Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Cell Science
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Cell Science

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS   Twitter  Facebook   YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)
Research Article
Contextual role for angiopoietins and TGFβ1 in blood vessel stabilization
Markus Ramsauer, Patricia A. D'Amore
Journal of Cell Science 2007 120: 1810-1817; doi: 10.1242/jcs.003533
Markus Ramsauer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patricia A. D'Amore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Summary

We used a 3D in-vitro model of angiogenesis to investigate the effects of different growth factors on vessel formation and stabilization in vitro. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was the only factor that induced the formation, elongation and sprouting of capillary-like structures (CLS) by bovine retinal capillary endothelial cells (BREC), an effect that was dose-dependent and saturable. Basic fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) enhanced capillary formation in the presence of VEGF, leading to a more complex network of CLS and a higher rate of BrdU incorporation than VEGF alone, indicating that whereas VEGF acts as a morphogen, FGF2 is primarily a mitogen. Addition of transforming growth factor β1 (TGFβ1) to the 3D assay along with VEGF and FGF2, reduced tube formation in a dose-dependent manner. When added at the time of cell plating TGFβ1 completely suppressed formation of VEGF/FGF2-stimulated CLS. Angiopoietin 1 (Ang1) prevented regression of the TGFβ1-induced CLS, an effect that was blocked by angiopoietin 2 (Ang2), but required the continuous presence of VEGF.

  • Angiogenesis
  • VEGF
  • Angiopoietin
  • Remodeling

Introduction

Vessel assembly, patterning and maintenance is a complex and highly regulated process. Targeted gene disruption and overexpression studies have revealed critical, rate-limiting roles for a number of molecules, including growth factors, receptors and transcription factors. Embryonic or perinatal lethality results from deficiency of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), platelet-derived growth factor beta (PDGFB), transforming growth factor β1(TGFβ1) and the angiopoietins, as well as their receptors, and analyses of vessel structure in animals deficient in these proteins have provided some insights into their roles. Mice deficient in VEGF (Carmeliet et al., 1996; Ferrara et al., 1996) or its receptors VEGFR1 (also known as Flt1) (Fong et al., 1995), VEGFR2 (also known as Flk1 and Kdr) (Shalaby et al., 1995) and neuropilin (Kawasaki et al., 1999), are embryogenic lethal due to disruption of endothelial cell (EC) differentiation or vessel assembly. Absence of PDGF-B (Leveen et al., 1994) or its receptor PDGF-β-receptor (Soriano, 1994) results in a hemorrhaging phenotype and a reduced number of perivascular cells. Mice deficient in the endothelial-specific receptor Tie2 or its ligand Ang1 are embryonic lethal as a result of defects in vessel remodeling (Sato et al., 1995; Suri et al., 1996), similar to mice over-expressing Ang2 (Maisonpierre et al., 1997). In addition, absence of TGFβ1 or its receptors TGFβR2 or endoglin, leads to defects in vascular wall structures (Dickson et al., 1995; Li et al., 1999; Oshima et al., 1996). A number of studies using cultured ECs or angiogenesis models such as the aortic ring assay (Nicosia et al., 1997) and the metatarsal assay (Leenders et al., 2002) have attempted to elucidate the relative contribution of the individual factors. Although some insight has been provided by these studies, they are limited by the fact that they, for the most part, examine a single growth factor at a time. Thus, little is known about the manner in which the growth factors interact to govern vessel formation.

An additional level of vessel regulation appears to lie with the heterotypic interactions between the endothelium and pericytes (reviewed by Armulik et al., 2005). A growing body of in vivo observations clearly demonstrates that the association of pericytes with forming vessels marks the maturation of the vessel (Benjamin et al., 1998; Darland and D'Amore, 2001). Analysis of experimental tumor models reveals that vessels that lack pericytes are targets of regression whereas the more mature microvessels, characterized by pericyte association, do not regress (Benjamin et al., 1999). In fact, there is increasing realization that the efficacy of anti-angiogenic therapy may be limited by the maturation state of the vasculature (Bergers et al., 2003; Gee et al., 2003). However, the molecular mechanism that underlies the pericyte-mediated vessel stabilization is not known and the complexity of the in situ environment makes it difficult to elucidate the basis of pericyte stabilization.

To address this issue and to gain insight into how the various polypeptide factors work together, we have developed a tissue culture model in which ECs cultured alone are induced to form CLS by the addition of VEGF. We have used this system to examine the combinatorial effects of the relevant growth factors, while at the same time eliminating the complicating issues of heterotypic interactions that would result from co-cultures. Thus, we have been able to assess the effect of `context' on the actions of the growth factors.

Results

We used a 3D in-vitro model of angiogenesis to investigate the effects of different growth factors on vessel formation and stabilization. The functions and sequential interactions of the factors were examined by evaluating formation of CLS, proliferation and apoptosis.

VEGF induces capillary formation

BREC grown in 2-D cultures were trypsinized and embedded in collagen gels. During gelation the cells settled out and attached to the underlying collagen layer. Cells plated into the collagen matrix in the absence of any growth factors remained round (Fig. 1A). Among all the growth factors tested (VEGF, FGF2, TGFβ1, Ang1, and Ang2), VEGF was the only factor that induced the formation, elongation and sprouting of CLS by the capillary ECs. The formation of the CLS was independent of plating cell density. The effect of VEGF on tube formation was dose dependent and saturable. In the presence of 1.5% serum, CLS first appeared at a concentration of 10 ng/ml VEGF and the maximal length of CLS was observed at 25-50 ng/ml. Initiation of CLS was also serum dependent; formation of CLS was seen in concentrations as low as 0.5% serum (5 ng/ml VEGF) and was completely suppressed at 10% serum (data not shown), suggesting the presence of an inhibitory factor in serum.

A serum concentration of 1.5% was used in all the experiments reported below as it supported significant CLS and provided sufficient nutrients so that the medium could be replaced after 2 days without any additional serum. VEGF was used at 25 ng/ml in all the reported studies. Addition of VEGF every other day was necessary to maintain the network of CLS. The formation of CLS by large vessel (bovine aortic) ECs occurred in the absence of added VEGF (not shown), probably because they produce higher levels of endogenous growth factors in vitro than capillary ECs (P.A.D., unpublished observations).

FGF2, a potent endothelial mitogen, enhanced capillary formation by BREC in the presence of VEGF (25 ng/ml). The optimal concentration of FGF2 varied as a function of the VEGF concentration. Therefore, we used 2.5 ng/ml FGF2 and 25 ng/ml VEGF in our system. The additive effect of VEGF and FGF2 was evident after 4 days (Fig. 1A,B). VEGF combined with FGF2 led to a more complex network of CLS and a higher rate of BrdU incorporation than VEGF alone (141 mm versus 104 mm total length of CLS; 1247 vs 610 BrdU-positive cells; VEGF plus FGF2 vs VEGF alone; Fig. 1B). When formed in the presence of VEGF plus FGF2, CLS were composed of numerous endothelial cells, as visualized by nuclear staining (Fig. 1C). Many nuclei, visible by DAPI staining, were identified by TUNEL staining as apoptotic figures. Because of the high density of cells in the CLS and the 3D nature of the structures, it was not technically possible to quantify the apoptotic nuclei. Dividing cells, detected by BrdU incorporation, were evenly distributed (Fig. 1C). These observations indicate that whereas VEGF has morphogenic activity, FGF2 acts primarily as a mitogen.

TGFβ1 inhibits capillary formation and induces apoptosis

TGFβ1 has been reported to both stimulate and inhibit angiogenesis (Pepper et al., 1993). When added to capillary ECs in the collagen gel along with VEGF plus FGF2, TGFβ1 reduced tube formation in a dose-dependent manner with effects observed at concentrations as low as 0.25 ng/ml. Addition of TGFβ1 (1 ng/ml) at the time the cells were plated completely suppressed formation of CLS by VEGF (25 ng/ml) plus FGF2 (2.5 ng/ml). If CLS were permitted to form for 2 days and then TGFβ1 (along with fresh VEGF plus FGF2) was added, the CLS completely regressed within the following 2 days (Fig. 2A,B; compare Fig. 2A and Fig. 1A). BrdU incorporation decreased by 30% within the first 13 hours and nearly all of the cells underwent apoptosis (Fig. 2B,C). The inhibitory effect of TGFβ1 was serum-dependent, with increasing inhibition noted at higher serum levels (data not shown).

  Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

VEGF and FGF2 have additive effects on the induction of capillary formation by BREC in a 3D collagen assay. (A) Phase-contrast images of BREC after 4 days in collagen, untreated or treated with 25 ng/ml VEGF, or with 25 ng/ml VEGF plus 2.5 ng/ml FGF2. (B) Total length of CLS after 2 (white bars) and 4 (black bars) days. Treatment with VEGF or VEGF plus FGF2 led to a significant increase in the total length of CLS at both 2 and 4 days (P<0.0006 in all comparisons). Administration of VEGF plus FGF2 for 4 days induced the longest CLS and was significantly different from VEGF (4 days, *P<0.03) and VEGF plus FGF2 (2 days, **P<0.007). Proliferation was assessed on the third day, after exposure to the growth factors for 13 hours (incorporation of BrdU over 12 hours). VEGF plus FGF2 caused a significant increase in the number of BrdU-positive cells vs no treatment or VEGF only (#P<0.0009). (C) Visualization of endothelial nuclei, apoptotic ECs and proliferating ECs on the third day, after treatment with VEGF plus FGF2 and application of BrdU for 12 hours. Bar, 100 μm.

  Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

TGFβ1 induces regression of CLS and apoptosis of BREC. (A) Phase-contrast image of BREC after treatment with VEGF plus FGF2 for 2 days, followed by VEGF, FGF2 plus TGFβ1 for an additional 2 days. (B) Quantification of the effects of TGFβ1 on the length of CLS and number of BrdU-positive cells. A pre-established capillary network completely regressed after addition of TGFβ1 for 2 days (*P<0.0001 vs VEGF plus FGF2) and proliferation was significantly decreased within the 13 hours of the assay (#P<0.002 vs VEGF plus FGF2). (C) Images of the same field of CLS assayed for apoptosis and proliferation after treatment with VEGF (25 ng/ml), FGF2 (2.5 ng/ml) plus TGFβ1 (1 ng/ml). Bar, 100 μm.

Ang1 stabilizes and Ang2 destabilizes capillaries in the presence of TGFβ1

Ang1, acting via the Tie2 receptor on ECs, is essential for the remodeling and stabilization of the embryonic vasculature (Uemura et al., 2002). Addition of Ang1 prevented the regression of TGFβ1-induced CLS (Fig. 3A). The effect was dose dependent; significant effects were detected at 100 ng/ml Ang1 and maximal effects were seen at 500-1000 ng/ml. At 500 ng/ml Ang1 rescued 60% of the pre-established endothelial network from TGFβ1-induced regression (Fig. 3A,B). Ang1 did not have a significant effect on EC proliferation. Increased concentrations of VEGF up to 100 ng/ml were not sufficient to prevent the TGFβ1-induced regression. Ang2 at 500 ng/ml had no effect on TGFβ1-induced regression (Fig. 3A,B). Consistent with the concept of Ang2 as an antagonist, simultaneous addition of Ang1 and Ang2 significantly reduced the Ang1-mediated `rescue'. In the absence of TGFβ1, neither Ang1 nor Ang2 had a detectable effect on the formation of CLS or EC proliferation.

VEGF is necessary for stability of CLS in the presence of TGFβ1

A network of CLS was established for 2 days in the presence of VEGF plus FGF2. With the subsequent addition of TGFβ1 and Ang1, the network remained stable, as described above. To determine if continuous VEGF was needed for vessel maintenance, the action of VEGF was blocked by the addition of a VEGF-Trap (1 μg/ml) after tubes had been forming in the presence of FGF2 plus VEGF for 48 hours. The neutralization of VEGF led to a dramatic increase in EC death (Fig. 4A). Although EC proliferation was not affected, the network completely regressed (Fig. 4B). These observations are consistent with the concept that the major action of VEGF is not as a mitogen but rather as an EC survival factor.

Ang1 stabilizes capillaries in the absence of VEGF

Reports using both in-vivo and in-vitro models have suggested that Ang1 can substitute for the stabilizing effect of VEGF. However, our observations (above) indicate that in the presence of TGFβ1, Ang1 is not sufficient to stabilize CLS in the absence of VEGF. Rather, the continued presence of VEGF is necessary for Ang1 to counter the pro-apoptotic effects of TGFβ1. In the absence of TGFβ1, Ang1 was indeed able to rescue capillary ECs from VEGF withdrawal (Fig. 5A). Furthermore, in the absence of TGFβ1, Ang2 did not antagonize the Ang1 rescue effect. As noted above, proliferation was not significantly altered by the angiopoietins (Fig. 5B).

We were also interested in determining the importance of FGF2 in this system. Thus, parallel experiments were conducted in the absence of FGF2. Addition of VEGF-Trap to cells incubated only in the presence of VEGF for 2 days led to dissolution of the CLS network, and this effect was only partially rescued by Ang1 (Fig. 5C,D). In the presence of VEGF-Trap, re-addition of FGF2 had no significant effect on CLS length and proliferation (Fig. 5D). From these results we conclude that FGF2 is additive not only with VEGF during formation of CLS but also with Ang1 during stabilization of these structures.

Discussion

Vessel assembly, patterning and maintenance are complex and highly regulated processes. Gene knockout and overexpression studies have revealed critical, limiting roles for a number of growth factors and receptors, including VEGF, PDGF, TGFβ1, Ang1 and their receptors. However, little is understood about the manner in which various cells and their secreted factors interact to govern vessel formation. To gain further insight into mechanisms that underlie the control of vessel formation and stability, we have studied the combinatorial effects of a number of growth factors in an in-vitro model of vessel assembly. To avoid the complicating issues of heterotypic interactions between ECs and pericytes (or smooth muscle cells), and to isolate the effects to the factors, we used pure primary cultures of retinal capillary ECs.

  Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Ang1 rescues CLS from TGFβ1-induced apoptosis. (A) Phase-contrast micrograph of BREC after 2 days treatment with VEGF plus FGF2 and an additional 2 days either with VEGF, FGF2 plus TGFβ1 (top panel) or with VEGF plus FGF2 (bottom panel) in various combinations with Ang1 and Ang2. (B) Total length of CLS after 2 days (white bars) and 4 days (black bars). After 4 days all treatments are significantly different compared to baseline (VEGF plus FGF2 after 2 days, P<0.0001). The addition of Ang1 rescued 60% of a pre-established network from TGFβ1-induced capillary regression (*P<0.0001), an effect that was antagonized by Ang2. In the absence of TGFβ1, Ang1 or Ang2 had no effect on the length of CLS after 4 days. Proliferation was measured on the third day by incorporation of BrdU over 12 hours. The number of BrdU-positive cells after addition of TGFβ1 plus Ang1 was not significantly different from TGFβ1 alone. TGFβ1 plus Ang2 induced significantly less proliferation than TGFβ1 plus Ang1 (#P<0.02). In the absence of TGFβ1, addition of Ang1 or Ang2 did not cause significantly different proliferation than with VEGF plus FGF2. Concentrations of factors used: 25 ng/ml VEGF, 2.5 ng/ml FGF2, 1 ng/ml TGFβ1, 500 ng/ml Ang1 and 500 ng/ml Ang2. Bar, 100 μm.

As expected, VEGF was necessary for assembly of ECs into CLS, an observation consistent with other reports of cells in culture (Goto et al., 1993) and with the lack of vessels observed in VEGF-deficient mice (Carmeliet et al., 1996; Ferrara et al., 1996). Consistent also with the observed modest mitogenic effect of VEGF in vitro (Yoshida et al., 1996), VEGF led to only a small increase in the proportion of BrdU-positive cells in CLS whereas FGF2 combined with VEGF caused a threefold increase in BrdU incorporation over controls and this was reflected in measurably longer CLS.

The role of FGF2 in vivo is not clear. Targeted disruption of FGF2 does not cause a dramatic vascular phenotype, but its absence causes a modest defect in wound healing (Ortega et al., 1998) and a decrease in vascular tone (Zhou et al., 1998). Thus, FGF2 may act in vivo to titrate vessel density as opposed to directly controlling assembly. The effects of FGF2 were additive not only with VEGF but also with Ang1. This effect may be due to its mitogenic effect or to its general effects on survival (Garcia et al., 2005; Miyamoto et al., 1998).

Mice deficient in TGFβ1 or its receptor TGFβR2 display approximately 50% embryonic lethality, with defective endothelial-mesenchymal interactions (Dickson et al., 1995; Oshima et al., 1996). Mice lacking endoglin exhibit a 70% reduction in smooth muscle cells (Li et al., 1999) and although mice heterozygous for endoglin display normal vascular development, ECs isolated from these mice have reduced ability to form tube-like structures in vitro (Jerkic et al., 2006). TGFβ1 has been shown to inhibit endothelial growth and to induce apoptosis (Ramsauer et al., 2002; Yan and Sage, 1998). These observations in monolayer cultures were reproduced in our 3D model where application of TGFβ1 either blocked initial capillary formation or caused a collapse of a pre-established capillary network.

However, these in vitro observations do not elucidate the action of TGFβ1 in the developing vessel where we suspect the TGFβ1 is supplied as a result of EC-mesenchymal cell (pericyte and/or smooth muscle cell) interactions. Recently, a model has been proposed in which TGFβ, by binding to TGFβR2, can activate two distinct type I receptors in ECs, i.e. the EC-restricted activin receptor-like kinase-1 (ALK1) and the broadly expressed ALK5, which have opposite effects on EC behavior (reviewed by Bobik, 2006; Lebrin et al., 2005). ALK1 via Smad1/5 transcription factors stimulates EC proliferation and migration, whereas ALK5 via Smad2/3 inhibits these processes. These receptor-regulated Smads interact with the common mediator Smad, Smad4, and translocate to the nucleus. It is suggested that TGFβ regulates the activation of the endothelium via a fine balance between ALK1 and ALK5 signaling (Goumans et al., 2002).

  Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

VEGF is necessary for the Ang1-mediated rescue from TGFβ1-induced apoptosis. (A) Phase-contrast micrograph of BREC after treatment for 2 days with VEGF plus FGF2 and an additional 2 days with VEGF-Trap, FGF2, TGFβ1 plus Ang1. (B) Quantification of the effects of VEGF on the length of CLS and number of BrdU-positive cells. Inhibition of VEGF with VEGF-Trap produced a significant decrease in the length of CLS (*P<0.0001 vs VEGF after 4 days). Proliferation within a pre-established network was not significantly influenced by the presence or absence of VEGF. Concentrations of factors used: 25 ng/ml VEGF, 2.5 ng/ml FGF2, 1 ng/ml TGFβ1, 500 ng/ml Ang1, and 1 μg/ml VEGF-Trap. Bar, 100 μm.

Using co-culture models of ECs and pericyte/smooth muscle cell precursors, we and others have shown that TGFβ1 that is locally activated upon contact between the cells inhibits endothelial proliferation (Antonelli-Orlidge et al., 1989) and migration (Sato and Rifkin, 1989), induces mesenchymal differentiation into pericytes (Hirschi et al., 1998) and stimulates pericyte production of VEGF (Darland et al., 2003). In addition, it has been reported that pericytes/smooth muscle cells are a local source of Ang1 (Sundberg et al., 2002). Our observations of the combinatorial effects of growth factors on ECs alone parallel these reports. Addition of TGFβ1 to the CLS caused regression of the tubes. By contrast, similar to co-cultures where contact leads to the generation of activated TGFβ1 and the pericytes secrete VEGF, FGF2 and Ang1 (Davis et al., 1996), addition of Ang1 can rescue CLS from the pro-apoptotic effects of TGFβ1.

An important remaining question is the mechanism of vessel stabilization. Ang1 has been shown to be involved in vascular remodeling and maturation (Suri et al., 1996), including vessel stabilization (Uemura et al., 2002) and control of permeability (Thurston, 2002). Consistent with these in vivo observations, we have shown that Ang1 rescues ECs from TGFβ1-induced apoptosis, an action likely mediated by the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI 3-kinase)-Akt pathway (Kim et al., 2002). Furthermore, only in the presence of TGFβ1 can Ang2 overcome Ang1 action. Therefore, the functions of Ang2 appear to be more complex and Ang2 probably acts in a context-dependent manner as an antagonist of Tie2 signaling to loosen up the vessel structure. Ang2, the natural antagonist of Ang1 (Maisonpierre et al., 1997), is produced by the endothelium (Fiedler et al., 2004). The expression of Ang2 by ECs indicates that it can act in an autocrine fashion to control endothelial quiescence and responsiveness. Studies of cultured cells indicate that VEGF induces Ang2 synthesis in ECs (Oh et al., 1999), thus leading to vessel destabilization that precedes new vessel growth.

Our results also address the role of VEGF in vessel stabilization and indicate that in the presence of TGFβ1, both VEGF and Ang1 are necessary for survival. These observations are consistent with our recent findings that virtually all adult vascularized tissues not only express VEGF but also display constitutive VEGFR2 phosphorylation (Maharaj et al., 2006). We conclude that vessels, which are induced to form by VEGF and/or FGF2, are subsequently stabilized by the coordinated action of TGFβ1 and Ang1, and the continued action of VEGF. New vessel growth or vessel regression results from a disruption in this balance. Excess VEGF can be provided by tumor cells, ischemic tissues or inflammatory cells, to name a few sources. The in vivo correlate of this phenomenon has been reported in a mouse model where dormant metastases were found to have high BrdU incorporation by both tumor cells and endothelial cells, and high apoptosis, whereas growing tumors displayed equally high BrdU and low apoptosis (Holmgren et al., 1995). The authors speculate that the difference in apoptosis was due to absence of trophic factors such as VEGF and FGF2.

The local production of activated TGFβ1, which we postulate to be generated locally by EC-pericyte interactions, can be interrupted by the loss of pericytes, such as in diabetic retinopathy (Hammes et al., 2002) or when EC-pericyte interactions are abnormal, such as in tumor vessels (Morikawa et al., 2002). Additionally, production of Ang2 by the endothelium (in the presence of TGFβ1) will act to antagonize the effects of Ang1, thus leading to vessel destabilization.

Thus, vessel development and maturation is a locally controlled process that involves a number of growth factors acting in an autocrine and paracrine fashion. The triad of pro-angiogenic growth factors (VEGF, FGF2 and Ang1) interacts to influence the proliferation, apoptosis, and differentiation of microvascular endothelial cells in respect to their anti-angiogenic counterparts (TGFβ1 and Ang2). Although solitaire functions of angiogens can be studied using isolated single factors, their full potential is displayed in a well-balanced combination, and withdrawal or addition of only one factor can cause deleterious effects.

Materials and Methods

Materials

Recombinant human VEGF 165, FGF2, TGFβ1, and Ang2 were obtained from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Bow Ang1-Fc and VEGF-Trap (VEGFR1R2-Fc) were kindly provided by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Tarrytown, NY). Other sources of material are given below.

  Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

FGF2 and Ang-1 have additive effects on the maintenance of CLS in the absence of VEGF. (A) Phase-contrast micrographs of BREC after treatment for 2 days with VEGF plus FGF2 and an additional 2 days of VEGF neutralization, in the absence or presence of Ang1. (B) Neutralization of VEGF significantly decreased the length of CLS (*P<0.0001 compared to 2 days treatment with VEGF plus FGF2), whereas Ang1 provided partial protection from the regression, an effect not antagonized by Ang2 (**P<0.04). The angiopoietins did not significantly alter proliferation from that with VEGF-Trap plus FGF2 alone. (C) Phase-contrast micrographs of BREC after treatment for 2 days in the presence of VEGF followed by VEGF neutralization for an additional 2 days, in the absence or presence of Ang1. (D) All treatments with VEGF-Trap led to a significant reduction of CLS compared with baseline (VEGF after 2 days, P<0.0001). In combination with VEGF neutralization, Ang1 treatment led to significantly more CLS (*P<0.03 vs no angiopoietins), an effect that was not influenced by Ang2. Addition of FGF2 or angiopoietins did not significantly alter proliferation from that with VEGF-Trap alone. Concentrations of factors used: 25 ng/ml VEGF, 2.5 ng/ml FGF2, 1 ng/ml TGFβ1, 500 ng/ml Ang1, 500 ng/ml Ang2, and 1 μg/ml VEGF-Trap. Bar, 100 μm.

Isolation and cultivation of bovine retinal endothelial cells (BREC)

Bovine eyes were obtained from a local slaughterhouse. The retinas were removed under sterile conditions and homogenized using a handheld pistil. The homogenized retinas were filtered through an 88-μm mesh and the capillaries trapped on top of the mesh were collected. This mix was subjected twice to a digestion with 0.5% collagenase Type II (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA) for 45 minutes at 37°C and the resulting cells [bovine retinal endothelial cells (BREC)] were plated on plastic dishes coated with fibronectin (Sigma, St Louis, MO). BREC were maintained in culture in endothelial basal medium (EBM; Clonetics, Walkersville, MD) supplemented with 10% horse serum (Sigma, St Louis, MO) and bovine brain extract with heparin (Clonetics, Walkersville, MD) and equilibrated with 95% air and 5% CO2 at 37°C. Medium was changed every other day and cells were passed when reaching confluence. Passage five cells were used in these experiments. Homogeneity was assessed by the expression of von Willebrand factor VIII-related antigen. Absence of pericytes or smooth muscle cells was confirmed by absence of α-smooth muscle actin.

In vitro angiogenesis assay

This assay was performed in 48-well plates. Collagen gels were prepared by mixing eight parts Vitrogen (Cohesion, Palo Alto, CA) with one part 10× Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium and one part 0.1 M NaOH. Aliquots (175 μl) of collagen were allowed to polymerize for 45 minutes at 37°C (5% CO2). Later, an additional layer of 75-μl collagen containing BREC (1×106 cells per ml) was added and allowed to solidify for another 45 minutes. An equal amount of 250 μl EBM supplemented with 1.5% horse serum was added on top of the collagen sandwich. Growth factors and soluble receptors were included in the medium as desired at initial plating. After 2 days the medium was replaced with serum-free EBM and growth factors. For proliferation studies, BrdU (5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine; Sigma, St Louis, MO) at a final concentration of 0.2 mM was added 1 hour after the addition of growth factors and left for 12 hours. Proliferation was therefore assessed 13 hours after addition of growth factors, on the third day.

Immunohistochemistry of cells embedded in collagen gels

For staining, collagen gels containing cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde solution for 16 hours at 4°C. After washing with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) the specimens were permeabilized with 1% Triton X-100 in PBS overnight at 4°C and processed as below.

TUNEL technique

To identify apoptotic cells, TUNEL (TdT-mediated dUTP nick end labeling) technique was performed by modifying the DeadEnd™ Colorimetric TUNEL System (Promega, Madison, WI). Specimens were pre-equilibrated with equilibration buffer for 1 hour. Subsequently gels were immersed in TUNEL reaction mix containing biotinylated nucleotides and TdT (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase) enzyme and incubated at 37°C. After 4 hours the reaction was terminated with 2× SSC solution for 30 minutes at room temperature. After several washes with PBS for 24 hours, non-specific binding sites were saturated by incubation of specimens in PBS containing 0.1% BSA and 10% goat serum for 12 hours. Biotinylated nucleotides were detected by incubation with Streptavidin Alexa Fluor® 568 conjugate (1:100; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) in the dark for 24 hours at 4°C.

DAPI staining

Cell nuclei were visualized by staining with DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindol-dihydrochloride, 0.5 μg/ml in PBS; Sigma, St Louis, MO) for 12 hours. After thorough rinsing with PBS for 2 days, specimens were visualized using immunofluorescence microscopy.

BrdU staining

Cell proliferation was measured by BrdU incorporation and subsequent immunostaining. DNA was denatured with 1 M HCl for 1 hour at 42°C. After neutralization with 0.2 mM Borax (sodium tetraborate) solution for 15 minutes, cells were stained with an anti-BrdU Alexa Fluor® 488 conjugate (1:10; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) for 24 hours at 4°C.

Quantification

Fixed and stained specimens were viewed with an Eclipse TE2000-S microscope (Nikon, Melville, NY). Images were captured with a SPOT camera (Diagnostic Instruments, Inc., Sterling Heights, MI). For each experimental condition, representative 2× low-magnification fields were photographed. Each field corresponded to an area of 25 mm2. Quantification was performed with the IPLab software for Macintosh Version 3.6 (Scanalytics, Fairfax, VA). To determine total length of CLS, capillaries were manually traced. Nuclear staining of proliferating cells was recognized automatically and confirmed by eye.

Statistical analysis

Experiments were performed three times in triplicate. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (s.d.). Statistical significance was tested using ANOVA and set at P<0.05.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the helpful discussions with members of the D'Amore laboratory particularly Magali Saint-Geniez and Eric Finkelstein. The work was supported by the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Center Grant, NIH EY05318 and NIH EY015435. P. D'Amore was a Senior Scholar of Research to Prevent Blindness at the time the work was conducted.

  • Accepted March 27, 2007.
  • © The Company of Biologists Limited 2007

References

  1. ↵
    Antonelli-Orlidge, A., Saunders, K. B., Smith, S. R. and D'Amore, P. A. (1989). An activated form of transforming growth factor β is produced by cocultures of endothelial cells and pericytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86, 4544-4548.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Armulik, A., Abramsson, A. and Betsholtz, C. (2005). Endothelial/pericyte interactions. Circ. Res. 97, 512-523.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Benjamin, L. E., Hemo, I. and Keshet, E. (1998). A plasticity window for blood vessel remodelling is defined by pericyte coverage of the preformed endothelial network and is regulated by PDGF-B and VEGF. Development 125, 1591-1598.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  4. ↵
    Benjamin, L. E., Golijanin, D., Itin, A., Pode, D. and Keshet, E. (1999). Selective ablation of immature blood vessels in tumors follows vascular endothelial growth factor withdrawal. J. Clin. Invest. 103, 159-165.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    Bergers, G., Song, S., Meyer-Morse, N., Bergsland, E. and Hanahan, D. (2003). Benefits of targeting both pericytes and endothelial cells in the tumor vasculature with kinase inhibitors. J. Clin. Invest. 111, 1287-1295.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    Bobik, A. (2006). Transforming growth factor-betas and vascular disorders. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 26, 1712-1720.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Carmeliet, P., Ferriera, V., Breier, G., Pollefeyt, S., Kieckens, L., Gertsenstein, M., Fahrig, M., Vandenhoeck, A., Harpal, K., Eberhardt, C. et al. (1996). Abnormal blood vessel development and lethality in embryos lacking a single VEGF allele. Nature 380, 435-439.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    Darland, D. C. and D'Amore, P. A. (2001). Cell-cell interactions in vascular development. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 52, 107-149.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    Darland, D. C., Massingham, L. J., Smith, S. R., Piek, E., Saint-Geniez, M. and D'Amore, P. A. (2003). Pericyte production of cell-associated VEGF is differentiation-dependent and is associated with endothelial survival. Dev. Biol. 264, 275-288.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    Davis, S., Aldrich, T. H., Jones, P. F., Acheson, A., Compton, D. L., Jain, V., Ryan, T. E., Bruno, J., Radziejewski, C., Maisonpierre, P. C. et al. (1996). Isolation of angiopoietin-1, a ligand for the TIE2 receptor, by secretion-trap expression cloning. Cell 87, 1161-1169.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    Dickson, M. C., Martin, J. S., Cousins, F. M., Kulkarni, A. B., Karlsson, S. and Akhurst, R. J. (1995). Defective haematopoiesis and vasculogenesis in transforming growth factor-β1 knock-out mice. Development 121, 1845-1854.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  12. ↵
    Ferrara, N., Carver-Moore, K., Chen, H., Dowd, M., Lu, L., O'Shea, K., Powell-Braxton, L., Hillan, K. J. and Moore, M. W. (1996). Heterozygous embryonic lethality induced by targeted inactivation of the VEGF gene. Nature 380, 439-442.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    Fiedler, U., Scharpfenecker, M., Koidl, S., Hegen, A., Grunow, V., Schmidt, J. M., Kriz, W., Thurston, G. and Augustin, H. G. (2004). The Tie-2 ligand Angiopoietin-2 is stored in and rapidly released upon stimulation from endothelial cell Weibel-Palade bodies. Blood 103, 4150-4156.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Fong, G.-H., Rossant, J., Gertsenstein, M. and Breitman, M. L. (1995). Role of the flt-1 receptor tyrosine kinase in regulating the assembly of vascular endothelium. Nature 376, 66-70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    Garcia, C. M., Yu, K., Zhao, H., Ashery-Padan, R., Ornitz, D. M., Robinson, M. L. and Beebe, D. C. (2005). Signaling through FGF receptor-2 is required for lens cell survival and for withdrawal from the cell cycle during lens fiber cell differentiation. Dev. Dyn. 233, 516-527.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    Gee, M. S., Procopio, W. N., Makonnen, S., Feldman, M. D., Yeilding, N. M. and Lee, W. M. (2003). Tumor vessel development and maturation impose limits on the effectiveness of anti-vascular therapy. Am. J. Pathol. 162, 183-193.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    Goto, F., Goto, K., Weindel, K. and Folkman, J. (1993). Synergistic effects of vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor on the proliferation and cord formation of bovine capillary endothelial cells within collagen gels. Lab. Invest. 69, 508-517.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    Goumans, M. J., Valdimarsdottir, G., Itoh, S., Rosendahl, A., Sideras, P. and ten Dijke, P. (2002). Balancing the activation state of the endothelium via two distinct TGF-beta type I receptors. EMBO J. 21, 1743-1753.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  19. ↵
    Hammes, H. P., Lin, J., Renner, O., Shani, M., Lundqvist, A., Betsholtz, C., Brownlee, M. and Deutsch, U. (2002). Pericytes and the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes 51, 3107-3112.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Hirschi, K., Rohovsky, S. A. and D'Amore, P. A. (1998). PDGF, TGF-β and heterotypic cell-cell interactions mediate the recruitment and differentiation of 10T1/2 cells to a smooth muscle cell fate. J. Cell Biol. 141, 805-814.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Holmgren, L., O'Reilly, M. S. and Folkman, J. (1995). Dormancy of micrometastases: balanced proliferation and apoptosis in the presence of angiogenesis suppression. Nat. Med. 1, 149-153.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    Jerkic, M., Rodriguez-Barbero, A., Prieto, M., Toporsian, M., Pericacho, M., Rivas-Elena, J. V., Obreo, J., Wang, A., Perez-Barriocanal, F., Arevalo, M. et al. (2006). Reduced angiogenic responses in adult Endoglin heterozygous mice. Cardiovasc. Res. 69, 845-854.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Kawasaki, T., Kitsukawa, T., Bekku, Y., Matsuda, Y., Sanbo, M., Yagi, T. and Fujisawa, H. (1999). A requirement for neuropilin-1 in embryonic vessel formation. Development 126, 4895-4902.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  24. ↵
    Kim, E. S., Serur, A., Huang, J., Manley, C. A., McCrudden, K. W., Frischer, J. S., Soffer, S. Z., Ring, L., New, T., Zabski, S. et al. (2002). Potent VEGF blockade causes regression of coopted vessels in a model of neuroblastoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 11399-11404.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Lebrin, F., Deckers, M., Bertolino, P. and Ten Dijke, P. (2005). TGF-beta receptor function in the endothelium. Cardiovasc. Res. 65, 599-608.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Leenders, W., Lubsen, N., van Altena, M., Clauss, M., Deckers, M., Lowik, C., Breier, G., Ruiter, D. and de Waal, R. (2002). Design of a variant of vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) antagonizing KDR/Flk-1 and Flt-1. Lab. Invest. 82, 473-481.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    Leveen, P., Pekny, M., Gebre-Medhin, S., Swolin, B., Larsson, E. and Betsholtz, C. (1994). Mice deficient for PDGF B show renal, cardiovascular, and hematological abnormalities. Genes Dev. 8, 1875-1887.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Li, D. Y., Sorensen, L. K., Brooke, B. S., Urness, L. D., Davis, E. C., Taylor, D. G., Boak, B. B. and Wendel, D. P. (1999). Defective angiogenesis in mice lacking endoglin. Science 284, 1534-1537.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Maharaj, A. S., Saint-Geniez, M., Maldonado, A. E. and D'Amore, P. A. (2006). Vascular endothelial growth factor localization in the adult. Am. J. Pathol. 168, 639-648.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    Maisonpierre, P. C., Suri, C., Jones, P. F., Bartunkova, S., Wiegand, S. J., Radziejewski, C., Compton, D., McClain, J., Aldrich, T. H., Papadopoulos, N. et al. (1997). Angiopoietin-2, a natural anatognist for Tie2 that disrupts in vivo angiogenesis. Science 277, 55-60.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Miyamoto, T., Leconte, I., Swain, J. L. and Fox, J. C. (1998). Autocrine FGF signaling is required for vascular smooth muscle cell survival in vitro. J. Cell. Physiol. 177, 58-67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. ↵
    Morikawa, S., Baluk, P., Kaidoh, T., Haskell, A., Jain, R. K. and McDonald, D. M. (2002). Abnormalities in pericytes on blood vessels and endothelial sprouts in tumors. Am. J. Pathol. 160, 985-1000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    Nicosia, R. F., Lin, Y. J., Hazelton, D. and Qian, X. (1997). Endogenous regulation of angiogenesis in the rat aorta model. Am. J. Pathol. 151, 1379-1386.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  34. ↵
    Oh, H., Takagi, H., Suzuma, K., Otani, A., Matsumura, M. and Honda, Y. (1999). Hypoxia and vascular endothelial growth factor selectively up-regulate angiopoietin-2 in bovine microvascular endothelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 15732-15739.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    Ortega, S., Ittmann, M., Tsang, S., Ehrlich, M. and Basilico, C. (1998). Neuronal defects and delayed wound healing in mice lacking fibroblast growth factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 5672-5677.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    Oshima, M., Oshima, H. and Taketo, M. M. (1996). TGF-β receptor type II deficiency results in defects of yolk sac hematopoiesis and vasculogenesis. Dev. Biol. 179, 297-302.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. ↵
    Pepper, M. S., Vassalli, J.-D., Orci, L. and Montesano, R. (1993). Biphasic effect of transforming growth factor-β 1 on in vitro angiogenesis. Exp. Cell Res. 204, 356-363.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. ↵
    Ramsauer, M., Krause, D. and Dermietzel, R. (2002). Angiogenesis of the blood-brain barrier in vitro and the function of cerebral pericytes. FASEB J. 16, 1274-1276.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    Sato, T., Tozawa, Y., Deutsch, U., Wolburg-Buchholz, K., Fujiwara, Y., Gendron-Maguire, M., Gridley, T., Wolburg, H., Risau, W. and Qin, Y. (1995). Distinct roles of the receptor tyrosine kinases Tie-1 and Tie-2 in blood vessel formation. Nature 376, 70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. ↵
    Sato, Y. and Rifkin, D. B. (1989). Inhibition of endothelial cell movement by pericytes and smooth muscle cells: activation of a latent transforming growth factor-beta 1-like molecule by plasmin during co-culture. J. Cell Biol. 109, 309-315.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    Shalaby, F., Rossant, J., Yamaguchi, T. P., Gertsenstein, M., Wu, X.-F., Breitman, M. L. and Schuh, A. C. (1995). Failure of blood-island formation and vasculogenesis in Flk-1-deficient mice. Nature 376, 62-66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. ↵
    Soriano, P. (1994). Abnormal kidney development and hematological disorders in PDGF β-receptor mutant mice. Genes Dev. 8, 1888-1896.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    Sundberg, C., Kowanetz, M., Brown, L. F., Detmar, M. and Dvorak, H. F. (2002). Stable expression of angiopoietin-1 and other markers by cultured pericytes: phenotypic similarities to a subpopulation of cells in maturing vessels during later stages of angiogenesis in vivo. Lab. Invest. 82, 387-401.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. ↵
    Suri, C., Jones, P. F., Patan, S., Bartunkova, S., Maisonpierre, P. C., Davis, S., Sato, T. N. and Yancopoulos, G. D. (1996). Requisite role of angiopoietin-1, a ligand for the TIE2 receptor, during embryonic angiogenesis. Cell 87, 1171-1180.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. ↵
    Thurston, G. (2002). Complementary actions of VEGF and angiopoietin-1 on blood vessel growth and leakage. J. Anat. 200, 575-580.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. ↵
    Uemura, A., Ogawa, M., Hirashima, M., Fujiwara, T., Koyama, S., Takagi, H., Honda, Y., Wiegand, S. J., Yancopoulos, G. D. and Nishikawa, S. (2002). Recombinant angiopoietin-1 restores higher-order architecture of growing blood vessels in mice in the absence of mural cells. J. Clin. Invest. 110, 1619-1628.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. ↵
    Yan, Q. and Sage, E. H. (1998). Transforming growth factor-beta1 induces apoptotic cell death in cultured retinal endothelial cells but not pericytes: association with decreased expression of p21waf1/cip1. J. Cell. Biochem. 70, 70-83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. ↵
    Yoshida, A., Anand-Apte, B. and Zetter, B. (1996). Differential endothelial migration and proliferation to basic fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor. Growth Factors 13, 1-8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  49. ↵
    Zhou, M., Sutliff, R. L., Paul, R. J., Lorenz, J. N., Hoying, J. B., Haudenschild, C. C., Yin, M., Coffin, J. D., Kong, L., Kranias, E. G. et al. (1998). Fibroblast growth factor 2 control of vascular tone. Nat. Med. 4, 201-207.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Cell Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Contextual role for angiopoietins and TGFβ1 in blood vessel stabilization
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Cell Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Cell Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
Contextual role for angiopoietins and TGFβ1 in blood vessel stabilization
Markus Ramsauer, Patricia A. D'Amore
Journal of Cell Science 2007 120: 1810-1817; doi: 10.1242/jcs.003533
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Contextual role for angiopoietins and TGFβ1 in blood vessel stabilization
Markus Ramsauer, Patricia A. D'Amore
Journal of Cell Science 2007 120: 1810-1817; doi: 10.1242/jcs.003533

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • Summary
    • Introduction
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Fibronectin Extra Domains tune cellular responses and confer topographically distinct features to fibril networks
  • The lysosomotrope, GPN, mobilises Ca2+ from acidic organelles
  • Microtubule-independent movement of the fission yeast nucleus
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Introducing FocalPlane’s new Community Manager, Esperanza Agullo-Pascual

We are pleased to welcome Esperanza to the Journal of Cell Science team. The new Community Manager for FocalPlane, Esperanza is joining us from the Microscopy Core at Mount Sinai School of Medicine. Find out more about Esperanza in her introductory post over on FocalPlane.


New funding scheme supports sustainable events

As part of our Sustainable Conferencing Initiative, we are pleased to announce funding for organisers that seek to reduce the environmental footprint of their event. The next deadline to apply for a Scientific Meeting grant is 26 March 2021.


Read & Publish participation continues to grow

"Alongside pre-printing for early documentation of work, such mechanisms are particularly helpful for early-career researchers like me.”

Dr Chris MacDonald (University of York) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 150 institutions in 15 countries and four library consortia taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


Cell scientist to watch: Romain Levayer

In an interview, Romain Levayer talks about starting his own lab, his love for preprints and his experience of balancing parenting with his research goals.


Live lactating mammary tissue

In a stunning video, Stewart et al. demonstrate warping of the alveolar unit due to basal cell-generated force as part of their recent work investigating roles for mechanically activated ion channels in lactation and involution.

Visit our YouTube channel to watch more videos from JCS, our sister journals and the Company.


JCS and COVID-19

For more information on measures Journal of Cell Science is taking to support the community during the COVID-19 pandemic, please see here.

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hestiate to contact the Editorial Office.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Journal of Cell Science
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Fast-track manuscripts
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • JCS Prize
  • Manuscript transfer network
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contacts

  • Contact JCS
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992