Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Cell Science
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Cell Science

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS   Twitter  Facebook   YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
Research Article
Kinase-activity-independent functions of atypical protein kinase C in Drosophila
Soya Kim, Ieva Gailite, Bernard Moussian, Stefan Luschnig, Maik Goette, Karen Fricke, Mona Honemann-Capito, Helmut Grubmüller, Andreas Wodarz
Journal of Cell Science 2009 122: 3759-3771; doi: 10.1242/jcs.052514
Soya Kim
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ieva Gailite
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bernard Moussian
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefan Luschnig
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maik Goette
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karen Fricke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mona Honemann-Capito
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Helmut Grubmüller
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas Wodarz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Table 1.

    Complementation analysis of aPKC alleles

    aPKCpsu69aPKCpsu141aPKCpsu265aPKCpsu417aPKCk06403Df Jp1
    aPKCpsu69 ++
    aPKCpsu141 ++ ++
    aPKCpsu265 o ++ o
    aPKCpsu417 o + o –
    aPKCk06403 + + o o –
    Df Jp1 – o – – – –
    • ++, Adult animals hatch in the expected Mendelian ratio; +, adult animals hatch in each experiment but numbers were less than expected from Mendels laws; o, occasional adult escapers hatched; –, no adult animals were observed

  •   Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    aPKC mutant embryos derived from germ-line clones show loss of epithelial integrity in the epidermis. (A) Cuticle preparation of a wild-type embryo showing a contiguous cuticle with ventral denticle bands (arrowheads) and the head skeleton (arrow). (B-F) Cuticles of aPKC mutant embryos derived from germ-line clones show only crumbs of cuticle (B,C,F) or rudimentary patches of contiguous cuticle (D,E; between white lines), indicative of a breakdown of epithelial tissue structure. The phenotypes of the aPKCpsu69 (B) and aPKCpsu141 (C) class I alleles are indistinguishable from the null allele aPKCk06403 (F), whereas the phenotypes of the aPKCpsu265 (D) and aPKCpsu417 (E) class II alleles are much milder. Arrowheads in D point to rudimentary denticle bands. The cuticle phenotype of par-6Δ226 null mutant embryos derived from germ-line clones (G) resembles the aPKC null mutant phenotype. Anterior is to the left in all panels. Scale bar:100 μm.

  •   Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Apical-basal polarity of the ectodermal epithelium is disrupted in aPKC and par-6 mutant embryos derived from germ-line clones. The ectodermal epithelium of wild-type and mutant embryos at stage 7 was stained for aPKC (A-E), PAR-6 (F-J), Baz (K-O), Nrt, Crb and Dlg (P-T′). Scale bars: 10 μm (A-O); 10 μm (P-T). (U) Ultrastructure of the wild-type embryonic epidermis at stage 11. There is a contiguous electron dense ZA (U′, red arrows) in the apical portion of the lateral membrane. By contrast, aPKCpsu141 mutant embryos at the same stage do not possess a contiguous ZA (V,V′). Instead, spot adherens junctions are found in ectopic positions along the lateral membrane (V″, arrow). Scale bars: 0.5 μm (U-V″). In all images apical is to the top.

  •   Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Neuroblast polarity in aPKC and par-6 mutant embryos derived from germ-line clones. Wild-type and mutant NBs at metaphase were stained for aPKC (red; A-G), PAR-6 (red; H-N), Baz (red) and Mira (blue; O-U″). DNA was stained with YOYO-1 (green). Note that spindle orientation deduced from the orientation of the metaphase plate and the position of the Baz crescent was occasionally abnormal (S,T). Scale bar: 5 μm. In all panels, apical is up.

  •   Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    aPKC mutant phenotypes in oogenesis. (A) In wild-type egg chambers, the follicular epithelium has a regular, monolayered structure and PAR-6 is localized to the apical cortex of the follicle cells. (B) Egg chambers of homozygous aPKCpsu69 mutant females show both multilayering and large gaps (arrowheads) in the follicle epithelium. Note that PAR-6 is still localized apically in follicle cells that are in direct contact with the germ-line cells. Scale bar: 10 μm (A,B). (C-E′) The phenotype of the hypomorphic aPKC alleles in homozygous mutant follicle cell clones is much milder than that of the aPKC null allele. Follicle cell clones of aPKCpsu417 (C,C′) and of aPKCpsu69 (D,D′) show a normal monolayered tissue structure and correct localization of the mutant aPKC (red) and PAR-6 (blue) to the apical cortex. Occasionally, gaps are observed in the follicle epithelium of egg chambers carrying clones of aPKC mutant cells (D,D′,D″, arrowheads). In contrast to the hypomorphic aPKC alleles, follicle cell clones of the null allele aPKCk06403 (E,E′,E″) show multilayering of the epithelium and a complete loss of the apical localization of Bazooka (blue). Clones of homozygous mutant follicle cells are marked by the absence of GFP (green). Scale bar: 10 μm (C-E″). (F-H) Oocyte determination occurs normally in aPKCpsu417 (F) and aPKCpsu265 (G) germ-line clones, but not in the the null allele aPKCk06403 germ-line clone (H), which shows loss of the oocyte in most egg chambers. Oocytes are marked by staining for Orb (red) and homozygous mutant cells are marked by absence of GFP (green, arrows). Scale bar: 10 μm (F-H). (I-K) Anterior-posterior polarity of the oocyte is normal in aPKCpsu69 and aPKCpsu417 germ-line clones. In wild-type oocytes (I), Gurken (red) is localized to the anterior dorsal cortex and Staufen (blue) to the posterior cortex of the oocyte. The localization of Gurken and Staufen in germ-line clones of aPKCpsu69 (J) and aPKCpsu417 (K) is indistinguishable from that in wild-type. Germ-line clones are marked by absence of GFP staining (insets) in nurse cells and oocytes. Scale bar: 50 μm (I-K). Anterior is to the left in all panels.

  •   Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Biochemical properties of mutant aPKC proteins. (A) Structure of the aPKC protein. The position of the mutations in the four new aPKC alleles is indicated by arrowheads. (B) The GFP-aPKCpsu69 protein does not bind to PAR-6. S2 cells were transfected with wild-type GFP-aPKC and with the four mutant versions of GFP-aPKC. Untransfected S2 cells were used as negative control. The cell lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) followed by western blotting (Blot) with the indicated antibodies. Preimmune serum (pre; for PAR-6 IPs) or anti-β-galactosidase antibodies (β-Gal; for GFP IPs) were used as negative controls. (C) The mutant aPKCpsu141 protein is not recognized by the phospho-specific antibody directed against the phosphorylated threonine residue T422. Lysates from S2 cells transfected with GFP-aPKC or with GFPaPKCpsu141 were subjected to western blotting with either an antibody that recognizes aPKC irrespective of its phosphorylation state (aPKC) or with an antibody that specifically recognizes aPKC phosphorylated at T422 (aPKCpT422). A T422 phospho-specific band corresponding to GFPaPKC, but not to GFPaPKCpsu141 was detected. Untransfected S2 cells were used as negative controls. The endogenous aPKC band served as loading control. This observation was confirmed in western blots of adult head extracts of wild-type and aPKCpsu141 homozygous mutant flies (right). (D) Three of the four mutant aPKC proteins show strongly reduced kinase activity. In vitro kinase assays using [γ-32P]ATP were performed on anti-GFP immunoprecipitates of lysates of S2 cells transfected with either wild-type GFP-aPKC, with any of the four mutant GFP-aPKC versions and with GFP-tagged kinase-dead aPKC (GFP-aPKCK293A). Untransfected cells and cells transfected with wild-type GFP-aPKC but immunoprecipitated with anti-HA antibody were used as negative controls. Both autophosphorylation of GFP-aPKC and phosphorylation of a GST-Baz fusion protein containing the aPKC target site S980 were measured by autoradiography. One representative autoradiogram is shown. The quantitative analysis of four independent in vitro kinase assays is shown in the bar diagrams below the autoradiographs. Values are percentage phosphorylation relative to that of the wild-type GFP-aPKC protein. The input for the kinase assay (top) is shown at the bottom. (E) Three of the four mutant aPKC proteins are kinase-dead with respect to phosphorylation of S980 of Baz. In vitro kinase assays were performed with non-radioactive ATP as phosphate donor and phosphorylation of the GST-Baz fusion protein was detected in western blots using a phospho-specific antibody against S980 of Baz. The immunoprecipitated GFP-aPKC from the same experiment was also detected by western blotting. Quantification of the blots with the phospho-specific Baz antibody from four independent experiments and the GST-Baz input corresponding to the kinase assay (top) are shown at the bottom.

  •   Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Structure of human PKCι and thermodynamic cycles. (A) Overall structure of human PKCι with modeled structure elements (blue) and mutated residues (red). The enlarged view (right) compares the ATP binding pocket of the wild-type structure (green) with that of the A272V mutant (dark blue). (B) Thermodynamic cycles used in the free energy calculations described in the text. WT and Mut. refer to the wild-type and each of the considered mutant structures, respectively; the indices (f) and (u) refer to the folded and unfolded states, respectively. The color codings of the free energy double differences (ΔΔGbind and ΔΔGfold) correspond to the respective mutated amino acids in A.

  • Table 2.

    Calculated free energy differences between wild-type protein and the three mutant proteins

    Mutant ΔGf ΔG+ATP ΔGu3 ΔGu5 ΔΔGbind ΔΔGfold(3) ΔΔGfold(5)
    A272V –101.4±1.0 –94.8±0.7 –91.9±0.4 –93.2±0.4 –6.6±1.2 –9.6±1.0 –8.2±1.0
    G328N –337.5±3.4 –347.1±1.9 –357.6±0.7 –361.0±0.8 9.7±3.9 20.1±3.5 23.5±3.5
    F404I 9.8±0.8 12.8±0.9 12.9±0.5 9.0±0.6 –2.9±1.2 –3.1±0.9 0.8±1.0
    • ΔGf denotes the free energy difference for the folded and ligand-free protein, ΔG+ATP for the Mg2+-ATP bound complex, ΔGu3 for the tripeptide, and ΔGu5 for the pentapeptide. ΔΔGbind=ΔGf–ΔG+ATP denotes the ATP binding free energy difference between wild type and the respective mutant, ΔΔGfold(3) between ΔGf and ΔGu3, and ΔΔGfold(5) between ΔGf and ΔGu5. All energies are given in kJ/mol

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Cell Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Kinase-activity-independent functions of atypical protein kinase C in Drosophila
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Cell Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Cell Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
Kinase-activity-independent functions of atypical protein kinase C in Drosophila
Soya Kim, Ieva Gailite, Bernard Moussian, Stefan Luschnig, Maik Goette, Karen Fricke, Mona Honemann-Capito, Helmut Grubmüller, Andreas Wodarz
Journal of Cell Science 2009 122: 3759-3771; doi: 10.1242/jcs.052514
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Kinase-activity-independent functions of atypical protein kinase C in Drosophila
Soya Kim, Ieva Gailite, Bernard Moussian, Stefan Luschnig, Maik Goette, Karen Fricke, Mona Honemann-Capito, Helmut Grubmüller, Andreas Wodarz
Journal of Cell Science 2009 122: 3759-3771; doi: 10.1242/jcs.052514

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • Summary
    • Introduction
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Histone chaperone APLF level dictates the implantation of mouse embryos
  • Switching between blebbing and lamellipodia depends on the degree of non-muscle myosin II activity
  • Kindlin-2 promotes rear focal adhesion disassembly and directional persistence during cell migration
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

2020 at The Company of Biologists

Despite the challenges of 2020, we were able to bring a number of long-term projects and new ventures to fruition. While we look forward to a new year, join us as we reflect on the triumphs of the last 12 months.


Mole – The Corona Files

"This is not going to go away, 'like a miracle.' We have to do magic. And I know we can."

Mole continues to offer his wise words to researchers on how to manage during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Cell scientist to watch – Christine Faulkner

In an interview, Christine Faulkner talks about where her interest in plant science began, how she found the transition between Australia and the UK, and shares her thoughts on virtual conferences.


Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

“The clear advantages are rapid and efficient exposure and easy access to my article around the world. I believe it is great to have this publishing option in fast-growing fields in biomedical research.”

Dr Jaceques Behmoaras (Imperial College London) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 60 institutions in 12 countries taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


JCS and COVID-19

For more information on measures Journal of Cell Science is taking to support the community during the COVID-19 pandemic, please see here.

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hestiate to contact the Editorial Office.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Journal of Cell Science
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Fast-track manuscripts
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • JCS Prize
  • Manuscript transfer network
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contacts

  • Contact JCS
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992