Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Cell Science
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Cell Science

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS   Twitter  Facebook   YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
Research Article
Conformational remodeling of the fibronectin matrix selectively regulates VEGF signaling
Anthony Ambesi, Paula J. McKeown-Longo
Journal of Cell Science 2014 127: 3805-3816; doi: 10.1242/jcs.150458
Anthony Ambesi
Center for Cell Biology and Cancer Research, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, NY 12208, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paula J. McKeown-Longo
Center for Cell Biology and Cancer Research, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, NY 12208, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mckeowp@mail.amc.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Anastellin inhibits VEGF-dependent microvessel endothelial cell proliferation and receptor activation. (A) Human dermal microvessel cells were cultured for 3 days in medium supplemented with or without (‘C’) 10 ng/ml VEGF165 in the presence of increasing concentrations of anastellin. FnIII13 served as a negative control. Cells were fixed and proliferation was determined by Toluidine Blue staining. Anastellin significantly inhibited proliferation in response to VEGF165 at all doses. Data show the mean±s.e.m.; *P<0.001. (B,D,F) Microvessel cells were starved overnight in serum-free medium containing 0.5% BSA and pretreated for 60 minutes with increasing concentrations of anastellin prior to stimulation with 10 ng/ml VEGF165 for 6 minutes. Cell lysates were analyzed by western blotting for phospho-ERK1/2 and VEGFR2 phosphorylation. Total ERK2 and VEGFR2 staining served as loading controls. (C,E,G) Western blots from the experiments shown in panels B,D and F were quantified using ImageJ software. Data show the mean±s.e.m. (three independent experiments).

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Anastellin disrupts VEGFR2–NRP1 complex assembly and signaling. (A) Serum-starved microvessel cell monolayers were pretreated for 2 hours with increasing concentrations of an NRP1-function-blocking antibody and then stimulated with 5 ng/ml VEGF165 for 6 minutes. Cell lysates were analyzed by western blotting for phosphorylation of VEGFR2 and ERK. (B) Microvessel cells treated with either siRNA against NRP1 or control siRNA were stimulated with increasing concentrations of VEGF165 for 6 minutes and analyzed for the phosphorylation of VEGFR2 and ERK by western blotting. Total VEGFR2 and ERK2 served as loading controls. (C,D) Blots from B were quantified using ImageJ software. Data show the mean±s.e.m. (three independent experiments). (E) Microvessel cells were grown for 3 days in basal medium containing the indicated amount of VEGF165. Cells were fixed and cell counts were obtained by Toluidine Blue staining. Knockdown of NRP1 significantly inhibited cell growth. Data show the mean±s.e.m. (three independent experiments); *P<0.001. (F) Microvessel cells were treated for 60 minutes with 20 µM anastellin prior to stimulation with 10 ng/ml VEGF165 for 15 minutes. Cell monolayers were washed, and NRP1 was immunoprecipitated (IP) from cell lysates. Immunoprecipitates were analyzed by western blotting for co-precipitation of VEGFR2. Input amounts of VEGFR2 and NRP1 present in lysates prior to immunoprecipitation are shown on the left.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Anastellin has no effect on VEGF121-induced VEGFR2 activation and signaling. (A) Serum-starved microvessel cell monolayers were pretreated for 60 minutes with increasing concentrations of anastellin, followed by stimulation with either 10 ng/ml VEGF121 or VEGF165 for 6 minutes. Cell lysates were analyzed by western blotting for changes in the phosphorylation of VEGFR2 and ERK. Total levels of VEGFR2 served as a loading control. (B) Blots were quantified using ImageJ software. Data show the mean±s.e.m. (three independent experiments). ‘C’, untreated control. (C) Microvessel cell monolayers were pretreated with 20 µM anastellin for 60 minutes prior to stimulation with 10 ng/ml VEGF165 or VEGF121 for 15 minutes. NRP1 was immunoprecipitated (IP) from all lysates, and precipitates were analyzed by western blotting for the presence of VEGFR2. Input amounts of VEGFR2 and NRP1 present in lysates prior to immunoprecipitation are shown on the left.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Anastellin inhibition of VEGF165 signaling requires fibronectin matrix remodeling. (A) Serum-starved microvessel cell monolayers were pretreated with increasing concentrations of anastellin or the anastellin mutant for 60 minutes prior to stimulation with 10 ng/ml VEGF165 for 6 minutes. Cell lysates were analyzed by western blotting for phosphorylated ERK and VEGFR2. Total VEGFR2 and ERK2 served as loading controls. (B) VEGF-dependent phosphorylation of Y1175VEGFR2 in the presence of 20 µm anastellin or anastellin mutant was quantified by scanning blots from three separate experiments. ‘C’, untreated control. Data show the mean±s.e.m. (C) Microvessel cells were treated with 20 µM anastellin, anastellin mutant or the control fibronectin module FnIII13 for 60 minutes prior to stimulation with 10 ng/ml VEGF165 for 15 minutes. NRP1 was immunoprecipitated (IP) from cell lysates. Immunoprecipitates were analyzed by western blotting for co-precipitation of VEGFR2. Input amounts of VEGFR2 and NRP1 present in lysates prior to immunoprecipitation are shown on the left.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Anastellin causes inactivation of β1 integrin. Microvessel cells were treated with vehicle (control), 20 µM anastellin or the control fibronectin module FnIII13 for 60 minutes. (A) Cells were washed, fixed and stained for active β1 integrin using the monoclonal antibody 9EG7. Nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33258. (B) NIH ImageJ software was used to quantify the number of β1-containing focal adhesions obtained from at least five fields of view. Data are shown normalized to control values. Data averaged over five independent experiments are represented as the mean±s.e.m.; *P<0.001. (C) Cells were stained for both actin (red) and active β1 integrin (green) using phalloidin and the 9EG7 antibody, respectively. Control cells show β1 integrin localized at actin termini in focal adhesions (arrowheads). (D,E) Microvessel cells were stained with a monoclonal antibody directed against integrin β5 and quantified as in B. (F) Microvessel cells were dual stained for β1 (9EG7, green) and α5 (AB1949, red) integrin subunits. Merged images are shown on the right. Scale bars: 25 µm.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Inactivation of α5β1 integrin and VEGFR2 by anastellin is both time dependent and reversible. (A) Microvessel cells were treated with 20 µM anastellin for the times indicated, washed, fixed and stained for β1 (9EG7, green) and α5 (AB1949, red) integrins. Nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33258. (B) Serum-starved microvessel cells were pretreated with 20 µM anastellin for increasing amounts of time up to 60 minutes prior to stimulation with 10 ng/ml VEGF165 for 6 minutes. Alternatively, VEGF165 and anastellin (VEGF/Anastellin) were mixed (10 ng/ml VEGF165, 20 µM anastellin) and incubated for 30 minutes prior to addition to cell monolayers for 6 minutes. ‘C’, vehicle (PBS) control. Phosphorylation of ERK was examined by western blotting. Blots were stripped and reprobed for ERK2, which served as a loading control. (C) ERK phosphorylation was quantified from three independent experiments using ImageJ software and was normalized to pERK levels obtained in the absence of anastellin. Data show the mean±s.e.m. (D) Microvessel cells were treated with 20 µM anastellin for 60 minutes and were incubated with serum-free medium (no anastellin) for the indicated times. Cells were then washed, fixed and dual stained for integrin β1 (9EG7, green) and α5 (AB1949, red) subunits. Nuclei were counterstained with Hoescht 33258. Control cells received no anastellin treatment. Scale bars: 10 µm. (E) Microvessel cells were pretreated with 20 µM anastellin for 60 minutes. The medium was replaced with serum-free medium. At the indicated times, cells were stimulated with 10 ng/ml VEGF165 for 6 minutes, and lysates were analyzed by western blotting for phosphorylated ERK. Blots were stripped and reprobed for ERK2, which served as loading control. (F) ERK phosphorylation was quantified from three independent experiments using ImageJ software and was normalized to VEGF-stimulated levels of pERK observed in the absence of anastellin (data not shown). Data show the mean±s.e.m.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Anastellin does not decrease the number of focal adhesion complexes. (A) Microvessel cell monolayers were treated with 20 µM anastellin for 60 minutes and stained for both active β1 integrin (green) and paxillin (red). (B) Microvessel cells were treated as in A, and paxillin-containing contacts were quantified by ImageJ software as described for Fig. 5. Data show the mean±s.e.m. (six fields of view, four independent experiments). (C) Paxillin was immunoprecipitated (IP) from microvessel cell lysates prepared from cells treated with 20 µM anastellin or the control fibronectin module, FnIII13. Lysates prepared from cells kept in suspension (Susp) served as a control for the loss of adhesion, whereas those prepared from cells treated with PBS served as adherent untreated control. Immunoprecipitates were analyzed by western blotting for phosphotyrosine (pTyr) using the monoclonal antibody 4G10. Blots were stripped and reprobed for paxillin, which served as the loading control. (D) Cells were treated as described in A and stained with antibody against phosphorylated FAK (pTyr397FAK, red). Scale bars: 10 µm. (E) pTyr397FAK-containing focal adhesions were quantified by ImageJ software. Data show the mean±s.e.m. (six fields of view, three independent experiments). (F) Lysates from cells treated as described in C were probed for pTyr397FAK by western blotting. Blots were stripped and reprobed for total FAK, which served as loading control.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Anastellin decreases the availability of the synergy site epitope in matrix fibronectin. (A) Microvessel cell monolayers were treated with 5 µM anastellin for 60 minutes, fixed, permeabilized and stained using a fibronectin-blocking antibody (HFN7.1) against the synergy site in the FnIII9 module or an antibody (clone 568) that binds to the FnIII8 module. Scale bar: 10 µm. (B) Total fluorescence was quantified using NIH ImageJ software. Data show the mean±s.e.m. (at least six fields of view, two independent experiments).

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Keywords

  • Fibronectin
  • integrin
  • Angiogenesis
  • Neuropilin
  • VEGF
  • Anastellin
  • Extracellular matrix

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Cell Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Conformational remodeling of the fibronectin matrix selectively regulates VEGF signaling
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Cell Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Cell Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
Conformational remodeling of the fibronectin matrix selectively regulates VEGF signaling
Anthony Ambesi, Paula J. McKeown-Longo
Journal of Cell Science 2014 127: 3805-3816; doi: 10.1242/jcs.150458
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Conformational remodeling of the fibronectin matrix selectively regulates VEGF signaling
Anthony Ambesi, Paula J. McKeown-Longo
Journal of Cell Science 2014 127: 3805-3816; doi: 10.1242/jcs.150458

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • An SNX10-dependent mechanism down-regulates fusion between mature osteoclasts
  • Combined heterogeneity in cell size and deformability promotes cancer invasiveness
  • Non-canonical ago loading of EV-derived exogenous single stranded miRNA in recipient cells
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Follow us on Instagram

Cell science is bursting with beautiful images and over on Instagram, we’re showing them off! Find both JCS and FocalPlane on Instagram for stories and techniques across cell biology.


An interview with Derek Walsh

Professor Derek Walsh is the guest editor of our new special issue Cell Biology of Host-Pathogen Interactions. In an interview, Derek tells us about his work in the field of DNA viruses, the impact of the pandemic on virology and what his role as Guest Editor taught him.


How to improve your scientific writing

"If you are a scientist and you want to succeed, you must become a writer."

How do scientists become master storytellers? We called on our journal Editors, proofreaders and contributors to our community sites for their advice on how to improve your scientific writing.


Meet the preLighters: Jennifer Ann Black

Following the theme of our latest special issue, postdoc Jennifer Ann Black studies replication stress and genome plasticity in Leishmania in Professor Luiz Tosi’s lab in Sao Paolo. We caught up with Jenn (virtually) to hear about her relocation to Brazil mid-pandemic, her research on parasites and what she enjoys about ‘preLighting’.

In our special issue, Chandrakar et al. and Rosazza et al. present their latest work on Leishmania.


Mole – The Corona Files

“There are millions of people around the world who continue to believe that the Terrible Pandemic is a hoax.”

Mole continues to offer his wise words to researchers on how to manage during the COVID-19 pandemic.


JCS and COVID-19

For more information on measures Journal of Cell Science is taking to support the community during the COVID-19 pandemic, please see here.

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hestiate to contact the Editorial Office.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Journal of Cell Science
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Fast-track manuscripts
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • JCS Prize
  • Manuscript transfer network
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contacts

  • Contact JCS
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992