Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contact
    • Contact the journal
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Cell Science
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Cell Science

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS   Twitter  Facebook   YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contact
    • Contact the journal
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
Cell Science at a Glance
G-protein-coupled receptors at a glance
Wesley K. Kroeze, Douglas J. Sheffler, Bryan L. Roth
Journal of Cell Science 2003 116: 4867-4869; doi: 10.1242/jcs.00902
Wesley K. Kroeze
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Douglas J. Sheffler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bryan L. Roth
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute a large and diverse family of proteins whose primary function is to transduce extracellular stimuli into intracellular signals. They are among the largest and most diverse protein families in mammalian genomes. On the basis of homology with rhodopsin, they are predicted to contain seven membrane-spanning helices, an extracellular N-terminus and an intracellular C-terminus. This gives rise to their other names, the 7-TM receptors or the heptahelical receptors. GPCRs transduce extracellular stimuli to give intracellular signals through interaction of their intracellular domains with heterotrimeric G proteins, and the crystal structure of one member of this group, bovine rhodopsin, has recently been solved (Palczewski et al., 2000).

The presence of GPCRs in the genomes of bacteria, yeast, plants, nematodes and other invertebrate groups argues in favor of a relatively early evolutionary origin of this group of molecules. The diversity of GPCRs is dictated both by the multiplicity of stimuli to which they respond, as well as by the variety of intracellular signalling pathways they activate. These include light, neurotransmitters, odorants, biogenic amines, lipids, proteins, amino acids, hormones, nucleotides, chemokines and, undoubtedly, many others. In addition, there are at least 18 different human Gα proteins to which GPCRs can be coupled (Hermans, 2003; Wong, 2003). These Gα proteins form heterotrimeric complexes with Gβ subunits, of which there are at least 5 types, and Gγ subunits, of which there are at least 11 types (Hermans, 2003).

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Estimates of the number of GPCRs in the human genome vary widely. Based on their sequences, as well as on their known or suspected functions, there are estimated to be five or six major classes of GPCR. In a recent analysis of the GPCRs in the human genome, more than 800 GPCRs were listed (Fredriksson et al., 2003). Of this total, 701 were in the rhodopsin family (type A) and, of these, 241 were non-olfactory (Fredriksson et al., 2003). According to this analysis, there are approximately 460 type A olfactory receptors, although estimates range from 322 (Glusman et al., 2001; Takeda et al., 2002) to 900 (Venter et al., 2001), of which 347 have already been cloned (Zozulya et al., 2001). This large number of olfactory receptors accounts for the ability of humans to detect a wide variety of exogenous (olfactory) ligands. A study similar to that of Fredriksson et al. (Fredriksson et al., 2003) identified 367 human endoGPCRs and 392 mouse endoGPCRs (Vassilatis et al., 2003); the term endoGPCR refers to GPCRs for endogenous (non-olfactory) ligands. In view of the known existence of alternatively spliced variants and editing isoforms of GPCRs, it is likely that the true number of GPCRs will never be known and is much higher than estimated.

The tree shown illustrates the relationships among the primary protein sequences of 274 type A rhodopsin-like GPCRs; for clarity, the secretin family receptors (of which there are 15), the adhesion receptor family (24), the glutamate receptor family (15) and the frizzled/taste2 receptor family (24) were not included. To construct this tree, the list of receptors used by Fredriksson et al. (Fredriksson et al., 2003) served as a starting point, and newly discovered `orphan' receptors were added to the list (http://kidb.bioc.cwru.edu/rothlab/jalview/viewJalView.html).

The protein sequence of each receptor was obtained, and the sequences of the N- and C-termini, which are of variable length and show little similarity among the receptors, were trimmed manually. The protein sequences were then aligned and the tree was drawn using the ClustalW server (http://clustalw.genome.ad.jp). An alignment file is available at http://kidb.bioc.cwru.edu/rothlab/jalview/viewJalView.html and can be examined with a more viewer-friendly interface using the JalView applet at that site. The G-protein-coupling information in the poster is derived from the review by Wong (Wong, 2003).

The groupings of the receptors in the poster are thus similar, but not identical, to those of Fredriksson et al. (Fredriksson et al., 2003). For example, Fredriksson's α, β, γ and δ groups, which appear to be `monophyletic' in their tree, were not monophyletic in ours; this is likely to be due to slight differences in the options used in the two alignments, and the relative imprecision of the location of the roots of the branches in both trees. Interestingly, the orphan receptors GPR57 and GPR58 were grouped with the trace amine receptors, and comparison of their sequences indicates that these orphans probably constitute the human equivalent of the type 2 trace amine receptors of rodents. Thus, trees of this type may serve to help in the process of `de-orphanizing' receptors.

How do GPCRs work?

The first step in signal transduction is ligand binding. The nature of GPCR ligand-binding sites is best studied by a combination of site-directed mutagenesis, molecular modelling of the receptors and screening of large numbers of potential ligands. Our group curates the largest publicly accessible database of ligand affinities as part of the Psychoactive Drug Screening Program (http://pdsp.cwru.edu), while the most comprehensive database of the effects of mutations in GPCRs upon ligand binding can be found at http://wwwgrap.fagmed.uit.no. Agonist binding is followed by a change in the conformation of the receptor that may involve disruption of a strong ionic interaction between the third and sixth transmembrane helices (Ballesteros et al., 2001; Shapiro et al., 2002), which facilitates activation of the G-protein heterotrimer. Depending on the type of G protein to which the receptor is coupled, a variety of downstream signalling pathways can be activated (reviewed by Marinissen and Gutkind, 2001; Neves et al., 2002). Signalling is then attenuated (desensitized) by GPCR internalization, which is facilitated by arrestin binding (Ferguson, 2001). Signalling, desensitization and eventual resensitization are regulated by complex interactions of various intracellular domains of the GPCRs with numerous intracellular proteins (Hall and Lefkowitz, 2003; Bockaert et al., 2003).

Although many studies have used β-adrenergic receptors as prototypical GPCRs, it has become increasingly clear that much more can be learned by systematic study of other receptors. Our studies of the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor, for instance, showed that GPCR internalization and desensitization can occur by arrestin-independent pathways (Bhatnagar et al., 2001; Gray et al., 2003) and similar findings have been reported for other GPCRs (Lee et al., 1998). Interactions of GPCRs with other proteins, including cytoskeletal components such as PSD-95 (Hall and Lefkowitz, 2002; Xia et al., 2003), are increasingly being found to be important for regulating the activity, targeting and trafficking of GPCRs.

GPCRs are attractive targets for magic bullets

Although the biology of GPCRs is certainly intriguing, their ultimate importance is underscored by the fact that at least one third (Robas et al., 2003) and perhaps as many as half (Flower, 1999) of currently marketed drugs target GPCRs, although only 10% of GPCRs are known drug targets (Vassilatis et al., 2003). As new functions for GPCRs are discovered, especially for the orphan GPCRs for which no function is currently known, the number of drugs that target GPCRs can only be expected to increase. This is a focus of intense research effort, both in academia and in industry.

In addition to biological studies of the types summarized above, much excitement remains in the field because of the continuing de-orphanization of GPCRs and the subsequent elucidation of their pharmacology and physiology.

Once a large enough panel of GPCRs has been obtained and comprehensively characterized, a systematic analysis of the `receptorome' (the portion of the proteome encoding receptors) can yield important discoveries. We have used such an approach to discover the molecular mechanisms responsible for serious drug side-effects – for example, phen/fen-induced heart disease (Rothman et al., 2000) and weight gain associated with the use of atypical antipsychotics (Kroeze et al., 2003). Additionally, screening the receptorome has been used to elucidate the actions of natural compounds and to obtain validated molecular targets for drug discovery (e.g. Roth et al., 2002).

  • © The Company of Biologists Limited 2003

References

  1. ↵
    Ballesteros, J. A., Jensen, A. D., Liapakis, G., Rasmussen, S. G., Shi, L., Gether, U. and Javitch, J. A. (2001). Activation of the beta 2-adrenergic receptor involves disruption of an ionic lock between the cytoplasmic ends of transmembrane segments 3 and 6. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 29171-29177.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Bhatnagar, A., Willins, D. L., Gray, J. A., Woods, J., Benovic, J. L. and Roth, B. L. (2001). The dynamin-dependent, arrestin-independent internalization of 5-hydroxytryptamine 2A (5-HT2A) serotonin receptors reveals differential sorting of arrestins and 5-HT2A receptors during endocytosis. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 8269-8277.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Bockaert, J., Marin, P., Dumuis, A. and Fagni, L. (2003). The `magic tail' of G protein-coupled receptors: an anchorage for functional protein networks. FEBS Lett. 546, 65-72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    Ferguson, S. S. G. (2001). Evolving concepts in G protein-coupled receptor endocytosis: the role in receptor desensitization and signaling. Pharmacol. Rev. 53, 1-24.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Flower, D. R. (1999). Modelling G-protein-coupled receptors for drug design. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1422, 207-234.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    Fredriksson, R., Lagerstrom, M. C., Lundin, L. G. and Schioth, H. B. (2003). The G-protein-coupled receptors in the human genome form five main families. Phylogenetic analysis, paralogon groups, and fingerprints. Mol. Pharmacol. 63, 1256-1272.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Glusman, G., Yanai, I., Rubin, I. and Lancet, D. (2001). The complete human olfactory subgenome. Genome Res. 11, 685-702.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Gray, J. A., Bhatnagar, A., Gurevich, V. V. and Roth, B. L. (2003). The interaction of a constitutively active arrestin with the arrestin-insensitive 5-HT(2A) receptor induces agonist-independent internalization. Mol. Pharmacol. 63, 961-972.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Hall, R. A. and Lefkowitz, R. J. (2002). Regulation of G protein-coupled receptor signaling by scaffold proteins. Circ. Res. 91, 672-680.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Hermans, E. (2003). Biochemical and pharmacological control of the multiplicity of coupling at G-protein-coupled receptors. Pharmacol. Ther. 99, 25-44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    Kroeze, W. K., Hufeisen, S. J., Popadak, B. A., Renock, S. M., Steinberg, S., Ernsberger, P., Jayathilake, K., Meltzer, H. A. and Roth, B. L. (2003) H1-histamine receptor affinity predicts short-term weight gain for typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs. Neuropsychopharmacology 28, 519-526.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    Lee, K. B., Pals-Rylaarsdam, R., Benovic, J. L. and Hosey, M. M. (1998). Arrestin-independent internalization of the m1, m3, and m4 subtypes of muscarinic cholinergic receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 12967-12972.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Marinissen, M. J. and Gutkind, J. S. (2001). G-protein-coupled receptors and signaling networks: emerging paradigms. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 22, 368-375.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    Neves, S. R., Ram, P. T. and Iyengar, R. (2002). G protein pathways. Science 296, 1636-1639.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Palczewski, K., Kumasaka, T., Hori, T., Behnke, C. A., Motoshima, H., Fox, B. A., Le Trong, I., Teller, D. C., Okada, T., Stenkamp, R. E., Yamamoto, M. and Miyano, M. (2000). Crystal structure of rhodopsin: a G protein-coupled receptor. Science 289, 739-745.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Robas, N., O'Reilly, M., Katugampola, S. and Fidock, M. (2003). Maximizing serendipity: strategies for identifying ligands for orphan G-protein-coupled receptors. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 3, 121-126.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    Roth, B. L., Baner, K., Westkaemper, R., Siebert, D., Rice, K. C., Steinberg, S., Ernsberger, P. and Rothman, R. B. 2002. Salvinorin A: a potent naturally occuring nonnitrogenous kappa opioid selective agonist. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 11934-11939.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Rothman, R. B., Baumann, M. H., Savage, J. E., Rauser, L., McBride, A., Hufeisen, S. J. and Roth, B. L. (2000). Evidence for possible involvement of 5-HT(2B) receptors in the cardiac valvulopathy associated with fenfluramine and other serotonergic medications. Circulation 102, 2836-2841.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Shapiro, D. A., Kristiansen, K., Weiner, D. M., Kroeze, W. K. and Roth, B. L. (2002). Evidence for a model of agonist-induced activation of 5-hydroxytryptamine 2A serotonin receptors that involves the disruption of a strong ionic interaction between helices 3 and 6. J Biol Chem 277, 11441-11449.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Takeda, S., Kadowaki, S., Haga, T., Takaesu, H. and Mitaku, S. (2002). Identification of G protein-coupled receptor genes from the human genome sequence. FEBS Lett. 520, 97-101.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    Vassilatis, D. K., Hohmann, J. G., Zeng, H., Li, F., Ranchalis, J. E., Mortrud, M. T., Brown, A., Rodriguez, S. S., Weller, J. R., Wright, A. C., Bergmann, J. E. and Gaitanaris, G. A. (2003). The G protein-coupled receptor repertoires of human and mouse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 4903-4908.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Venter, J. C., Adams, M. D., Myers, E. W., Li, P. W., Mural, R. J., Sutton, G. G., Smith, H. O., Yandell, M., Evans, C. A., Holt, R. A. et al. (2001). The sequence of the human genome. Science 291, 1304-1351.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Wong, S. K. F. (2003). G protein selectivity is regulated by multiple intracellular regions of GPCRs. Neurosignals 12, 1-12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    Xia, Z., Gray, J. A., Compton-Toth, B. A. and Roth, B. L. (2003). A direct interaction of PSD-95 with 5-HT2A serotonin receptors regulates receptor trafficking and signal transduction. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 21901-21908.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Zozulya, S., Echeverri, F. and Nguyen, T. (2001). The human olfactory receptor repertoire. Genome Biol. 2, RESEARCH0018.1-0018.12.
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Cell Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
G-protein-coupled receptors at a glance
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Cell Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Cell Science web site.
Share
Cell Science at a Glance
G-protein-coupled receptors at a glance
Wesley K. Kroeze, Douglas J. Sheffler, Bryan L. Roth
Journal of Cell Science 2003 116: 4867-4869; doi: 10.1242/jcs.00902
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Cell Science at a Glance
G-protein-coupled receptors at a glance
Wesley K. Kroeze, Douglas J. Sheffler, Bryan L. Roth
Journal of Cell Science 2003 116: 4867-4869; doi: 10.1242/jcs.00902

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • How do GPCRs work?
    • GPCRs are attractive targets for magic bullets
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • The liquid nucleome – phase transitions in the nucleus at a glance
  • Nutrient regulation of mTORC1 at a glance
  • Adaptor protein complexes and disease at a glance
Show more CELL SCIENCE AT A GLANCE

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

First Person interviews

Photo collage of Chen Yu, Sushmita Chatterjee, Ruiqi Wang and Lotte Vanheer.

Have you seen our First Person interviews with the early-career first authors of our papers? The authors talk about their work in and out of the lab, the journeys that led them to where they are now and the scientists who inspired them along the way. Recently, we caught up with first authors Maitreyi Rathod, Sushmita Chatterjee, Lotte Vanheer, Rachel Furlong, Pamela Adami, Ruiqi Wang and Chen Yu.


Travelling Fellowship – New imaging approach unveils a bigger picture

Highlights from Travelling Fellowship trips

Find out how Pamela Imperadore’s Travelling Fellowship grant from The Company of Biologists took her to Germany, where she used new imaging techniques to investigate the cellular machinery underlying octopus arm regeneration. Don’t miss the next application deadline for 2020 travel, coming up on 29 November. Where will your research take you?


preLights – Meet the preLighters: an interview with Maiko Kitaoka

Maiko Kitaoka

Maiko Kitaoka is a graduate student in the lab of Rebecca Heald at the University of California, Berkeley. Here she studies the cause of chromosome mis-segregation defects in Xenopus hybrids. We caught up with Maiko to discuss her research, science communication, ballet, preprints and more.


Journal Meeting – Cell Dynamics: Host-Pathogen Interface

Registration is now open for the third instalment of the highly successful Cellular Dynamics Meeting Series, and will focus on ‘Host-Pathogen Interface’. The meeting will take place 17-20 May 2020, and further information is available here.


Cell Science at a Glance – Adaptor protein complexes and disease at a glance

A new poster from the Robinson lab summarises what is known about the five adaptor protein complexes and discuss how this helps to explain the clinical features of different genetic disorders.


JCS joins the Review Commons initiative

Journal of Cell Science is pleased to be a part of the new and exciting Review Commons initiative, launched by EMBO and ASAPbio. Streamlining the publishing process, Review Commons enables high-quality peer review to take place before journal submission. Papers submitted to Review Commons will be assessed independently of any journal, focusing solely on the paper’s scientific rigor and merit.


Articles of interest in our sister journals

Casein kinase 1α decreases β-catenin levels at adherens junctions to facilitate wound closure in Drosophila larvae
Chang-Ru Tsai, Michael J. Galko
Development

Spherical spindle shape promotes perpendicular cortical orientation by preventing isometric cortical pulling on both spindle poles during C. elegans female meiosis
Elizabeth Vargas, Karen P. McNally, Daniel B. Cortes, Michelle T. Panzica, Brennan M. Danlasky, Qianyan Li, Amy Shaub Maddox, Francis J. McNally
Development

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Journal of Cell Science
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Fast-track manuscripts
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • JCS Prize
  • Manuscript transfer network
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact Journal of Cell Science
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2019   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992