Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Cell Science
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Cell Science

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS   Twitter  Facebook   YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
Research Article
Regulation of IRS1/Akt insulin signaling by microRNA-128a during myogenesis
Norio Motohashi, Matthew S. Alexander, Yuko Shimizu-Motohashi, Jennifer A. Myers, Genri Kawahara, Louis M. Kunkel
Journal of Cell Science 2013 126: 2678-2691; doi: 10.1242/jcs.119966
Norio Motohashi
1Program in Genomics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew S. Alexander
1Program in Genomics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuko Shimizu-Motohashi
1Program in Genomics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer A. Myers
1Program in Genomics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Genri Kawahara
1Program in Genomics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Louis M. Kunkel
1Program in Genomics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
2Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
3The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kunkel@enders.tch.harvard.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Expression of miR-128a in tissues and myogenic cells. (A) Expression of miR-128a in adult mouse tissues. Quantitative PCR results show that miR-128a is highly expressed in brain and skeletal muscle. (B) MiR-128a expression during myogenesis. Total RNA enriched for miRNAs was extracted from mouse quiescent (Q) satellite cells, myoblasts (cultured satellite cells in growth medium for 3 days) and myotube (fused myoblasts in differentiation medium for 5 days), and analyzed by qPCR to assess miR-128 expression. The levels of miR-128a increased during myogenesis. The expression values were normalized with U6 snRNA expression, and are represented as mean±s.e. (n = 3). (C) MiR-128a expression during skeletal muscle regeneration. Mouse TA muscles were injured with cardiotoxin (CTX), and isolated 1, 3, 5, 7 and 14 days after CTX injection. After extraction of total RNAs, miR-128a expression was subjected to analysis by qPCR. The levels of miR-128a declined immediately after CTX injection. Values are represented as mean±s.e. (n = 3).

  • Table 1.
  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Predicted miR-128a targets related to insulin signaling. (A) Alignment of the predicted binding sequence of miR-128a given below the binding site in the 3′ UTR of insulin signaling pathway-related genes, and the mutated 3′ UTR binding sequence below. The miR-128a seed match region is highlighted in bold and mutated region is underlined. (B) Luciferase reporter gene linked to the 3′ UTR of the individual genes (WT) or the 3′ UTR with a mutated miR-128a binding site (Mut) was co-transfected with miR-128a (black bar) or a scrambled miRNA control (CON) expression plasmid (white bar) into 293T cells. Forty-eight hours after transfection, luciferase assay was performed. The transfection of miR-128a overexpression vector significantly inhibited the levels of luciferase activity in cells that were transfected with 3′ UTR-pGL2 construct of individual genes, whereas it had no effect when cells were transfected with mutated 3′ UTR-pGL2 and miR-128a.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    miR-128a negatively regulates myoblast proliferation through targeting of IRS1. (A) Myoblasts, where miR-128a is overexpressed or inhibited, were seeded at the same number (10,000 cells per well in a 48-well culture plate) and then counted every 2 days for 8 days. Overexpression of miR-128a repressed myoblast proliferation compared with scrambled control (CON), whereas inhibition of miR-128 promoted proliferation of myoblasts, indicating that miR-128a is the regulator of cell proliferation in myoblasts. Values are represented as mean±s.e. (n = 3). (B) Immunostaining with phospho-histone-H3 antibody (H3-P), which is a mitosis marker. Myoblasts cultured in growth medium were stained with H3-P antibody and the number of H3-P-positive cells was counted. The ratio of H3-P-positive cells to total nuclei was significantly lower in myoblasts where miR-128a is overexpressed than in control myoblasts, whereas anti miR-128-containing myoblasts had more H3-P-positive cells in comparison with control or miR-128-overexpressed myoblasts. This would indicate that myoblast proliferation is regulated by miR-128a expression levels. Values are represented as mean±s.e. (n = 4). Scale bar: 50 µm. (C,D) Protein levels in genes related to insulin signaling during myoblast proliferation indicated that miR-128a induced the decline of IRS1 and phospho-Akt levels, and the elevation of p21 protein levels. All quantitative results are normalized by GAPDH, and are shown as mean±s.e. from three independent experiments. (E) Effect of miR-128a on the expression of myogenic transcriptional factors (Pax7, Myf5, MyoD and Myogenin) during myoblast proliferation. The levels of myogenic factors were slightly elevated by expression of the anti miR-128, although not significantly. These transcription factors were not affected by miR-128a overexpression in primary myoblasts. The expression values were normalized with 18s rRNA expression, and are represented as mean±s.e. (n = 3).

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    miR-128a does not affect myoblast differentiation, but inhibition of miR-128a promotes myotube hypertrophy. (A) Primary myoblasts where miR-128a is overexpressed or inhibited were induced to differentiate with DMEM medium containing 5% horse serum for 3 days. The differentiated cells were stained with myosin heavy chain (MyHC) antibody and DAPI. The ratio of MyHC-positive cells to total nuclei (DAPI-positive cells) was quantified. There were no changes among each group during myoblast differentiation. Values are represented as mean±s.e. (n = 3). (B) Quantification of myotube formation. Three days after differentiation, the number of nuclei per myotube was calculated and it was found that overexpression of miR-128a induced smaller myotubes with fewer nuclei relative to anti miR-128a-transduced myotubes. Values are represented as mean±s.e. (n = 3). (C) Evaluation of the mRNA levels of myogenic transcriptional factors (Myf5, Pax7, MyoD and Myogenin). Five days after differentiation, total RNA was extracted from myotubes, and the RNAs were subjected to analysis with qPCR. The expression of Pax7 and MyoD in myotubes where miR-128 was suppressed was significantly reduced compared with scrambled control (CON) myotubes. The expression values were normalized with 18s rRNA expression, and are represented as mean±s.e. (n = 3). (D,E) C2C12 myoblasts transduced by anti miR-128 or scrambled miR control lentivirus vectors were induced to differentiate with DMEM medium containing 5% horse serum for 1 and 3 days, and starved with serum-free medium 24 hours before extraction of protein. The protein levels were explored by western blot analysis. Protein levels of IRS1 and Akt phosphorylation were higher in anti miR-128-transduced myotubes compared with that of control myotubes 1 day after differentiation. Three days after differentiation, the level of IRS1 was still higher in anti miR-128 myotubes than in control myotubes, although phosphorylated Akt level was slightly lower in anti miR-128 myotubes relative to that of control myotubes. All quantitative results were normalized by GAPDH, and are shown as mean±s.e. from four independent experiments. (F) C2C12 myoblasts transduced by anti miR-128 or scrambled control lentivirus vectors were induced to differentiate for 5 days, and starved with serum-free medium 24 hours before extraction of protein. The protein levels of IRS1, INSR, PIK3r1, and Akt phosphorylation were analyzed and quantified, indicating that IRS1 and phospho-Akt levels were reduced whereas INSR and PIK3r1 levels were not altered in anti miR-128-expressing myotubes. Quantitative data were normalized by GAPDH, and are shown as mean±s.e. (n = 3). (G) Inhibition of miR-128 induced myotube hypertrophy. C2C12 myoblasts transduced by anti miR-128 or scrambled control lentivirus vectors were induced to differentiate for 5 days, and then stained with myosin heavy chain (MyHC) antibody (red) and DAPI (blue). Myofiber diameter was measured and quantified. Representative data show that anti miR-128-expressing myotubes were thicker than control-expressing myotubes. Values are shown as mean±s.e. Scale bar: 50 µm.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Inhibition of miR-128 with minicircle vector increases skeletal muscle mass and fiber size. (A) C57BL/6 wild type mice were intravenously injected with 50 µg of minicircle vectors, which have the H1 promoter with anti miR-128 or scrambled miRNA, every 4 days, and each animal was analyzed for body weight. The results indicated that the body weight of anti miR-128-transduced mice was heavier than control (CON) mice. Values are shown as mean±s.e. (n = 4). (B) Thirty-five days after first injection, muscles from mice where anti miR-128 or scrambled miRNA was transduced via minicircle were isolated and each muscle was weighed. The results indicate that the volume of muscles was increased in anti miR-128-transduced mice in comparison with control mice. Values are represented as mean±s.e. (n = 3). (C) The expression levels of miR-128a target genes in the GA muscle from mice where anti miR-128 or scrambled miRNA was transduced were investigated by qPCR. The expression levels of miR-128a targets were elevated in anti miR-128-transduced muscle relative to control muscle, indicating that the expression of miR-128a targets was effectively promoted by anti miR-128 minicircle vector injection in vivo. Values are shown as mean±s.e. (n = 4). (D) QC muscles were isolated 35 days after first injection, sectioned and then stained with H&E. Images show representative H&E staining of QC muscle from mice where anti miR-128 (right) or scrambled miRNA (left) was transduced. The graph shows the frequency distribution of muscle fiber diameter, revealing that transduction of anti miR-128 via minicircles promoted muscle hypertrophy in QC muscles. Values are shown as mean±s.e. (n = 3). Scale bar: 100 µm. (E) Expression levels of Myh7 (MyHC type I slow), Myh2 (MyHC type IIa), Myh1 (MyHC type IIx) and Myh4 (MyHC type IIb) in GA muscles were quantified by qPCR, revealing that there were no differences between anti miR-128- or scrambled miRNA-transduced mice. The expression values were normalized with 18s rRNA expression, and are represented as mean±s.e. (n = 3).

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    TNF-α decreases miR-128a expression, and promotes myoblast proliferation through the elevation of IRS1. (A) Primary myoblasts and C2C12 myoblasts cultured in growth medium were treated with TNF-α (TNFa) (20 ng/ml) for 24 hours. Total RNAs containing miRNAs were extracted from TNF-α-treated C2C12 myoblasts, and then subjected to analysis of the miR-128a levels by qPCR. This analysis revealed that miR-128a expression was suppressed by TNF-α. The expression values were normalized with U6 expression, and are represented as mean±s.e. (n = 3). (B) Primary myoblasts in growth medium were treated with TNF-α (20 ng/ml) for 3 days, stained with phospho-histone H3 (H3-P) antibody and DAPI, and the number of H3-P-positive cells calculated. The ratio of H3-P-positive cells to total nuclei was significantly increased in TNF-α-treated myoblasts than in control (CON) myoblasts, indicating that TNF-α promoted myoblast proliferation. Values are represented as mean±s.e. (n = 3). Scale bar: 50 µm. (C) The protein levels of miR-128a targets (IRS1, INSR and PIK3r1), Akt and p21 in myoblasts, which were treated with/without TNF-α for 3 days, were evaluated by western blot analysis, revealing that the expression levels of IRS1 and the level of Akt phosphorylation were increased in myoblasts treated with TNF-α in comparison with non-treated myoblasts. (D) C2C12 myotubes, which were induced to differentiate for 5 days and then cultured with serum-free medium supplemented with or without TNF-α (20 ng/ml) for 24 hours. Total RNAs were extracted from TNF-α-treated C2C12 myotubes, and then subjected to analysis of the miR-128a levels by qPCR. This analysis indicated that miR-128a expression was suppressed by TNF-α in C2C12 myotubes. The expression values were normalized with U6 expression, and are represented as mean±s.e. (n = 3). (E,F) The protein levels of miR-128a targets (IRS1, INSR, PDK1 and PIK3r1) and Akt in C2C12 myotubes, which were treated with or without TNF-α, were explored by western blot analysis. The results of western blot analysis were quantified, suggesting that the expression levels of IRS1, PIK3r1 and Akt phosphorylation were increased in C2C12 myotubes treated with TNF-α relative to non-treated myotubes. Quantitative data were normalized by GAPDH, and are shown as mean±s.e. MiR-128a was overexpressed by using a lentivirus vector, and myoblasts were induced to differentiate in differentiation medium for 5 days. MiR-128a-overexpressing myotubes were cultured with serum-free medium supplemented with or without TNF-α (20 ng/ml) for 24 hours, and then were evaluated for miR-128a expression by qPCR. The results show that miR-128a levels were not affected by TNF-α treatment in miR-128a-overexpressing myotubes. The expression values were normalized with U6 expression, and are represented as mean±s.e. (n = 3). (H) Western blot analysis to verify the protein levels of IRS1, PIK3r1 and phosphorylated Akt was performed in miR-128a-overexpressing myotubes that were cultured with serum-free medium supplemented with or without TNF-α for 24 hours. The results indicated that there was no effect on miR-128a-overexpressing myotubes of TNF-α treatment, revealing that the elevation of IRS1, PIK3r1 and phosphorylated Akt levels by TNF-α treatment was mediated by the decline of miR-128a expression. (I) Schematic protocol of the experiment. C2C12 myoblasts were induced into myotubes with differentiation medium for 2 days, and then myotubes were cultured under the differentiation condition with or without TNF-α (20 ng/ml). Three days after TNF-α treatment, myotubes were stained with myosin heavy chain (MyHC) antibody (green), and myofiber diameter was measured and quantified. Represented data show that TNF-α-treated myotubes were thicker than control myotubes. Values are shown as mean±s.e. Scale bar: 50 µm. (J) The protein levels of IRS1, INSR, PIK3r1 and Akt in myotubes, which were treated with or without TNF-α for 1 and 5 days, were evaluated by western blot analysis, revealing that protein levels of IRS1 and Akt phosphorylation were higher in myotubes treated with TNF-α compared with control myotubes 1 day after differentiation. Five days after treatment, IRS1 level in TNF-α-treated myotubes had declined to the same level as that in control myotubes, and phospho-Akt levels were reduced whereas INSR and PIK3r1 levels were not altered in TNF-α-treated myotubes. All quantitative results were normalized by GAPDH, and are shown as mean±s.e. from four independent experiments. (K) A model for the regulatory network involving miR-128a and IRS/Akt signaling in myogenesis. The model proposes that TNF-α regulates IRS1, PIK3r1 and phosphorylation of Akt levels through miR-128a.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Keywords

  • Muscle satellite cell
  • MicroRNA
  • Cell proliferation
  • Insulin signalling
  • Muscular dystrophy

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Cell Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Regulation of IRS1/Akt insulin signaling by microRNA-128a during myogenesis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Cell Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Cell Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
Regulation of IRS1/Akt insulin signaling by microRNA-128a during myogenesis
Norio Motohashi, Matthew S. Alexander, Yuko Shimizu-Motohashi, Jennifer A. Myers, Genri Kawahara, Louis M. Kunkel
Journal of Cell Science 2013 126: 2678-2691; doi: 10.1242/jcs.119966
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Regulation of IRS1/Akt insulin signaling by microRNA-128a during myogenesis
Norio Motohashi, Matthew S. Alexander, Yuko Shimizu-Motohashi, Jennifer A. Myers, Genri Kawahara, Louis M. Kunkel
Journal of Cell Science 2013 126: 2678-2691; doi: 10.1242/jcs.119966

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • Summary
    • Introduction
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Histone chaperone APLF level dictates the implantation of mouse embryos
  • Switching between blebbing and lamellipodia depends on the degree of non-muscle myosin II activity
  • Kindlin-2 promotes rear focal adhesion disassembly and directional persistence during cell migration
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

2020 at The Company of Biologists

Despite the challenges of 2020, we were able to bring a number of long-term projects and new ventures to fruition. While we look forward to a new year, join us as we reflect on the triumphs of the last 12 months.


Mole – The Corona Files

"This is not going to go away, 'like a miracle.' We have to do magic. And I know we can."

Mole continues to offer his wise words to researchers on how to manage during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Cell scientist to watch – Christine Faulkner

In an interview, Christine Faulkner talks about where her interest in plant science began, how she found the transition between Australia and the UK, and shares her thoughts on virtual conferences.


Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

“The clear advantages are rapid and efficient exposure and easy access to my article around the world. I believe it is great to have this publishing option in fast-growing fields in biomedical research.”

Dr Jaceques Behmoaras (Imperial College London) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 60 institutions in 12 countries taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


JCS and COVID-19

For more information on measures Journal of Cell Science is taking to support the community during the COVID-19 pandemic, please see here.

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hestiate to contact the Editorial Office.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Journal of Cell Science
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Fast-track manuscripts
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • JCS Prize
  • Manuscript transfer network
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contacts

  • Contact JCS
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992