Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Cell Science
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Cell Science

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS   Twitter  Facebook   YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
Research Article
Kinase-activity-independent functions of atypical protein kinase C in Drosophila
Soya Kim, Ieva Gailite, Bernard Moussian, Stefan Luschnig, Maik Goette, Karen Fricke, Mona Honemann-Capito, Helmut Grubmüller, Andreas Wodarz
Journal of Cell Science 2009 122: 3759-3771; doi: 10.1242/jcs.052514
Soya Kim
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ieva Gailite
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bernard Moussian
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefan Luschnig
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maik Goette
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karen Fricke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mona Honemann-Capito
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Helmut Grubmüller
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas Wodarz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Data supplements

  • JCS052514 Supplementary Material

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Table S1 -
    • Supplemental Tables S2 -
    • Supplemental Table S3 -
    • Supplemental Table S4 -
    • Supplemental Figure S1 -

      Fig. S1. The severity of Baz mislocalization at the extended germ band stage differs substantially in germ-line clone embryos mutant for class I and class II aPKC alleles. (A-G) Embryos of the indicated genotypes at the extended germ band stage (stage 10-11) were stained for Baz (green). The top panel shows an overview of the embryo and the bottom panel a superficial optical section of the same embryo at the plane of the ZA. Note that in wild type (A) and in the class II aPKC mutants (D,E) Baz forms contiguous belts at the ZA, whereas in class I aPKC mutants (B,C) and in aPKCk06403 (F) and par-6Δ226 (G) null mutants only scattered dots of Baz staining are visible. Scale bar for top panels: 100 µm. Scale bar for bottom panels: 10 µm. Anterior is to the left and dorsal up.

    • Supplemental Figure S2 -

      Fig. S2. aPKC mutant embryos show a strong increase in apoptotic cell death. Apoptotic cells were labeled by TUNEL staining (green) and antibody staining for the active caspase Drice (red) in wild-type (A) and aPKCpsu69 mutant (B) embryos. Scale bar: 100 µm (A,B). (C) In wild-type embryos, apoptotic bodies (red arrowheads) are engulfed by macrophages without interfering with the integrity of the ectodermal epithelium. (D) In aPKCpsu69 (class I) mutant embryos, apoptotic bodies remain on the surface of the embryo and are not internalized by macrophages. Scale bars: 1 µm (C,D). In A and B anterior is to the left and dorsal up. In C and D, apical is up. The embryos shown in A-D are at stage 11.

    • Supplemental Figure S3 -

      Fig. S3. Spindle orientation defects in neuroblasts of aPKC mutants. (A) In a wild-type neuroblast the mitotic spindle (dark yellow) is orientated perpendicular to the crescents of apical proteins (red), including Bazooka, aPKC and PAR-6 and basal proteins (blue), including Miranda, Prospero and Numb. We define the orientation of the spindle with respect to these proteins as the intrinsic orientation. In addition, the spindle is also perpendicular to the plane of the overlying ectodermal epithelium. We define this latter orientation as the extrinsic orientation. (B) To quantify extrinsic spindle orientation defects, we have defined two categories, which were determined by measuring the angle of the metaphase plate (green) with respect to the plane of the overlying ectodermal epithelium. In category 1, which we define as correct spindle orientation, the angle of the metaphase plate deviates less than 20° from the plane of the epithelium. In category 2, which we define as extrinsic misorientation, the metaphase plate deviates more than 20° from the plane of the epithelium. In both categories 1 and 2, the spindle is oriented perpendicular to the crescent of Baz, so the intrinsic orientation is correct. The orientation of the spindle with respect to the localization of Miranda could not be scored, because in the majority of cases Miranda was mislocalized all around the neuroblast cortex. In category 3 we scored all neuroblasts in which the spindle was not properly aligned with the crescent of Baz. Apical is up.

    • Supplemental Figure S4 -

      Fig. S4. Four new mutant alleles of aPKC change single highly conserved amino acid residues. The sequence alignment of the environment of the mutated amino acid residues was performed with Megalign (DNAStar) software. The numbers on the left correspond to the first amino acid shown in the respective line.

    • Supplemental Figure S5 -

      Fig. S5. Two dimensional principal component analysis of the modeled protein. Shown are the final structures taken from ten simulated annealing simulations of the modeled protein, projected on their first two common eigenvectors (grey dots). The circle shows two independently sampled structures, converged to a common point in the essential space. This structure has therefore been chosen for the subsequent simulations.

    • Supplemental Figure S6 -

      Fig. S6. Root mean square deviations (RMSD) of the simulated systems. (A) Backbone RMSDs of the modeled wild-type (WT) and the respective mutant structures. (B) Backbone (bb, solid line) and Mg2+-ATP (dashed line) RMSDs of the wild-type and the respective mutant structures after Mg2+-ATP insertion.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Cell Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Kinase-activity-independent functions of atypical protein kinase C in Drosophila
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Cell Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Cell Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
Kinase-activity-independent functions of atypical protein kinase C in Drosophila
Soya Kim, Ieva Gailite, Bernard Moussian, Stefan Luschnig, Maik Goette, Karen Fricke, Mona Honemann-Capito, Helmut Grubmüller, Andreas Wodarz
Journal of Cell Science 2009 122: 3759-3771; doi: 10.1242/jcs.052514
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Kinase-activity-independent functions of atypical protein kinase C in Drosophila
Soya Kim, Ieva Gailite, Bernard Moussian, Stefan Luschnig, Maik Goette, Karen Fricke, Mona Honemann-Capito, Helmut Grubmüller, Andreas Wodarz
Journal of Cell Science 2009 122: 3759-3771; doi: 10.1242/jcs.052514

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • Summary
    • Introduction
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Hydrostatic pressure prevents chondrocyte differentiation through heterochromatin remodeling
  • PLEKHG4B enables actin cytoskeletal remodeling during epithelial cell–cell junction formation
  • Matrix stiffness regulates α-TAT1-mediated acetylation of α-tubulin and promotes silica-induced epithelial–mesenchymal transition via DNA damage
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

2020 at The Company of Biologists

Despite the challenges of 2020, we were able to bring a number of long-term projects and new ventures to fruition. While we look forward to a new year, join us as we reflect on the triumphs of the last 12 months.


Mole – The Corona Files

"This is not going to go away, 'like a miracle.' We have to do magic. And I know we can."

Mole continues to offer his wise words to researchers on how to manage during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Cell scientist to watch – Christine Faulkner

In an interview, Christine Faulkner talks about where her interest in plant science began, how she found the transition between Australia and the UK, and shares her thoughts on virtual conferences.


Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

“The clear advantages are rapid and efficient exposure and easy access to my article around the world. I believe it is great to have this publishing option in fast-growing fields in biomedical research.”

Dr Jaceques Behmoaras (Imperial College London) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 60 institutions in 12 countries taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


JCS and COVID-19

For more information on measures Journal of Cell Science is taking to support the community during the COVID-19 pandemic, please see here.

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hestiate to contact the Editorial Office.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Journal of Cell Science
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Fast-track manuscripts
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • JCS Prize
  • Manuscript transfer network
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contacts

  • Contact JCS
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992