Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Cell Science
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Cell Science

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS   Twitter  Facebook   YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
Research Article
Sorting nexin-2 is associated with tubular elements of the early endosome, but is not essential for retromer-mediated endosome-to-TGN transport
Jez G. Carlton, Miriam V. Bujny, Brian J. Peter, Viola M. J. Oorschot, Anna Rutherford, Rebecca S. Arkell, Judith Klumperman, Harvey T. McMahon, Peter J. Cullen
Journal of Cell Science 2005 118: 4527-4539; doi: 10.1242/jcs.02568
Jez G. Carlton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Miriam V. Bujny
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian J. Peter
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Viola M. J. Oorschot
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna Rutherford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca S. Arkell
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Judith Klumperman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Harvey T. McMahon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter J. Cullen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  •   Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    SNX2 binds PtdIns(3)P and PtdIns(3,5)P2. (A) Bacterially expressed SNX2 was incubated with sucrose-loaded liposomes formed from a lipid mixture of PtdCho, PtdSer and PtdEth supplemented with 20% of the relevant phosphoinositide species. SNX2 association with pelleted liposomes was assayed by western blotting with SNX2-specific antisera. Results are representative of more than three independent experiments. (B) Relative amounts of phosphoinositides were titrated down while keeping total lipid mass constant. SNX2 association with the lipid pellet was determined by volume integration of western blots. Results were averaged for at least three separate experiments. (C) The PX domain mutant SNX2(K211A) is unable to associate with phosphoinositides. Results are representative of more than three independent experiments.

  • Table 1.

    Quantification of the co-localisation of GFP-SNX2 with various endosomal markers

    Percentage of structures
    Marker Co-localisation GFP-SNX2 alone Marker alone
    EEA1 70.3±5.6 16.0±6.0 11.7±2.3
    EGFR, 10 min 71.0±5.9 12.3±3.4 17.7±9.3
    SNX1 78.4±6.4 9.5±7.7 12.1±1.3
    LAMP1 9.0±4.2 49.5±12.0 41.5±7.8
    • HeLa cells expressing low levels of GFP-SNX2 were fixed and stained for the various markers. For co-localisation with internalised EGF receptor, serum-starved cells were stimulated for 10 minutes with EGF (100 ng/ml) prior to fixation. The degree of co-localisation was determined as described in Materials and Methods.

  •   Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    SNX2 is capable of sensing membrane curvature but does not induce membrane tubulation in vitro or in vivo. (A) Variously curved liposomes were formed by extrusion, and binding of proteins was assayed by sedimentation. SNX2 bound preferentially to highly curved membranes, as did SNX1. The epsin1 ENTH domain (which strongly tubulates membranes), and Dab2 (which does not change liposome shape) were insensitive to curvature. Amount of bound protein was normalised to the value for 0.8 μm liposomes. Average values for three experiments ± s.d. are shown. (B) Liposomes derived from brain were incubated with 20 μM BSA (i) or 20 μM of full length recombinant SNX1 (ii,iii) or SNX2 (iv,v). Whereas budding tubular profiles and occasionally tubular networks were observed with SNX1, no tubules were observed when using SNX2. For SNX1 (ii,iii) and SNX2 (iv,v) the data represents two independent experiments. (C). HeLa cells were transiently transfected with a construct encoding for GFP-SNX2. After 48 hours of incubation, cells expressing low and high levels of GFP-SNX2 were fixed and imaged by confocal microscopy. At low levels, SNX2 was associated with punctate cytoplasmic vesicles, which contrasted with the swollen endosomal vacuoles observed under conditions of high level expression. Bars, 10 μm.

  •   Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    At low-level expression, GFP-SNX2 is associated with elements of the early endosome. HeLa cells were transiently transfected with GFP-SNX2 and, after 24 hours, cells were fixed and stained for the early endosomal markers EEA1 (A) and SNX1 (B), internalised receptors for transferrin (C) and EGF (D), and the late endosomal marker LAMP1 (E). Images are representative of more than 10 imaged cells in each case. Bars, 10 μm.

  •   Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    In HeLa cells endogenous SNX2 and SNX1 co-localise on an early endosomal compartment. (A) HeLa cells were treated with control, SNX2-specific, SNX1-specific or both SNX2 and SNX1 siRNA duplexes for 72 hours. At this time, the levels of SNX2 and SNX1 were determined by western blotting with SNX2 or SNX1 antisera. In all cases loading was controlled by probing samples with an anti-tubulin antibody. Quantification of the data revealed that, for individual siRNA treatment using SNX2-specific or SNX1-specific duplexes, the level of SNX2 and SNX1 expression was suppressed by 82% and 93%, respectively. Under conditions of simultaneous duplex treatment, SNX2 and SNX1 were suppressed by 81% and 92%, respectively. (B) HeLa cells were treated with control, SNX2-specific, SNX1-specific or both SNX2 and SNX1 siRNA duplexes for 72 hours prior to fixation. Cells were stained for endogenous SNX1 and SNX2. Bar, 10 μm. (C) HeLa cells were fixed and co-stained with SNX1- and SNX2-specific antibodies to reveal the endogenous distribution of these proteins. Bar, 10 μm.

  •   Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Endogenous SNX2 and SNX1 co-localise on tubular elements of the early endosome. Ultrathin cryosections of HepG2 cells showing the co-localization of SNX2 with SNX1 and CI-MPR on endosomal tubules. SNX2 (15 nm gold particles) and SNX1 (10 nm gold particles) co-localize on tubules emanating from endosomal (E) vacuoles (arrow in A) and on numerous vesicular-tubular profiles in close vicinity of endosomal vacuoles (arrows in B). SNX2 (15 nm gold particles) associates with CI-MPR (10 nm gold particles)-positive endosomal buds (arrows in C) and similar endosome-associated vesicular-tubular profiles, as shown in B (arrow in D). Bars, 200 nm

  •   Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Suppression of SNX2 or the joint suppression of SNX2 and SNX1 has no gross affect on EGF or transferrin receptor sorting. (A) HeLa cells were treated with either control, SNX2-specific siRNA or jointly with SNX1- and SNX2-specific siRNA duplexes for 72 hours. Cells were serum-starved for 3 hours and labelled with 1 kBq per well 125I-EGF for 1 hour at 4°C, allowed to internalise surface bound 125I-EGF for 5 minutes at 37°C, and then returned to 4°C. Cells were chased into 100 ng/ml cold EGF-containing media for various times at 37°C. Recycled, degraded and internalised fractions were subjected to gamma counting. Data is the average±s.d. from three independent experiments. (B) HeLa cells were treated with control, SNX2-specific siRNA or jointly with SNX1- and SNX2-specific siRNA duplexes for 72 hours. Cells were serum-starved for 3 hours and labelled with 1 kBq per well 125I-transferrin for 60 minutes at 37°C. Cells were chased into 50 μg/ml cold transferrin-containing media for various times at 37°C. Recycled, degraded and internalised fractions were subjected to gamma counting. Data is the average±s.d. from three independent experiments. (C) Western analysis of a typical SNX1 and SNX2 suppression achieved during one of the three sets of receptor trafficking assays.

  •   Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Endogenous SNX2 shows a high degree of co-localisation with the retromer component mVps26. (A) Co-localisation of endogenous SNX2 and endogenous mVps26. Cells were plated on coverslips, fixed and stained for SNX2 and mVps26. (B) Suppression of SNX1, SNX2, or joint suppression of both SNX1 and SNX2 does not affect mVps26 localisation. HeLa cells were treated with control, SNX1-specific siRNA, SNX2-specific siRNA or jointly with SNX1- and SNX2-specific siRNA duplexes for 72 hours. Cells were then fixed and stained against endogenous SNX1, endogenous SNX2 and endogenous mVps26. Individual or joint suppression of SNX1 and SNX2 does not affect punctate distribution of mVps26. Bars, 20 μm (A,B).

  •   Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Suppression of SNX2 does not result in a detectable defect in the steady-state distribution of the CI-MPR. (A) HeLa cells were treated with control, SNX1-specific siRNA, SNX2-specific siRNA or jointly with SNX1- and SNX2-specific siRNA duplexes for 72 hours. Cells were fixed and stained against endogenous SNX1, endogenous SNX2 and endogenous CI-MPR. In cells subjected to RNAi against SNX2, the CI-MPR remains at a perinuclear structure that has been previously characterised as the TGN. In cells in which SNX1 and SNX2 have been suppressed, the CI-MPR undergoes a limited redistribution at steady state to peripheral structures. Bars, 20 μm. (B) HeLa cells were treated twice with control, SNX1-specific siRNA, SNX2-specific siRNA or jointly with SNX1- and SNX2-specific siRNA duplexes for two consecutive periods of 72 hours. At this time, cells were washed into cycloheximide (40 μg/ml)-containing media for 0, 4, 8 or 12 hours. Cells were lysed and the levels of endogenous CI-MPR present were resolved by western blotting with CI-MPR-specific antisera, followed by volume integration. Results are presented graphically from the averages of four independent experiments.

  •   Fig. 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 9.

    In HeLaM cells stably expressing a CD8-CI-MPR chimera, suppression of SNX2 induces a subtle change in the rate of sorting to the TGN. (A) Images depicting the kinetics of delivery of a cell-surface-labelled CD8-CI-MPR chimera to the TGN in HeLaM cells. Bars, 20 μm. (B) HeLaM cells stably expressing a CD8-CI-MPR chimera were treated with control, SNX1-specific, SNX2-specific, or SNX1- and SNX2-specific siRNA and subjected to an anti-CD8 antibody uptake experiment as described in Materials and Methods. Briefly, CD8-CI-MPR at the cell surface were labelled with anti-CD8, and allowed to internalise for 2, 8, 16 or 24 minutes. Cells were fixed and the amount of anti-CD8 that had reached the TGN46-labelled TGN was quantified by immunofluoresence using LCSLite (Leica). Results are expressed ± the s.e.m. from three independent experiments (except the 2 minute time point, which is from two independent experiments). The key indicates the siRNA treatment. (C) Western blot indicating representative levels of SNX1 and SNX2 suppression.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Cell Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sorting nexin-2 is associated with tubular elements of the early endosome, but is not essential for retromer-mediated endosome-to-TGN transport
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Cell Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Cell Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
Sorting nexin-2 is associated with tubular elements of the early endosome, but is not essential for retromer-mediated endosome-to-TGN transport
Jez G. Carlton, Miriam V. Bujny, Brian J. Peter, Viola M. J. Oorschot, Anna Rutherford, Rebecca S. Arkell, Judith Klumperman, Harvey T. McMahon, Peter J. Cullen
Journal of Cell Science 2005 118: 4527-4539; doi: 10.1242/jcs.02568
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Sorting nexin-2 is associated with tubular elements of the early endosome, but is not essential for retromer-mediated endosome-to-TGN transport
Jez G. Carlton, Miriam V. Bujny, Brian J. Peter, Viola M. J. Oorschot, Anna Rutherford, Rebecca S. Arkell, Judith Klumperman, Harvey T. McMahon, Peter J. Cullen
Journal of Cell Science 2005 118: 4527-4539; doi: 10.1242/jcs.02568

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • Summary
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • EFA6A, an exchange factor for Arf6, regulates early steps in ciliogenesis
  • SetDB1 and Su(var)3-9 play non-overlapping roles in somatic cell chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster
  • p.E152K-STIM1 mutation deregulates Ca2+ signaling contributing to chronic pancreatitis
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

2020 at The Company of Biologists

Despite the challenges of 2020, we were able to bring a number of long-term projects and new ventures to fruition. While we look forward to a new year, join us as we reflect on the triumphs of the last 12 months.


Mole – The Corona Files

"This is not going to go away, 'like a miracle.' We have to do magic. And I know we can."

Mole continues to offer his wise words to researchers on how to manage during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Cell scientist to watch – Christine Faulkner

In an interview, Christine Faulkner talks about where her interest in plant science began, how she found the transition between Australia and the UK, and shares her thoughts on virtual conferences.


Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

“The clear advantages are rapid and efficient exposure and easy access to my article around the world. I believe it is great to have this publishing option in fast-growing fields in biomedical research.”

Dr Jaceques Behmoaras (Imperial College London) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 60 institutions in 12 countries taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


JCS and COVID-19

For more information on measures Journal of Cell Science is taking to support the community during the COVID-19 pandemic, please see here.

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hestiate to contact the Editorial Office.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Journal of Cell Science
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Fast-track manuscripts
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • JCS Prize
  • Manuscript transfer network
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contacts

  • Contact JCS
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992