Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Cell Science
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Cell Science

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS   Twitter  Facebook   YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
Research Article
Synthesized basement membranes direct the differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells into pancreatic lineages
Yuichiro Higuchi, Nobuaki Shiraki, Keitaro Yamane, Zeng Qin, Katsumi Mochitate, Kimi Araki, Takafumi Senokuchi, Kazuya Yamagata, Manami Hara, Kazuhiko Kume, Shoen Kume
Journal of Cell Science 2010 123: 2733-2742; doi: 10.1242/jcs.066886
Yuichiro Higuchi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nobuaki Shiraki
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Keitaro Yamane
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zeng Qin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katsumi Mochitate
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kimi Araki
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takafumi Senokuchi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kazuya Yamagata
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manami Hara
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kazuhiko Kume
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shoen Kume
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: skume@kumamoto-u.ac.jp
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    M15 cells highly express Lama5, which effects their pancreatic induction potential. (A) Microarray analysis of the expression of Lama gene family members in M15 cells. Black bars indicate signal intensities of distinct probe sets for Lama family members. (B) Real-time PCR analysis of Lama5 expression in PA6, OP9 and M15 cell lines. Expression was normalized with that of β-actin. (C) Western blot analysis of Lama5 in the Lama5 KD or non-silencing shRNA (NS) M15 cell line. Actin is used as an internal control for total proteins. Lama5 protein was significantly reduced in Lama5 KD but not in NS M15 cells. (D) Flow cytometry analysis of E-cadherin-positive and Pdx1-positive cells differentiated on NS or Lama5 KD M15 cells. (E) Quantification of E-cadherin and Pdx1-positive cells differentiated on NS or Lama5 KD M15 cells. E-cadherin and Pdx1-GFP cells were significantly decreased when grown on Lama5 KD M15 cells (*P<0.05). Values represent means ± s.e. (n=3).

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Preparation of rLN511 sBM. (A) A schema of the rLN511 sBM preparation procedure. The rLN-10 cells, in which the recombinant human LN511 molecule was overexpressed, were seeded on a cell culture insert (a), and allowed to form the BM substratum (b). After the construction of BM, rLN-10 cells were removed (c). And then mouse ES or iPS cells were seeded on the synthesized BM (sBM) substratum and cultured (d). (B) Structural and components analysis of the rLN511 sBM. (a) Transmission electron micrograph (TEM) of the extracellular matrix structure beneath rLN-10 cells that were cultured for 2 weeks on an oligo-GlcNAc-coated fibrillar collagen matrix. A lamina densa was formed beneath the cells (arrows). A number of anchoring filaments (arrow heads) connecting between the basal surface of rLN-10 cells and the lamina densa were confirmed. (b) TEM of a bared lamina densa substratum. The covering rLN-10 cells were removed by the treatment of alkali and detergent. (c) Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of a bared lamina densa substratum. Initial matrix of collagen fibrils was observed through a small window opened at lamina densa. (d) Immunofluorescent microscopy of the transverse section in rLN10 cell culture. Laminin (d1) and type IV collagen (d2) were continuously integrated beneath rLN-10 cells. (e) Horizontal viewing of a bared ECM after the removal of rLN-10 cells. The integration of laminin (e1) and type IV (e2) collagen was observed.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    ES cells cultured on rLN511 sBM substratum alone gave rise to definitive endoderm cells. (A) Quantification of endodermal cells grown on the (a) sBM or (b) M15 cells. E-cadherin-positive CXCR4-positive DE cells were quantified by flow cytometry on d8. (B) Real-time PCR analysis of the cells grown on the sBM or M15 cells. On d8 or d15, the expression levels of Pou5f1, Sox17, Foxa2 and Pdx1 were quantified, and normalized with that of β-actin. Undifferentiated ES cells were used as a control. Values represent means ± s.e. (n=3).

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Differentiation of mouse ES cells into pancreatic cell lineages on the sBM substratum. (A) Schematic representation of the differentiation conditions used. Mouse ES or iPS cells seeded on the sBM substratum were cultured with serum-free medium throughout the differentiation. At d0 to d10, 20 ng/ml activin A and 50 ng/ml bFGF were supplemented in the medium, and 1 μM retinoic acid (RA) was further supplemented from d10 to d13. After d13, the glucose concentration was switched from 4500 mg/l to 1000 mg/l, and 10 mM nicotinamide and 10 nM glucagon-like peptide (GLP1) were supplemented. (B) Fluorescent images of the Pdx1 ES cell line, SK7, grown on the sBM substratum. Pdx1 expression became detectable at d10 and increased until d15. After d15, Pdx1-expressing cells formed three-dimensional clusters. On d28, strong Pdx1 expression was observed in the differentiated cell clusters. Scale bars: 100 μm. (C) Quantification of Pdx1-expressing cells. On d15, Pdx1-positive cells were quantified by flow cytometry. (D) Differentiation of the Ins1 ES cell line, ING112, on the sBM substratum. The green fluorescence of ING112 on d26 and d28 is shown. The expression of Ins1 became detectable on d26. Scale bars: 100 μm.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Gene-expression analysis of mouse ES or iPS cells differentiated on the sBM substratum. (A) Expression of mature pancreas endocrine and exocrine markers. RNA from undifferentiated ES cells (SK7, ud ES) and E13.5 fetal pancreas (FP) was used as a control (negative and positive, respectively). sBM, differentiated ES cells grown on the sBM substratum; d15 and d28, whole differentiated ES cells at the indicated day after initiation of differentiation. d28/M15, differentiated ES cells grown on M15 at d28. The amount of cDNA was normalized with the expression level of β-actin. Ins1 transcripts became detectable at d28 in ES cells cultured on sBM but not in those on M15. Pdx1, Pancreatic duodenum homeodomein 1; Ins1, Insulin1; Gcg, glucagon; Sst, somatostatin; Ptf1a, pancreas specific transcription factor 1a; Amy, amylase. (B) Expression of immature (NeuroD1, Nkx2-2, Nkx6-1, Pax4, Pax6) and mature (Isl1, Glut2, Iapp) β-cell markers. NeuroD1, neurogenic differentiation 1; Nkx2-2, NK2 transcription factor related locus 2; Nkx6-1, NK6 homeobox 1; Pax4, paired box gene 4; Pax6, paired-box gene 6; Isl1, ISL1 transcription factor; Glut2, Glucose transporter type 2; Iapp, islet amyloid polypeptide. (C) RT-PCR analysis of iPS cells grown on the sBM substratum. RNA from undifferentiated iPS cells (ud iPS) was used as a negative control. SBM, differentiated iPS cells grown on the sBM substratum; d16, d20 and d28, whole differentiated ES cells at the indicated day after initiation of differentiation.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Itgb1 knockdown inhibits the differentiation of Pdx1-expressing cells. (A) A schematic of the experimental procedure. Non-silencing (NS) or Itgb1 knockdown (Itgb1 KD) lentivirus-containing medium was added on d10. To remove the uninfected cells, puromycin selection was performed from d13 to d15. Cells were analyzed on d15. (B) Real-time PCR analysis of Itgb1 expression in NS or Itgb1 KD ES cells. On d15, total RNA was extracted. Itgb1 expression was normalized with that of β-actin. (C) Quantification of the Pdx1-positive cells. Significant differences were observed (*P<0.05) versus NS. Values represent means ± s.e. (n=3).

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    HSPGs are involved in the differentiation of Pdx1-expressing cells. (A) Real-time PCR analysis of Hspg2 expression in non-silencing control (NS) and Hspg2-knockdown (Hspg2 KD) SK7 ES cells. Hspg2 expression was normalized to that of β-actin. (B) A schematic drawing of the experimental procedure. NS or Hspg2-KD ES cells were allowed to differentiate on sBM. Pdx1-positive cells were quantified on d15. In the heparitinase treatment (+heparitinase), the sBM was pre-treated with heparitinase before seeding ES cells, and then ES cell cultures were treated daily from d10 to d15. (C) Quantification of Pdx1-positive cells. Values represent means ± s.e. (n=3). Compared with NS and Hspg2 KD and/or heparitinase-treated samples, significant differences were observed (*P<0.05). *1, NS vs Hspg2 KD; *2, NS vs NS+heparitinase; *3, Hspg2 KD vs Hspg2 KD+heparitinase; *4, NS+heparitinase vs Hspg2 KD+heparitinase.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    In vivo differentiation of ING112 ES cells cultured on the sBM substratum. (A) Fluorescent image of the recovered graft. ING112 ES cells grown on sBM for 28 days were transplanted under the kidney capsules of SCID mice. Green fluorescence indicates the expression of Ins1 (arrowheads). Scale bar: 1 mm. (B) Expression of mature pancreas endocrine and exocrine markers. Before, ING112 cells grown on the sBM substratum at d28 (pre-engraftment control); after, the recovered graft. MafA, v-maf musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene protein A; Ppy, pancreatic polypeptide. Real-time PCR analysis of the recovered graft. (C) The expression of mature pancreas endocrine (Ins1, Ppy and Sst) and exocrine (Amy) markers were normalized to that of β-actin. RNA from E13.5 fetal pancreas (FP) was used as a positive control. (D) Immunofluorescence analysis of the recovered graft. Immunostaining of GFP (a,b,e,f; green) and Ins (a; magenta) or C-peptide (C-pep, b; magenta) revealed that GFP expression overlapped with insulin-expressing cells. The expression of mature β-cell markers, MafA (c; magenta) and Nkx6-1 (d; magenta) was observed in Ins1-positive cells (c,d; green). GFP-positive cells were surrounded by Amy-positive (e; magenta) exocrine tissues, similarly to normal pancreatic tissue. Gcg (e; yellow), Sst (f; magenta), Ppy (g; magenta) and ductal marker, DBA-positive cells (h; magenta) were also observed. Samples shown in e-h are counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bars: 100 μm.

  • Fig. 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 9.

    Differentiation signals from the BM. A schematic of the differentiation signals from the BM. One of the BM components, Lama5, interacts with integrin β1, leading to pancreatic differentiation. HSPG2 in BM-mediated pancreatic differentiation. Moreover, various kinds of signaling molecules are trapped in the heparan sulfate chain of HSPG2 or other HSPGs. These molecules directly and/or indirectly induce pancreatic differentiation.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Cell Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Synthesized basement membranes direct the differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells into pancreatic lineages
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Cell Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Cell Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
Synthesized basement membranes direct the differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells into pancreatic lineages
Yuichiro Higuchi, Nobuaki Shiraki, Keitaro Yamane, Zeng Qin, Katsumi Mochitate, Kimi Araki, Takafumi Senokuchi, Kazuya Yamagata, Manami Hara, Kazuhiko Kume, Shoen Kume
Journal of Cell Science 2010 123: 2733-2742; doi: 10.1242/jcs.066886
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Synthesized basement membranes direct the differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells into pancreatic lineages
Yuichiro Higuchi, Nobuaki Shiraki, Keitaro Yamane, Zeng Qin, Katsumi Mochitate, Kimi Araki, Takafumi Senokuchi, Kazuya Yamagata, Manami Hara, Kazuhiko Kume, Shoen Kume
Journal of Cell Science 2010 123: 2733-2742; doi: 10.1242/jcs.066886

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • Summary
    • Introduction
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Human-specific staphylococcal virulence factors enhance pathogenicity in a humanised zebrafish C5a receptor model
  • Jagged–Notch-mediated divergence of immune cell crosstalk maintains the anti-inflammatory response in visceral leishmaniasis
  • PDZD8 mediated lipid transfer at ER-LE/lys contacts is required for LE/lys positioning and neurite outgrowth
Show more Research Articles

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Cell scientist to watch: Janet Iwasa

Read our interview with molecular animator Janet Iwasa, where she talks about her transition from the wet lab, explains how animation can facilitate research and discusses the challenges of the field.


New funding scheme supports sustainable events

As part of our Sustainable Conferencing Initiative, we are pleased to announce funding for organisers that seek to reduce the environmental footprint of their event. The next deadline to apply for a Scientific Meeting grant is 26 March 2021.


Mole – The Corona files

“Despite everything, it's just incredible that we get to do science.”

Mole continues to offer his wise words to researchers on how to manage during the COVID-19 pandemic.


JCS and COVID-19

For more information on measures Journal of Cell Science is taking to support the community during the COVID-19 pandemic, please see here.

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hestiate to contact the Editorial Office.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Journal of Cell Science
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Fast-track manuscripts
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • JCS Prize
  • Manuscript transfer network
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contacts

  • Contact JCS
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992