Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Cell Science
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Cell Science

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS   Twitter  Facebook   YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
Research Article
γ-Sarcoglycan deficiency increases cell contractility, apoptosis and MAPK pathway activation but does not affect adhesion
Maureen A. Griffin, Huisheng Feng, Manorama Tewari, Pedro Acosta, Masataka Kawana, H. Lee Sweeney, Dennis E. Discher
Journal of Cell Science 2005 118: 1405-1416; doi: 10.1242/jcs.01717
Maureen A. Griffin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Huisheng Feng
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manorama Tewari
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pedro Acosta
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masataka Kawana
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Lee Sweeney
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dennis E. Discher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  •   Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Apoptosis of primary cells. γSG-deficient myotubes on rigid substrate exhibited greater apoptosis than wild-type C57 myotubes at day 7. Both C57 and γSG–/– cells were split, plated in parallel on soft collagen-substrates or rigid IPN-patterned coverslips, and later tested for apoptosis by TUNEL assay at day 2 and day 7. The mean intensity of nuclei for the cells on coverslips was divided by the mean intensity for the cells grown on the collagen-substrates for each day. Error bars represent the s.e.m. of the intensities of at least 50 cells. The relative intensity for γSG–/– at day 7 was significantly greater (17-fold) (P<0.001) than the relative intensity at day 2, indicating that γSG–/– cells cultured on rigid substrate apoptosed to a far greater extent than normal cells under normal conditions.

  • Table 1.

    Protein expression of cells on IPN-patterned glass

    C57 γSG-/-
    Lower layer Upper layer Lower layer Upper layer
    γSG +++ +++ - -
    αSG + + - +
    Myosin + +++ - ++
    Utrophin +++ +++++ + +
  •   Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Myosin expression and striation in primary cells. A fraction of primary cells crawled on top of other cells while in culture. (A) A sketch of the two-cell system indicating that only the upper cell was striated. (B,C) Two different fields with γSG–/– cells growing on top of other cells. The upper layer of cells is in focus in (B,C) and the lower layer of cells is in focus in (B′,C′). There is ∼6 μm height difference between the two focal planes. The arrowheads point to nuclei that are in focus in the lower layer. Myosin appeared highly expressed and often exhibited some structure (B) or complete striation (C) only in cells growing on top of other cells. The arrow in B indicates a fiber of structured myosin in the myotube and the arrow in C indicates a fully striated myofiber. (D) Almost twice as many γSG–/– cells were striated as C57 cells. For both cell types, only the upper cell was striated. Bar, 20 μm.

  •   Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Relaxation dynamics of normal and γSG-deficient myotubes.(A) Length relaxation, or self-peeling, occurred when one end of the cell was mechanically detached with a micropipette at t=0. (B) Data for 6-day-old C57 (15 cells) and γSG–/– (10 cells) were binned by time, averaged, and fit by L/Linit = 1 – A (1 – e–t/τ) with the indicated R2 values. Based on the fit of the binned data, AC57=0.16 and AγSG=0.31. Error bars represent the s.e. of the binned means. Although γSG–/– cells relaxed faster and to a greater extent than C57 cells, γSG–/– cells showed more heterogeneity.

  •   Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Cell width ratios. (A) The mid-width of cells Wmid was compared with the width near the end Wend. (B) Twice as many γSG–/– cells had a high width ratio as C57 cells. Bar, 20 μm.

  •   Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Dynamic adhesive strength of primary myotubes. C57 and γSG–/– myotubes have similar dynamic adhesive strength. (A) Forced peeling was done with a large-bore micropipette. The shear stress, τcell, of the aspirating fluid imposed a tension, Tpeel, which peeled the cell from the substrate at a velocity Vpeel. The flow rate, Q, was held constant by a syringe pump, but Tpeel increased linearly with the length of cell inside the micropipette, Lasp. The fluid velocity uz within the pipette is parabolic in profile as sketched. (B) A typical peeling run exhibits dips in the velocity as a function of tension. These dips correspond to physical focal adhesions (PFA, empty squares) along the length of the cell. The velocity envelope that defines `peeling' (filled squares) can be compared between cell types. (C) A comparison of peeling data for normal (C57) and γSG–/– cells revealed no significant difference in peeling dynamics. The R2 for the C57 and γSG–/– fits are 0.71 and 0.84, respectively.

  •   Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Phosphoprotein comparisons of normal and γSG-deficient TA muscle. (A) Immunoblots of tissue lysates show significant activation of ERK-1 and downregulation of adducin-γ phosphorylation with no changes in cofilin in γSG–/– tissue compared with control tissue. (B) Blots of stretched and unstretched γSG–/– tissue show hyperactivation of p38 MAPK, ERK1/2, MAPKAP2 and Smad1 in stretched tissue.

  • Table 2.

    Phosphoscreen of activation in γSG-/- muscle relative to normal muscle

    Phosphoprotein (site) γSG-/- (% Normal) Stress/stretch, mechano-transduction Apoptosis signal Viability signal
    Hyperactivation
        (P)-ERK1(T185/Y187) +126 Hornberger et al., 2004 Subramaniam et al., 2004; Cheung et al., 2004
        (P)-MAPKAPK2 (T222) +114 Krook et al., 2000
        (P)-FAK (Y577) +114 Lunn et al., 2004 Grace et al., 2003 Kurenova et al., 2004; Lin et al., 2004
        (P)-MYPT1/2 (T696) +53
        (P)-FAK (Y397) +38 Lunn et al., 2004 Grace et al., 2003; Lesay et al., 2001 Frisch et al., 1996
    No significant change in activation
        (P)-PKC-e (S729) +16 Ni et al., 2003; Mansour et al., 2004 Jung et al., 2004
        (P)-PAX (Y31) +10
        (P)-NR1 (S896) +3
        (P)-Histone H3 (S28) -2
        (P)-CREB (S133) -3
        (P)-PKCa (S657) -4
        (P)-PAX (Y118) -8
        (P)-Cofilin 2 (S3) -16
    Decreased activation
        (P)-AcCoA Carb. (S79) -26
        (P)-Adducin-α (S662) -40
        (P)-SMAD-1 (S463) -40
        (P)-p38 MAPK (T180/Y182) -54
        (P)-MAPKAP-2 (T334) -78
        (P)-Adducin-γ (S662) -74
  • Table 3.

    Stretch activation of normal muscle and γSG-/- *

    Phosphoprotein (site) Normal (%) stretched/unstretched γSG-/- (%) stretched/unstretched Stress/stretch mechano-transduction Apoptosis signal
    Activation
        (P)-p38 MAPK (T180/Y182) +556 +900 Martineau et al., 2001; Azuma et al., 2001; Fanning et al., 2003 Deschesnes et al., 2001
        (P)-ERK1/2 (T202/Y204) +204 +846 Jansen et al., 2004 Subramaniam et al., 2004; Cheung et al., 2004
        (P)-ERK1/2 (T185/Y187) +738 +797 Jansen et al., 2004; Hornberger et al., 2004 Subramaniam et al., 2004; Cheung et al., 2004
        (P)-MAPKAPK2 (T334) +162 +586 Krook et al., 2000; Mizutani et al., 2004
        (P)-Smad1 (S463) -13 +39 Suzawa et al., 2002
    • ↵* After 20 minutes at ∼10% stretch.

  •   Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Sarcoglycans and signaling. (A) Schematics of sarcolemma scaffolding in normal and γSG–/– muscle cells. Filamin normally associates with sarcoglycans, but in γSG–/– cells, sarcolemma filamin expression is considerably increased (Thompson et al., 2000). A relationship between cytoskeletal stresses and signaling via phosphorylation is posited. DG, dystroglycan; ECM, extracellular matrix; SG, sarcoglycan. The integrin adhesion complex proteins talin, paxillin, vinculin, etc., may be perturbed by the filamin over-expression, affecting signalling. (B) Proposed signaling circuit that incorporates changes in phosphorylation in γSG–/– tissue (+ or – in red) as well as our in vitro results for contractility and viability. Filamin-B overexpression has been shown to accelerate myotube differentiation (van der Flier et al., 2002) and is also known to influence MAP-kinase signaling (Awata et al., 2001), extending perhaps to ERK-1/2. Filamin also interacts with cvHSP, a homolog of hsp27 (Krief et al., 1999) and (P)-hsp27 is a substrate of (P)-MAPKAPK2 (Ibitayo et al., 1999), which is in turn a substrate of (P)-p38 MAPK (Ryder et al., 2000). Both (P)-hsp27 and (P)-MYPT1/2 are associated with sustained muscle contraction (Ibitayo et al., 1999; Sward et al., 2000). (P)-ERK-1/2 phosphorylates FAK (Carragher et al., 2003). Both (P)-FAK (Laprise et al., 2002) and (P)-ERK-1/2 have been linked to myocyte apoptosis (Cheung and Slack, 2004; Subramaniam et al., 2004). Dashed lines indicate proposed connections, thick lines indicate stretch-induced signals.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Cell Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
γ-Sarcoglycan deficiency increases cell contractility, apoptosis and MAPK pathway activation but does not affect adhesion
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Cell Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Cell Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
γ-Sarcoglycan deficiency increases cell contractility, apoptosis and MAPK pathway activation but does not affect adhesion
Maureen A. Griffin, Huisheng Feng, Manorama Tewari, Pedro Acosta, Masataka Kawana, H. Lee Sweeney, Dennis E. Discher
Journal of Cell Science 2005 118: 1405-1416; doi: 10.1242/jcs.01717
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
γ-Sarcoglycan deficiency increases cell contractility, apoptosis and MAPK pathway activation but does not affect adhesion
Maureen A. Griffin, Huisheng Feng, Manorama Tewari, Pedro Acosta, Masataka Kawana, H. Lee Sweeney, Dennis E. Discher
Journal of Cell Science 2005 118: 1405-1416; doi: 10.1242/jcs.01717

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • Summary
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • EFA6A, an exchange factor for Arf6, regulates early steps in ciliogenesis
  • SetDB1 and Su(var)3-9 play non-overlapping roles in somatic cell chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster
  • p.E152K-STIM1 mutation deregulates Ca2+ signaling contributing to chronic pancreatitis
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

2020 at The Company of Biologists

Despite the challenges of 2020, we were able to bring a number of long-term projects and new ventures to fruition. While we look forward to a new year, join us as we reflect on the triumphs of the last 12 months.


Mole – The Corona Files

"This is not going to go away, 'like a miracle.' We have to do magic. And I know we can."

Mole continues to offer his wise words to researchers on how to manage during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Cell scientist to watch – Christine Faulkner

In an interview, Christine Faulkner talks about where her interest in plant science began, how she found the transition between Australia and the UK, and shares her thoughts on virtual conferences.


Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

“The clear advantages are rapid and efficient exposure and easy access to my article around the world. I believe it is great to have this publishing option in fast-growing fields in biomedical research.”

Dr Jaceques Behmoaras (Imperial College London) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 60 institutions in 12 countries taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


JCS and COVID-19

For more information on measures Journal of Cell Science is taking to support the community during the COVID-19 pandemic, please see here.

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hestiate to contact the Editorial Office.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Journal of Cell Science
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Fast-track manuscripts
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • JCS Prize
  • Manuscript transfer network
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contacts

  • Contact JCS
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992