Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Cell Science
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Cell Science

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS   Twitter  Facebook   YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
Cell Science at a Glance
Apicobasal polarity complexes
Ben Margolis, Jean-Paul Borg
Journal of Cell Science 2005 118: 5157-5159; doi: 10.1242/jcs.02597
Ben Margolis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Paul Borg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Asymmetric distribution of proteins and other molecules within cells leads to cell polarization. One of the most studied examples occurs in epithelial cells that polarize to form apical and basolateral surfaces (Nelson, 2003). Although we know much about directed protein trafficking after cells are polarized, less is known about the initial mechanisms that lead to polarization. Genetic and biochemical studies in mammalian systems and lower organisms have begun to reveal the pathways that control this process. The current model is that apical and basolateral protein complexes are mutually antagonistic, which leads to the distribution of proteins in a polarized fashion (Bilder et al., 2003; Tanentzapf and Tepass, 2003). In this model, distinct protein kinases become localized in a polarized fashion and, through phosphorylation, control the localization of other proteins (see below).⇓

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

The poster indicates the major proteins thought to play a role in the initiation of apicobasal polarity and is based on studies in mammalian and Drosophila cells. The antagonistic apical and basolateral protein complexes are separated by a dotted line. Currently, the apical complexes are better understood owing to conservation in structure and function between the mammalian and Drosophila systems. By contrast, some of the basolateral protein complexes are less well understood in mammalian cells.

Studies of the apical domain have focused on two major complexes, the Crumbs-PALS1(Stardust)-PATJ complex and the PAR3(Bazooka)-PAR6-aPKC complex (Macara, 2004). (Names in parenthesis indicate Drosophila nomenclature if different from the mammalian name.) In mammalian cells, these complexes localize to the tight junction seal, a fence of tight junction complexes that separates apical and basolateral domains. In Drosophila the proteins concentrate in the subapical complex (also known as the marginal zone), which is also located at the border between apical and basolateral membranes, but no junctional seal is formed (Knust and Bossinger, 2002).

Crumbs is an apical transmembrane protein first identified in Drosophila that can directly bind through its C-terminal tail to a PDZ domain in PALS1 (Stardust) (Bachmann et al., 2001; Hong et al., 2001). Crumbs also has a region in its intracellular domain that can bind to members of the ezrin-radixin-moesin (ERM) family of proteins but the exact role of this domain in polarity is uncertain. PALS1 (Stardust) is a scaffold that has multiple protein-protein interaction domains and is a member of the membrane-associated guanylate kinase (MAGUK) family of proteins. It can interact with the small PDZ domain protein Lin-7 through one L27 domain and with PATJ (formerly known as Discs Lost in Drosophila) through a second L27 domain. PATJ is a multi-PDZ-domain scaffold protein highly related to MUPP1 that can bind to tight junction proteins such as claudins and zonula occludens 3 (ZO-3) through its PDZ domains (Roh and Margolis, 2003).

The second protein complex localized to the tight junction is the PAR6-PAR3(Bazooka)-aPKC complex. The role of this protein complex in polarity was first described in the C. elegans zygote and since then its role in polarity has been confirmed in many cell systems (Macara, 2004). PAR3/Bazooka and PAR6, like PALS1(Stardust) and PATJ, are PDZ domain scaffold proteins involved in multiple protein-protein interactions. The key effector of the complex is aPKC, a kinase that can directly interact with Par6 through PB1 domains. aPKC plays a pivotal role in polarity signaling by phosphorylating proteins and altering their localization along the polarity gradient. For example, one substrate of aPKC is a lateral protein, lethal giant larvae (LGL), which forms a separate complex with aPKC and PAR6 that excludes PAR3 (Betschinger et al., 2003; Plant et al., 2003; Yamanaka et al., 2003). Phosphorylation of LGL is thought to exclude it from the apical membrane and facilitate targeting to the lateral membrane.

Small G proteins of the Rho family, especially CDC42, also appear to play an important role in control of the apical complex (Macara, 2004). The role of CDC42 in cell polarity appears to be highly conserved from yeast to man (Etienne-Manneville, 2004). In mammalian and Drosophila systems, CDC42 binds to PAR6 and probably increases the activity of aPKC within the PAR6-PAR3(Bazooka)-aPKC complex. It might also play a role in localization and modulation of other protein complexes (Macara, 2004). Small G protein guanine-nucleotide-exchange factors (GEFs) such as Tiam1 appear to concentrate at apical complexes and are important for tight junction formation and possibly polarization (Chen and Macara, 2005; Liu et al., 2004).

The Crumbs-PALS1(Stardust)-PATJ and PAR3(Bazooka)-PAR6-aPKC complexes directly interact. PALS1 can bind to PAR6, and Crumbs can bind directly to PAR6 in addition to PALS1 (Hurd et al., 2003b; Lemmers et al., 2004). A current concept is that the PAR3(Bazooka)-PAR6-aPKC core complex is a universal effector of polarity and that Crumbs-PALS1(Stardust)-PATJ is a specific adaptor targeting this effector in epithelial polarity. Still unclear is how this complex initially localizes to mark the apical-basolateral boundary.

Polarity complexes are also found at the lateral surface. First among these are the proteins that mediate cell-cell adhesion, including the transmembrane cadherin and nectin proteins (Nelson, 2003; Sakisaka and Takai, 2004). Both of these adhesion protein families connect to multiple signaling pathways, including small G proteins of the Rho family. The initiation of cell-cell adhesion appears to be an important step in early polarization by specifying the lateral membrane. However the exact mechanisms involved in localization of the polarity effectors by these adhesion receptors are still under investigation. Like the apical complexes, serine/threonine kinases are thought to be important effectors of the polarization signal. The PAR1 kinase (also known as ELKL motif kinase, EMK) has been shown in Drosophila and mammalian cells to localize to the lateral membrane of epithelia and control polarization (Cohen et al., 2004; Doerflinger et al., 2003). PAR1 has also been identified in mammalian cells as microtubule-affinity-regulating kinase (MARK), which suggests that regulation of microtubules might be important in the polarization process (Biernat et al., 2002). Indeed, PAR1 has important control over microtubule organization in Drosophila and mammalian polarity models. In addition, PAR1 regulates the localization of polarity proteins. For example, it can phosphorylate PAR3, leading to the binding of 14-3-3 protein to phosphorylated PAR3 (Benton and St Johnston, 2003; Hurd et al., 2003a). In turn, PAR1 can be phosphorylated by aPKC, which prevents its membrane targeting (Hurov et al., 2004; Suzuki et al., 2004). PAR1 is also a substrate of another kinase, LKB1 (also known as STK11 or PAR4), which regulates apical membrane formation (Baas et al., 2004). LKB1 appears to require two cofactors for cytosolic activity, MO25 and Strad, but understanding its role in polarity is confounded by the existence of multiple substrates (Lizcano et al., 2004).

Like the PDZ-domain-based complexes in the apical domain, there might also be a similar lateral complex, including the PDZ domain proteins Scribble and Discs Large (DLG), as well as the WD40 protein, LGL (Bilder, 2004). In Drosophila, impaired activity of these basolateral proteins promotes a compromised localization of apical markers that expand the lateral membranes and lead to epithelial overgrowth (Bilder, 2004). The molecular basis of this defect remains unclear but the Scribble-DLG-LGL pathway is known to antagonize the apical Crumbs and PAR complexes (Bilder et al., 2003; Tanentzapf and Tepass, 2003). However, it is not clear whether Scribble, DLG and LGL actually form a protein complex. These proteins might also control a signalling cascade, whose disruption in mutant flies leads to a tumorigenic process (Zeitler et al., 2004). Scribble, DLG and LGL have highly conserved roles in mammals in terms of protein organization and subcellular localization, and their roles as neoplastic tumor suppressors in flies have boosted studies in vertebrates (Bilder, 2004). Nevertheless, there is no evidence to date that supports a role of the mammalian proteins in apical-basal polarity, despite overlapping functions demonstrated by rescue experiments in flies using human proteins (Bilder, 2004). Redundancy or functional divergence during evolution might explain the inability to demonstrate an effect. At the molecular level, LGL and Scribble are connected to trafficking machinery. LGL associates with syntaxin 4, a component of the basolateral exocytotic machinery (Musch et al., 2002) whereas Scribble binds to PIX and GIT, two regulators of the ARF6 and CDC42/RAC small GTPases (Audebert et al., 2004). More studies are needed to establish whether this Scribble-PIX-GIT-ARF6 pathway has a role in apicobasal polarity. In addition, the function of basal proteins such as integrins in epithelial polarization requires further investigation.

  • © The Company of Biologists Limited 2005

References

  1. ↵
    Audebert, S., Navarro, C., Nourry, C., Chasserot-Golaz, S., Lecine, P., Bellaiche, Y., Dupont, J. L., Premont, R. T., Sempere, C., Strub, J. M. et al. (2004). Mammalian Scribble forms a tight complex with the betaPIX exchange factor. Curr. Biol. 14, 987-995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    Baas, A. F., Smit, L. and Clevers, H. (2004). LKB1 tumor suppressor protein: PARtaker in cell polarity. Trends. Cell. Biol. 14, 312-319.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    Bachmann, A., Schneider, M., Thellenberg, E., Grawe, F. and Knust, E. (2001). Drosophila. Stardust is a partner of Crumbs in the control of epithelial cell polarity. Nature 414, 638-643.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    Benton, R. and St Johnston, D. (2003). Drosophila PAR-1 and 14-3-3 inhibit Bazooka/PAR-3 to establish complementary cortical domains in polarized cells. Cell 115, 691-704.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    Betschinger, J., Mechtler, K. and Knoblich, J. A. (2003). The Par complex directs asymmetric cell division by phosphorylating the cytoskeletal protein Lgl. Nature 422, 326-330.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Biernat, J., Wu, Y. Z., Timm, T., Zheng-Fischhofer, Q., Mandelkow, E., Meijer, L. and Mandelkow, E. M. (2002). Protein kinase MARK/PAR-1 is required for neurite outgrowth and establishment of neuronal polarity. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 4013-4028.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Bilder, D. (2004). Epithelial polarity and proliferation control: links from the Drosophila neoplastic tumor suppressors. Genes. Dev. 18, 1909-1925.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Bilder, D., Schober, M. and Perrimon, N. (2003). Integrated activity of PDZ protein complexes regulates epithelial polarity. Nat. Cell. Biol. 5, 53-58.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    Chen, X. and Macara, I. G. (2005). Par-3 controls tight junction assembly through the Rac exchange factor Tiam1. Nat. Cell. Biol. 7, 262-269.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    Cohen, D., Brennwald, P. J., Rodriguez-Boulan, E. and Musch, A. (2004). Mammalian PAR-1 determines epithelial lumen polarity by organizing the microtubule cytoskeleton. J. Cell Biol. 164, 717-727.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Doerflinger, H., Benton, R., Shulman, J. M. and St Johnston, D. (2003). The role of PAR-1 in regulating the polarised microtubule cytoskeleton in the Drosophila follicular epithelium. Development 130, 3965-3975.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Etienne-Manneville, S. (2004). Cdc42–the centre of polarity. J. Cell. Sci. 117, 1291-1300.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Hong, Y., Stronach, B., Perrimon, N., Jan, L. Y. and Jan, Y. N. (2001). Drosophila Stardust interacts with Crumbs to control polarity of epithelia but not neuroblasts. Nature 414, 634-638.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    Hurd, T. W., Fan, S., Liu, C. J., Kweon, H. K., Hakansson, K. and Margolis, B. (2003a). Phosphorylation-dependent binding of 14-3-3 to the polarity protein Par3 regulates cell polarity in mammalian epithelia. Curr. Biol. 13, 2082-2090.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    Hurd, T. W., Gao, L., Roh, M. H., Macara, I. G. and Margolis, B. (2003b). Direct interaction of two polarity complexes implicated in epithelial tight junction assembly. Nat. Cell. Biol. 5, 137-142.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    Hurov, J. B., Watkins, J. L. and Piwnica-Worms, H. (2004). Atypical PKC phosphorylates PAR-1 kinases to regulate localization and activity. Curr. Biol. 14, 736-741.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    Knust, E. and Bossinger, O. (2002). Composition and formation of intercellular junctions in epithelial cells. Science 298, 1955-1959.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Lemmers, C., Michel, D., Lane-Guermonprez, L., Delgrossi, M. H., Medina, E., Arsanto, J. P. and Le Bivic, A. (2004). CRB3 binds directly to Par6 and regulates the morphogenesis of the tight junctions in mammalian epithelial cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 120, 663-667.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    Liu, X. F., Ishida, H., Raziuddin, R. and Miki, T. (2004). Nucleotide exchange factor ECT2 interacts with the polarity protein complex Par6/Par3/protein kinase Czeta (PKCzeta) and regulates PKCzeta activity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 6665-6675.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Lizcano, J. M., Goransson, O., Toth, R., Deak, M., Morrice, N. A., Boudeau, J., Hawley, S. A., Udd, L., Makela, T. P., Hardie, D. G. et al. (2004). LKB1 is a master kinase that activates 13 kinases of the AMPK subfamily, including MARK/PAR-1. EMBO J. 23, 833-843.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  21. ↵
    Macara, I. G. (2004). Parsing the polarity code. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 5, 220-231.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    Musch, A., Cohen, D., Yeaman, C., Nelson, W. J., Rodriguez-Boulan, E. and Brennwald, P. J. (2002). Mammalian homolog of Drosophila tumor suppressor lethal (2) giant larvae interacts with basolateral exocytic machinery in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 158-168.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Nelson, W. J. (2003). Adaptation of core mechanisms to generate cell polarity. Nature 422, 766-774.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    Plant, P. J., Fawcett, J. P., Lin, D. C., Holdorf, A. D., Binns, K., Kulkarni, S. and Pawson, T. (2003). A polarity complex of mPar-6 and atypical PKC binds, phosphorylates and regulates mammalian Lgl. Nat. Cell. Biol. 5, 301-308.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    Roh, M. H. and Margolis, B. (2003). Composition and function of PDZ protein complexes during cell polarization. Am. J. Physiol. Renal. Physiol. 285, F377-F387.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Sakisaka, T. and Takai, Y. (2004). Biology and pathology of nectins and nectin-like molecules. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol 16, 513-521.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    Suzuki, A., Hirata, M., Kamimura, K., Maniwa, R., Yamanaka, T., Mizuno, K., Kishikawa, M., Hirose, H., Amano, Y., Izumi, N. et al. (2004). aPKC acts upstream of PAR-1b in both the establishment and maintenance of mammalian epithelial polarity. Curr. Biol 14, 1425-1435.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    Tanentzapf, G. and Tepass, U. (2003). Interactions between the crumbs, lethal giant larvae and bazooka pathways in epithelial polarization. Nat. Cell. Biol. 5, 46-52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    Yamanaka, T., Horikoshi, Y., Sugiyama, Y., Ishiyama, C., Suzuki, A., Hirose, T., Iwamatsu, A., Shinohara, A. and Ohno, S. (2003). Mammalian Lgl Forms a Protein Complex with PAR-6 and aPKC Independently of PAR-3 to Regulate Epithelial Cell Polarity. Curr. Biol. 13, 734-743.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    Zeitler, J., Hsu, C. P., Dionne, H. and Bilder, D. (2004). Domains controlling cell polarity and proliferation in the Drosophila tumor suppressor Scribble. J. Cell Biol. 167, 1137-1146.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Cell Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Apicobasal polarity complexes
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Cell Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Cell Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Cell Science at a Glance
Apicobasal polarity complexes
Ben Margolis, Jean-Paul Borg
Journal of Cell Science 2005 118: 5157-5159; doi: 10.1242/jcs.02597
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Cell Science at a Glance
Apicobasal polarity complexes
Ben Margolis, Jean-Paul Borg
Journal of Cell Science 2005 118: 5157-5159; doi: 10.1242/jcs.02597

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Translation initiation in cancer at a glance
  • Tumour-directed microenvironment remodelling at a glance
  • FGF2 and IL-1β – explorers of unconventional secretory pathways at a glance
Show more CELL SCIENCE AT A GLANCE

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

2020 at The Company of Biologists

Despite the challenges of 2020, we were able to bring a number of long-term projects and new ventures to fruition. While we look forward to a new year, join us as we reflect on the triumphs of the last 12 months.


Mole – The Corona Files

"This is not going to go away, 'like a miracle.' We have to do magic. And I know we can."

Mole continues to offer his wise words to researchers on how to manage during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Cell scientist to watch – Christine Faulkner

In an interview, Christine Faulkner talks about where her interest in plant science began, how she found the transition between Australia and the UK, and shares her thoughts on virtual conferences.


Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

“The clear advantages are rapid and efficient exposure and easy access to my article around the world. I believe it is great to have this publishing option in fast-growing fields in biomedical research.”

Dr Jaceques Behmoaras (Imperial College London) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 60 institutions in 12 countries taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


JCS and COVID-19

For more information on measures Journal of Cell Science is taking to support the community during the COVID-19 pandemic, please see here.

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hestiate to contact the Editorial Office.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Journal of Cell Science
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Fast-track manuscripts
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • JCS Prize
  • Manuscript transfer network
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contacts

  • Contact JCS
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992