Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Cell Science
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Cell Science

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS   Twitter  Facebook   YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
Research Article
Docosahexaenoic acid mediates peroxisomal elongation, a prerequisite for peroxisome division
Akinori Itoyama, Masanori Honsho, Yuichi Abe, Ann Moser, Yumi Yoshida, Yukio Fujiki
Journal of Cell Science 2012 125: 589-602; doi: 10.1242/jcs.087452
Akinori Itoyama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masanori Honsho
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuichi Abe
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ann Moser
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yumi Yoshida
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yukio Fujiki
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: yfujiki@kyudai.jp
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Data supplements

  • JCS087452 Supplementary Material

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Figure S1 -

      Fig. S1. Several PUFAs play an auxiliary role in peroxisome proliferation. (A) Several different PUFAs augment peroxisomal proliferation. AOx-deficient fibroblasts were cultured for 48 h in the presence of 50 µM DHA, EPA, AA, α-LA, OA, or stearic acid (SA). Peroxisome abundance per cell was determined as in Fig. 2B. *P<0.01 vs mock treatment. (B) Several PUFAs induce hyper-oligomerization of Pex11pβ. AOx-deficient fibroblasts were cultured for 20 h in the absence or presence of 150 µM DHA, EPA, or α-LA and then treated for 30 min with 1 mM DSP. Cell lysates were fractionated by sucrose density-gradient ultracentrifugation and each fraction was analyzed by immunoblot using an anti-Pex11pβ antibody. Upward arrowheads indicate the higher molecular-mass oligomer of Pex11pβ. (C) Dysfunctional peroxisomal β-oxidation does not affect intracellular levels of EPA and AA. Lipids extracted from AOx- and D-BP-deficient fibroblasts were analyzed by LC/MS. Values are the mole % of total DHA in control fibroblasts and represent means ± s.d.; n=3.

    • Supplemental Figure S2 -

      Fig. S2. DHA-induced peroxisome division is independent of the activation of PPARα. (A) AOx-deficient fibroblasts were treated with a control dsRNA or dsRNAs each for PPARα (#1 and #2) for 48 h and then cultured for an additional 24 h in the absence or presence of 150 µM DHA. Left, peroxisome abundance per cell was determined as in Fig. 2B. Data represent the means ± s.d. of three independent experiments. Right, PPARα mRNA levels were assessed by RT-PCR using total RNA. Actin was assessed as a loading control. (B) MEFs and human fibroblasts from a normal control or a patient with AOx-deficiency were cultured in the absence or presence of 50 µM DHA or 100 µM Wy-14,643 for 48 h. Peroxisome abundance per cell was determined as in Fig. 2B. Data represent the means ± s.d. of three independent experiments. *P<0.01. (C) mRNA levels of PEX11α and PEX11β were assessed by RT-PCR using total RNA extracted from AOx- and D-BP-deficient fibroblasts cultured in the absence or presence of 50 µM DHA for 24 h. Actin was assessed as a loading control.

    • Supplemental Figure S3 -

      Fig. S3. Dynasore inhibits DLP1 in vivo. Control fibroblasts were cultured for 30 min in the presence of DMSO or 40 µM dynasore and then treated for 4 h with 0.3 mM or 1 mM H2O2. The morphology of the mitochondria was verified using an anti-Tom20 antibody (left panels). Mitochondrial morphology was classified into two types, tubular (right panel, open bar) and fragmented (right panel, solid bar) in 150 randomly selected cells. Scale bar: 20 µm. Data represent the means ± s.d. of three independent experiments. *P<0.01.

    • Supplemental Figure S4 -

      Fig. S4. Knockdown of PEX11α inhibits DHA-mediated peroxisome division. (A) AOx-deficient fibroblasts were treated with control dsRNA (upper panel) or a dsRNA (#2) for PEX11α (lower panel) for 48 h. Cells were cultured for an additional 12 h (b and e) and 24 h (a, c, d, and f) in the absence (a and d) or presence (b, c, e, and f) of 150 µM DHA and then stained with an anti-Pex14p antibody. Scale bar: 10 µm. Insets, higher magnification images of the boxed regions. Scale bar: 2 µm. (B) AOx-deficient fibroblasts were treated as in (A) with PEX11α #1 and PEX11α #2 dsRNAs. PEX11α mRNA level was assessed by RT-PCR using total RNA. Actin was assessed as a loading control. (C) Peroxisome abundance per cell was determined as in Fig. 2B. Data represent the means ± s.d. of three independent experiments. *P<0.01.

    • Supplemental Figure S5 -

      Fig. S5. Knockdown of PEX16 does not affect peroxisomal morphogenesis. (A) AOx-deficient fibroblasts were treated with control dsRNA (a and b) or PEX16 #2 dsRNA (c and d) for 72 h and then stained with antibodies to Pex14p (a and c) and Pex16p (b and d). Scale bar: 10 µm. (B) AOx-deficient fibroblasts were treated with control dsRNA or two different dsRNAs for PEX16 (#1 and #2) for 72 h. Pex16p levels were verified by immunoblot analysis using an antibody to Pex16p. Actin was assessed as a loading control. (C) Peroxisome abundance per cell was determined as in Fig. 2B. Data represent the means ± s.d. of three independent experiments.

    • Supplemental Table S1 -

      Table S1. Sequences of complementary antisense oligonucleotides used in this study

    • Movie 1 -

      Movie 1. Peroxisome division is highly elevated in AOx-deficient fibroblasts in the presence of DHA. Frames (58 total) were taken at 0.8-second intervals. The video runs at 15 frames/second and corresponds to Fig. 8A.

    • Movie 2 -

      Movie 2. Peroxisomal elongation occurs in one direction. Frames (39 total) were taken at 0.8-second intervals. The video runs at 20 frames/second and corresponds to Fig. 8B.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Cell Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Docosahexaenoic acid mediates peroxisomal elongation, a prerequisite for peroxisome division
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Cell Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Cell Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
Docosahexaenoic acid mediates peroxisomal elongation, a prerequisite for peroxisome division
Akinori Itoyama, Masanori Honsho, Yuichi Abe, Ann Moser, Yumi Yoshida, Yukio Fujiki
Journal of Cell Science 2012 125: 589-602; doi: 10.1242/jcs.087452
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Docosahexaenoic acid mediates peroxisomal elongation, a prerequisite for peroxisome division
Akinori Itoyama, Masanori Honsho, Yuichi Abe, Ann Moser, Yumi Yoshida, Yukio Fujiki
Journal of Cell Science 2012 125: 589-602; doi: 10.1242/jcs.087452

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • Summary
    • Introduction
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Histone chaperone APLF level dictates the implantation of mouse embryos
  • Switching between blebbing and lamellipodia depends on the degree of non-muscle myosin II activity
  • Kindlin-2 promotes rear focal adhesion disassembly and directional persistence during cell migration
Show more Research Articles

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

2020 at The Company of Biologists

Despite the challenges of 2020, we were able to bring a number of long-term projects and new ventures to fruition. While we look forward to a new year, join us as we reflect on the triumphs of the last 12 months.


Mole – The Corona Files

"This is not going to go away, 'like a miracle.' We have to do magic. And I know we can."

Mole continues to offer his wise words to researchers on how to manage during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Cell scientist to watch – Christine Faulkner

In an interview, Christine Faulkner talks about where her interest in plant science began, how she found the transition between Australia and the UK, and shares her thoughts on virtual conferences.


Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

“The clear advantages are rapid and efficient exposure and easy access to my article around the world. I believe it is great to have this publishing option in fast-growing fields in biomedical research.”

Dr Jaceques Behmoaras (Imperial College London) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 60 institutions in 12 countries taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


JCS and COVID-19

For more information on measures Journal of Cell Science is taking to support the community during the COVID-19 pandemic, please see here.

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hestiate to contact the Editorial Office.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Journal of Cell Science
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Fast-track manuscripts
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • JCS Prize
  • Manuscript transfer network
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contacts

  • Contact JCS
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992