Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Cell Science
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Cell Science

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS   Twitter  Facebook   YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
Research Article
Docosahexaenoic acid mediates peroxisomal elongation, a prerequisite for peroxisome division
Akinori Itoyama, Masanori Honsho, Yuichi Abe, Ann Moser, Yumi Yoshida, Yukio Fujiki
Journal of Cell Science 2012 125: 589-602; doi: 10.1242/jcs.087452
Akinori Itoyama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masanori Honsho
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuichi Abe
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ann Moser
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yumi Yoshida
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yukio Fujiki
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: yfujiki@kyudai.jp
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Severely reduced number and aberrant morphology of peroxisomes in fibroblasts from patients with peroxisomal fatty acid β-oxidation disorders. (A) Fibroblasts from a normal control subject (Aa) and individual patients with deficiencies in PEX10 (Ab), AOx (Ac), and D-BP (Ad), and an X-ALD patient (Ae) were stained with an anti-Pex14p antibody. Scale bar: 10 μm. (B) Peroxisome abundance per cell was determined as described in Materials and Methods. (C) Peroxisomal β-oxidation in control and patient-derived fibroblasts. β-oxidation in control fibroblasts was 0.76 nmol/hour/mg of protein. β-oxidation activity in the patient-derived cells was expressed relative to the control, which was set as 100%. Data represent the means ± s.d. of three independent experiments; *P<0.01 compared with control fibroblasts.

  • Table 1.
  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    DHA restores peroxisome morphogenesis in AOx- and D-BP-defective fibroblasts. (A) Fibroblasts defective in AOx (Aa–Ad) or D-BP (Ae–Ah) were cultured in the absence (Aa,Ae) or presence of 50 μM DHA for 12 hours (Ab,Af), 24 hours (Ac,Ag) or 48 hours (Ad,Ah), and then stained with an antibody to Pex14p. (B) Peroxisome abundance per cell following treatment with 50 or 150 μM DHA for the indicated times was determined as described in Materials and Methods. (C) AOx-deficient fibroblasts were cultured with 50 μM DHA for 0, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 24 hours. Peroxisome morphology was verified using an antibody to Pex14p (left panel). Total DHA levels were analyzed as described for Table 1 (right panel). Values are mol% of total DHA in control fibroblasts. (D) Control (Da,Dc) or PEX10-deficient (Db,Dd) fibroblasts were cultured in the absence (Da,Db) or presence (Dc,Dd) of 150 μM DHA for 48 hours and then stained with an antibody to Pex14p. (E) Fibroblasts from control and individual patients defective in PEX10 and PEX2 were treated with DHA as in A and peroxisome abundance determined. Insets are higher-magnification images of the boxed regions. Scale bars: 10 μm and 2 μm (insets). Data represent the means ± s.d. of three independent experiments; *P<0.05.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Functional role of DLPI in peroxisome proliferation. (A) AOx-deficient fibroblasts were cultured for 16 hours in the absence (Aa,Ab) or presence (Ac,Ad) of 150 μM DHA and then treated for an additional 8 hours with DMSO (Aa,Ac) or 40 μM dynasore (Ab,Ad). Cells were stained with an anti-Pex14p antibody. (B) Peroxisome abundance per cell was determined as in Fig. 2B. (C) AOx-deficient fibroblasts were treated for 48 hours with a control dsRNA (left panel) or DLP1 #2 dsRNA (right panel). Cells were cultured for an additional 24 hours in the absence (Ca,Cb) or presence (Cc,Cd) of 150 μM DHA and then stained with an anti-Pex14p antibody. (D) AOx-deficient fibroblasts were treated for 48 hours with a control dsRNA or two different test dsRNAs (DLP1 #1 and DLP1 #2). DLP1 levels were verified by immunoblot analysis using an anti-DLP antibody. Actin was used as a loading control. (E) Peroxisome abundance per cell was determined as in Fig. 2B. (F) Control (Fa–Fc) and AOx-deficient fibroblasts (Fd–Fi) were cultured for 24 hours in the absence (Fa–Ff) or presence (Fg–Fi) of 150 μM DHA. Cells were stained with antibodies to Pex14p (Fa,Fd,Fg) and DLP1 (Fb,Fe,Fh); the merged view of the two different proteins is shown in Fc, Ff, and Fi. Insets are higher-magnification images of the boxed regions. Scale bars: 10 μm and 2 μm (insets). Data represent the means ± s.d. of three independent experiments; *P<0.01.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    DHA induces peroxisome elongation and division in a Pex11pβ-dependent manner. (A) AOx-deficient fibroblasts were treated with a control dsRNA (upper row) or PEX11β #2 dsRNA (lower row) for 48 hours. Cells were cultured for an additional 12 hours (Ab,Ae) and 24 hours (Aa,Ac,Ad,Af) in the absence (Aa,Ad) or presence (Ab,Ac,Ae,Af) of 150 μM DHA and then stained with an anti-Pex14p antibody. Insets are higher-magnification images of the boxed regions. Scale bars: 10 μm and 2 μm (insets). (B) AOx-deficient fibroblasts were treated with control dsRNA or two different test dsRNAs (PEX11β #1 and PEX11β #2) for 48 hours. Pex11pβ levels were verified by immunoblot analysis using an antibody to Pex11pβ. Actin was used as a loading control. (C) AOx-deficient fibroblasts were treated as in A with control, PEX11β #1, PEX11β #2 or PEX11β #1 plus PEX11α #1 dsRNAs. Cells were cultured for an additional 24 hours in the absence or presence of 150 μM DHA. Peroxisome abundance per cell was determined as in Fig. 2B. Data represent the means ± s.d. of three independent experiments; *P<0.01. (D) AOx-deficient, control, and PEX10-deficient fibroblasts were cultured for 20 hours in the absence (left panels) or presence (right panels) of 150 μM DHA and then treated for 30 minutes with 1 mM DSP. Cell lysates were fractionated by sucrose density gradient ultracentrifugation and each fraction analyzed by immunoblot using antibodies to Pex11pβ, DLP1 and Fis1. Upward arrowhead indicates the higher molecular-mass oligomer of Pex11pβ.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    In vitro Pex11pβ oligomerization assay. (A) DHA levels in proteoliposomes. SL were prepared by mixing PC and PE. DL were prepared by mixing PDPC and PDPE, and OL by mixing POPC and POPE. DHA levels were determined as described in Materials and Methods. (B) Introduction of an MBP–Pex11pβ fusion protein into liposomes. Liposomes were solubilized with 1% Triton X-100 and then fractionated by ultracentrifugation in a 1–30% glycerol density gradient. Each fraction was analyzed by immunoblot using an anti-MBP antibody. Upward arrowheads indicate the higher molecular mass oligomers of MBP–Pex11pβ.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    DHA induces the formation of Pex11pβ-rich regions on elongated peroxisomes. (A) AOx-deficient fibroblasts were cultured in the absence (Aa–Ac) or presence (Ad–Ai) of 150 μM DHA for 12 hours and then stained with antibodies to Pex14p (Aa,Ad,Ag) and Pex11pβ (Ab,Ae,Ah); the merged view of the two proteins is shown in Ac, Af and Ai. Insets are higher-magnification images of the boxed regions. Scale bars: 10 μm and 1 μm (insets). Arrowheads indicate regions enriched with Pex11pβ compared with Pex14p. The numbers 1, 2 and 3 correspond to those in panel B. (B) Mutually distinct peaks of Pex11pβ and Pex14p were apparent upon in-line scanning of the transecting line shown in Ag–Ai. The intensity of Pex11pβ signals was significantly increased at regions (arrowheads) that did not contain Pex14p.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    PMP70 and catalase colocalize with Pex14p. (A) AOx-deficient fibroblasts were cultured in the absence (Aa–Ad) or presence (Ae–Al) of 150 μM DHA for 12 hours and then stained with antibodies to Pex14p (Aa,Ae,Ai), PMP70 (Ab,Af,Aj), and catalase (Ac,Ag,Ak); the merged view of the proteins is shown in Ad, Ah and Al. Scale bars: 10 μm and 1 μm (insets). (B) Line-scanning evaluation of the transecting line shown in Ai–Al. Note the similar peaks for Pex14p, PMP70 and catalase. Insets are higher-magnification images of the boxed regions.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Real-time imaging of peroxisome division. (A,B) AOx-deficient fibroblasts were transfected with an expression vector for HA2-EGFP-AKL. After 4 hours, fibroblasts were supplemented with 150 μM DHA for 20 hours and then analyzed by time-lapse fluorescence microscopy. Images show division (A) and the sequence of steps involved in peroxisome elongation (B). Scale bar: 1 μm.

  • Fig. 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 9.

    Association of peroxisomes with microtubules is required for proper distribution but not division. (A) AOx-deficient fibroblasts were cultured for 4 hours in the absence (Aa,Ab) or presence of 150 μM DHA (Ac–Af) followed by the addition of DMSO (Aa–Ad) or 10 μM nocodazole (Ae,Af) for 20 hours. Cells were stained with antibodies to Pex14p (Aa,Ac,Ae) and α-tubulin (Ab,Ad,Af). Arrows indicate peroxisomal clusters. Scale bars: 20 μm. (B) Microtubules are not involved in peroxisomal elongation. AOx-deficient fibroblasts were treated with 10 μM nocodazole for 1 hour and then cultured for 12 hours in the presence of 150 μM DHA. Cells were stained with antibodies to Pex14p (Ba) and α-tubulin (Bb). Insets are higher-magnification images of the boxed regions. Scale bars: 10 μm and 2 μm (inset).

  • Fig. 10.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 10.

    Model of DHA-mediated peroxisome division. DHA promotes the oligomerization of Pex11pβ, which leads to the formation of Pex11pβ-rich regions and initiates peroxisome elongation (steps 1 and 2), in which peroxisomes elongate in one direction (step 3). The elongation of peroxisomes activates DLP1 to cleave peroxisomal membranes, thereby giving rise to peroxisomal fission (step 4). After division, daughter peroxisomes translocate via microtubules (MT) (step 5). See Discussion for details.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Cell Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Docosahexaenoic acid mediates peroxisomal elongation, a prerequisite for peroxisome division
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Cell Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Cell Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
Docosahexaenoic acid mediates peroxisomal elongation, a prerequisite for peroxisome division
Akinori Itoyama, Masanori Honsho, Yuichi Abe, Ann Moser, Yumi Yoshida, Yukio Fujiki
Journal of Cell Science 2012 125: 589-602; doi: 10.1242/jcs.087452
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Docosahexaenoic acid mediates peroxisomal elongation, a prerequisite for peroxisome division
Akinori Itoyama, Masanori Honsho, Yuichi Abe, Ann Moser, Yumi Yoshida, Yukio Fujiki
Journal of Cell Science 2012 125: 589-602; doi: 10.1242/jcs.087452

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • Summary
    • Introduction
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • EFA6A, an exchange factor for Arf6, regulates early steps in ciliogenesis
  • SetDB1 and Su(var)3-9 play non-overlapping roles in somatic cell chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster
  • p.E152K-STIM1 mutation deregulates Ca2+ signaling contributing to chronic pancreatitis
Show more Research Articles

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

2020 at The Company of Biologists

Despite the challenges of 2020, we were able to bring a number of long-term projects and new ventures to fruition. While we look forward to a new year, join us as we reflect on the triumphs of the last 12 months.


Mole – The Corona Files

"This is not going to go away, 'like a miracle.' We have to do magic. And I know we can."

Mole continues to offer his wise words to researchers on how to manage during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Cell scientist to watch – Christine Faulkner

In an interview, Christine Faulkner talks about where her interest in plant science began, how she found the transition between Australia and the UK, and shares her thoughts on virtual conferences.


Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

“The clear advantages are rapid and efficient exposure and easy access to my article around the world. I believe it is great to have this publishing option in fast-growing fields in biomedical research.”

Dr Jaceques Behmoaras (Imperial College London) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 60 institutions in 12 countries taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


JCS and COVID-19

For more information on measures Journal of Cell Science is taking to support the community during the COVID-19 pandemic, please see here.

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hestiate to contact the Editorial Office.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Journal of Cell Science
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Fast-track manuscripts
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • JCS Prize
  • Manuscript transfer network
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contacts

  • Contact JCS
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992