Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Cell Science
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Cell Science

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS   Twitter  Facebook   YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
Research Article
Clathrin-independent endocytosis of ErbB2 in geldanamycin-treated human breast cancer cells
Daniel J. Barr, Anne G. Ostermeyer-Fay, Rachel A. Matundan, Deborah A. Brown
Journal of Cell Science 2008 121: 3155-3166; doi: 10.1242/jcs.020404
Daniel J. Barr
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne G. Ostermeyer-Fay
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachel A. Matundan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Deborah A. Brown
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  •   Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Effect of bound antibodies, GA and CPZ on ErbB2 localization in SK-BR-3 cells. (A) ErbB2 in fixed, permeabilized cells detected by immunofluorescence. (B) Cells were warmed for 2 hours after binding Fl-anti-ErbB2 before fixation. (C) Cells were treated with GA for 2 hours before detecting ErbB2 by immunofluorescence. (D,E) Cells were pre-treated for 45 minutes at 37°C with GA, with (D) or without (E) 12 μg/ml CPZ, before binding anti-ErBb2 antibodies (left, green) and Alexa-Fluor-594-Tf (middle, red) for 1 hour on ice and warming for 2 minutes with the same drugs. Cells were acid-washed and processed for immunofluorescence, detecting ErbB2 with the Alexa-Fluor-488 Zenon mouse IgG labeling kit. Merged images are shown on the right. Scale bar: 10 μm. (F,G) Internalization of biotinylated Tf (F) or biotinylated anti-ErbB2 antibodies (G) was measured by CELISA after treatment with GA (circles) or both GA and CPZ (squares). Values shown are the mean ± s.e.m. of three experiments.

  •   Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Localization of internalized ErbB2, Rh-Tf, EGFR and clathrin. SK-BR-3 cells were pretreated with GA for 1 hour before binding Fl-anti-ErbB2 (A,C,E,F) or Fl-anti-EGFR (B,D,G) and warming for 5 minutes (with Rh-Tf in A,B and E) before acid washing and immunofluorescence analysis. (C,D) Clathrin heavy chain (CHC, red) was detected by immunofluorescence. (E-G) High-magnification views of the boxed regions in A,C and D, respectively. Right-hand panels in A-D and bottom panels in E-G show merged images. (A) Epifluorescence images. All other panels show maximum-intensity projections of deconvolved z-stacks. Scale bars: 10 μm (bar in B applies to B-D). (H) Quantification of colocalization of Rh-Tf with ErbB2 or EGFR in cells treated as in A,B, except that internalization was for 2 minutes.

  •   Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Dominant-negative forms of Eps15 and dynamin inhibit internalization of Rh-Tf but not ErbB2. SK-BR-3 cells transfected with EGFP–DN-Eps15 (A,C) or HA–DN-dynamin-1 (B,D) were pretreated with GA for 2 hours before binding unlabeled anti-ErbB2 antibodies (A,C) or Fl-anti-ErbB2 antibodies (B,D). Cells were then warmed for 30 minutes with Rh-Tf, fixed and permeabilized. (A,B) EGFP–DN-Eps15 (A, green) or HA–DN-dynamin (B, blue) are shown with Rh-TF and ErbB2 in deconvolved images, each from a z-stack of a field in which one cell expressed DN-Eps15 (A) or DN-dynamin (B). ErbB2 was detected with Alexa-Fluor-350 goat anti-mouse antibodies (A, blue; C) or by fluorescein fluorescence (B, green; D). Scale bar: 10 μm. (C,D) Internalization of ErbB2 and Rh-Tf in cells expressing EGFP–DN-Eps15 (C) or HA–DN-dynamin (D) (+), and untransfected cells on the same coverslips (–). Cells showing at least three intracellular punctae were scored positive. Numbers shown are averages of two experiments (counting at least 100 transfected and 100 untransfected cells in each experiment), the data from which varied by <10%.

  •   Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Genistein inhibits EGF-stimulated tyrosine-kinase activity but not ErbB2 internalization. SK-BR-3 cells were serum-starved overnight, treated as described below for the individual panels, fixed and permeabilized. Cells were treated with: (A) GA for 2 hours; (B) 100 ng/ml EGF for 10 minutes; (C) GA for 2 hours, with 100 ng/ml EGF added for the last 10 minutes; and (D) 100 μg/ml genistein for 1 hour, then GA added for another 2 hours and 100 ng/ml EGF added for the last 10 minutes. Deconvolved images from z-stacks are shown. ErbB2 (green, top) and phosphotyrosine (P-Tyr; red, middle) were detected by immunofluorescence. Bottom: merged images. Scale bar: 10 μm. (E) SK-BR-3 cells were pretreated with GA (circles) or GA + 100 μg/ml genistein (squares) for 45 minutes before binding biotinylated anti-ErbB2 antibodies and warming for 0-5 minutes. Internalized antibodies were quantified by CELISA. Values shown are the mean ± s.e.m. of three experiments.

  •   Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Internalized ErbB2 colocalizes with Alexa-Fluor-594-CtxB, GPI-anchored proteins and dextran in GA-treated SK-BR-3 cells. Cells were pretreated with GA for 1 hour, subjected to antibody and/or toxin binding, warmed for 5 minutes, acid-stripped and fixed. (A) Fl-anti-ErbB2 (green) and Alexa-Fluor-594-CtxB (0.5 μg/ml; red) were bound to cells. A merged maximum-intensity projection image of a deconvolved z-stack is shown. Asterisks delimit the region shown enlarged in B (ErbB2, left; Alexa-Fluor-594-CtxB, middle; merged image, right). (C) Fl-anti-PLAP Fab fragments and Rh-anti-ErbB2 antibodies were bound to cells. A deconvolved image from a z-stack, showing part of the edge of one cell, is shown. ErbB2, left; PLAP, middle; merged image, right. (D) Fl-anti-ErbB2 was bound to cells, which were warmed with 1 mg/ml FluoroRuby dextran. An epifluorescence image, showing part of the edge of one cell, is shown. ErbB2, left; dextran, middle; merged image, right. Scale bars: 10 μm (A); 5 μm (D; applies to B-D). (E) Colocalization of ErbB2 and CtxB, or ErbB2 and PLAP, in cells treated as in A-C (except that internalization was for 2 minutes) was quantified. To measure the colocalization of ErbB2 and Thy1.1, SK-BR-3 cells transfected with Thy1.1 were treated with GA for 1 hour. Fl-anti-ErbB2 and Alexa-Fluor-594-anti-Thy1 Fab fragments were bound on ice, and cells warmed for 2 minutes. Residual surface-bound antibodies were acid-stripped before fixation, visualization and quantification.

  •   Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Internalized ErbB2 colocalizes with CtxB, GPI-anchored proteins and dextran in SK-BR-3 cells without GA. (A-D) Cells were subjected to antibody and/or toxin binding on ice for 1 hour, warmed for 2 minutes, acid-stripped and fixed. (A) Fl-anti-ErbB2 and Alexa-Fluor-594-CtxB (0.5 μg/ml) were bound to cells. (B) Fl-anti-PLAP Fab fragments and Rh-anti-ErbB2 antibodies were bound to cells. (C) Fl-anti-ErbB2 was bound to cells, which were warmed with 1 mg/ml FluoroRuby dextran. (D) Fl-anti-ErbB2 and Rh-Tf were bound to cells. (A-D) Deconvolved images from z-stacks are shown. ErbB2, left; CtxB, PLAP, dextran or Tf, middle; merged images, right. Scale bar: 10 μm. (E) Internalization of biotinylated anti-ErbB2 antibodies was measured by CELISA in cells treated with (squares) or without (circles) GA. Values shown are the mean ± s.e.m. of three experiments.

  •   Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    C. difficile toxin B does not inhibit internalization of ErbB2 or fluid in SK-BR-3 cells. (A) SK-BR-3 cells grown for 48 hours on poly-Lys-coated coverslips were left untreated (Con) or were treated for 2 hours with 0.5 μg/ml C. difficile toxin B (Tox), fixed, permeabilized and incubated with rhodamine phalloidin (4 U/ml). Stress fibers were seen in about half of the control cells and <1% of treated cells. (B,C) Serum-starved SK-BR-3 cells on poly-Lys-coated coverslips were left untreated (B) or were treated for 2 hours with 0.5 μg/ml C. difficile toxin B (C) before addition of FluoroRuby dextran (1 mg/ml) for 10 minutes. After fixation, surface morphology was visualized with anti-ErbB2 antibodies and green secondary antibodies. PM, plasma membrane. Scale bar: 10 μm. (D,E) Internalization of biotinylated anti-ErbB2 antibodies (D) or biotinylated BSA (E) was measured by CELISA in serum-starved SK-BR-3 cells treated with GA (D, circles), GA + C. difficile toxin B (D, squares), C. difficile toxin alone (E, squares) or left untreated (E, circles) as described in the Materials and Methods. Where appropriate, cells were pre-incubated with C. difficile toxin B (0.5 μg/ml) for 2 hours at 37°C with the addition of GA for the last 45 minutes. Values shown are the mean ± s.e.m. of three experiments.

  •   Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    ErbB2 is delivered to early endosomes after GA treatment. (A-D) SK-BR-3 cells were left untransfected (A,B), or were transiently transfected with GFP-Rab5 (C) or GFP–Rab5-Q79L (D), and then treated with GA for 2 hours (with Rh-Tf added for the last 30 minutes in A), fixed and permeabilized. Left panels: ErbB2, detected with polyclonal antibodies. Center panels: (A) Rh-Tf fluorescence; (B) endogenous EEA1; (C,D) GFP fluorescence. Right panels: merged images. (A) Deconvolved image from a z-stack; (B-D) epifluorescence images. Scale bars: 10 μm (A); 5 μm (D, applies to B-D).

  •   Fig. 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 9.

    ErbB2 is delivered to late endosomes and lysosomes after GA treatment. After transient expression of GFP-Rab7 (A only), SK-BR-3 cells were treated with GA for 5 hours (together with 0.1 mg/ml leupeptin, D only), fixed and permeabilized. Left panels: ErbB2 was detected with polyclonal (A,B) or monoclonal (C,D) antibodies and appropriate secondary antibodies. Middle panels: (A) Rab7 (GFP fluorescence); (B) endogenous CD63; (C,D) endogenous LAMP1. Right panels: merged images. Epifluorescence images are shown. Scale bar: 5 μm.

  •   Fig. 10.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 10.

    GA-induced ErbB2 degradation is sensitive to chloroquine. SK-BR-3 cells were incubated with GA with or without chloroquine (CQ) for the times indicated and lysed. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to membranes for western blotting and detection of ErbB2. (A) Western blots. Top, GA alone; bottom, GA and CQ. Arrow: ca. 135-kDa ErbB2 fragment. (B) Bands were quantified by scanning densitometry and plotted as the percentage of the signal at time=0 remaining at each time point.

  •   Fig. 11.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 11.

    Accumulation of ErbB2 in Arf-Q67L-positive endosomes occurs only without GA. (A-F) SK-BR-3 cells were transfected with Arf6-Q67L alone (A,D) or in combination with either GFP-Rab5 (B,E) or GFP-Rab7 (C,F). Fl-anti-ErbB2 (A,D) or unlabeled anti-ErbB2 (B,C,E,F) antibodies were bound for 1 hour before cells were warmed for 2 hours with (A-C) or without (D-F) GA. Internalized anti-ErbB2 was detected in fixed and permeabilized cells by Fl-anti-ErbB2 fluorescence (A,D) or with Texas-Red goat-anti-mouse antibodies (B,C,E,F). Although Arf6-Q67L was not visualized in B,C,E or F, vacuoles characteristic of Arf6-Q67L expression were seen. Scale bar: 10 μm. (G,H) COS-7 cells were transfected with ErbB2 alone or together with Arf6-Q67L as indicated. Cells were incubated with GA for the indicated times and solubilized in gel loading buffer. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose. ErbB2 and Arf6-Q67L were detected by immunoblotting as described in the Materials and Methods. (H) A representative Arf6-Q67L blot is shown, demonstrating expression in co-transfected cells (+Arf6-Q67L), but not in cells expressing ErbB2 alone (–Arf6-Q67L).

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Cell Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clathrin-independent endocytosis of ErbB2 in geldanamycin-treated human breast cancer cells
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Cell Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Cell Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
Clathrin-independent endocytosis of ErbB2 in geldanamycin-treated human breast cancer cells
Daniel J. Barr, Anne G. Ostermeyer-Fay, Rachel A. Matundan, Deborah A. Brown
Journal of Cell Science 2008 121: 3155-3166; doi: 10.1242/jcs.020404
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Clathrin-independent endocytosis of ErbB2 in geldanamycin-treated human breast cancer cells
Daniel J. Barr, Anne G. Ostermeyer-Fay, Rachel A. Matundan, Deborah A. Brown
Journal of Cell Science 2008 121: 3155-3166; doi: 10.1242/jcs.020404

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • Summary
    • Introduction
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • An SNX10-dependent mechanism down-regulates fusion between mature osteoclasts
  • Combined heterogeneity in cell size and deformability promotes cancer invasiveness
  • Non-canonical ago loading of EV-derived exogenous single stranded miRNA in recipient cells
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Follow us on Instagram

Cell science is bursting with beautiful images and over on Instagram, we’re showing them off! Find both JCS and FocalPlane on Instagram for stories and techniques across cell biology.


An interview with Derek Walsh

Professor Derek Walsh is the guest editor of our new special issue Cell Biology of Host-Pathogen Interactions. In an interview, Derek tells us about his work in the field of DNA viruses, the impact of the pandemic on virology and what his role as Guest Editor taught him.


How to improve your scientific writing

"If you are a scientist and you want to succeed, you must become a writer."

How do scientists become master storytellers? We called on our journal Editors, proofreaders and contributors to our community sites for their advice on how to improve your scientific writing.


Meet the preLighters: Jennifer Ann Black

Following the theme of our latest special issue, postdoc Jennifer Ann Black studies replication stress and genome plasticity in Leishmania in Professor Luiz Tosi’s lab in Sao Paolo. We caught up with Jenn (virtually) to hear about her relocation to Brazil mid-pandemic, her research on parasites and what she enjoys about ‘preLighting’.

In our special issue, Chandrakar et al. and Rosazza et al. present their latest work on Leishmania.


Mole – The Corona Files

“There are millions of people around the world who continue to believe that the Terrible Pandemic is a hoax.”

Mole continues to offer his wise words to researchers on how to manage during the COVID-19 pandemic.


JCS and COVID-19

For more information on measures Journal of Cell Science is taking to support the community during the COVID-19 pandemic, please see here.

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hestiate to contact the Editorial Office.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Journal of Cell Science
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Fast-track manuscripts
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • JCS Prize
  • Manuscript transfer network
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contacts

  • Contact JCS
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992