Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Cell Science
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Cell Science

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS   Twitter  Facebook   YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
Cell Science at a Glance
Death receptor signaling
Inna Lavrik, Alexander Golks, Peter H. Krammer
Journal of Cell Science 2005 118: 265-267; doi: 10.1242/jcs.01610
Inna Lavrik
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander Golks
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter H. Krammer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Apoptosis or programmed cell death is a common property of multicellular organisms (Danial and Korsmeyer, 2004; Krammer, 2000). It can be triggered by a number of factors, including UV- or γ-irradiation, chemotherapeutic drugs or signaling by death receptors (DR). The DR family is part of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily (Bhardwaj and Aggarwal, 2003). Triggering members of the DR family by death ligands results in the transduction of either apoptotic or survival signals. The poster shows a general overview of DR signaling, summarizing the molecules and pathways involved.

Death receptor family members

Eight members of the death receptor family have been characterized so far: tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (TNFR1; also known as DR1, CD120a, p55 and p60), CD95 (also known as DR2, APO-1 and Fas), DR3 (also known as APO-3, LARD, TRAMP and WSL1), TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor 1 (TRAILR1; also known as DR4 and APO-2), TRAILR2 (also known as DR5, KILLER and TRICK2), DR6, ectodysplasin A receptor (EDAR) and nerve growth factor receptor (NGFR) (French and Tschopp, 2003; Wajant, 2003). These are distinguished by a cytoplasmic region of ∼80 residues termed the death domain (DD). When these receptors are triggered by corresponding ligands, a number of molecules are recruited to the DD and subsequently a signaling cascade is activated. Death ligands also interact with decoy receptors (DcRs) that do not possess DDs and so cannot form signaling complexes. To date, four decoy receptors have been characterized: TRAILR3 (also known as DcR1), TRAILR4 (also known as DcR2), DcR3 and osteoprotegrin (OPG).⇓

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Two types of DR signaling complex can be distinguished. The first group comprises the death-inducing signaling complexes (DISCs) that are formed at the CD95 receptor, TRAILR1 or TRAILR2 (Peter and Krammer, 2003). All three receptors recruit DISCs with similar compositions. DISC formation results in the activation of caspase-8, which plays the central role in transduction of the apoptotic signal. The second group comprises the TNFR1, DR3, DR6 and EDAR. These recruit a different set of molecules, which transduce both apoptotic and survival signals.

CD95/Fas and TRAILR signaling

CD95 and TRAILR1/TRAILR2 DISCs consist of oligomerized, probably trimerized, receptors, the DD-containing adaptor molecule FADD (Fas-Associated Death Domain), two isoforms of procaspase-8 (procaspase-8/a and procaspase-8/b), procaspase-10 and the cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein (FLIPL/S) (Peter and Krammer, 2003). The interactions between the molecules at the DISC are based on homotypic contacts. The DD of the receptor interacts with the DD of FADD whereas the death effector domain (DED) of FADD interacts with the N-terminal tandem DEDs of procaspase-8, procaspase-10 and FLIPL/S. Activation of procaspase-8 is believed to follow an `induced proximity' model, in which high local concentrations of procaspase-8 at the DISC lead to its autoproteolytic activation, a multi-step cleavage process resulting in formation of a caspase-8 heterotetramer containing two large subunits (p18) and two small subunits (p10). This is then released into the cytosol to propagate the apoptotic signal.

Procaspase-10 is also activated at the DISC, forming an active heterotetramer (Sprick et al., 2002). However, whether caspase-10 can trigger cell death in absence of caspase-8 in response to CD95 or TRAILR1/R2 stimulation is controversial. Thus, the role of caspase-10 remains elusive.

FLIPL and FLIPS inhibit activation of procaspase-8 at the DISC by blocking its processing. There is increasing evidence that FLIPL also facilitates the cleavage of procaspase-8 at the DISC by forming FLIPL-procaspase-8 heterodimers (Chang et al., 2003; Micheau et al., 2002). A detailed understanding of FLIP action at the DISC requires further studies.

Besides the above-mentioned components of the DISC, a number of molecules have been reported to be recruited to the DISC by direct interaction with DISC proteins (Daxx, FAP-1, FLASH, RIP, FAF-1 and others). The roles of many of these proteins are unclear (Peter and Krammer, 2003).

Two types of CD95 signaling have been established. Type I cells are characterized by high levels of DISC formation and increased amounts of active caspase-8. Activated caspase-8 directly leads to the activation of downstream effector caspases. In type II cells, there are lower levels of CD95 DISC formation and, thus, lower levels of active caspase-8 (Scaffidi et al., 1998). In this case, signaling requires an additional amplification loop that involves the cleavage by caspase-8 of the Bcl-2-family protein Bid to generate truncated (t) Bid and subsequent tBid-mediated release of cytochrome c (Cyt c) from mitochondria. The release of Cyt c from mitochondria results in apoptosome formation, followed by the activation of procaspase-9, which in turn cleaves downstream effector caspases (Korsmeyer et al., 2000). Type II CD95 signaling might be blocked by Bcl-2 family members such as Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL (Willis et al., 2003). Signaling downstream of TRAILR1/R2 receptors is similar to CD95 signaling.

TNFR, DR3 and DR6 signaling

TNF-R1 signaling differs from CD95-receptor or TRAILR1/R2-induced apoptosis (Varfolomeev and Ashkenazi, 2004). TNFR1 stimulation is postulated to result in the formation of two signaling complexes (Micheau and Tschopp, 2003). Complex I - formed at the membrane - comprises TNFR1, TNF, RIP (receptor-interacting protein), TRADD (TNFR-associated death domain protein), TRAF-1/2 (TNFR-associated factor), and probably other, as-yet-unidentified molecules. It is proposed to trigger the NF-κB signaling pathway through recruitment of the IKK complex and activates JNK through a TRAF-2-dependent mechanism. Complex I lacks FADD and procaspase-8 but is reported to translocate to the cytosol, where FADD, procaspase-8/10 and FLIPL/S are recruited to form the so-called traddosome or complex II (Micheau and Tschopp, 2003). Activation of procaspase-8 takes place in the traddosome and is followed by activation of downstream death signaling. In this model, the choice between survival and death depends upon the efficiency of complex II formation, caspase-8 activation and the amount of FLIP in the cells that blocks procaspase-8 activation at complex II. Although this proposed model provides an elegant mechanism of life-death decision making, it needs further experimental confirmation.

The DR3 and DR6 signaling pathways are less well characterized (Bhardwaj and Aggarwal, 2003). RIP and TRADD are recruited to the receptor complex, and DR3 and DR6 promote activation of NF-κB that leads to the expression of survival genes (Bhardwaj and Aggarwal, 2003; Karin and Lin, 2002).

Modulation of Death Receptor signaling

There are several levels of modulation of DR signaling (French and Tschopp, 2003). As mentioned above, decoy receptors can compete with DRs for ligand binding, and FLIP blocks procaspase-8 activation at the DISC. Further downstream, IAPs (inhibitors of apoptosis) inhibit effector caspase activation. Our current understanding of DR signaling has opened possibilities for the design of new therapeutic strategies for targeting death receptor pathways. This would allow the treatment of a number of diseases potentially associated with defects in DR signaling, such as multiple sclerosis and Alzheimer's disease.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Karsten Gülow and Martin Sprick for their critical comments and the Wilhem Sander Stiftung, SFB 405, Tumorzentrum Heidelberg/Mannheim for supporting our work. We apologize to the many scientists and colleagues who are not cited owing to space limitations.

  • © The Company of Biologists Limited 2005

References

  1. ↵
    Bhardwaj, A. and Aggarwal, B. B. (2003). Receptor-mediated choreography of life and death. J. Clin. Immunol. 23, 317-332.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Chang, D. W., Xing, Z., Capacio, V. L., Peter, M. E. and Yang, X. (2003). Interdimer processing mechanism of procaspase-8 activation. EMBO J. 22, 4132-4142.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  3. ↵
    Danial, N. N. and Korsmeyer, S. J. (2004). Cell death: critical control points. Cell 116, 205-219.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    French, L. E. and Tschopp, J. (2003). Protein-based therapeutic approaches targeting death receptors. Cell Death Differ. 10, 117-123.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    Karin, M. and Lin, A. (2002). NF-kappaB at the crossroads of life and death. Nat. Immun. 3, 221-227.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    Korsmeyer, S. J., Wei, M. C., Saito, M., Weiler, S., Oh, K. J. and Schlesinger, P. H. (2000). Proapoptotic cascade activates BID, which oligomerizes BAK or BAX into pores that result in the release of cytochrome c. Cell Death Differ. 7, 1166-1173.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    Krammer, P. H. (2000). CD95's deadly mission in the immune system. Nature 407, 789-795.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    Micheau, O., Thome, M., Schneider, P., Holler, N., Tschopp, J., Nicholson, D. W., Briand, C. and Grutter, M. G. (2002). The long form of FLIP is an activator of caspase-8 at the Fas death-inducing signaling complex. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 45162-45171.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Micheau, O. and Tschopp, J. (2003). Induction of TNF receptor I-mediated apoptosis via two sequential signaling complexes. Cell 114, 181-190.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    Peter, M. E. and Krammer, P. H. (2003). The CD95 (APO-1/Fas) DISC and beyond. Cell Death Differ. 10, 26-35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    Scaffidi, C., Fulda, S., Srinivasan, A., Friesen, C., Li, F., Tomaselli, K. J., Debatin, K. M., Krammer, P. H. and Peter, M. E. (1998). Two CD95 (APO-1/Fas) signaling pathways. EMBO J. 17, 1675-1687.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  12. ↵
    Sprick, M., Rieser, E., Stahl, H., Grosse-Wilde, A., Weigand, M. and Walczak, H. (2002). Caspase-10 is recruited to and activated at the native TRAIL and CD95 death-inducing signalling complexes in a FADD-dependent manner but can not functionally substitute caspase-8. EMBO J. 21, 4520-4530.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  13. ↵
    Varfolomeev, E. E. and Ashkenazi, A. (2004). Tumor necrosis factor: an apoptosis JuNKie? Cell 116, 491-497.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    Wajant, H. (2003). Death receptors. Essays Biochem. 39, 53-71.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    Willis, S., Day, C. L., Hinds, M. G. and Huang, D. C. (2003). The Bcl-2-regulated apoptotic pathway. J. Cell Sci. 116, 4053-4056.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Cell Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Death receptor signaling
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Cell Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Cell Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Cell Science at a Glance
Death receptor signaling
Inna Lavrik, Alexander Golks, Peter H. Krammer
Journal of Cell Science 2005 118: 265-267; doi: 10.1242/jcs.01610
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Cell Science at a Glance
Death receptor signaling
Inna Lavrik, Alexander Golks, Peter H. Krammer
Journal of Cell Science 2005 118: 265-267; doi: 10.1242/jcs.01610

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • Death receptor family members
    • CD95/Fas and TRAILR signaling
    • TNFR, DR3 and DR6 signaling
    • Modulation of Death Receptor signaling
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Histone variants at a glance
  • Malaria parasite egress at a glance
  • Cargo transport through the nuclear pore complex at a glance
Show more CELL SCIENCE AT A GLANCE

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Follow us on Instagram

Cell science is bursting with beautiful images and over on Instagram, we’re showing them off! Find both JCS and FocalPlane on Instagram for stories and techniques across cell biology.


An interview with Derek Walsh

Professor Derek Walsh is the guest editor of our new special issue Cell Biology of Host-Pathogen Interactions. In an interview, Derek tells us about his work in the field of DNA viruses, the impact of the pandemic on virology and what his role as Guest Editor taught him.


How to improve your scientific writing

"If you are a scientist and you want to succeed, you must become a writer."

How do scientists become master storytellers? We called on our journal Editors, proofreaders and contributors to our community sites for their advice on how to improve your scientific writing.


Meet the preLighters: Jennifer Ann Black

Following the theme of our latest special issue, postdoc Jennifer Ann Black studies replication stress and genome plasticity in Leishmania in Professor Luiz Tosi’s lab in Sao Paolo. We caught up with Jenn (virtually) to hear about her relocation to Brazil mid-pandemic, her research on parasites and what she enjoys about ‘preLighting’.

In our special issue, Chandrakar et al. and Rosazza et al. present their latest work on Leishmania.


Mole – The Corona Files

“There are millions of people around the world who continue to believe that the Terrible Pandemic is a hoax.”

Mole continues to offer his wise words to researchers on how to manage during the COVID-19 pandemic.


JCS and COVID-19

For more information on measures Journal of Cell Science is taking to support the community during the COVID-19 pandemic, please see here.

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hestiate to contact the Editorial Office.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Journal of Cell Science
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Fast-track manuscripts
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • JCS Prize
  • Manuscript transfer network
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contacts

  • Contact JCS
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992