Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Cell Science
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Cell Science

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS   Twitter  Facebook   YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)
Cell Science at a Glance
Circadian oscillators of Drosophila and mammals
Wangjie Yu, Paul E. Hardin
Journal of Cell Science 2006 119: 4793-4795; doi: 10.1242/jcs.03174
Wangjie Yu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul E. Hardin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Animals, plants, fungi and even some prokaryotic organisms display daily rhythms in behavior, physiology, metabolic activity and gene expression. These rhythms are not passively driven by environmental cycles (e.g. light and temperature) but are controlled by endogenous circadian clocks that keep time even in the absence of environmental time cues. Environmental cycles are nevertheless required to entrain these clocks so that they activate rhythmic processes at the appropriate time of day. In animals, circadian clocks reside in a variety of tissues, including the brain, sensory structures and a number of internal organs (Glossop and Hardin, 2002). Although all clocks drive rhythms in gene expression, some control tissue-autonomous rhythms in physiology and metabolism, whereas others form networks of clock tissues that control rhythms in behavior (Bell-Pedersen et al., 2005; Chang, 2006).

Circadian clocks have three basic parts: an input pathway that receives environmental cues and transmits them to the circadian oscillator, a circadian oscillator that keeps circadian time and activates output pathways, and output pathways that control various metabolic, physiological and behavioral processes (Eskin, 1979). Considerable effort has been focused on determining how the circadian oscillator functions to keep circadian time. Genetic and molecular studies in the fruit fly have contributed significantly to our understanding of the circadian oscillator mechanism. Identification and isolation of the first clock gene from Drosophila, period (per), and subsequent analysis of its expression led to the first molecular model of the circadian oscillator - an autoregulatory feedback loop in gene expression (Hall, 2003). Discovery of additional clock genes in Drosophila not only support the feedback loop model but add substantially to its mechanistic detail and complexity. Current analysis indicates that the Drosophila circadian oscillator is composed of two interlocked feedback loops - the original per/timeless (tim) loop and a Clock (Clk) loop (Hardin, 2004; Hardin, 2005; Stanewsky, 2003) - and exhibits striking similarity to that in mammals (shown in the center of the poster).

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

The fly per/tim feedback loop

Starting from mid-day (top right), two basic-helix-loop-helix/PAS domain transcription factors, CLOCK (CLK) and CYCLE (CYC), form heterodimers and bind E-box regulatory elements (CACGTG) to activate per and tim transcription. Although per and tim mRNA levels accumulate during this phase of the circadian cycle, PER and TIM protein levels do not. TIM remains at low levels because it is destabilized by light (see below). PER is phosphorylated by DOUBLE-TIME (DBT) kinase and, without TIM, is targeted for degradation by the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway (reviewed by Harms et al., 2004). PER phosphorylation is also dependent on casein kinase 2 (CK2), which is believed to be a primer kinase for DBT, and protein phosphatase 2a (PP2a), which dephosphorylates PER (Allada and Meissner, 2005; Harms et al., 2004). The coordinated effects of kinases and phosphatases during this time keep PER at low levels and in a hypophosphorylated state because hyperphosphorylated PER is degraded owing to low TIM levels.

After sundown (bottom right), per and tim continue to be transcribed and their mRNAs reach peak levels during the early evening. TIM begins to accumulate in the dark and forms a complex with PER and DBT, thereby stabilizing PER despite continued phosphorylation by DBT and CK2. As a result, PER and TIM accumulate to high levels during the middle of the night (bottom left). As DBT-PER-TIM accumulates, phosphorylation of TIM by SHAGGY (SGG) is believed to be a crucial step that triggers DBT, PER and TIM entry into the nucleus (Harms et al., 2004). Although these proteins enter the nucleus at about the same time, PER-DBT and TIM enter the nucleus separately (Hall, 2003). Once in the nucleus, PER-DBT or re-formed DBT-PER-TIM complexes bind to CLK-CYC, which represses transcription of per, tim and other genes by removing CLK-CYC from E-boxes and promotes DBT-dependent hyperphosphorylation of CLK (Hardin, 2005). The ∼6-hour delay between per and tim transcription and accumulation of PER and TIM proteins in the nucleus is thought to be a critical determinant of circadian period. By the end of the night, TIM levels begin to decline through an as yet uncharacterized mechanism.

At dawn (top left), a light-induced conformational change in the blue-light photoreceptor cryptochrome (CRY) promotes the formation of CRY-TIM complexes, TIM degradation by the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway, and CRY destabilization (Ashmore and Sehgal, 2003). PER and CLK are also degraded during the early morning, but their degradation is promoted by DBT-dependent phosphorylation (Hardin, 2005). Although PER falls to its lowest levels by the middle of the day (top right), CLK levels remain relatively constant because hypophosphorylated CLK is generated by new CLK synthesis or PP2a-dependent dephosphorylation of hyperphosphorylated CLK (Kim and Edery, 2006; Yu et al., 2006). Hypophosphorylated CLK then forms a heterodimer with CYC and binds to E-boxes to initiate a new cycle of per and tim transcription (Hardin, 2005). The per/tim feedback loop is a necessary component of the circadian oscillator since per-null and tim-null mutants each abolish circadian oscillator function.

The fly Clk loop

Interlocked with the per/tim feedback loop is a second feedback loop in Clk transcription. Two additional CLK-CYC target genes, vrille (vri) and PAR domain protein 1ϵ (Pdp1ϵ), are activated by E-box binding at mid-day (top right). Although vri mRNA accumulates in phase with per and tim mRNAs, Pdp1ϵ RNA accumulation is delayed by several hours (Hardin, 2004). In contrast to the delayed accumulation of PER and TIM, VRI levels rise in concert with vri mRNA. As VRI accumulates in the nucleus during the mid to late day, it binds VRI/PDP1ϵ binding sites (V/P-boxes) [consensus A(/G)TTA(/T)T(/C):GTAAT(/C)], to repress Clk and cry transcription (Hardin, 2004). VRI protein reaches peak levels during the early evening (bottom right), which is coincident with low levels of Clk and cry mRNAs. Despite the low levels of cry mRNA, CRY begins to accumulate because it is relatively stable in the dark (Ashmore et al., 2003).

Whereas PDP1ϵ accumulates to peak levels during the mid to late night (bottom-left), VRI levels decline during this time owing to DBT-PER-dependent repression of vri transcription. The rising ratio of PDP1ϵ/VRI favors binding of PDP1ϵ to V/P-boxes, which activates Clk and cry transcription (Hardin, 2004). PDP1ϵ levels start to decline during the late evening, and are low by the early morning (top left). However, small amounts of PDP1ϵ may continue to activate Clk and cry transcription until the middle of the day, when VRI starts to accumulate after the next cycle of CLK-CYC transcription is initiated (top right).

The Clk feedback loop necessarily drives rhythmic transcription in the opposite phase as the per/tim loop because CLK-CYC activates E-box transcription and represses V/P-box transcription around dusk, and DBT-PER (or DBT-PER-TIM) represses E-box transcription and activates V/P-box transcription around dawn (Hardin, 2004). In addition to driving rhythms in per, tim, vri, Pdp1ϵ, Clk and cry expression, these feedback loops drive rhythms in the expression of ∼150 clock output genes (Wijnen et al., 2006). For example, the slowpoke (slo) Ca2+-dependent voltage-gated potassium channel and the SLO-binding protein (slob) genes are rhythmically expressed (Ceriani et al., 2002; Jaramillo et al., 2004), which suggests that aspects of neurotransmission are under clock control. Since Clk and cry mRNA cycling do not control CLK and CRY levels or activity, the Clk feedback loop may be more important for controlling rhythmic outputs than for sustaining circadian oscillator function.

The circadian timekeeping mechanism in Drosophila and mammals is conserved

As in Drosophila, the circadian oscillator in mammals is composed of interlocked transcriptional feedback loops. Many components of the Drosophila circadian oscillator have orthologs and/or functional equivalents in mammals. In fact, the Drosophila circadian oscillator depicted in the poster can be converted to a mammalian circadian oscillator by making the following changes (see blue lettering and arrows in center): CLOCK-BMAL1 replaces CLK-CYC, mPER-mCRY replaces PER-TIM, CK1ϵ replaces DBT, REV-ERBα replaces VRI, RORa replaces PDP1ϵ, RORE elements replace V/P-boxes, and PP2a, SGG, CK2 and CRY are removed. Several differences in the structure or function of these mammalian clock components are notable. mPER-mCRY functions to repress CLOCK-BMAL1 transcription, but mCRY is the major repressor as opposed to PER in flies (Reppert and Weaver, 2002). Although CRY functions as a circadian photoreceptor in flies, its role as a transcriptional repressor has been retained in at least some fly peripheral tissues (Collins et al., 2006). REV-ERBα and RORa are nuclear receptors rather than bZIP transcription factors like VRI and PDP1ϵ, and they regulate transcription by binding RORE elements rather than V/P-boxes (Bell-Pedersen et al., 2005). Although the circadian oscillator mechanisms of Drosophila and mammals show striking similarities, their entrainment to light differs markedly. In flies, light entrains the circadian oscillator by inducing TIM degradation, whereas light entrains the mammalian oscillator by inducing Per1 transcription (Reppert and Weaver, 2002). Since light can directly entrain Drosophila oscillators (Ashmore and Sehgal, 2003), but indirectly entrains mammalian oscillators (Reppert and Weaver, 2002), it is not surprising that different mechanisms have evolved in these animals.

  • © The Company of Biologists Limited 2006

References

  1. ↵
    Allada, R. and Meissner, R. A. (2005). Casein kinase 2, circadian clocks, and the flight from mutagenic light. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 274, 141-149.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    Ashmore, L. J. and Sehgal, A. (2003). A fly's eye view of circadian entrainment. J. Biol. Rhythms 18, 206-216.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Ashmore, L. J., Sathyanarayanan, S., Silvestre, D. W., Emerson, M. M., Schotland, P. and Sehgal, A. (2003). Novel insights into the regulation of the timeless protein. J. Neurosci. 23, 7810-7819.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Bell-Pedersen, D., Cassone, V. M., Earnest, D. J., Golden, S. S., Hardin, P. E., Thomas, T. L. and Zoran, M. J. (2005). Circadian rhythms from multiple oscillators: Lessons from diverse species. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 544-556.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    Ceriani, M. F., Hogenesch, J. B., Yanovsky, M., Panda, S., Straume, M. and Kay, S. A. (2002). Genome-wide expression analysis in Drosophila reveals genes controlling circadian behavior. J. Neurosci. 22, 9305-9319.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Chang, D. C. (2006). Neural circuits underlying circadian behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Behav. Processes 71, 211-225.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    Collins, B., Mazzoni, E. O., Stanewsky, R. and Blau, J. (2006). Drosophila CRYPTOCHROME is a circadian transcriptional repressor. Curr. Biol. 16, 441-449.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    Eskin, A. (1979). Identification and physiology of circadian pacemakers. Fed. Proc. 38, 2570-2572.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    Glossop, N. R. and Hardin, P. E. (2002). Central and peripheral circadian oscillator mechanisms in flies and mammals. J. Cell Sci. 115, 3369-3377.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Hall, J. C. (2003). Genetics and molecular biology of rhythms in Drosophila and other insects. Adv. Genet. 48, 1-280.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    Hardin, P. E. (2004). Transcription regulation within the circadian clock: the E-box and beyond. J. Biol. Rhythms 19, 348-360.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Hardin, P. E. (2005). The circadian timekeeping system of Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 15, 714-722.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    Harms, E., Kivimae, S., Young, M. W. and Saez, L. (2004). Posttranscriptional and posttranslational regulation of clock genes. J. Biol. Rhythms 19, 361-373.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Jaramillo, A. M., Zheng, X., Zhou, Y., Amado, D. A., Sheldon, A., Sehgal, A. and Levitan, I. B. (2004). Pattern of distribution and cycling of SLOB, Slowpoke channel binding protein, in Drosophila. BMC Neurosci. 5, 3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Kim, E. Y. and Edery, I. (2006). Balance between DBT/CKIepsilon kinase and protein phosphatase activities regulate phosphorylation and stability of Drosophila CLOCK protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 6178-6183.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Reppert, S. M. and Weaver, D. R. (2002). Coordination of circadian timing in mammals. Nature 418, 935-941.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    Stanewsky, R. (2003). Genetic analysis of the circadian system in Drosophila melanogaster and mammals. J. Neurobiol. 54, 111-147.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    Wijnen, H., Naef, F., Boothroyd, C., Claridge-Chang, A. and Young, M. W. (2006). Control of daily transcript oscillations in Drosophila by light and the circadian clock. PLoS Genet. 2, e39.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Yu, W., Zheng, H., Houl, J. H., Dauwalder, B. and Hardin, P. E. (2006). PER-dependent rhythms in CLK phosphorylation and E-box binding regulate circadian transcription. Genes Dev. 20, 723-733.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Cell Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Circadian oscillators of Drosophila and mammals
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Cell Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Cell Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Cell Science at a Glance
Circadian oscillators of Drosophila and mammals
Wangjie Yu, Paul E. Hardin
Journal of Cell Science 2006 119: 4793-4795; doi: 10.1242/jcs.03174
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Cell Science at a Glance
Circadian oscillators of Drosophila and mammals
Wangjie Yu, Paul E. Hardin
Journal of Cell Science 2006 119: 4793-4795; doi: 10.1242/jcs.03174

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • The fly per/tim feedback loop
    • The fly Clk loop
    • The circadian timekeeping mechanism in Drosophila and mammals is conserved
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Cargo transport through the nuclear pore complex at a glance
  • Translation initiation in cancer at a glance
  • Tumour-directed microenvironment remodelling at a glance
Show more CELL SCIENCE AT A GLANCE

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Introducing FocalPlane’s new Community Manager, Esperanza Agullo-Pascual

We are pleased to welcome Esperanza to the Journal of Cell Science team. The new Community Manager for FocalPlane, Esperanza is joining us from the Microscopy Core at Mount Sinai School of Medicine. Find out more about Esperanza in her introductory post over on FocalPlane.


New funding scheme supports sustainable events

As part of our Sustainable Conferencing Initiative, we are pleased to announce funding for organisers that seek to reduce the environmental footprint of their event. The next deadline to apply for a Scientific Meeting grant is 26 March 2021.


Read & Publish participation continues to grow

"Alongside pre-printing for early documentation of work, such mechanisms are particularly helpful for early-career researchers like me.”

Dr Chris MacDonald (University of York) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 150 institutions in 15 countries and four library consortia taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


Cell scientist to watch: Romain Levayer

In an interview, Romain Levayer talks about starting his own lab, his love for preprints and his experience of balancing parenting with his research goals.


Live lactating mammary tissue

In a stunning video, Stewart et al. demonstrate warping of the alveolar unit due to basal cell-generated force as part of their recent work investigating roles for mechanically activated ion channels in lactation and involution.

Visit our YouTube channel to watch more videos from JCS, our sister journals and the Company.


JCS and COVID-19

For more information on measures Journal of Cell Science is taking to support the community during the COVID-19 pandemic, please see here.

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hestiate to contact the Editorial Office.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Journal of Cell Science
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Fast-track manuscripts
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • JCS Prize
  • Manuscript transfer network
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contacts

  • Contact JCS
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992