Ω×cm2, (++) 150-200Ω× cm2, (-) < 20 Ω×cm2.
-
↵ b (-) no and (+++) vigorous spreading of colonies formed in soft agar ( Fig. 4A).
-
↵ c as monitored by initial tumor palpation after subcutaneous injection into SCID/BALB/c mice.
-
↵ d (+/-) a small and (+++) a high proportion of endothelial cells in the respective tumor tissue ( Fig. 4C).
-
↵ e (+/-) a small and (+++) a high number of cells migrate through Matrigel invasion chambers ( Fig. 4E).
-
Article navigation
Related articles
Cited by...
More in this TOC section
Similar articles
Other journals from The Company of Biologists
JCS and COVID-19
We are aware that the COVID-19 pandemic is having an unprecedented impact on researchers worldwide. The Editors of all The Company of Biologists’ journals have been considering ways in which we can alleviate concerns that members of our community may have around publishing activities during this time. Read about the actions we are taking at this time.
Please don’t hesitate to contact the Editorial Office if you have any questions or concerns.
Ricardo Henriques introduces FocalPlane
FocalPlane Scientific Advisory Board member Ricardo Henriques (University College London) gives a brief introduction to our upcoming microscopy community site. Follow us on Twitter @focalplane_jcs or sign up for the latest launch updates.
The Corona Files
“…if there is one thing that is achingly, chillingly clear, if it wasn't already, is that this thing we do is really, really important.”
Our resident insectivore, Mole, has started a new series – The Corona Files. Follow Mole’s weekly musings on how COVID-19 is changing the landscape for researchers.
Do you have an idea for a Workshop?
Our Workshop programme may be on hold for now, but we are welcoming ideas for the 2022 line-up. The proposal deadline is 29 May 2020, so find out how to pitch your idea to the Workshop Committee in good time.
Call for papers: Cell Biology of Host-Pathogen Interactions
Showcase your breakthrough research on all aspects of cell biology relating to host-pathogen interactions for our upcoming Special Issue. Articles must be received by 30 July 2020 for consideration. Find out more about the scope, publication schedule and how to submit your manuscript.