Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Cell Science
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Cell Science

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS   Twitter  Facebook   YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
Research Article
Cadherin switching: essential for behavioral but not morphological changes during an epithelium-to-mesenchyme transition
Masato Maeda, Keith R. Johnson, Margaret J. Wheelock
Journal of Cell Science 2005 118: 873-887; doi: 10.1242/jcs.01634
Masato Maeda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Keith R. Johnson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Margaret J. Wheelock
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  •   Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Subcloning NMuMG cells. (A) Parental NMuMG cells (a-c), clone NMuMG/E9 (d,e) and clone NMuMG/E11 (f,g) were stained for N-cadherin (a,d,f) and E-cadherin (b,e,g). (c) A merged picture of a,b. (a-c) Photographs were taken using a 10× objective; scale bar, 50 μm. (d-g) Photographs were taken using a 40× dry objective; scale bar, 10 μm. (B) TNE extracts of NMuMG/E9 (lane 1) and NMuMG/E11 (lane 2) were analysed for N-cadherin (top) and E-cadherin (bottom) by immunoblots. (C) Both clones underwent morphological changes (elongation of cell shape, b,d) in response to TGF-β1 [Tβ1; 5 ng ml–1 for 1 day (d)]. Photographs were taken of living cells using a 10× objective; scale bar, 50 μm.

  •   Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    TGF-β1-mediated EMT in NMuMG/E9 cells. (A) NMuMG/E9 cells were stained for E-cadherin (a,b), ZO-1 (c,d), paxillin (e,f) and F-actin (phalloidin; g,h) in the absence of TGF-β1 (a,c,e,g) or in the presence of TGF-β1 (5 ng ml–1 for 1 day; b,d,f,h). In the presence of TGF-β1, the signals for E-cadherin and ZO-1 became weak and punctate, and focal adhesions (f) and stress fibers (h) were induced. Photographs were taken using a 63× oil objective; scale bar, 10 μm. (B) NMuMG/E9 cells were treated with TGF-β1 and cultured without passage for the indicated times. TNE extracts were immunoblotted for N-cadherin, E-cadherin, β-catenin and GAPDH at the indicated times from t=0 hour (h) to t=9 days (d). Immunoblots were quantified and normalized to GAPDH as shown on the graph. ZO-1 (an epithelium marker) and fibronectin (a mesenchyme marker) were examined in the same time course.

  •   Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    E-Cadherin continued to function after morphological EMT was induced. (A) Permeabilized (0.2% Triton X-100, Tx100; a) and unpermeabilized (b) NMuMG/E9 cells that had been treated with 5 ng ml–1 TGF-β1 for 1 day were stained with antibodies against the extracellular portion of E-cadherin (ECCD2). E-Cadherin was localized to the cell surface (b). Photographs were taken using a 40× dry objective; scale bar, 10 μm. (B) Extracts of untreated NMuMG/E9 cells (lanes 3, 4) or NMuMG/E9 cells treated with 5 ng ml–1 TGF-β1 for 1 day (lanes 5, 6) were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-E-cadherin (EC; lanes 4, 6) or control antibodies (Ctr; lanes 3, 5) and immunoblotted for E-cadherin, β-catenin and α-catenin. Comparable amounts of β-catenin and α-catenin were coimmunoprecipitated with E-cadherin in treated (lane 6) and untreated (lane 4) NMuMG/E9 cells, indicating that E-cadherin junctional complexes were functional. Lanes 1, 2 are immunoblots of treated and untreated cells to show N-cadherin and fibronectin were induced in this experiment, as expected, and to show the input levels of E-cadherin, β-catenin and α-catenin in the immunoprecipitations.

  •   Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Snail and SIP1 were induced during TGF-β1-mediated EMT in NMuMG/E9 cells. (A) RT-PCR using total RNA extracted from untreated (lane 1) and TGF-β1-treated (5 ng ml–1 for 2 days) NMuMG/E9 cells (lane 2) was done for snail, SIP1, slug, E12/E47 and β-actin (as a control). The identity of the slower migrating band in the E12/E47 lane is not known. (B) RT-PCR using total RNA extracted from NMuMG/E9 cells over the same time course as Fig. 2B. E-Cadherin, snail, SIP1 and GAPDH were analysed. (C) The snail and SIP1 mRNA levels were analysed by quantitative real-time RT-PCR using the same total RNA as in B.

  •   Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Cadherin switching was reversible in TGF-β1-treated NMuMG/E9 cells. (A) Untreated NMuMG/E9 cells (a,d,g), NMuMG/E9 cells treated with 1 ng ml–1 TGF-β1 and 20 ng ml–1 EGF for 30 days (b,e,h), and NMuMG/E9 cells treated with TGF-β1 and EGF for 23 days and subsequently cultured upon removal of both reagents for an additional 7 days (c,f,i) were stained for E-cadherin (a-c), ZO-1 (d-f) or F-actin (phalloidin) (g-i). Photographs were taken using a 40× dry objective; scale bar, 10 μm. (B) TNE extracts from untreated NMuMG/E9 cells (lane 1), TGF-β1- and EGF-treated NMuMG/E9 cells for 60 days (lane 2) or reversibly treated NMuMG/E9 cells (lane 3) were examined for N-cadherin, E-cadherin, fibronectin and GAPDH by immunoblot. (C) RT-PCR was performed using total RNA extracted from untreated NMuMG/E9 cells (lane 1), TGF-β1- and EGF-treated NMuMG/E9 cells (for 1 day, lane 2, or for 30 days, lane 3) or reversibly treated NMuMG/E9 cells (lane 4) to examine the levels of mRNAs encoding E-cadherin, N-cadherin, snail, SIP1 and GAPDH.

  •   Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Manipulation of N-cadherin expression in NMuMG/E9 cells did not interfere with TGF-β1-induced morphological change. (A) N-Cadherin-knockdown NMuMG/E9 cells (NMuMG/E9ΔNcad cells) showed similar morphology to parental NMuMG/E9 cells in phase-contrast microscopy (a,b). Photographs were taken of living cells using a 10× phase objective; scale bar, 50 μm. Parental NMuMG/E9 cells and NMuMG/E9ΔNcad cells were stained with N-cadherin mAb in the absence of TGF-β1 (c,d). Cell-cell border staining of N-cadherin was significantly reduced. Photographs were taken using a 40× dry objective; scale bar, 10 μm. (B) TNE extracts of NMuMG/E9 cells and NMuMG/E9ΔNcad cells in the absence and presence of TGF-β1 (5 ng ml–1 for 1 day) were immunoblotted for N-cadherin, E-cadherin, GAPDH and fibronectin. N-Cadherin and E-cadherin levels were quantified and normalized to GAPDH as shown on the bar graph. (C) NMuMG/E9ΔNcad cells in the absence (a,c) or presence of TGF-β1 (5 ng ml–1 for 1 day; b,d) were stained for paxillin (a,b) and F-actin (c,d). Photographs were taken using a 40× dry objective; scale bar, 10 μm. (D) Transwell motility assays were done using control knockdown NMuMG/E9 cells (ctr KD) and NMuMG/E9ΔNcad cells in the absence of TGF-β1 showed that NMuMG/E9ΔNcad cells were significantly less motile than control cells (P<0.05). (E) NMuMG/E9 cells expressing 2×-Myc-tagged human N-cadherin (NMuMG/E9 Ncad cells) showed similar morphology to parental NMuMG/E9 cells in phase-contrast microscopy (a,b). Photographs were taken using a 40× dry objective; scale bar, 10 μm. (F) TNE extracts of parental NMuMG/E9 cells and NMuMG/E9 Ncad cells were immunoblotted for N-cadherin (top) and E-cadherin (bottom).

  •   Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    E-Cadherin and N-cadherin expression in MCF10A cells was dependent on cell confluence. (A) Phase-contrast micrographs of MCF10A cells in sparse culture (a) or confluent culture (b). Photographs were taken of living cells using a 10× objective; scale bar, 50 μm. (B) MCF10A cells in sparse culture (a,c) or confluent culture (b,d) were stained for E-cadherin (a,b) or N-cadherin (c,d). Photographs were taken using a 40× dry objective; scale bar, 10 μm. (C) TNE extracts of MCF10A cells in increasing confluence were immunoblotted for N-cadherin (top), E-cadherin (middle) and β-catenin (bottom).

  •   Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    TGF-β1-mediated EMT in MCF10A cells. (A) MCF10A cells in the absence (a) or presence (b) of TGF-β1 [2 ng ml–1 for 1 day (d)] were stained for F-actin. Photographs were taken using a 63× oil objective; scale bar, 10 μm. (B) Phase-contrast micrographs of TGF-β1-treated MCF10A cells (t=0-3 days). Photographs were taken of living cells using a 10× objective; scale bar, 50 μm. (C) TNE extracts of TGF-β1-treated parental MCF10A cells (t=0-3 days; lanes 1-4) control knockdown cells (ctr KD cells) (t=0-3 days; lanes 5-8), N-cadherin knockdown cells (ΔNcad cells) (t=0-3 days; lanes 9-12) and untreated N-cadherin overexpressing cells (Ncad cells) (lane 13) were immunoblotted for N-cadherin (regular and longer exposure), E-cadherin, GAPDH and fibronectin. The slower migrating bands in the N-cadherin immunoblot are pro-region-containing precursor forms of N-cadherin. (D) Quantification of N- and E-cadherin levels using normalization with GAPDH. (E) MCF10AΔNcad in the absence (a,c) or presence (b,d) of TGF-β1 (2 ng ml–1 for 2 days) were co-stained for paxillin (a,b) and F-actin (c,d). Photographs were taken using a 63× oil objective; scale bar, 10 μm.

  •   Fig. 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 9.

    Knockdown of N-cadherin in MCF10A cells decreased cell motility. (A) Wound-healing assays. Phase-contrast micrographs of living cultures of parental MCF10A cells (a-f), MCF10A/ctr KD cells (g-l) and MCF10AΔNcad cells (m-r) in a wound-healing assays performed in the absence (a-c,g-i,m-o) or presence (d-f,j-l,p-r) of TGF-β1 (2 ng ml–1). TGF-β1 treatment began 2 days before initiation of the assays. Photographs were taken just after the incision (0 hour) (a,d,g,j,m,p) and at 5 hours (b,e,h,k,n,q) and 13 hours (c,f,i,l,o,r) after incision using a 10× objective; scale bar, 50 μm. (B) Motility was quantified by measuring the decrease in the denuded area at 5 hours and 13 hours, and presented as the average decrease in the number of pixels with standard deviation in three independent experiments. TGF-β1 treatment increased motility in all cell lines tested. In the presence of TGF-β1, MCF10AΔNcad cells were significantly slower than parental or control knockdown cells at 5 hours (h) and 13 hours. (C) Transwell motility assays of parental MCF10A cells, MCF10A/ctr KD cells and MCF10AΔNcad cells in the absence (–) or presence (+) of TGF-β1 (2 ng ml–1). TGF-β1 treatment began 2 days before initiation of the assays. Data are presented as the average number of migrating cells in nine random fields of view in three independent experiments. In the presence of TGF-β1, MCF10AΔNcad cells were significantly less motile than parental or control knockdown cells.

  •   Fig. 10.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 10.

    N-Cadherin overexpression promoted motility in MCF10A cells. (A) Phase-contrast micrographs of living cells (a,b; 10× objective; scale bar, 50 μm) and N-cadherin immunostaining micrographs (c,d; 40× objective; scale bar, 10 μm) of parental MCF10A cells (a,c) or MCF10A cells overexpressing 2×-Myc-tagged human N-cadherin (MCF10A/Ncad; b,d). (B) Phase-contrast micrographs of living cultures of parental MCF10A cells (a-c), MCF10A/ctr KD cells (d-f) or MCF10A/Ncad cells (g-i) in a wound-healing assay performed in the absence of TGF-β1. Photographs were taken immediately after incision (0 hour; a,d,g) and at 13 hours (b,e,h) or 27 hours (c,f,i) after incision using a 10× objective; scale bar, 50 μm. Some of these panels are the same as those shown in Fig. 9A, for easier comparison to MCF10A/Ncad cells. (C) Wound-healing assays were quantified as described in Fig. 9. MCF10A/Ncad cells were significantly more motile than either control cell line at 13 hours and at 27 hours. (D) Transwell motility assay comparing parental MCF10A cells, MCF10A/ctr KD cells and MCF10A/Ncad cells in the absence of TGF-β1. Data are presented as the average number of migrating cells in nine random fields of view in three independent experiments.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Cell Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cadherin switching: essential for behavioral but not morphological changes during an epithelium-to-mesenchyme transition
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Cell Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Cell Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
Cadherin switching: essential for behavioral but not morphological changes during an epithelium-to-mesenchyme transition
Masato Maeda, Keith R. Johnson, Margaret J. Wheelock
Journal of Cell Science 2005 118: 873-887; doi: 10.1242/jcs.01634
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Cadherin switching: essential for behavioral but not morphological changes during an epithelium-to-mesenchyme transition
Masato Maeda, Keith R. Johnson, Margaret J. Wheelock
Journal of Cell Science 2005 118: 873-887; doi: 10.1242/jcs.01634

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • Summary
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Calcium elevations disrupt interactions between intraflagellar transport and the flagella membrane in Chlamydomonas
  • SFPQ regulates the accumulation of RNA foci and dipeptide repeat proteins from the expanded repeat mutation in C9orf72
  • EFA6A, an exchange factor for Arf6, regulates early steps in ciliogenesis
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

2020 at The Company of Biologists

Despite the challenges of 2020, we were able to bring a number of long-term projects and new ventures to fruition. While we look forward to a new year, join us as we reflect on the triumphs of the last 12 months.


Mole – The Corona Files

"This is not going to go away, 'like a miracle.' We have to do magic. And I know we can."

Mole continues to offer his wise words to researchers on how to manage during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Cell scientist to watch – Christine Faulkner

In an interview, Christine Faulkner talks about where her interest in plant science began, how she found the transition between Australia and the UK, and shares her thoughts on virtual conferences.


Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

“The clear advantages are rapid and efficient exposure and easy access to my article around the world. I believe it is great to have this publishing option in fast-growing fields in biomedical research.”

Dr Jaceques Behmoaras (Imperial College London) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 60 institutions in 12 countries taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


JCS and COVID-19

For more information on measures Journal of Cell Science is taking to support the community during the COVID-19 pandemic, please see here.

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hestiate to contact the Editorial Office.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Journal of Cell Science
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Fast-track manuscripts
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • JCS Prize
  • Manuscript transfer network
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contacts

  • Contact JCS
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992