Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Cell Science
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Cell Science

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS   Twitter  Facebook   YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
Short Report
CLIP-170 recruits PLK1 to kinetochores during early mitosis for chromosome alignment
Mohammed Abdullahel Amin, Go Itoh, Kenji Iemura, Masanori Ikeda, Kozo Tanaka
Journal of Cell Science 2014 127: 2818-2824; doi: 10.1242/jcs.150755
Mohammed Abdullahel Amin
Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University, 4-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8575, Miyagi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mabmain@yahoo.com k.tanaka@idac.tohoku.ac.jp
Go Itoh
Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University, 4-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8575, Miyagi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenji Iemura
Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University, 4-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8575, Miyagi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masanori Ikeda
Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University, 4-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8575, Miyagi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kozo Tanaka
Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University, 4-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8575, Miyagi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mabmain@yahoo.com k.tanaka@idac.tohoku.ac.jp
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The cytoplasmic linker protein (CLIP)-170, an outer kinetochore protein, has a role in kinetochore–microtubule attachment and chromosome alignment during mitosis. However, the mechanism by which CLIP-170 is involved in chromosome alignment is not known. Here, we show that CLIP-170 colocalizes with Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) at kinetochores during early mitosis. Depletion of CLIP-170 results in a significant reduction in PLK1 recruitment to kinetochores and causes kinetochore-fiber (K-fiber) instability and defects in chromosome alignment at the metaphase plate. These phenotypes are dependent on the phosphorylation of CLIP-170 at a CDK1-dependent site, T287, as ectopic expression of wild-type CLIP-170, but not the expression of a non-phosphorylatable mutant, CLIP-170-T287A, restores PLK1 localization at kinetochores and rescues K-fiber stability and chromosome alignment in CLIP-170-depleted cells. These data suggest that CLIP-170 acts as a novel recruiter and spatial regulator of PLK1 at kinetochores during early mitosis, promoting K-fiber stability and chromosome alignment for error-free chromosome segregation.

INTRODUCTION

During cell division, faithful chromosome segregation is dependent on the efficient and correct formation of kinetochore–microtubule (KT–MT) attachments on the mitotic spindle, which facilitate the progress of chromosome alignment (Tanaka et al., 2005; Tanaka, 2012; Tanaka, 2013). Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) is a key regulator of mitotic division (Strebhardt, 2010). Disruption of PLK1 activity, either by RNAi or by chemical inhibition, prevents the formation of stable KT–MT attachments, leading to defects in chromosome alignment (Sumara et al., 2004; Hanisch et al., 2006; Peters et al., 2006; Lénárt et al., 2007; Petronczki et al., 2007). A more recent study has shown that PLK1 accumulates at kinetochores to stabilize the initial KT–MT attachments during prometaphase by suppressing kinetochore-microtubule dynamics, and that its levels decline markedly at kinetochores during metaphase, thus allowing stable kinetochore-microtubules to become dynamic (Liu et al., 2012).

Cytoplasmic linker protein (CLIP)-170, a microtubule plus-end-tracking and outer kinetochore protein, plays an essential role in mitosis (Dujardin et al., 1998; Wieland et al., 2004; Tanenbaum et al., 2006). Depletion of CLIP-170 in human cells leads to a mitotic block and defects in chromosome alignment (Wieland et al., 2004), due to a failure in the formation of KT–MT attachments (Tanenbaum et al., 2006). Thus, CLIP-170 has an important role in mitotic progression. CLIP-170 interacts with, and is directly phosphorylated by, PLK1 at its N-terminal region and casein kinase 2 (CK2) at its C-terminal region. Both phosphorylation events are required for the dynactin-dependent kinetochore localization of CLIP-170 and the formation of KT–MT attachments (Li et al., 2010). Moreover, CLIP-170 is phosphorylated on T287 by cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) – an event that is essential for cell cycle progression (Yang et al., 2009). However, the mechanism of the role of CLIP-170 in chromosome alignment remains unknown. Here, we report that CLIP-170 functions in chromosome alignment by recruiting PLK1 to kinetochores during early mitosis and, in turn, by stabilizing kinetochore (K)-fibers – functions that are both mediated by phosphorylation of its CDK1-dependent site, T287.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

CLIP-170 promotes the localization of PLK1 at kinetochores during early mitosis, and their localization is interdependent

Live-cell imaging showed that CLIP-170 fused with mCherry appeared at kinetochores during early mitosis and disappeared from kinetochores immediately after KT–MT attachment (supplementary material Fig. S1A; Movie 1). Immunofluorescence of fixed cells showed that a strong kinetochore-associated CLIP-170 signal appeared in early mitosis and declined markedly during metaphase (supplementary material Fig. S1B,C). Immunofluorescence data also showed that CLIP-170 colocalized with PLK1 during prometaphase (Fig. 1A). Depletion of CLIP-170, confirmed by both western blotting and immunostaining (supplementary material Fig. S2A–C), caused a significant reduction in the amount of PLK1 recruitment to kinetochores compared with that observed during prometaphase, and even metaphase, in mock-treated cells (Fig. 1B,D). However, total PLK1 levels were unaffected (supplementary material Fig. S3A,B). This reduction in PLK1 recruitment to kinetochores was independent of microtubule attachment, as the level of kinetochore-associated PLK1 was also significantly reduced in CLIP-170-depleted nocodazole-treated cells compared with that of mock-treated cells (Fig. 1C,E). Furthermore, the level of CLIP-170 localization at kinetochores was also reduced in cells treated with nocodazole and a PLK1 inhibitor (Fig. 1F,G), consistent with a previous report (Tanenbaum et al., 2006). These data indicate that the localization of CLIP-170 and PLK1 at kinetochores is interdependent during early mitosis.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

CLIP-170 recruits PLK1 to kinetochores during early mitosis in HeLa cells. (A) HeLa cells were immunostained for PLK1 (red) and CLIP-170 (green). Mock- and CLIP-170-depleted cells were immunostained for PLK1 (red) and GFP–CENP-A (green) under physiological conditions (B) and in the presence of nocodazole (C). (D,E) Quantification of PLK1 intensity at kinetochores in cells from B and C, respectively. PM, prometaphase; Met, metaphase. (F) Cells treated with nocodazole and the PLK1 inhibitor BI2536 were immunostained for CLIP-170 (red) and GFP–CENP-A (green). (G) Quantification of CLIP-170 intensity at kinetochores in cells from F. (H) Mock- and CLIP-170-depleted cells treated with nocodazole were immunostained for CENP-E (red) and GFP–CENP-A (green). In all microscopy images, white boxes indicate the regions enlarged to the right of the image. DNA was counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bars: 5 µm. (I) Quantification of CENP-E intensity at kinetochores in cells from H. A.U., arbitrary units; KT, kinetochore. All quantitative data show the mean±s.e.m. (three independent experiments, ∼100 kinetochores were quantified for ≥5 cells per condition); *P<0.05; **P<0.01 (two-tailed t-test).

As several kinetochore-associated proteins, such as centromere protein E (CENP-E), depend on PLK1 for their localization at kinetochores (Ahonen et al., 2005), we checked whether CENP-E intensity at kinetochores was affected upon CLIP-170 depletion. Immunofluorescence data showed that kinetochore-associated CENP-E intensity was significantly reduced in nocodazole-treated and CLIP-170-depleted cells, compared with mock-treated cells (Fig. 1H,I). However, the total CENP-E levels remained unaffected by CLIP-170 depletion (supplementary material Fig. S3A,B). Kinetochore localization of two other outer kinetochore proteins, Hec1 (also known as NDC80) and BubR1 (also known as BUB1B), was not affected in CLIP-170-depleted cells, showing that outer kinetochore structure per se has not been altered (supplementary material Fig. S3C,D). By contrast, the kinetochore localization of CLIP-170 remained unchanged in CENP-E-depleted cells (supplementary material Fig. S3F,G). These data indicate that CLIP-170 is important for the localization of CENP-E at kinetochores.

The effect of the depletion of CLIP-170 on the kinetochore localization of PLK1 during early mitosis was confirmed by live-cell imaging analyses of HeLa cells expressing H2B–mCherry and YFP–PLK1 (Fig. 2A,B). In mock-treated cells, the kinetochore-associated PLK1 signal was strong from the time of nuclear envelope breakdown (NEBD) until the initial formation of bipolar spindles (∼8 minutes), and then the signal declined (Fig. 2A; supplementary material Movie 2). By contrast, in CLIP-170-depleted cells, the kinetochore-associated PLK1 signal was lower starting from NEBD, although the PLK1 signal at the centrosomes and nuclear envelope remained unchanged (Fig. 2B; supplementary material Movie 3). These data indicate that CLIP-170 is crucial for PLK1 localization at kinetochores during early mitosis. The reason why the kinetochore localization of PLK1 is already reduced at NEBD, when CLIP-170 does not localize to kinetochores, is currently unknown.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Observation of PLK1 localization in HeLa cells during early mitosis by live-cell imaging. (A,B) Selected frames of videos from HeLa cells stably expressing H2B–mCherry (lower panels) and YFP–PLK1 (upper panels) under mock (A) and CLIP-170-RNAi (B) conditions. Images were captured at 1-minute intervals for 30 minutes. The time (in minutes) from the first image capture is shown at the upper-right corner of each image. Scale bars: 5 µm.

PLK1 recruitment to kinetochores is dependent on CDK1 phosphorylation of CLIP-170 at T287

CDK1 interacts with CLIP-170 and phosphorylates it on T287, and this is essential for cell cycle progression (Yang et al., 2009). A series of elegant studies has demonstrated that, by phosphorylating proteins, CDK1 generates PLK1-docking sites in early mitosis when CDK1 activity is high (Elia et al., 2003a; Elia et al., 2003b; Barr et al., 2004). Because the binding of PLK1 to substrates in early mitosis is often dependent on priming phosphorylation mediated by CDK1 (Kang et al., 2006; Qi et al., 2006), we checked whether the non-phosphorylatable mCherry–CLIP-170-T287A mutant influenced the recruitment of PLK1 to kinetochores in early mitosis. Rescue experiments and immunofluorescence data showed that wild-type mCherry-tagged CLIP-170 (mCherry–CLIP-170-WT), but not the mCherry–CLIP-170-T287A mutant, rescued the localization of PLK1 at kinetochores in CLIP-170-depleted cells (Fig. 3B,C). Kinetochore localization of mCherry–CLIP-170-T287A, which cannot be efficiently bound or phosphorylated by PLK1, was also reduced, compared with that of mCherry–CLIP-170-WT (Fig. 3D,E). This is consistent with the reduction in the kinetochore localization of CLIP-170 in PLK1-inhibited cells. Western blotting analyses demonstrated the efficiency of CLIP-170 depletion and the expression of RNAi-resistant rescue constructs (Fig. 3A). As CLIP-170 interacts with PLK1 in early mitosis (Li et al., 2010), we further tested whether this interaction was affected in cells expressing the non-phosphorylatable mCherry–CLIP-170-T287A mutant. Immunoprecipitation and western blot data showed that mCherry–CLIP-170-WT, but not the mCherry–CLIP-170-T287A mutant, could interact with PLK1 in cells arrested in mitosis (Fig. 3F). This interaction is thought to be through the Polo-box domain (PBD) in PLK1, as CLIP-170 was co-immunoprecipitated with FLAG-tagged wild-type PBD, but not with its binding-deficient mutant (Fig. 3G; Oshimori et al., 2006). The sequence context of T287 in CLIP-170 (STT287P) partially satisfies the optimal sequence motif recognized by the PBD, which is Ser-[pSer/pThr]-[Pro/X]. These data suggest that PLK1 recruitment to kinetochores is dependent on CLIP-170 phosphorylation on the CDK1-dependent site, T287, during early mitosis. We also found that the reduced kinetochore localization of CENP-E was restored by expression of wild-type CLIP-170, but not by that of the T287A mutant (supplementary material Fig. S3E). It has been reported that kinetochore localization of two other microtubule plus-end-tracking proteins, CLASP1 and CLASP2, is dependent on CENP-E (Maffini et al., 2009). Consistent with this, the kinetochore localization of CLASP1 and CLASP2 was also reduced in CLIP-170-depleted cells, and this was rescued by expressing wild-type CLIP-170, but not by the expression of the T287A mutant (supplementary material Fig. S3H,I). As CLASP2 has also been reported to recruit PLK1 to kinetochores (Maia et al., 2012), CLIP-170 might recruit PLK1 to kinetochores both directly and also indirectly through the recruitment of CLASP2.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

The interaction with PLK1 and its recruitment to kinetochores are affected in cells expressing the CLIP-170-T287A mutant. (A) Western blotting for the RNAi-resistant constructs. α-tubulin was used as a loading control. (B) HeLa cells expressing mCherry (Vector), mCherry–CLIP-170-WT (WT) or mCherry–CLIP-170-T287A mutant (T287A) were immunostained for PLK1 (green) and mCherry (red) and counterstained for DNA with DAPI (blue). (C) Quantification of PLK1 signal intensity in cells from B. (D) HeLa cells expressing mCherry–CLIP-170-WT or the mCherry–CLIP-170-T287A mutant were immunostained for GFP–CENP-A (green) and mCherry (red) and counterstained for DNA with DAPI (blue). White boxes indicate the regions enlarged to the right of the image. Scale bars: 5 µm. (E) Quantification of mCherry–CLIP-170 intensity at kinetochores in cells from D. A.U., arbitrary units; KT, kinetochore. All quantitative data show the mean±s.e.m. (three independent experiments, ∼100 kinetochores were quantified for ≥5 cells per condition); **P<0.01 (Mann–Whitney test). (F) Western blotting (IB) analysis of extracts from mitotic-shake-off cells expressing mCherry–CLIP-170, including whole-cell extract (WCE, 10% input) and immunoprecipitates (IP) obtained by incubation with a nonspecific IgG or an anti-mCherry antibody. (G) Extracts from cells expressing FLAG–PBD-WT or FLAG–PBD-mt (H538A, K540M) as well as mCherry–CLIP-170 were subjected to immunoprecipitation with nonspecific IgG or anti-FLAG antibody, followed by western blotting analysis (WCE, 10% input).

CLIP-170 phosphorylation on a CDK1-dependent site, T287, is required for K-fiber stability and chromosome alignment

Knockdown of CLIP-170 causes defects in KT–MT attachment and chromosome alignment in human cells (supplementary material Fig. S2C; Tanenbaum et al., 2006). We confirmed that the formation of cold-stable K-fibers was compromised in CLIP-170-depleted cells in nocodazole-washout assays (supplementary material Fig. S4). To test whether CLIP-170 phosphorylation on T287 might play a role in KT–MT attachment, we examined the stability of K-fibers during cold treatment using an approach described previously (Itoh et al., 2011; Itoh et al., 2013). Immunofluorescence data showed that cells expressing mCherry–CLIP-170-T287A had unstable K-fibers and unattached chromosomes, whereas cells expressing mCherry–CLIP-170-WT had robust and stable K-fibers after cold treatment (Fig. 4A,B). These data suggest that CLIP-170 phosphorylation on T287 is required for the formation of stable K-fibers.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Expression of the CLIP-170-T287A mutant reduces K-fiber stability at the metaphase plate and causes defects in chromosome alignment. (A) HeLa cells that were depleted of CLIP-170 and transfected with the indicated vectors after cold treatment were immunostained for α-tubulin (green) and mCherry (red), and DNA was counterstained with DAPI (blue). White arrowheads, misaligned and unattached chromosomes. (B) Quantification of the cold-stable K-fibers at the metaphase plate in cells from A. (C) The defect in chromosome alignment is rescued by mCherry–CLIP-170-WT but not by the mCherry–CLIP-170-T287A mutant. The data show the mean±s.e.m. (three independent experiments, n≥10 cells for each experiment for B, n≥200 mitotic cells expressing mCherry signal for C); nsP>0.05; **P<0.01 (Mann–Whitney test). (D) Selected frames from live-cell imaging of mitotic HeLa cells depleted of CLIP-170 and expressing the indicated vectors. The time (in minutes) from the first image capture is shown in the upper-right corner of each image. Scale bars: 5 µm. (E) Model for the roles of CLIP-170 during early mitosis.

Next, we examined whether the phosphorylation of CLIP-170 on T287 had an essential function in chromosome alignment. In the presence of the proteasome inhibitor MG132, the defects in chromosome alignment at the metaphase plate were rescued in >60% of cells expressing mCherry–CLIP-170-WT; approximately similar to results from mock-treated cells (>70%; Fig. 4C). By contrast, in total, ∼60% of mitotic cells expressing the mCherry–CLIP170-T287A mutant had misaligned chromosomes (Fig. 4C). We further confirmed the data obtained from fixed cells by using live-cell imaging analyses. HeLa cells expressing mCherry–CLIP-170-WT underwent chromosome alignment and segregation within a standard period (∼30 minutes for alignment), whereas cells expressing the mCherry–CLIP-170-T287A mutant could not align chromosomes even after 3 hours of recording (Fig. 4D; supplementary material Movies 4–6). Thus, it can be concluded that the phosphorylation of CLIP-170 on the CDK1-dependent site, T287, is required for chromosome alignment.

Our data show that CLIP-170 is required for targeting PLK1 to kinetochores during early mitosis, and they thus reveal a mechanism by which the loss of CLIP-170 induces defects in the stability of the KT–MT attachments and in chromosome alignment. We propose the following model to explain the roles of CLIP-170 phosphorylation during early mitosis (Fig. 4E). After entry into mitosis, CDK1 activity is high, and it induces phosphorylation of CLIP-170 and other mitotic proteins, such as Bub1 (Qi et al., 2006), INCENP (Goto et al., 2006), MCAK (also known as KIF2C) (Rosasco-Nitcher et al., 2008) and CLASP2 (Maia et al., 2012). Then, PLK1 interacts with phosphorylated (phospho)-CLIP-170, followed by recruitment of the resulting PLK1–phospho-CLIP-170 complex to outer kinetochores through dynactin (Li et al., 2010). PLK1 in the complex possibly phosphorylates CLIP-170 at S195, which is required for the kinetochore localization of CLIP-170 (Li et al., 2010). The primary candidate for regulation by the PLK1 that is recruited to kinetochores through CLIP-170 is CLIP-170 itself. CLIP-170 is thought to facilitate KT–MT attachment by binding to microtubules through its N-terminus, which contains cytoskeleton-associated protein-glycine-rich (CAP-Gly) domains (Tanenbaum et al., 2006). Recently, it was reported that PLK1 also phosphorylates CLIP-170 at S312, which regulates the binding of CLIP-170 to microtubules and is pivotal for chromosome alignment (Kakeno et al., 2014). Therefore, PLK1 recruitment by CLIP-170 is expected to promote KT–MT attachment directly through CLIP-170 by regulating the kinetochore localization and microtubule-binding activity of the latter. Other nearby molecules, e.g. CENP-E, might also be regulated by CLIP-170 through PLK1 recruitment to kinetochores. As CENP-E (a microtubule-dependent plus-end-directed motor protein) is known to be essential for stable KT–MT interactions, as well as for aligning chromosomes that localize close to spindle poles to the metaphase plate (Wood et al., 1997; Kapoor et al., 2006; Kim et al., 2008; Kim et al., 2010; Cai et al., 2009), it might cooperate with CLIP-170 to facilitate the formation of KT–MT attachments.

Localized PLK1 activity is essential for the formation of stable KT–MT attachments and for chromosome alignment (Sumara et al., 2004; Hanisch et al., 2006; Matsumura et al., 2007). Therefore, it is not surprising that the kinetochore localization of PLK1 is regulated by multiple factors, as is already known (Qi et al., 2006; Kang et al., 2006; Nishino et al., 2006; Maia et al., 2012; Yeh et al., 2013). In this study, we have revealed a further layer of the elaborate network that regulates PLK1 function. Interestingly, CLIP-170 might contribute to the efficient recruitment of PLK1 to kinetochores not only directly but also indirectly, by recruiting CLASP2 to kinetochores. Residual PLK1 signal on kinetochores in CLIP-170-depleted cells might represent the contribution of other pathways of PLK1 recruitment to kinetochores. The relative contributions of different pathways for PLK1 recruitment to kinetochores to facilitate KT–MT attachment and chromosome alignment will be an important topic for future studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell culture and drug treatments

HeLa cells were grown at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere under 5% CO2, in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. Nocodazole (2 µM) and MG132 (10 µM) were used to arrest cells in prometaphase and metaphase, respectively. The PLK1 inhibitor BI2536 was used at 100 nM for 1 hour.

Plasmid construction

The cDNA coding for human CLIP-170 was PCR-amplified from a MegaManTM library (Agilent). The PCR product for CLIP-170 was subcloned into the pmCherry-C1 (Clontech) expression vector. The RNAi-resistant vectors, such as those encoding mCherry–CLIP-170-WT and mCherry–CLIP-170-T287A, were prepared using the vector encoding mCherry–CLIP-170 as a template vector.

Antibodies

The following primary antibodies were used for immunofluorescence: rabbit anti-CLIP-170 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), mouse and rabbit anti-α-tubulin (Sigma-Aldrich), mouse anti-PLK1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), rabbit anti-GFP (Invitrogen), rabbit anti-CLASP1 (Epitomics), rabbit anti-CLASP2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), mouse anti-mCherry (Clontech), rabbit anti-mCherry (Abnova), mouse anti-CENP-E (Abcam), rabbit anti-BubR1 (Novus), mouse anti-Hec1 (Abcam) and mouse anti-FLAG (Sigma-Aldrich).

RNAi and rescue experiments

The targeted sequences for human CLIP-170 and CENP-E were 5′-AUUUCUAGCAGCAUGGACUGUUCCC-3′ and 5′-UUAUAUUACAGCCUUCCUUGAGCCG-3′, respectively (Invitrogen). HeLa cells were transfected with 150 nM duplexed siRNA by using RNAi MAX (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. As a control, a mock transfection reaction was performed using H2O instead of siRNA oligonucleotides. Cells were prepared for analysis after 72 hours of transfection. For rescue assays, RNAi-resistant CLIP-170 constructs, prepared by introducing six silent mutations using the Mutagenesis Basal Kit (Takara), were transfected into cells after 24 hours of siRNA transfection using Lipofectamine 2000 (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Cells were prepared for analysis after 48 hours of plasmid transfection.

Immunofluorescence

HeLa cells fixed in cold methanol or 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature were blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS, and incubated with the specified primary antibodies at a dilution of 1∶300 (see ‘Antibodies’, above). The primary antibodies were detected by using Alexa-Fluor-labeled secondary antibodies at a dilution of 1∶500 (Molecular Probes), and DNA was counterstained with 1 mg/ml DAPI. Analyses of cold-stable microtubules were performed as reported previously (Itoh et al., 2011; Itoh et al., 2013).

Image acquisition and analysis

Image acquisition was performed on a DeltaVision Personal DV microscope (Applied Precision) equipped with a camera (CoolSNAP HQ2, Photometrics) and a 100× or 60× NA 1.40 Plan Apochromat objective lens (Olympus), and SoftWoRx acquisition software (Applied Precision). For fixed-cell experiments, images were acquired as z-stacks at 0.2-µm intervals. To measure the fluorescence intensity, we selected manually and measured individual kinetochores by quantification of the pixel gray levels of the focused z plane in a region of interest (ROI) using ImageJ (NIH). After subtracting the background, which was measured outside of the ROI, intensities were averaged over all kinetochores in a single cell. The average intensity was normalized to the expression level by dividing by the peak intensity for that cell. For the measurement of K-fiber intensity, we converted identically scaled images into TIFF files, selected ROIs at the equatorial position of the metaphase plate and measured microtubule intensity as described above. For live-cell imaging, HeLa cells, grown in chambered coverslips (Thermo Fisher Scientific), were imaged at 24 or 48 hours after DNA transfection in Leibovitz's L-15 medium (Invitrogen), supplemented with 20% FBS and 20 mM HEPES pH 7.0 at 37°C within an environmental chamber (Precision Control). Z-stacks were collected at 0.8–1.2-µm intervals every 1–6 minutes. All images represent maximum-intensity projections of all z planes. All images and movies presented were processed in ImageJ, and the statistical tests performed are specified in the figure legends.

Immunoprecipitation and western blotting

Cell lysates were prepared with lysis buffer [20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 20 mM β-glycerophosphate, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.1% NP-40, 5% glycerol, 30 µg/ml DNase, 30 µg/ml RNase, complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche) and complete phosphatase inhibitor (Nacalai Tesque)]. Western blotting was performed as described previously (Itoh, et al., 2013). For immunoprecipitation assays, pre-cleared native protein extracts (1 mg of total protein) were incubated overnight with mouse anti-mCherry at a dilution of 1∶100 (Clontech) or mouse nonspecific IgG at a dilution of 1∶100, followed by incubation with 40 µl of anti-mouse-IgG magnetic Dynabeads (Invitrogen) for 2 hours at 4°C. After washing three times with lysis buffer and once with cold PBS, precipitated proteins were eluted by boiling for 5 minutes in 2× SDS sample buffer and were then analyzed by electrophoresis and western blotting.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Kensaku Mizuno (Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan) for YFP-PLK1 construct, Miho Ohsugi (University of Tokyo, Japan) for FLAG-PBD constructs and Aoi Harata (Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan) for technical assistance.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    The authors declare no competing interests.

  • Author contributions

    M.A.A. and K.T. designed the study. M.A.A. performed the experiments and analyzed the data. M.A.A. wrote the paper. G.I. prepared some constructs; K.I. and M.I. prepared some parts of the microscopy data. K.T. supervised and revised all experimental data and the entire manuscript.

  • Funding

    This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research and Japan Society for the Promotion of Science fellows from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan; and grants from the Mitsubishi Foundation; the Naito Foundation; Takeda Science Foundation; Princess Takamatsu Cancer Research Fund [grant number 10-24210]; Daiichi-Sankyo Foundation of Life Science; and Gonryo Medical Foundation.

  • Supplementary material available online at http://jcs.biologists.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1242/jcs.150755/-/DC1

  • Received January 29, 2014.
  • Accepted April 8, 2014.
  • © 2014. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd

References

  1. ↵
    1. Ahonen, L. J.,
    2. Kallio, M. J.,
    3. Daum, J. R.,
    4. Bolton, M.,
    5. Manke, I. A.,
    6. Yaffe, M. B.,
    7. Stukenberg, P. T. and
    8. Gorbsky, G. J.
    (2005). Polo-like kinase 1 creates the tension-sensing 3F3/2 phosphoepitope and modulates the association of spindle-checkpoint proteins at kinetochores. Curr. Biol. 15, 1078–1089. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.05.026
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Barr, F. A.,
    2. Silljé, H. H. and
    3. Nigg, E. A.
    (2004). Polo-like kinases and the orchestration of cell division. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 429–441. doi:10.1038/nrm1401
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Cai, S.,
    2. O'Connell, C. B.,
    3. Khodjakov, A. and
    4. Walczak, C. E.
    (2009). Chromosome congression in the absence of kinetochore fibres. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 832–838. doi:10.1038/ncb1890
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Dujardin, D.,
    2. Wacker, U. I.,
    3. Moreau, A.,
    4. Schroer, T. A.,
    5. Rickard, J. E. and
    6. De Mey, J. R.
    (1998). Evidence for a role of CLIP-170 in the establishment of metaphase chromosome alignment. J. Cell Biol. 141, 849–862. doi:10.1083/jcb.141.4.849
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Elia, A. E.,
    2. Rellos, P.,
    3. Haire, L. F.,
    4. Chao, J. W.,
    5. Ivins, F. J.,
    6. Hoepker, K.,
    7. Mohammad, D.,
    8. Cantley, L. C.,
    9. Smerdon, S. J. and
    10. Yaffe, M. B.
    (2003a). The molecular basis for phosphodependent substrate targeting and regulation of Plks by the Polo-box domain. Cell 115, 83–95. doi:10.1016/S0092--8674(03)00725--6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Elia, A. E.,
    2. Cantley, L. C. and
    3. Yaffe, M. B.
    (2003b). Proteomic screen finds pSer/pThr-binding domain localizing Plk1 to mitotic substrates. Science 299, 1228–1231. doi:10.1126/science.1079079
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Goto, H.,
    2. Kiyono, T.,
    3. Tomono, Y.,
    4. Kawajiri, A.,
    5. Urano, T.,
    6. Furukawa, K.,
    7. Nigg, E. A. and
    8. Inagaki, M.
    (2006). Complex formation of Plk1 and INCENP required for metaphase-anaphase transition. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 180–187. doi:10.1038/ncb1350
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    1. Hanisch, A.,
    2. Wehner, A.,
    3. Nigg, E. A. and
    4. Silljé, H. H.
    (2006). Different Plk1 functions show distinct dependencies on Polo-Box domain-mediated targeting. Mol. Biol. Cell 17, 448–459. doi:10.1091/mbc.E05--08--0801
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Itoh, G.,
    2. Kanno, S.,
    3. Uchida, K. S.,
    4. Chiba, S.,
    5. Sugino, S.,
    6. Watanabe, K.,
    7. Mizuno, K.,
    8. Yasui, A.,
    9. Hirota, T. and
    10. Tanaka, K.
    (2011). CAMP (C13orf8, ZNF828) is a novel regulator of kinetochore-microtubule attachment. EMBO J. 30, 130–144. doi:10.1038/emboj.2010.276
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Itoh, G.,
    2. Sugino, S.,
    3. Ikeda, M.,
    4. Mizuguchi, M.,
    5. Kanno, S.,
    6. Amin, M. A.,
    7. Iemura, K.,
    8. Yasui, A.,
    9. Hirota, T. and
    10. Tanaka, K.
    (2013). Nucleoporin Nup188 is required for chromosome alignment in mitosis. Cancer Sci. 104, 871–879. doi:10.1111/cas.12159
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Kakeno, M.,
    2. Matsuzawa, K.,
    3. Matsui, T.,
    4. Akita, H.,
    5. Sugiyama, I.,
    6. Ishidate, F.,
    7. Nakano, A.,
    8. Takashima, S.,
    9. Goto, H. and
    10. Inagaki, M.
    et al.(2014). Plk1 phosphorylates CLIP-170 and regulates its binding to microtubules for chromosome alignment. Cell Struct. Funct. 39, 45–59. doi:10.1247/csf.14001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Kang, Y. H.,
    2. Park, J. E.,
    3. Yu, L. R.,
    4. Soung, N. K.,
    5. Yun, S. M.,
    6. Bang, J. K.,
    7. Seong, Y. S.,
    8. Yu, H.,
    9. Garfield, S. and
    10. Veenstra, T. D.
    et al.(2006). Self-regulated Plk1 recruitment to kinetochores by the Plk1-PBIP1 interaction is critical for proper chromosome segregation. Mol. Cell 24, 409–422. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2006.10.016
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. Kapoor, T. M.,
    2. Lampson, M. A.,
    3. Hergert, P.,
    4. Cameron, L.,
    5. Cimini, D.,
    6. Salmon, E. D.,
    7. McEwen, B. F. and
    8. Khodjakov, A.
    (2006). Chromosomes can congress to the metaphase plate before biorientation. Science 311, 388–391. doi:10.1126/science.1122142
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Kim, Y.,
    2. Heuser, J. E.,
    3. Waterman, C. M. and
    4. Cleveland, D. W.
    (2008). CENP-E combines a slow, processive motor and a flexible coiled coil to produce an essential motile kinetochore tether. J. Cell Biol. 181, 411–419. doi:10.1083/jcb.200802189
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Kim, Y.,
    2. Holland, A. J.,
    3. Lan, W. and
    4. Cleveland, D. W.
    (2010). Aurora kinases and protein phosphatase 1 mediate chromosome congression through regulation of CENP-E. Cell 142, 444–455. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.039
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Lénárt, P.,
    2. Petronczki, M.,
    3. Steegmaier, M.,
    4. Di Fiore, B.,
    5. Lipp, J. J.,
    6. Hoffmann, M.,
    7. Rettig, W. J.,
    8. Kraut, N. and
    9. Peters, J. M.
    (2007). The small-molecule inhibitor BI 2536 reveals novel insights into mitotic roles of polo-like kinase 1. Curr. Biol. 17, 304–315. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.12.046
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. Li, H.,
    2. Liu, X. S.,
    3. Yang, X.,
    4. Wang, Y.,
    5. Wang, Y.,
    6. Turner, J. R. and
    7. Liu, X.
    (2010). Phosphorylation of CLIP-170 by Plk1 and CK2 promotes timely formation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments. EMBO J. 29, 2953–2965. doi:10.1038/emboj.2010.174
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    1. Liu, D.,
    2. Davydenko, O. and
    3. Lampson, M. A.
    (2012). Polo-like kinase-1 regulates kinetochore-microtubule dynamics and spindle checkpoint silencing. J. Cell Biol. 198, 491–499. doi:10.1083/jcb.201205090
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Maffini, S.,
    2. Maia, A. R.,
    3. Manning, A. L.,
    4. Maliga, Z.,
    5. Pereira, A. L.,
    6. Junqueira, M.,
    7. Shevchenko, A.,
    8. Hyman, A.,
    9. Yates, J. R. III. and
    10. Galjart, N.
    et al.(2009). Motor-independent targeting of CLASPs to kinetochores by CENP-E promotes microtubule turnover and poleward flux. Curr. Biol. 19, 1566–1572. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.07.059
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Maia, A. R.,
    2. Garcia, Z.,
    3. Kabeche, L.,
    4. Barisic, M.,
    5. Maffini, S.,
    6. Macedo-Ribeiro, S.,
    7. Cheeseman, I. M.,
    8. Compton, D. A.,
    9. Kaverina, I. and
    10. Maiato, H.
    (2012). Cdk1 and Plk1 mediate a CLASP2 phospho-switch that stabilizes kinetochore-microtubule attachments. J. Cell Biol. 199, 285–301. doi:10.1083/jcb.201203091
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Matsumura, S.,
    2. Toyoshima, F. and
    3. Nishida, E.
    (2007). Polo-like kinase 1 facilitates chromosome alignment during prometaphase through BubR1. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 15217–15227. doi:10.1074/jbc.M611053200
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Nishino, M.,
    2. Kurasawa, Y.,
    3. Evans, R.,
    4. Lin, S. H.,
    5. Brinkley, B. R. and
    6. Yu-Lee, L. Y.
    (2006). NudC is required for Plk1 targeting to the kinetochore and chromosome congression. Curr. Biol. 16, 1414–1421. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.05.052
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Oshimori, N.,
    2. Ohsugi, M. and
    3. Yamamoto, T.
    (2006). The Plk1 target Kizuna stabilizes mitotic centrosomes to ensure spindle bipolarity. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 1095–1101. doi:10.1038/ncb1474
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    1. Peters, U.,
    2. Cherian, J.,
    3. Kim, J. H.,
    4. Kwok, B. H. and
    5. Kapoor, T. M.
    (2006). Probing cell-division phenotype space and Polo-like kinase function using small molecules. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2, 618–626. doi:10.1038/nchembio826
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    1. Petronczki, M.,
    2. Glotzer, M.,
    3. Kraut, N. and
    4. Peters, J. M.
    (2007). Polo-like kinase 1 triggers the initiation of cytokinesis in human cells by promoting recruitment of the RhoGEF Ect2 to the central spindle. Dev. Cell 12, 713–725. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2007.03.013
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. Qi, W.,
    2. Tang, Z. and
    3. Yu, H.
    (2006). Phosphorylation- and polo-box-dependent binding of Plk1 to Bub1 is required for the kinetochore localization of Plk1. Mol. Biol. Cell 17, 3705–3716. doi:10.1091/mbc.E06--03--0240
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Rosasco-Nitcher, S. E.,
    2. Lan, W.,
    3. Khorasanizadeh, S. and
    4. Stukenberg, P. T.
    (2008). Centromeric Aurora-B activation requires TD-60, microtubules, and substrate priming phosphorylation. Science 319, 469–472. doi:10.1126/science.1148980
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Strebhardt, K.
    (2010). Multifaceted polo-like kinases: drug targets and antitargets for cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 9, 643–660. doi:10.1038/nrd3184
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Sumara, I.,
    2. Giménez-Abián, J. F.,
    3. Gerlich, D.,
    4. Hirota, T.,
    5. Kraft, C.,
    6. de la Torre, C.,
    7. Ellenberg, J. and
    8. Peters, J. M.
    (2004). Roles of polo-like kinase 1 in the assembly of functional mitotic spindles. Curr. Biol. 14, 1712–1722. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.09.049
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    1. Tanaka, K.
    (2012). Dynamic regulation of kinetochore-microtubule interaction during mitosis. J. Biochem. 152, 415–424. doi:10.1093/jb/mvs109
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Tanaka, K.
    (2013). Regulatory mechanisms of kinetochore-microtubule interaction in mitosis. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 70, 559–579. doi:10.1007/s00018--012--1057--7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Tanaka, T. U.,
    2. Stark, M. J. and
    3. Tanaka, K.
    (2005). Kinetochore capture and bi-orientation on the mitotic spindle. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 929–942. doi:10.1038/nrm1764
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    1. Tanenbaum, M. E.,
    2. Galjart, N.,
    3. van Vugt, M. A. and
    4. Medema, R. H.
    (2006). CLIP-170 facilitates the formation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments. EMBO J. 25, 45–57. doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600916
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Wieland, G.,
    2. Orthaus, S.,
    3. Ohndorf, S.,
    4. Diekmann, S. and
    5. Hemmerich, P.
    (2004). Functional complementation of human centromere protein A (CENP-A) by Cse4p from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 6620–6630. doi:10.1128/MCB.24.15.6620--6630.2004
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Wood, K. W.,
    2. Sakowicz, R.,
    3. Goldstein, L. S. and
    4. Cleveland, D. W.
    (1997). CENP-E is a plus end-directed kinetochore motor required for metaphase chromosome alignment. Cell 91, 357–366. doi:10.1016/S0092--8674(00)80419--5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. ↵
    1. Yang, X.,
    2. Li, H.,
    3. Liu, X. S.,
    4. Deng, A. and
    5. Liu, X.
    (2009). Cdc2-mediated phosphorylation of CLIP-170 is essential for its inhibition of centrosome reduplication. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 28775–28782. doi:10.1074/jbc.M109.017681
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Yeh, T. Y.,
    2. Kowalska, A. K.,
    3. Scipioni, B. R.,
    4. Cheong, F. K.,
    5. Zheng, M.,
    6. Derewenda, U.,
    7. Derewenda, Z. S. and
    8. Schroer, T. A.
    (2013). Dynactin helps target Polo-like kinase 1 to kinetochores via its left-handed beta-helical p27 subunit. EMBO J. 32, 1023–1035. doi:10.1038/emboj.2013.30
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Keywords

  • CLIP-170
  • Plk1
  • Kinetochore
  • Kinetochore-fiber
  • Chromosome alignment

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Cell Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
CLIP-170 recruits PLK1 to kinetochores during early mitosis for chromosome alignment
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Cell Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Cell Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Short Report
CLIP-170 recruits PLK1 to kinetochores during early mitosis for chromosome alignment
Mohammed Abdullahel Amin, Go Itoh, Kenji Iemura, Masanori Ikeda, Kozo Tanaka
Journal of Cell Science 2014 127: 2818-2824; doi: 10.1242/jcs.150755
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Short Report
CLIP-170 recruits PLK1 to kinetochores during early mitosis for chromosome alignment
Mohammed Abdullahel Amin, Go Itoh, Kenji Iemura, Masanori Ikeda, Kozo Tanaka
Journal of Cell Science 2014 127: 2818-2824; doi: 10.1242/jcs.150755

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Ipomoeassin-F inhibits the in vitro biogenesis of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and its host cell membrane receptor
  • The association of Plk1 with the astrin–kinastrin complex promotes formation and maintenance of a metaphase plate
  • Turgor-dependent and coronin-mediated F-actin dynamics drive septin disc-to-ring remodeling in the blast fungus
Show more SHORT REPORT

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

2020 at The Company of Biologists

Despite the challenges of 2020, we were able to bring a number of long-term projects and new ventures to fruition. While we look forward to a new year, join us as we reflect on the triumphs of the last 12 months.


Mole – The Corona Files

"This is not going to go away, 'like a miracle.' We have to do magic. And I know we can."

Mole continues to offer his wise words to researchers on how to manage during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Cell scientist to watch – Christine Faulkner

In an interview, Christine Faulkner talks about where her interest in plant science began, how she found the transition between Australia and the UK, and shares her thoughts on virtual conferences.


Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

“The clear advantages are rapid and efficient exposure and easy access to my article around the world. I believe it is great to have this publishing option in fast-growing fields in biomedical research.”

Dr Jaceques Behmoaras (Imperial College London) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 60 institutions in 12 countries taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


JCS and COVID-19

For more information on measures Journal of Cell Science is taking to support the community during the COVID-19 pandemic, please see here.

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hestiate to contact the Editorial Office.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Journal of Cell Science
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Fast-track manuscripts
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • JCS Prize
  • Manuscript transfer network
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contacts

  • Contact JCS
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992